DHS Using Drones Capable of Surveillance Amid L.A. Protests
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is using drones during the protests in Los Angeles, the department has confirmed, further fueling controversy surrounding the escalating law enforcement response to the demonstrations that broke out as immigration raids occurred throughout the city.
Customs and Border Patrol (CBP), an agency within DHS, confirmed on Thursday that it is providing 'aerial support' to law enforcement.
"Air and Marine Operations (AMO) is providing aerial support to federal law enforcement partners conducting operations in the Greater Los Angeles area. AMO's efforts are focused on situational awareness and officer safety support as requested,' a CBP spokesperson told TIME via email.
DHS shared footage of the protests shot with a drone on social media earlier in the week.
'WATCH: DHS drone footage of LA rioters,' the department wrote via an X post on June 10, which included video of cars burning and an apparent explosion accompanied by sinister music. 'California politicians must call off their rioting mob.'
The protests in Los Angeles have been predominantly peaceful as they enter their seventh day, media on the ground has reported, though some have escalated as cars have been set on fire and projectiles have been thrown.
Despite that, President Donald Trump has deployed thousands of National Guard members and is mobilizing hundreds of Marines to the area, against the wishes of state and local leaders. Local law enforcement has also used crowd control tactics such as rubber bullets and tear gas, and Mayor Karen Bass has declared a state of 'local emergency' and imposed an ongoing 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew.
Read More: Veterans Condemn Trump's 'Misuse of Military Power' Amid L.A. Protests
Since the protests began on Friday, more than 160 people have been arrested by the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD). The majority of those arrests, according to the New York Times, occurred on Monday, and a majority of them were based on failure to disperse charges.
CBP confirmed to 404 media that the drones used by the agency were two Predator drones after the media company reported that drones were spotted flying without call signs where the anti-ICE protests were occurring.
Department of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed reports of the drones in a June 11 hearing with Congress. Rhode Island Senator Jack Reed asked Hegseth if he was prepared for DHS to use drones to 'to detain or arrest American citizens.'
'Every authorization we've provided the National Guard and the Marines in Los Angeles is under the authority of the President of the United States,' Hegseth answered.
According to Alejandra Montoya-Boyer, senior director of the Center for Civil Rights & Technology at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, tech groups and civil rights groups alike are "surprised and deeply concerned' by the use of drones, but it is not "necessarily new.'
'CBP has a pretty expansive opportunity to be able to deploy drone technology and other technologies that are able to surveil and track anyone, whether they're crossing the border or in these spaces,' Montoya-Boyer tells TIME. She says 'this isn't necessarily the first time we're seeing this,' but noted that it could still be harmful and 'disproportionately impacting communities of color and immigrants right now.'
She says people are often unaware of the extent of land that CBP has access to—100 air miles from any external boundary of the U.S, a border zone that almost two-thirds of the U.S. population lives within.
Montoya-Boyer says that the technology used by these drones was created to track border crossings, not to be used to track U.S. citizens at protests.
'The reality is, with the development of these types of technologies, and with appropriations by CBP and DHS, they can be used for domestic surveillance and as needed by an administration that isn't necessarily doing what's usual,' she says.
Though the CBP has stated that the drones are focused on 'situational awareness' and 'officer safety,' Montoyta-Boyers says there 'is no reason for us to believe that it is just in the name of law and order' as 'there is an increase, an expansion of surveillance technologies in the name of immigration enforcement being deployed all across the country on the majority of people, whether they're immigrants or not
She recommends those who decide to lawfully and peacefully protest to access both the ACLU's and Electronic Frontier Foundation's guides to what protestors' rights are.
This is not the first time that drones have been used during U.S. protests in support of law enforcement efforts.
Back in 2020, CBP utilized drones at the height of protests in the Black Lives Matter movement spurred by the murder of George Floyd by Minneapolis police. At the time, however, CBP argued that its drones were not being used to 'surveil' protestors, but rather to provide 'assistance to state and locals so they could make sure that their cities and their towns were protected,' according to Acting CBP Commissioner Mark Morgan in a 2020 interview with ABC News.
"We were not providing any resources to surveil lawful peaceful protesters. That's not what we were doing," he said. 'We weren't taking any information on law-abiding protesters, but we were absolutely there to ensure the safety of folks there as well as to enforce, and make sure law and order remain.'
Contact us at letters@time.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
16 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
What to know about Zelenskyy's meeting with Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump is set to host Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House on Monday to discuss how to end Russia's three-year war in Ukraine. Months of U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to stop the fighting haven't made headway, but the stakes have risen since Trump met with with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday. After that summit, Trump abandoned the requirement of reaching a ceasefire in order to hold further talks and aligned with Putin's position that negotiations should focus on a long-term settlement instead. The presence of several European leaders at the talks in Washington shows how central the conflict — and any settlement — is to wider security questions on the continent. They are looking to safeguard Ukraine and Europe more broadly from any further aggression from Moscow — but also are providing a show of support for Zelenskyy after his last visit to the White House led to an angry confrontation. The American and Ukrainian leaders are scheduled to first meet privately, without the Europeans. On 'Trump's ultimate policy towards the Russia-Ukraine war hangs not just the future of Ukraine security, but Europe's as well,'' said Nigel Gould-Davies, senior fellow for Russia and Eurasia at the International Institute for Strategic Studies. 'The stakes could not be higher for the continent.'' Here's what to know about the Washington meeting. After meeting Putin in Alaska, Trump is making a big push for a breakthrough. A lot of issues need to be resolved, however, and the two sides have previously established red lines that are incompatible, including questions of whether Ukraine will cede any land to Russia, the future of Ukraine's army and whether the country will have any guarantee against further Russian aggression. In a post on social media Sunday night, Trump appeared to shift the burden for ending the war to Zelenskyy, whose country was invaded in February 2022. 'President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight,' he wrote. A comprehensive peace deal could still be a long way off. As a condition for peace, the Russian leader wants Kyiv to give up the Donbas, the industrial region in eastern Ukraine that has seen some of the most intense fighting but that Russian forces have failed to capture completely. In his Sunday night post, Trump wrote that Zelenskyy should also accept Russia's illegal 2014 annexation of Ukraine's Crimea region. As part of a deal, Putin has said the United States and its European allies can provide Ukraine with a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defense pledge, according to a senior U.S. official. Trump envoy Steve Witkoff called that a 'game-changing' step though he offered few details on how it would work. Ukraine has long pressed for some kind of guarantee that would prevent Russia from invading again. Zelenskyy has rejected Putin's demand that Ukraine surrender the Donbas region, made up of the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, since the Ukrainian Constitution forbids giving up territory or trading land. That also means he can't cede Crimea either. Instead, freezing the front line — which snakes roughly 620 miles from northeastern to southeastern Ukraine — seems to be the most the Ukrainian people might accept. Russia currently holds about 20% of Ukrainian territory. European leaders see Ukraine's fight as a bulwark against any Kremlin ambitions to threaten other countries in eastern Europe and beyond. French President Emmanuel Macron described Ukraine as an 'outpost of our collective defense if Russia wanted to advance again.' 'If we are weak with Russia today, we'll be preparing the conflicts of tomorrow and they will impact the Ukrainians and — make no mistake — they can impact us, too.' Macron said Sunday. The European political heavyweights expected in Washington are Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, and NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte. Ukraine has in recent months been losing more territory against Russia's bigger army, and Moscow's forces breached Ukrainian lines in a series of minor infiltrations in the Donetsk region ahead of the Alaska summit. But there is no sign of a looming, major Russian breakthrough on the front line. Both sides have also kept up their daily long-range strikes behind the front line. A Russian drone strike on Kharkiv, Ukraine's second-largest city, killed six people late Sunday, including an 18-month-old and a 16-year-old, according to regional head Oleh Syniehubov. The attack on the northeastern city injured 20 others, including six children, he said. Russia's Defense Ministry on Monday reported intercepting 23 Ukrainian drones over Russian regions and the annexed Crimean peninsula overnight.
CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Federal agents open fire at San Bernardino family during enforcement operation, DHS says
US Customs and Border Protection officers opened fire during a targeted immigration enforcement operation in San Bernadino, California, on Saturday, calling it an act of self-defense after a man 'struck two CBP officers with his vehicle,' the Department of Homeland Security said. But the family inside the vehicle said they drove away out of fear for their safety after masked men emerged from unmarked cars and surrounded their truck with weapons drawn before smashing the truck's windows. Martin, one of the three men in the vehicle, told CNN affiliate KABC he was working with his father-in-law and 18-year-old brother-in-law on Saturday morning when their vehicle was suddenly surrounded. The agents did not identify themselves and the family stayed inside the locked car, said Martin, who KABC only identified by his first name. Videos recorded from inside the family's truck show at least three masked agents wearing tactical vests marked with 'police' surrounding the car. At least one of the agents is wearing a hat marked 'CBP.' The agents are seen asking the men inside the truck to roll down the window, but the men refuse. The agents are then seen breaking two windows in the truck before the driver accelerates away. It's unclear why DHS was pursuing the men in the vehicle. 'Once the glasses were shattered, my father-in-law, fearing for his life from his perspective … he drove the vehicle away from where those agents were at,' Martin told KABC. It is unclear in the videos when officers were struck by the vehicle. In its statement, DHS said two officers were injured. It did not specify the severity of the injuries. As the truck drives away, three apparent gunshots can be heard in the videos and one video shows what seems to be bullet holes in the side of the truck. Watch a different angle here: 'Thank God the bullets didn't go through the truck. They just went in, got stuck into the door, but they were aimed at my brother-in-law, who was in the passenger front,' Martin told KABC. Once home, the men called San Bernardino police to report the incident, Martin said. At 9:30 a.m., about an hour after the vehicle stop, armed immigration and Homeland Security agents, along with San Bernardino police, surrounded the family's home, according to the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice. They remained at the scene until 3:45 p.m., despite never presenting a warrant, 'pressuring the individual to come outside and placing the entire family in fear,' the organization said in a statement to CNN. 'This is a clear abuse of power. Firing at civilians, detaining families without cause, and silencing community voices is unacceptable and must end,' the organization said. DHS said local police 'located the subject at a residence and briefly had him in custody,' but 'he was set free' and officers left the scene. 'This decision was made despite the subject refusing to comply and wounding two officers — another terrible example of California's pro-sanctuary policies in action that shield criminals instead of protecting communities,' DHS said in a statement. According to KABC, San Bernardino police cited the California Values Act, which prevents local law enforcement from helping federal officials with immigration enforcement actions. Police told KABC they later returned to the scene after a request from federal officials due to a large crowd forming as federal officers attempted to arrest a man. The department said it learned the man, whose identity was not revealed, was wanted for assaulting a federal officer. It's unclear if the man was taken into custody. CNN has reached out to the San Bernardino County Sheriff's Department and San Bernardino Police Department for further information. Video credit: Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice CNN's Norma Galeana and Amanda Jackson contributed to this report.
Newsweek
17 minutes ago
- Newsweek
The 1600: Zelensky Brings His Muscle
The Insider's Track Good morning, President Trump has once again done the impossible: convincing a bunch of Europeans to take a work trip in the middle of August. Zelensky is on the ground in DC this morning, and he brought his muscle. The leaders of the UK, Germany, Italy, France, NATO and the EU will join him at the White House this afternoon for a series of high-stakes meetings with the president and his team, coming after Trump's poorly-reviewed summit with Putin in Alaska on Friday. This story is being spun six ways from Sunday from all sides, so let's try to step back and take a sober look at what's happening. The state of play here is that Putin reportedly told Trump in Anchorage what his conditions would be for not just a ceasefire, but a comprehensive peace agreement: Ukraine would have to essentially give up the Donbas and Crimea, and in exchange Putin would promise in writing not to attack or occupy any new territories in Ukraine or Europe. Obviously that's a pretty maximalist position on Putin's part, and a "written promise" from Vladimir Putin is worth less than this newsletter column, but what did you expect. But Steve Witkoff, the president's special envoy, said over the weekend that Putin is willing to accept US and European security guarantees for Ukraine as part of those conditions, even if not in the form of NATO's Article 5. That, if true, is a pretty notable concession from the Russians. Ukraine would basically become a shadow member of NATO and be absorbed under the West's security umbrella, in exchange for the 20% of its land Russia now holds, is how I am reading this. If that becomes the contours of the deal that they're working out today, is it the worst thing ever after 3+ years of grinding war? I dunno, I'd probably take it! It's unclear if it would mean American boots on the ground in Ukraine, but remember when this is all over there are also going to be American companies operating in the country to mine its rare-earth minerals, so there already is kind of an implicit security guarantee from us There's an emerging narrative I'm seeing in the media coverage of this story that suggests Trump completely capitulated to Putin in Alaska, and the European calvary is coming today to back up Zelensky and make sure Trump doesn't steamroll him into accepting a deal where he gives up territory and gets nothing for it. That's possible, but I think it is more likely that we could be close to a breakthrough, so all the principals are gathering to get on the same page and work out the details. I could be wrong, but I am taking the glass-half-full view because I am a glutton for punishment. The summit in Alaska on Friday was instructive, I thought, in that it put on display the symbiotic but tortured relationship between the president and the media and how it acts as the engine of everything. The reviews of the meeting in the non-Fox press have been almost invariably bad. But the president himself created the conditions for that kind of coverage! All last week, the White House was playing down the expectations for the summit, framing it as a "listening exercise" with modest goals or commitments. Then, on the way there, Trump tells the reporters aboard Air Force One that he "won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a ceasefire." Then, once they land, the optics of the summit itself are totally over the top. Putin gets the literal red carpet rolled out for him, is subject to a B-2 flyover, snaps photos with the smiling US president, gets a ride in The Beast, and even a long, rambling monologue about the "root causes" of the war he started, which amount to his narcissistic attempts to reclaim Russia's lost glory of the past, delivered live on primetime American television, and without having to answer any questions from the press. So it's hard to fault the media for watching that all play out and delivering the verdict that the meeting was, at best, a big nothingburger or, at worst, just delivered Putin exactly what he wanted. Had these two just decided to meet at some neutral midpoint, say Switzerland, behind closed doors and without any of the pomp, statecraft or pressers, he would have avoided this sort of coverage. His reality-show producer instincts get him in trouble this way, which the media gets called biased for pointing out... and around we go (this is precisely what happened when he met Lil' Kim of North Korea in the first term, btw). All this is to say, give credit to the POTUS for at least pushing the ball down the field. Things are happening, and movement is better than no movement. I just hope Zelensky wears a suit today. The Rundown President Donald Trump has said that Ukraine will not be able to reclaim Crimea nor become a member of NATO if Kyiv wishes to sign a peace deal with Russia. Trump said late Sunday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky "can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight." Read more. Also happening: Trump to target mail-in ballots: President Donald Trump said he will issue an executive order to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, a move that would inevitably spark legal challenges by the states. "I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump wrote Monday morning. Read more . President Donald Trump said he will issue an executive order to end the use of mail-in ballots and voting machines ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, a move that would inevitably spark legal challenges by the states. "I am going to lead a movement to get rid of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, and also, while we're at it, Highly 'Inaccurate,' Very Expensive, and Seriously Controversial VOTING MACHINES, which cost Ten Times more than accurate and sophisticated Watermark Paper, which is faster, and leaves NO DOUBT, at the end of the evening, as to who WON, and who LOST, the Election," Trump wrote Monday morning. . New census: President Donald Trump's proposal for a new national census that excludes people living in the U.S. illegally could reduce Texas' political power by reducing both its number of Electoral College votes and seats in the House. Joshua Blank, who heads the Texas Politics Project at the University of Texas at Austin, tells Newsweek that a new census without illegal migrants would reduce the state's population and therefore its House representation. Read more. This is a preview of The 1600—Tap here to get this newsletter delivered straight to your inbox.
