
Gildan to buy underwear maker Hanesbrands for 2.2 billion dollars
Canada-based Gildan is offering Hanesbrands holders roughly 6 dollars a share, based on the companies' closing prices on Aug. 11, according to a statement Wednesday. Including debt, the deal values Hanesbrands at about 4.4 billion dollars.
The transaction targets synergies at least 200 million dollars within three years, according to the statement, and be at least 20% accretive to Gildan's earnings per share.
Shares in Hanesbrands slid 7.4% in premarket trading, after gaining 28% on Tuesday following reports on the deal.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

LeMonde
44 minutes ago
- LeMonde
Pro-Trump channel Newsmax agrees to pay $67M in defamation case over 2020 election claims
The conservative network Newsmax will pay $67 million to settle a lawsuit accusing it of defaming a voting equipment company by spreading lies about US President Donald Trump's 2020 election loss, according to documents filed Monday, August 18. The settlement comes after Fox News Channel paid $787.5 million to settle a similar lawsuit in 2023 and Newsmax paid what court papers describe as $40 million to settle a libel lawsuit from a different voting machine manufacturer, Smartmatic, which also was a target of pro-Trump conspiracy theories on the network. Delaware Superior Court Judge Eric Davis ruled earlier that Newsmax did indeed defame Denver-based Dominion Voting Systems by airing false information about the company and its equipment. But Davis left it to a jury to eventually decide whether that was done with malice, and, if so, how much Dominion deserved from Newsmax in damages. Newsmax and Dominion reached the settlement before the trial could take place. The settlement was disclosed by Newsmax in a new filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission. "Newsmax believed it was critically important for the American people to hear both sides of the election disputes that arose in 2020," the company said in a statement. "We stand by our coverage as fair, balanced, and conducted within professional standards of journalism." A spokesperson for Dominion said the company was pleased to have settled the lawsuit. The disclosure of the settlement came as Trump, who lost his 2020 reelection bid to Democrat Joe Biden, vowed in a social media post Monday to eliminate mail-in ballots and voting machines such as those supplied by Dominion and other companies. It was unclear how the Republican president could achieve that. The same judge also handled the Dominion-Fox News case and made a similar ruling that the network repeated numerous lies by Trump's allies about his 2020 loss despite internal communications showing Fox officials knew the claims were bogus. At the time, Davis found it was "crystal clear" that none of the allegations was true. Internal correspondence from Newsmax officials likewise shows they knew the claims were baseless. "How long are we going to play along with election fraud?" Newsmax host Bob Sellers said two days after the 2020 election was called for Biden, according to internal documents revealed as part of the case. Though Trump has insisted his fraud claims are real, there is no evidence they were, and the lawsuits in the Fox and Newsmax cases show how some of the president's biggest supporters knew they were false at the time. Trump's then-attorney general, William Barr, said there was no evidence of widespread fraud. Trump and his backers lost dozens of lawsuits alleging fraud, some before Trump-appointed judges. Numerous recounts, reviews and audits of the election results, including some run by Republicans, turned up no signs of significant wrongdoing or error and affirmed Biden's win.


France 24
5 hours ago
- France 24
Air Canada flight attendants face new pressure to end strike
Roughly 10,000 flight attendants walked off the job after midnight on Saturday, insisting the airline had failed to address their demands for higher wages and compensation for unpaid ground work, including during boarding. Canada's national carrier, which flies directly to 180 cities domestically and abroad, said the strike had forced cancellations impacting 500,000 people. Over the weekend, federal labor minister Patty Hajdu invoked a legal provision to halt the strike and force both sides into binding arbitration. Following Hajdu's intervention, the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB), a regulatory tribual, ordered the flight attendants back to work on Sunday. The flight attendants' union said it would defy the order, forcing Air Canada to walk back plans to partially restore service late Sunday. CIRB regulators upped the pressure on Monday. It ordered the union "to resume the performance of their duties immediately and to refrain from engaging in unlawful strike activities," Air Canada said in a statement. The tribunal gave the Canadian Union of Public Employees until 12:00 pm (1600 GMT) to communicate to members that they "are required to resume the performance of their duties," Air Canada further said. Carney 'disappointed' Prime Minister Mark Carney told reporters in Ottawa Monday it was "disappointing" that eight months of negotiations between the carrier and union did not produce an agreement. "We recognize very much the critical role that flight attendants play in keeping Canadians and their families safe as they travel," he said. "It is important that they're compensated equitably." But, he added, Canada faced a situation where hundreds of thousands of citizens and visitors were facing travel uncertainty. CUPE had over the weekend earlier slammed the Canadian government's intervention as "rewarding Air Canada's refusal to negotiate fairly by giving them exactly what they wanted." "This sets a terrible precedent," it said. Labor minister Hajdu said over the weekend that she had hoped a deal could have been reached through bargaining, but "it has now become clear that this dispute won't be resolved at the table." "Canadians are increasingly finding themselves in very difficult situations and the strike is rapidly impacting the Canadian economy," she added. On Thursday, Air Canada detailed the terms offered to cabin crew, indicating a senior flight attendant would on average make CAN$87,000 ($65,000) by 2027. CUPE has described Air Canada's offers as "below inflation (and) below market value." In a statement issued before the strike began, the Business Council of Canada warned an Air Canada work stoppage would exacerbate the economic pinch already being felt from US President Donald Trump's tariffs.


Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
Google to pay €30M fine for anti-competition deals in Australia
Google has agreed to pay a 55 million Australian dollar (€30.1m) fine for signing anticompetitive deals with Australia's two largest telcos that banned the installation of competing search engines on some smartphones, the US tech giant and Australia's competition watchdog said. The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission said in a statement it had commenced proceedings in the Australian Federal Court on Monday against the Singapore-based Google Asia Pacific division. The court will decide whether the AU$50 million (€27.9m) penalty is appropriate. Restricting competition is illegal in Australia Under the anticompetitive agreements, which were in place for 15 months until March 2021, Telstra and Optus only pre-installed Google Search on Android phones sold to customers. Other search engines were excluded. In return, the telcos received a share of the advertisement revenue Google generated from those customers. Google accepted that the agreements were likely to have the effect of 'substantially lessening competition,' the commission said. Google has also signed a court-enforceable undertaking that commits the company to removing certain pre-installation and default search engine restrictions from its contracts with Android phone manufacturers and telcos, the commission said. The tech company said in a statement: 'We're pleased to resolve the ACCC's concerns, which involved provisions that haven't been in our commercial agreements for some time.' Commissioner chair Gina-Cass Gottlieb said: "Conduct that restricts competition is illegal in Australia because it usually means less choice, higher costs or worse service for consumers.' 'Importantly, these changes come at a time when AI search tools are revolutionising how we search for information, creating new competition,' Cass-Gottlieb added. Last year, Telstra, Optus and their smaller rival TPG agreed to court-enforceable undertakings with the commission that they would not renew or make similar deals with Google to limit search options.