How much does food for Easter cost locally?
CHICOPEE, Mass. (WWLP) – On Monday, Chicopee residents headed to their favorite local stores to pick out everything they need to prepare the perfect meal for Easter Sunday.
Even though some foods are a bit pricier this time of year, people seem to be less worried about what they're paying and more worried about if there's enough in stores to be able to make what they need.
Gas prices in Springfield fall 4.4 cents, now averaging $2.90 per gallon
'Prime rib, lamb, ham, and tenderloin–those are the four major meats that people are buying when they come into Arnold's Meats,' said Larry Katz, owner of Arnold's Meats.
Despite inflation, people are coming in to buy what they need for Easter brunch or just a night at home. The average price for a dozen eggs statewide is $5.04. Katz said that those who come in are not as vocal about grocery prices, but rather about other factors in their lives.
'Customers are really speaking out about everything, not just food,' Katz said. 'They're speaking out about the prices of automobiles, and everything else that's going up. As far as our products, pork prices have actually dropped. Hams have stayed the same, and boneless prime rib is up a bit.'
The average American who chooses to go out to brunch on Easter could spend anywhere between $30 to $100 per person. Cooking at home, while messier, is cheaper. Walmart is currently selling a family Easter meal that runs approximately $35.
Some grocery chains around the region only allow for shoppers to buy one dozen eggs per shopping trip, but at Arnold's, that's not the case.
'Egg prices are dropping,' Katz said. 'People can buy as much as they want. We do sell to a lot of restaurants and schools, so people can buy as many as they want, we have plenty of eggs.'
Arnold's Meats is open every day this week, except Easter itself. Locals said it's become a staple for last-minute shopping.
WWLP-22News, an NBC affiliate, began broadcasting in March 1953 to provide local news, network, syndicated, and local programming to western Massachusetts. Watch the 22News Digital Edition weekdays at 4 p.m. on WWLP.com.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel Conducts Strikes in Iran in Major Escalation
(Bloomberg) -- Israel launched airstrikes on Iran, in a major escalation in the standoff over Tehran's atomic program that risks sparking a new war in the Middle East. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Explosions were heard in Tehran, according to local media. Iran had previously vowed to respond to any attack. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz said in a statement he's declaring a special state of emergency due to Israel's 'preemptive strike against Iran.' Israel is anticipating a retaliatory drone and missile attack, Katz said in a statement. The attack came amid renewed questions about diplomatic efforts to resolve tensions over Iran's atomic work. US and Iranian negotiators are scheduled to hold a sixth round of talks in Oman on Sunday, but President Donald Trump said this week he's less confident about the chances of a deal. Oil surged following reports of the strike. Brent rose as much as 5.7%, jumping above $73 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate also rallied. Israel is already involved in a major military operation in Gaza where it's been bombarding and blockading the civilian population for the past 20 months as it tries to destroy Hamas following the group's deadly attack on the Jewish state on Oct. 7, 2023. --With assistance from Nick Wadhams and Jon Herskovitz. (Updates with more details throughout, Katz statement in third paragraph.) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Anteris Technologies Global (ASX:AVR) investors are sitting on a loss of 66% if they invested three years ago
If you are building a properly diversified stock portfolio, the chances are some of your picks will perform badly. Long term Anteris Technologies Global Corp. (ASX:AVR) shareholders know that all too well, since the share price is down considerably over three years. Regrettably, they have had to cope with a 66% drop in the share price over that period. And more recent buyers are having a tough time too, with a drop of 62% in the last year. The falls have accelerated recently, with the share price down 35% in the last three months. So let's have a look and see if the longer term performance of the company has been in line with the underlying business' progress. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. Anteris Technologies Global isn't currently profitable, so most analysts would look to revenue growth to get an idea of how fast the underlying business is growing. When a company doesn't make profits, we'd generally hope to see good revenue growth. That's because it's hard to be confident a company will be sustainable if revenue growth is negligible, and it never makes a profit. In the last three years Anteris Technologies Global saw its revenue shrink by 24% per year. That means its revenue trend is very weak compared to other loss making companies. Arguably, the market has responded appropriately to this business performance by sending the share price down 18% (annualized) in the same time period. Bagholders or 'baggies' are people who buy more of a stock as the price collapses. They are then left 'holding the bag' if the shares turn out to be worthless. After losing money on a declining business with falling stock price, we always consider whether eager bagholders are still offering us a reasonable exit price. The image below shows how earnings and revenue have tracked over time (if you click on the image you can see greater detail). Balance sheet strength is crucial. It might be well worthwhile taking a look at our free report on how its financial position has changed over time. While the broader market gained around 14% in the last year, Anteris Technologies Global shareholders lost 62%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. On the bright side, long term shareholders have made money, with a gain of 8% per year over half a decade. It could be that the recent sell-off is an opportunity, so it may be worth checking the fundamental data for signs of a long term growth trend. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 5 warning signs for Anteris Technologies Global (3 don't sit too well with us) that you should be aware of. If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of undervalued small caps that insiders are buying. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump signs measure to block California car standards, says it will 'rescue' automakers
President Donald Trump has signed a congressional resolution reversing a waiver previously granted to California and other states that would have let them ban the sale of gasoline-powered cars, trucks and sport-utility vehicles. At a ceremony at the White House on June 12, Trump said the resolution has the force of law and suggested it can't be challenged in court. But California officials and a coalition of officials from other states on the same day did just that, arguing it was passed in the U.S. House and Senate under a process they say violated existing law. By signing the resolution, Trump continued to deliver on his promise to tear down rules and regulations promoting the adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) nationwide which he and other Republicans argue amounted to a mandate on American consumers regarding which cars and trucks they may buy. The signing also happened as Trump and California Gov. Gavin Newsom continue to spar over Trump's decision to send thousands of National Guard members and some 700 Marines to that state in support of efforts to respond to protests against immigration enforcement by the Trump administration. No such military intervention has been ordered into a state by the federal government without the state's request since the 1960s. Trump said the California waiver, which is provided for under the Clean Air Act, "has been a disaster for this country." He added that by signing the resolution, he was moving to "rescue the American auto industry." But Trump repeatedly seemed to suggest that the resolution somehow ends the federal government's requirement to consider and approve California's waivers on fuel emissions standards on cars and trucks except for under narrow legal circumstances. The resolution passed by the U.S. House and Senate only dealt with a waiver granted to California — and more than a dozen other states which are allowed to follow California's lead on car and truck emissions standards — about a month before former President Joe Biden left office in January. The Trump administration, under Environmental Protection Agency head Lee Zeldin, asked Congress to overturn the Biden waiver for California's so-called Advanced Clean Cars II program under the Congressional Review Act, which lets Congress reverse certain agency rules within a short time of their implementation. Most importantly, the Congressional Review Act allows the U.S. Senate to adopt those reversals with a simple 52-vote majority, rather than a 60-vote margin needed to shut down debate. But the review act has never been applied to California's waivers under the Clean Air Act and the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO), which provides nonpartisan recommendations to Congress and federal public agencies, has formally said that those waivers can't be considered under that law. California Attorney General Rob Bonta called Trump's actions "reckless, politically motivated and illegal." More: Trump has kind words for Slotkin, UAW's Fain, though without mentioning them by name More: U-M raises tuition and fees 3.4% amid state and federal funding questions California's ability to get waivers to set fuel emissions standards has been in place for decades as a way to fight pollution in a state where smog has been a huge problem. The most recent waiver allowed the state to effectively end the sale of gas-powered cars and trucks in the state by 2035. Trump signed other resolutions reversing a few other California Clean Air Act waivers, as well, on June 12, including a measure sponsored by U.S. Rep. John James, R-Shelby Township, which overturns California's program to require heavy trucks also emit no greenhouse gases. James attended the signing ceremony and was acknowledged by Trump. The resolution overturning the California program affecting a ban on gas-powered cars and light-duty trucks and SUVs was sponsored by U.S. Rep. John Joyce, R-Pennsylvania. Trump said his move will save consumers thousands on new cars and trucks, though that may not take into account fuel costs that EVs can save their owners over the lives of their vehicles. The White House put out a statement June 12 from General Motors with the automaker saying, "We appreciate the actions taken by President Trump to sign (the resolution) into law and help align emissions standards with today's market realities. We have long advocated for one national standard that will allow us to stay competitive, continue to invest in U.S. innovation, and offer customer choice across the broadest lineup of gas-powered and electric vehicles.' GM and other automakers have long argued that California and the states that follow it shouldn't be allowed to effectively decide what kind of cars and trucks they have to make for the whole country. But in more recent years — certainly since the Obama administration stepped in to financially rescue GM and what is now Stellantis in 2009 — automakers have been more willing to work to avoid legal fights over fuel standards with California. As to the most recent California standards, John Bozzella, president and CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, an industry trade group in Washington, said, 'Everyone agreed these EV sales mandates were never achievable and wildly unrealistic" and, if they remained in place would be, "harmful to auto affordability, to consumer choice, to industry competitiveness and to economic activity." [ Take our short survey. ] He credited Trump for "identifying this problem and doing something about it." Meanwhile, American Petroleum Institute President and CEO Mike Sommers and American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers President and CEO Chet Thompson issued a statement calling the resolution, along with others reversing some other vehicle mandates earlier provided to California, "a major win for the American people." Environmental groups criticized the resolution, as they had on its passage last month. 'California's vehicle standards reduce costs for drivers, increase customer choice, boost domestic manufacturing, improve air quality and help address the climate crisis," said Simon Mui, managing director for transportation at the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The only losers from cleaner vehicles are oil industry billionaires." Several officials from the oil industry were on hand as the president signed the resolution. 'Ripping away California's clean air protections is Trump's latest betrayal of democracy,' added Dan Becker, director of the Center for Biological Diversity's Safe Climate Transport Campaign. 'Signing this bill is a flagrant abuse of the law to reward big oil and big auto corporations at the expense of everyday people's health and their wallets." Contact Todd Spangler: tspangler@ Follow him on X @tsspangler. This article originally appeared on Detroit Free Press: Trump moves to block Calif. car rules, says it will rescue automakers
