Man smuggling exotic protected birds in cardboard box is detained in CA, feds say
A California man arrived to the U.S. from Mexico with a commercial amount of alcohol, candy, snacks and soda in his car — as well as seven exotic, protected birds inside a cardboard SKYY vodka box, according to court documents.
Juandaniel Medina, 24, of Lindsay, planned on breeding or reselling the live Amazon parrots he smuggled into California after traveling through the San Ysidro Port of Entry, a southern border crossing linking Tijuana and San Diego, federal prosecutors said.
He was detained after U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials found the birds, six of which are Red-Lored Amazon parrots, inside the box on the floor of Medina's car, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of California.
Now, Medina is charged with illegally trafficking the parrots, which are protected by the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Flora and Fauna, the U.S. Attorney's Office said in a June 10 news release.
Attorney information for Medina, who appeared in court on June 10, wasn't immediately available the morning of June 11.
Medina is the third person 'charged with illegal trafficking of protected exotic birds through Ports of Entry in the Southern District of California' in the last few weeks, prosecutors said.
He was found smuggling the parrots on May 26, according to charging documents. A CBP officer discovered the birds after spotting multiple holes poked into the SKYY Vodka box in which Medina hid them, charging documents say.
Medina told officials that he bought the parrots for $700 in cash, according to prosecutors.
'Fortunately, all seven of the parrots are alive and thriving at a quarantine facility managed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,' prosecutors said.
Medina's arrest is a part of a larger, 'troubling pattern' of wildlife being trafficked into the U.S. through Southern California, according to the U.S. Attorney's Office.
Amazon parrots inhabit Mexico, the West Indies and South America, prosecutors said.
About thirty different species of Amazon parrots are all protected by Appendix I or Appendix II of CITES, according to prosecutors.
Bringing birds into the U.S. illegally prevents officials from examining and quarantining them, creating potential public health risks, as birds smuggled into the country can carry Avian influenza, also known as bird flu, the U.S. Attorney's Office said.
U.S. Attorney Adam Gordon said in a statement that 'Bird smuggling is not a victimless crime.'
'These animals suffer, and the consequences to public health and the environment can be catastrophic,' Gordon added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US troops begin detaining migrants on border defense zone
U.S. troops at the southern border started detaining migrants last week as part of the 'Deep South Campaign' to prosecute individuals found trespassing in National Defense Areas (NDAs). President Trump has currently designated the U.S.-Mexico stretches between El Paso to Fort Hancock, Texas, as an NDA alongside the land line marking the country's boundaries in New Mexico. U.S. Army Lt. Col. Chad Campbell said three individuals were among the first detained near Santa Teresa, N.M., last week. They now remain in the custody of U.S. Customs and Border Protection awaiting prosecution for illegal entry in addition to trespassing charges under the Trump administration's new policies. In an effort to curb illegal immigration, officials ordered the Department of Defense to monitor border operations at NDAs on land previously overseen by the Interior Department, according to The Associated Press. 'We have been very clear that there will be additional National Defense Areas across the southern border,' Geoffrey Carmichael, a spokesperson for an enforcement task force at the southern border, told the AP. 'I won't speculate to where those are going to be.' Although recurring signs placed nearly 100 meters apart clearly mark the NDAs, judges in New Mexico and Texas have moved to drop national security charges on individuals caught in militarized zones due to their lack of knowledge of the newly designated areas. 'We're going to keep going forward on these NDA charges,' U.S. Attorney Justin Simmons, who oversees western Texas, said in a statement to the AP. 'We are going to still bring them, we may win on them, we may not. … At the end of the day, you are not going to be allowed to stay in this country if you enter this country illegally.' Migrant arrests follow the Trump administration's broader crackdown on immigrants without legal status nationwide sparking protests across the country. The president recently called in the National Guard and Marines to deter large groups from rioting over detainment and removal efforts in Los Angeles. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Diddy juror sparks credibility concerns, may have 'lied' to get on the case: expert
Juror issues marred the 21st day of testimony in Sean "Diddy" Combs' federal trial for sex crimes. Before cross-examination continued Wednesday of Diddy's ex-girlfriend, who testified using the pseudonym "Jane," the defense told Judge Arun Subramanian that they'd like to respond to the government's attempt to dismiss a Black juror from the case. The U.S. Attorney's Office allegedly told the court that while the situation was less than desirable, they were compelled to because of a lack of candor. The judge told the court he would rule on the issue if there was any basis for removing a juror and once the defense submitted a letter. New York attorney Nicole Brenecki told Fox News Digital that complications with the jury could lead to severe problems down the road, including a possible mistrial. Diddy Allegedly Wanted One Last Drug-fueled Night After Rehab Push: Testimony "Every time that we engage in a jury trial, there's a process called voir dire, which is a process that both attorneys engage in, under the supervision of a judge, where the attorneys have an opportunity to question the potential jurors and ask them questions to make sure that they are not biased, that they're truthful, and that they are capable of adjudicating this case on its facts and not based on their individual biases or prejudice or whatever," Brenecki said. Read On The Fox News App Diddy's Alleged 'Sexual Deviant' Behavior Doesn't Prove Government's Case: Expert "If there's a letter discussing lack of candor, that means that maybe that juror just wanted to be on the jury because it's a high-profile case or because it involves a celebrity or perhaps for other personal reasons, but the lack of candor has to go to the fact that that juror potentially is biased in one way or another." In court on Tuesday, Diddy's lawyers objected to the U.S. Attorney's Office's request to remove Juror No. 6 from the case. "We object to ask Juror No. 6 being stricken, and I understand the colloquy is under seal, so I don't want to explain further on the record now, but if the government is going to put in a letter … we'd like the opportunity to be heard either in writing or tomorrow morning," Diddy attorney Alexandra Shapiro said. Like What You're Reading? Click Here For More Entertainment News The judge said "everyone will be fully heard on this issue" once a letter is filed with the court. Former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani highlighted the negative effects a tainted jury may have on a case. "The big news of the day is that the judge is considering removing Juror 6 for lack of candor. That means he lied, in layman's terms. … This request was made by the prosecution, and the defense is trying to keep him on. For what it's worth, Juror 6 is a Black male and a '90s hip-hop fan." On Wednesday, Jane continued testimony about "hotel nights," where she claimed one time there were three entertainers at the party, and she allegedly did not take any drugs. She testified that while she agreed to the party, she also resented Diddy "for knowing how much I loved him and knowing how I couldn't say no to him." Click Here To Sign Up For The Entertainment Newsletter Under direct examination last week, the government asked Jane if she and Diddy experienced "hotel nights" without drugs. Jane explained that the former couple attempted the nights a handful of times, and it was at Diddy's request in October 2023 that they tried a "sobriety party." "Around this time, I just really wanted my partner to get sober," Jane testified. "I just really cared so much about Sean's health, and I could see that he just, like, was excessively partying on top of just so many pills that he takes daily for I don't know what. And I just really wanted him to get clean and just get better." She continued, "And he said, 'OK, I'm going to do like 30 days without anything, and I'll be sober. But let's just have, like, one more, one more sobriety party, just one, like, sobriety party.'" When asked what drugs Diddy used during the "sobriety party," Jane replied, "I believe ecstasy and cocaine, I don't know." She also alleged the party lasted "too long," claiming it was "close to 12 to 18 hours." Before cross-examination began Tuesday, Subramanian denied Diddy's second request for a mistrial. Diddy's legal team had argued that the prosecution knowingly presented false testimony to the court in a letter filed June 7 and obtained by Fox News Digital. In a federal indictment unsealed on Sept. 17, Combs was charged with racketeering conspiracy (RICO); sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and transportation to engage in prostitution. If found guilty, he faces a minimum of 15 years behind bars or a maximum sentence of life in prison. He has maintained his innocence throughout the trial, in which witnesses have testified to alleged rape, sexual assault, severe physical abuse, forced labor and drug trafficking. The trial is expected to wrap by July 4. Jane's cross-examination is expected to finish Thursday morning, and the government indicated they will rest their case by next Friday, but as early as next Wednesday. Fox News' Maria Paronich contributed to this article source: Diddy juror sparks credibility concerns, may have 'lied' to get on the case: expert
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
DHS Using Drones Capable of Surveillance Amid L.A. Protests
Police arrest dozens of protesters during a protest over immigration raids near the City Hall in Los Angeles, California, on June 11, 2025. Credit - Tayfun Coskun—Anadolu via Getty The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is using drones during the protests in Los Angeles, the department has confirmed, further fueling controversy surrounding the escalating law enforcement response to the demonstrations that broke out as immigration raids occurred throughout the city. Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), an agency within DHS, confirmed on Thursday that it is providing 'aerial support' to law enforcement. "Air and Marine Operations (AMO) is providing aerial support to federal law enforcement partners conducting operations in the Greater Los Angeles area. AMO's efforts are focused on situational awareness and officer safety support as requested,' a CBP spokesperson told TIME via email. DHS shared footage of the protests shot with a drone on social media earlier in the week. 'WATCH: DHS drone footage of LA rioters,' the department wrote via an X post on June 10, which included video of cars burning and an apparent explosion accompanied by sinister music. 'California politicians must call off their rioting mob.' The protests in Los Angeles have been predominantly peaceful as they enter their seventh day, media on the ground has reported, though some have escalated as cars have been set on fire and projectiles have been thrown. Despite that, President Donald Trump has deployed thousands of National Guard members and is mobilizing hundreds of Marines to the area, against the wishes of state and local leaders. Local law enforcement has also used crowd control tactics such as rubber bullets and tear gas, and Mayor Karen Bass has declared a state of 'local emergency' and imposed an ongoing 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew. Read More: Veterans Condemn Trump's 'Misuse of Military Power' Amid L.A. Protests Since the protests began on Friday, more than 160 people have been arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). The majority of those arrests, according to the New York Times, occurred on Monday, and a majority of them were based on failure to disperse charges. CBP confirmed to 404 media that the drones used by the agency were two Predator drones after the media company reported that drones were spotted flying without call signs where the anti-ICE protests were occurring. Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed reports of the drones in a June 11 hearing with Congress. Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed asked Hegseth if he was prepared for DHS to use drones to 'to detain or arrest American citizens.' 'Every authorization we've provided the National Guard and the Marines in Los Angeles is under the authority of the President of the United States,' Hegseth answered. According to Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of the Center for Civil Rights & Technology at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, tech groups and civil rights groups alike are "surprised and deeply concerned' by the use of drones, but it is not "necessarily new.' 'CBP has a pretty expansive opportunity to be able to deploy drone technology and other technologies that are able to surveil and track anyone, whether they're crossing the border or in these spaces,' Montoya-Boyer tells TIME. She says 'this isn't necessarily the first time we're seeing this,' but noted that it could still be harmful and 'disproportionately impacting communities of color and immigrants right now.' She says people are often unaware of the extent of land that CBP has access to—100 air miles from any external boundary of the U.S, a border zone that almost two-thirds of the U.S. population lives within. Montoya-Boyer says that the technology used by these drones was created to track border crossings, not to be used to track U.S. citizens at protests. 'The reality is, with the development of these types of technologies, and with appropriations by CBP and DHS, they can be used for domestic surveillance and as needed by an administration that isn't necessarily doing what's usual,' she says. Though the CBP has stated that the drones are focused on 'situational awareness' and 'officer safety,' Montoyta-Boyers says there 'is no reason for us to believe that it is just in the name of law and order' as 'there is an increase, an expansion of surveillance technologies in the name of immigration enforcement being deployed all across the country on the majority of people, whether they're immigrants or not She recommends those who decide to lawfully and peacefully protest to access both the ACLU's and Electronic Frontier Foundation's guides to what protestors' rights are. This is not the first time that drones have been used during U.S. protests in support of law enforcement efforts. Back in 2020, CBP utilized drones at the height of protests in the Black Lives Matter movement spurred by the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. At the time, however, CBP argued that its drones were not being used to 'surveil' protestors, but rather to provide 'assistance to state and locals so they could make sure that their cities and their towns were protected,' according to Acting CBP Commissioner Mark Morgan in a 2020 interview with ABC News. "We were not providing any resources to surveil lawful peaceful protesters. That's not what we were doing," he said. 'We weren't taking any information on law-abiding protesters, but we were absolutely there to ensure the safety of folks there as well as to enforce, and make sure law and order remain.' Contact us at letters@
