logo
Consumer Panel Slaps Rs 1.25 Lakh Fine On Saudi Airline For Lost Baggage

Consumer Panel Slaps Rs 1.25 Lakh Fine On Saudi Airline For Lost Baggage

News182 days ago

Last Updated:
A consumer commission has directed Flynas Airlines, a Saudi Arabian low-cost carrier, to pay a compensation of more than Rs 1.25 lakh to a passenger for the loss of her baggage.
A consumer disputes redressal commission has directed Flynas Airlines, a Saudi Arabian low-cost carrier, to pay a compensation of Rs 1.25 lakh to a passenger for the loss of her baggage.
The commission also directed that the customer be paid Rs 10,000 towards compensation for mental agony.
What's The Case?
The incident dates back to January 2024 when the complainant, along with her family, had gone on a trip to Turkey from Mumbai between December 23, 2023 and January 3, 2024. Their return flight to the city was booked from Istanbul with a connecting flight from Riyadh.
The complainant said that at the Istanbul airport, she handed over five bags for check-in, but only four of them had baggage tags attached. When the complainant pointed it out, she was given a physical tag for the fifth bag with the assurance that it would be sent to the destination along with the other bags.
However, when they reached Mumbai, the complainant received only four bags at the airport. The complainant approached the airline, but the bag was not located.
The complainant made multiple communications through personal meetings, emails, WhatsApp chats and written complaints to locate the lost bag, but got an 'unsatisfactory response" from the airlines.
Ultimately, the complainant approached the consumer commission for the resolution against deficient service and unfair trade practice by the airlines.
There was a "mala fide negligence" and the airlines "purposely avoided all the logical actions to find the lost bag," the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Mumbai (Suburban) said in a recent order.
The opposite party remained absent during the hearing, hence the complaint proceeded ex-parte.
What The Consumer Panel Said?
The commission, after perusal of all the facts related to the incident, held 'there was a mala fide negligence by the Flynas Airlines supporting staff as well as officials who were in communication with the complainant".
'The opposite party didn't give any conclusive reply to the complaint raised by the complainant. The actions of the opposite party were not satisfactory in the said incidence," the commission said.
The commission pointed out that the airline could have checked the CCTV footage to confirm the incident and could have brought more factual reports on record.
'However, we do not find any genuine efforts taken by the opposite party to confirm the incidence to trace the lost bag," it said.
The airline 'purposely avoided all the logical actions to find the lost bag," the commission added.
The commission further stated that there are standardised rules on compensation in baggage loss claims, namely the Montreal Convention of 1999, applicable only to international flights between countries that have ratified the convention.
The commission stated that while the complainant had followed the rules in filing the complaint, the airline remained absent during the proceedings, despite being aware of them.
'The opposite party remained absent in the whole proceedings of the case even though they have full knowledge of filing of the present complaint by the complainant," it said.
'Hence, we have no doubt in our mind about the negligent act of the opposite party/Flynas Airlines. The allegations of the complainant about loss of luggage by Flynas Airlines are genuine," the commission said.
The complainant is entitled to claim the cost of goods due to the loss of luggage along with compensation, it said.
The commission directed the Flynas Airlines to pay Rs 1.25 lakh to the complainant for the baggage loss with six per cent interest rate from January 15, 2025, till its realisation.
(With inputs from PTI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Absence of devotees at Sangam impacting livelihood of boatmen
Absence of devotees at Sangam impacting livelihood of boatmen

Time of India

time24 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Absence of devotees at Sangam impacting livelihood of boatmen

Prayagraj: The ongoing summer and sultry weather conditions seem to have left their impact on the turnout of the pilgrims and devotees at Sangam as the banks of Ganga are witnessing a thin attendance of devotees and pilgrims from all across the country, impacting the livelihood of boatmen. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Although the boatmen claim to have earned hefty profits during Maha Kumbh, they are now finding few takers. President of Prayagraj Navik Sangh, Pappu Nishad, told TOI, "The ongoing summer season has hit the turnout as there is limited attendance of devotees and pilgrims flocking to Sangam and hiring boats to take holy dips and perform rituals. In the current scenario, a limited section of devotees travelling to Sangam are from Varanasi or Ayodhya. Those arriving in Varanasi or Ayodhya to seek blessings of Lord Shiva and Lord Ram often plan their tours to Sangam in Prayagraj to take holy dips and perform rituals. " However, the strength of such devotees is very limited and directly impacting the income of boatmen. In the current scenario, a boatman is charging Rs 50 for a devotee to ferry a pilgrim from Quila Ghat to Sangam, and the rate from other ghats to Sangam is more or less. Shantanu, a boatman, told TOI, "Around 75% of all around 1,500 boatmen in and around Prayagraj earn their livelihoods by catering to the pilgrims at the limited attendance of visitors who arrive at Sangam to take holy dips, boatmen are fighting to earn big earnings. The strength of devotees has declined since the temperature crossed 42 degrees Celsius." Rakesh, another boatman, asserted, "We are hardly able to manage better earnings by catering to the few visitors who arrive either to take holy dips or to immerse the mortal remains." A section of boatmen who were earlier engaged in ferrying pilgrims during the season are planning to do some other work to earn a livelihood.

Finance ministry, RBI & NPCI tighten digital fraud safeguards
Finance ministry, RBI & NPCI tighten digital fraud safeguards

Time of India

time36 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Finance ministry, RBI & NPCI tighten digital fraud safeguards

NEW DELHI: Union finance ministry, along with Reserve Bank of India and National Payments Corporation of India (NPCI), has rolled out several crucial measures to secure digital financial transactions and combat fraud, official sources said, rejecting allegations that frauds have soared. The ministry of home affairs had set up Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C) in Jan 2020 as the national agency for a coordinated response to all cybercrimes. The total number of digital payment frauds was 63,315, as reported by commercial banks and all India financial institutions under the specific category 'card/internet and digital payments' (for amounts involving Rs 1 lakh and above) between 2014-15 and Dec 2024 (covering a period of nearly 10 years), the sources said citing official data. The total extent of financial loss attributed specifically to these digital payment frauds during this period amounted to Rs 733.26 crore, sources said. Detailing steps taken by finance ministry, they said these included setting up of an online searchable database of frauds reported by banks - central fraud registry - by RBI to enable timely identification, control and mitigation of fraud risk. Credit discipline has been instilled through enactment of Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, setting up of Central Repository of Information on Large Credits by RBI to collect, store, and disseminate credit data to lenders, sources added.

How many bullets he fired? Bulandshahr man acquitted of murder after 5 years
How many bullets he fired? Bulandshahr man acquitted of murder after 5 years

Time of India

time39 minutes ago

  • Time of India

How many bullets he fired? Bulandshahr man acquitted of murder after 5 years

Noida: The fast track court of additional sessions judge, Saurabh Dwivedi, acquitted Neeraj Sharma, who spent five years in jail after police falsely accused him of attempted murder and firing at officers in 2018. Evidence revealed that Sharma, a Bulandshahr resident, was actually the victim who had been shot by the police. The court ordered his immediate release on May 31, exposing a case of wrongful imprisonment and police misconduct. The case goes back to July 2, 2018 when a Bisrakh police team was on patrol near Hanuman Temple after a tip-off about suspicious vehicles coming from Sorkha and Hindon Bridge. According to the prosecution, the police team, which was on patrol in their private vehicle, had split into two teams to conduct the checks. During checks, an informer identified a motorcycle carrying alleged 'anti-social elements' with illegal arms. When asked to stop, the riders allegedly fired at police with the intention of killing and tried to flee. The pillion rider, Neeraj, shot twice before the bike skidded, throwing both off. While the rider escaped, Neeraj fired again, prompting police to shoot in self-defense. The prosecution claimed during the trial that the firing was retaliatory. Refuting these claims, Sharma said the encounter was false and instead, he was picked up by police, shot at, and he was booked in a fabricated case. Seeking trial, his counsel, Deepak Vats, said that after firing on Sharma, police made up a story to accuse him of firing on police and possessing illegal arms. Having heard both sides, the court noted serious flaws in the prosecution's case, including a failure to prove that the pistol recovered from the accused was functional. No forensic or ballistic tests were conducted to confirm if the pistol had been fired. Additionally, there were contradictions in witness testimonies as prosecution witness 2 (Rajendra Kumar) claimed the accused fired two bullets, with both empty cartridges recovered from the scene, while witness 1 (Devendra Rathi) stated only one cartridge was found, with the other stuck in the pistol. These inconsistencies raised doubts about the prosecution's version of events. The court also found the use of a private vehicle and the missing general diary entry, ahead of the claimed patrol of July 2, 2018, as doubtful. "Under the given circumstances, the prosecution has failed to establish the fact that the pistol produced here belonged to the accused or that he used it to fire on police, and accordingly, he deserves to be acquitted of the attempted murder charge levelled under section 307 IPC and also section 25/27 of the Arms Act for possessing an illegal weapon," the judgement read. Court ordered Sharma's immediate release and directed him to deposit a personal bond with two sureties of Rs 25,000 each.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store