Trump will be at the Kennedy Center on the same day recipients of the honors are announced
Trump avoided the Kennedy Center Honors during his first term after artists said they would not attend out of protest. This year, he has taken over as the Kennedy Center's new chairman and fired the board of trustees, which he replaced with loyalists.
In a Truth Social post Tuesday, Trump teased a name change for the performing arts center and said it would be restored to its former glory.
'GREAT Nominees for the TRUMP/KENNEDY CENTER, whoops, I mean, KENNEDY CENTER, AWARDS,' Trump wrote. He said work was being done on the site that would be 'bringing it back to the absolute TOP LEVEL of luxury, glamour, and entertainment.'
'It had fallen on hard times, physically, BUT WILL SOON BE MAKING A MAJOR COMEBACK!!!' he wrote.
It is unclear how this year's batch of honorees were chosen, though Trump had indicated he wanted a more active role. Historically, a bipartisan advisory committee selects the recipients, who over the years have ranged from George Balanchine and Tom Hanks to Aretha Franklin and Stephen Sondheim. A message sent to the Kennedy Center press office asking how this year's honorees were selected wasn't returned Tuesday.
The Kennedy Center did post this on social media, however: 'Coming Soon ... A country music icon, an Englishman, a New York City Rock band, a dance Queen and a multi-billion dollar Actor walk into the Kennedy Center Opera House ...'
In the past, Trump has floated the idea of granting Kennedy Center Honors status to singer-songwriter Paul Anka and actor Sylvester Stallone, one of three actors Trump named as Hollywood 'ambassadors' earlier this year. Anka was supposed to perform 'My Way' at Trump's first inaugural and backed out at the last moment.
The Kennedy Center honors were established in 1978 and have been handed out to a broad range of artists. Until Trump's first term, presidents of both parties traditionally attended the annual ceremony, even when they disagreed politically with a given recipient.
Prominent liberals such as Barbra Streisand and Warren Beatty were honored during the administration of Republican George W. Bush, and a leading conservative, Charlton Heston, was feted during the administration of Democrat BIll Clinton.
In 2017, after honoree Norman Lear declared that he would not attend a White House celebration in protest of Trump's proposed cuts to federal arts funding, Trump and first lady Melania Trump decided to skip the Kennedy Center event and remained away throughout his first term. Honorees during that time included such Trump critics as Cher, Lin-Manuel Miranda and Sally Field.
Since taking office for a second time, Trump has taken a much more forceful stance on the Kennedy Center and inserted himself into its governance. Besides naming himself chairman and remaking the board, he has also indicated that he would take over decisions regarding programming at the center and vowed to end events featuring performers in drag.
The steps have drawn further criticism from some artists. In March, the producers of 'Hamilton' pulled out of staging the Broadway hit musical in 2026, citing Trump's aggressive takeover of the institution's leadership. Other artists who canceled events include actor Issa Rae, singer Rhiannon Giddens and author Louise Penny.
House Republicans have introduced an amendment to a spending bill that would rename the Kennedy Center's opera house after first lady Melania Trump. Maria Shriver, a niece of the late President John F. Kennedy, has criticized as 'insane' a separate House proposal to rename the entire center after Trump.
Recipients of the Kennedy Center Honors are given a medallion on a rainbow ribbon, a nod to the range of skills that fall under the performing arts. In April, the center changed the lights on the exterior from the long-standing rainbow to a permanent red, white and blue display.
___
Italie reported from New York.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Ohio Man Plants Massive 13-Acre Corn Maze with Secret Marriage Proposal Hidden Inside
'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget," farmer Tim Sullivan told ABC6 NEED TO KNOW Circle S Farms in Ohio recently revealed its 2025 corn maze design: a 13-acre marriage proposal from farmer Tim Sullivan to his now-fiancée, Caroline Liggett 'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget. Seeing her face when she realized what it said — I'll never forget that moment," Sullivan told ABC6 The elaborate maze was planted using a computerized tractor, and will be open to the public this fall An Ohio man's marriage proposal was a little corny. Farmer Tim Sullivan and his girlfriend, Caroline Liggett, privately flew over a 13-acre maze, which he designed to grow a hidden question: "Will You Marry Me, Caroline?" Ohio-based family farm Circle S Farms shared via it's 2025 corn maze design reveal Facebook post Aug. 5 that the surprise proposal was successful, as Liggett said, "Yes!" 'I wanted to do something big, something she'd never forget," Sullivan told ABC6. "Seeing her face when she realized what it said — I'll never forget that moment." The elaborate maze was complete with three pumpkin designs. Speaking with The Columbus Dispatch, Sullivan explained that he and other workers began planting the acres of corn using a computerized tractor on June 3. Later that month, the message was visible from the air. Sullivan was admittedly "super nervous" that someone else would fly over the field and spoil the surprise by posting a photo of it on social media, but luckily no one did. With the engagement ring in his pocket, Sullivan convinced Liggett to fly over the cornfield with him by pretending to have an interest in flying. Initially, Liggett missed the message — but after a second pass, she said saw the secret proposal and happily accepted. "I was just like so amazed that somebody put that much effort in planning into a proposal like that," Liggett told the local news outlet. "I expected he would do something quite elaborate and intentional, but nothing to that extreme by any means." The couple work at competing agricultural companies — Sullivan with Corteva Agriscience and Liggett with WinField United — so Liggett said, "It was only fitting that our proposal would happen with the cornfield." Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The maze opens to the public "this fall" at Circle S Farms, allowing visitors to wander the romantic rows. "See you soon for a season full of fun, memories, and a little extra love in the air!" Circle S Farms wrote on Facebook. Sullivan and Liggett's wedding is planned for early summer 2026. Read the original article on People Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Government data is now in question. Here's where macro investors are turning to fill the gaps.
The firing of the BLS head by President Donald Trump has spooked some macro investors. Trump's nomination of a partisan economist may push investors to rely more heavily on other data. Sources like ADP, Homebase, and MIT's Billion Prices Project have become critical, traders say. No savvy investor makes a decision off a single data point, but there are some numbers that carry more weight than others. For many macro investors, the North Star has long been the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the unit within the Department of Labor that measures, among other things, inflation, unemployment rates, and wage growth. Those in charge of the BLS have long been non-partisan economists, but President Donald Trump's firing of Commissioner Erika McEntarfer on August 1 and his top pick for her replacement, chief economist at the right-leaning Heritage Foundation, EJ Antoni, have many concerned with the validity of future government data, especially as Antoni floated pausing monthly jobs reports. Love Business Insider? Log in to Google and make us a preferred source. It's concerning for macro traders who rely on this data to make their bets, but there are non-governmental data sources that many already use. While helpful, these alternative databases can't replicate the widespread foundation BLS numbers provided for decades, where all market participants worked for the same set of basic facts about the state of the world's biggest economy. Still, traders are ramping up their use of this data in light of Trump's moves. "What's going to be tricky here is how to judge numbers coming out of the Bureau of Labor Statistics moving forward," said Andreas Steno Larsen, onetime macro investor and researcher, on his weekly podcast. He compared the firing to something that would happen "in Latin America" and predicted that investors would "look for alternative sources" to get a second opinion on the official data. Four macro investors pointed to the well-known ADP jobs report, which comes out monthly and tracks payroll from private employers, and MIT's Billion Prices Project as ways to track employment and inflation, respectively, in the US. The investors declined to be named because their firms don't authorize them to speak publicly. Some investors tap datasets that constantly scrape e-commerce prices, such as PriceStats, and track how different products rise and fall over time. This is a useful tool to understand Trump's tariff policies' impact, given the volume of online goods that US consumers buy from overseas. Payroll and scheduling company Homebase tracks more than 150,000 small businesses and produces monthly employment reports. LinkUp has tracked online job postings since 2007. Numerator has become a key source for in-person consumer data at places such as restaurants and home improvement stores. "Given the recent BLS conversations, we've recently seen demand for our data increase," Homebase CEO John Waldmann said in a statement. Not a replacement These alternative data sources are just that — alternative. They were used to get a sneak peek or a deeper look at inflation or unemployment figures that the government would release, not replace them entirely. They also sometimes vary. For example, ADP's payroll figures often diverge from the BLS's monthly jobs report, and MIT's Billion Prices Project can capture inflation trends sooner than the official CPI but is less comprehensive. "We don't see them replacing economic statistics altogether in the near future," said Julie Meigh, the head of ESG & macro research at alt-data platform Neudata, about non-traditional datasets. Even if BLS data becomes less trustworthy, the different macro investors who spoke with Business Insider said they'll still need to use it in some fashion unless there's a structural change in financial products. For example, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities, or TIPS, change when the Consumer Price Index from the government is announced. For those who have exposure to these types of assets, ignoring the BLS is not possible even if the data becomes untrustworthy. As one trader at one of the world's biggest macro hedge funds said, he was surprised markets weren't more spooked by Trump's firing. Equity markets were near record highs, and bond yields stayed mostly steady. "I think it's clear that institutions are not as strong as many had thought," this individual said. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is access to more NFL games at more cost better?
Every so often in our changing-every-second media world, it's worth pausing, taking a look around and measuring just how far we've come. Naturally, there's a handy meme format for this: How It Started/How It's Going. So as we try to sort through the massive NFL broadcast news of this past week, let's consider how far we've come. How it started: Every Sunday afternoon, you grabbed your beverage and snack of choice and you plunked down on the couch for six hours of football. Sure, you only had a choice of a few games — and only one if your home-market team was playing — and you might get stuck with, say, a Chargers-Dolphins clunker in one of your time slots. But all games were one click of the remote away, and none of them cost any more than you were already paying. [Join or create a Yahoo Fantasy Football league for the 2025 NFL season] How it's going: Every Sunday afternoon, you'll grab your beverage and snack of choice, plunk down on your couch and — if you're a cord-cutter — prepare for up to 13 different games at once. You open up your phone app (Yahoo Sports, of course) to see who's playing when and on what channel. You get your remote humming, running from your home page through multiple streaming services, dipping in and backing out of Fox/ESPN, Paramount+ and NFL+ apps (and, depending on the game, Netflix, Prime Video or Peacock). Your remote hand will get as much of a workout as an NFL cornerback facing Patrick Mahomes … and oh, will it cost you money. The overwhelming mantra that drives all content-delivery systems now, from streaming services to email newsletters, is the concept of limitless choice, the idea that (almost) everything everywhere is available all at once. It can be overwhelming, as anyone who's tried to figure out what movie to stream on a Friday night knows, but it also puts you in control of, basically, your own personal network. But that power comes with a substantial monthly cost. So is that access to more inventory of games worth the price charged to your credit card every month? That's for you to decide for yourself … and the NFL and its broadcast partners aren't making the decision easy on you. The grand promise of cable unbundling was that we'd all be able to get rid of those shopping channels, old movie channels, endless inane kids' cartoon channels, screaming-demagogue 'news' channels, and all the other gunk on our TV that we never watched and didn't want. Pick and choose, and you'll pay for only what you want! What could possibly go wrong? Like most grand promises, though, the Great Unbundling was built on false hopes. Turns out that when broadcasters know exactly what you want, they know you'll pay more to get it … so much more, at this point, that a la carte services are approaching, or even surpassing, the cost of old cable bills. Not only that, sports programming is the last remaining big-tent entertainment product, the one attraction that forces its viewers to watch a specific channel at a specific time. That, of course, makes sports broadcasting rights highly lucrative — or highly expensive, depending on which side of the equation you stand — and take a wild guess who's going to be bearing the brunt of those ever-higher costs. (Hint: Not the NFL, and not ESPN.) So what will those costs be? Let's run a hypothetical here. Although streaming-service costs are almost as slippery as new-car costs, here's a rough estimate of what cord-cutters can expect to pay for an unbundled bouquet of streaming services each month during the NFL season: • ESPN/Fox: $39.99 for Fox Sunday, Monday Night Football, 2027 Super Bowl• Prime Video: $8.99 (video only) for Thursday Night Football• Peacock: $10.99 (with ads) for Sunday Night Football• Paramount+: $7.99 (with ads) and up, CBS Sunday• Netflix: $7.99 (with ads): Christmas Day games• NFL+: $6.99 (without Red Zone): Local & primetime games on phone/tablet That right there is more than $80 a month to cover your NFL needs. Eighty bucks a month! And that includes the ad-based tiers, so you're not even going to be able to escape ads at these prices. This is what loving the NFL gets you: a price tag on your emotions. Now, granted, with all that spending you do get an array of choices you didn't get back in the old broadcast-only days. You can ditch that lame Titans-Jags game in favor of something more lively, or you can mainline the NFL straight with Red Zone. You don't have to be satisfied with what the network broadcasts dish up to you, you can create your own Sunday programming … as long as you're willing to pay. So which way do you go, a less-expensive cafeteria meal, or a pricey all-inclusive buffet? Is it better to have more choice at more cost, or are you OK with the cheaper, smaller menu? Which way do you go?
