logo
‘Cybercrimes threat to nation's economy': Court denies bail to farmer who provided mule accounts

‘Cybercrimes threat to nation's economy': Court denies bail to farmer who provided mule accounts

Time of India4 hours ago

Mumbai: Noting the serious nature of cybercrimes and their potential to undermine the nation's economy, a sessions court denied bail to a Bikaner farmer who allegedly arranged for bank accounts to park Rs 7.2 lakh conned out of a naval staffer threatened with digital arrest last year.
Tired of too many ads? go ad free now
The court said if released on bail, the accused, Ugraram Godara, might commit similar offences. "The advocate for the accused vehemently argued that he received only Rs 22,500 [as commission]. More than the amount, the modus operandi holds weightage," the judge said. "He (Godara) took a day's commission [from each transaction] and handed over that amount to the key accused. This is a very serious cybercrime."
Godara was arrested by Mumbai police on April 8.
The complainant said he received a call from a person who claimed to be a representative of Telecom Regulatory Authority of India on Dec 24, 2024, and was told that his bank account was used to launder illicit funds abroad in a case linked to a politician. The Navy staffer said he then received a video call from a person posing as a Delhi police officer, who cited a pending arrest warrant and threatened to place him under digital arrest.
The impersonator said the warrant could be cancelled if he transferred certain sums of money to specific bank accounts. The complainant complied and eventually transferred Rs 7.2 lakh in all.
The prosecution alleged Godara provided mule bank accounts for commissions. As per the alleged modus operandi, another fraudster would contact targets and direct them to transfer money into these accounts. It was claimed Godara's driver, Shyamsunder Rahar, withdrew money from different ATMs, took his cut and handed the rest to him. The prosecution said Godara has been named in other cybercrime cases too.
Godara's advocate said he was arrested merely on suspicion, adding that he has a young daughter, his wife has died, and his elderly father is dependent on him.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EOW: IPS officer got Rs 2.6 crore in account from husband facing probe
EOW: IPS officer got Rs 2.6 crore in account from husband facing probe

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

EOW: IPS officer got Rs 2.6 crore in account from husband facing probe

IPS officer got Rs 2.6 crore in account from husband facing probe MUMBAI: IPS officer Rashmi Karandikar received Rs 2.64 crore in her bank account from her husband Puroshattam Chavan, who is facing investigation in two cases of cheating and money laundering, according to a probe by the Economic Offences Wing. The investigators also found that Karandikar invested the money in share market intraday trading, but lost. The EOW has written to the Maharashtra director general of police (DGP), seeking clarification if Karandikar had declared this in her asset disclosure. The money was received in a 90-day period between 2017 and 2018. The police have not named her as an accused. When contacted by TOI, Karandikar responded via WhatsApp, "I am on medical leave and not in a condition to talk." The EOW had registered two First Information Reports (FIRs) in February this year against Chavan and 11 others for allegedly duping 20 victims of Rs 24.78 crore under the pretext of providing government quota flats in Mumbai, Thane and Pune at concessional rates. Chavan allegedly misused his influence to promise flats and govt plots in Bhiwandi, Pune, Panvel, Sewri, and even plots belonging to the Bombay Port Trust (BPT). In addition to these cases, the Enforcement Directorate is separately probing Chavan in a Rs 263-crore income tax refund fraud. "The money was transferred to Karandikar's account and not reversed. We have summoned her for questioning so that she can provide an explanation. However, she has not appeared so far, citing medical leave," an EOW official said. According to an associate of Karandikar, she has initiated divorce proceedings at the Bandra family court, citing mental cruelty, financial harassment, incompatibility, her husband's bipolar disorder, and concealment of financial dealings. Karandikar reportedly vacated her official quarters located above Colaba police station without formally informing police headquarters.

Former BJP minister's corruption allegations: Goa court tells police to register FIR
Former BJP minister's corruption allegations: Goa court tells police to register FIR

Indian Express

time2 hours ago

  • Indian Express

Former BJP minister's corruption allegations: Goa court tells police to register FIR

A sessions court in Goa has directed the Goa Police to register an FIR to investigate bribery allegations raised by BJP leader and former Goa transport minister Pandurang Madkaikar. In March, Madkaikar alleged that ministers in the ruling BJP government were 'busy counting money' and that he had paid a bribe of Rs 15-20 lakh to the personal assistant of a minister to process a file. Later, Madkaikar withdrew the allegations. However, a group of activists led by one Kashinath Shetye lodged a complaint with the anti-corruption branch of the Goa Police in March, seeking an investigation into the matter. The complainants also sought action against Madkaikar if the investigation proved that he had made a false statement. They then filed an application in the court of the Sessions Judge, North Goa, Tiswadi Merces, under section 175(3) of the BNSS, seeking directions for an FIR to be lodged. The police opposed the application. In an order last week, the court directed the police inspector of the anti-corruption branch 'to register FIR and proceed in accordance with law'. Shetye submitted to the court that after receiving the complaint, an FIR ought to have been registered and an inquiry ought to have been carried out by the investigating agency. The counsel for police submitted that an inquiry has been conducted and, 'since the ingredient of the offence have not been made out, the offence is not registered'. However, the court observed that a video of Madkaikar making corruption allegations, which had gone viral, 'by itself ought to have been the material for registering the FIR'. Observing that an FIR should be registered, the court said that 'whether the statements were made correctly or wrongly ought to have been decided after registering of the FIR'. 'The statements made by Pandurang Madkaikar definitely show that huge amount is required to be paid as bribe to clear the files. The applicants have alleged that the culprits ought to have been booked under section 7 and under section 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act,' the court said. On March 4, Madkaikar, who served as a minister in the Manohar Parrikar-led Cabinet, had told the media, 'I will tell you very frankly, it's not corruption, it's loot. Loot is going on in Goa. Rampant loot… All Ministers are busy counting money. Last week, I paid Rs 15-20 lakh to one minister for a small work (sic). He took one file, which I had processed from the department…to his home and left a message that if someone comes to inquire about that file, tell that fellow to come and meet me. So, I sent my manager to meet the minister… Then he was told to meet his PA. He met his PA, and the PA directly demanded Rs 15-20 lakh. I was also a minister. So, I know what procedures are followed in that department.'

Supreme Court: Bank can't revalue gold once loan repaid
Supreme Court: Bank can't revalue gold once loan repaid

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

Supreme Court: Bank can't revalue gold once loan repaid

Supreme Court (Photo: ANI) NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court has ruled that a bank cannot re-evaluate gold pledged against a loan after it is repaid and restored the FIR/chargesheet against bank officials, which was lodged by the borrower alleging that they did not return the ornaments on ground that those were found to be fake. A bench of Justices Sanjay Karol and Manoj Misra said in a judgment last week, "It is true that the appellant (Abhishek Singh) repaid the amount, but with substantial delay. However, once the loan is settled, it is difficult to understand as to why the gold was revalued and auctioned." Singh had taken a loan of Rs 7.7 lakh from the Motijheel branch of Bank of India in Bihar on July 22, 2020, after pledging 254gm of 22-carat gold ornaments as security. He repaid the loan on March 31, 2023. However, when he demanded the ornaments back, the bank told him that when he had not paid, back the loan with interest on time, the ornaments were re-evaluated and were found to be fake. As he had not repaid the loan amount at the time of revaluation, the gold-plated ornaments were confiscated and auctioned. The bank also lodged an FIR against Singh for cheating on May 22, 2023. Singh too lodged an FIR accusing the bank officials of misappropriating the gold ornaments. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo The bank officials challenged registration of the FIR against them before Patna high court (HC), which quashed it, saying the FIR was a counter to the FIR lodged against them by the bank. Singh appealed before Supreme Court. Faulting the high court for quashing the FIR against bank officials, the top court said, "The discussion made by the high court in quashing the FIR in no way addresses the possibility of the respondents' possible involvement in the misappropriation of the gold pledged." Writing the judgment, Justice Karol said, "At all times, the appellant had no access to the gold which, after its initial valuation, was always kept in the safe custody of the bankers. Fraud, if any, whether perpetrated at the first instance of valuation or later, is a matter which could be unearthed only after a trial based on the evidence led by the parties." "But, as of now, in no circumstances, it can be said that no prima facie case regarding commission of an offence, as alleged in the FIR, is made out from its perusal." The court ordered the bank officials to face trial in the case lodged by Singh.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store