Kentucky hospitals testify they need drug discount program under attack by pro-Trump group
FRANKFORT — A bill aimed at strengthening access in Kentucky to a federal program that generates income for charity health care passed a Senate committee Wednesday, with several rural hospital executives telling lawmakers it has helped keep them in business.
The program 'undoubtedly saved our hospital,' said Angela Portman, CEO of Breckinridge Health Inc., a 25-bed independent hospital in Hardinsburg. 'We were out of options.'
Several speakers attempted to express concerns about how Senate Bill 14 would affect the federal 340B Drug Pricing Program but were cut short by Sen. Stephen Meredith, R-Leitchfield, chairman of the Senate Health Services Committee and sponsor of SB 14.
Meredith warned beforehand he didn't want to hear testimony about the federal program, subsidized through deep discounts from the pharmaceutical industry. Any reforms to the program overall must come at the federal level, where legislation is pending, he said.
Critics of SB 14, including a representative of the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of American, of PhRMA, came forward to testify.
'We will not have a debate on 340B today,' Meredith said. 'We can't change that. It's federal law.'
But a national 'dark money,' pro-Trump group, Building America's Future, showed its opposition Wednesday by driving a truck with a flashing sign board around the Capitol with alternating messages including its claim that '340B is subsidizing gender transitions for kids.'
'Tell state Republican: STOP 340B,' it said, with a notice that it was 'paid for by Building America's Future.'
Supporters of the program in Kentucky have rejected that claim as baseless, pointing out Kentucky's Republican-controlled General Assembly banned gender affirming care for minors in 2023 and the program is chiefly aimed at generating revenue hospitals and clinics use to expand health resources for the poor.
'This is a very critical program for our hospitals and access to care in rural communities,' Nancy Galvagni, president of the Kentucky Hospital Association, said at the hearing.
The outside group, which has been linked to Elon Musk, an advisor to President Donald Trump, said in a recent press release it has launched a 'five-figure' television and podcast ad buy appealing to Republicans to oppose pending bills in Utah, Nebraska, North Dakota and Kentucky, describing 340B as an 'out-of-control government program' that is 'secretly sabotaging' Trump's agenda.
No one from the group spoke at Wednesday's hearing and Meredith didn't address its claims in the 45-minute discussion of SB 14. The group has not responded to the Lantern's request for comment.
Rather, Meredith limited discussion to SB 14, which he said would preserve benefits to Kentucky health providers.
The 340B program, authorized by Congress in 1992, was meant to aid health providers by giving them more money to help low-income patients, including providing lower cost drugs.
Created with the support of the pharmaceutical industry, it required drug manufacturers to provide drugs at discounts of up to 50% to hospitals and clinics that provide care to a certain percentage of low-income patients including those covered through Medicaid, the state-federal health plan.
Hospitals and clinics provide those discounted drugs through pharmacies, then bill insurers including Medicaid for the market price of the drugs and keep the difference — the goal being to use those resources for low-income patients.
But it has expanded rapidly over the years, aided by changes in federal law that the pharmaceutical industry and some consumer advocates argue have allowed national pharmacy chains and major health systems to benefit from 340B at the expense of consumers and low-income patients it was supposed to help.
KY health care providers depend on drug discount program that's facing fire on several fronts
'Our members believe this bill does not protect patients,' said Russell Palk, with the Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a Washington D.C.-based trade association. 'It does not lower their out-of-pocket costs.'
Meredith rejected that assertion.
'I don't believe that's true,' he said.
Rather, he said, his bill — similar to legislation enacted in other states — would merely prevent pharmaceutical manufacturers from discriminating against Kentucky by requiring them to provide the same drugs at the same discounts as they do in other states. As 340B has grown, some pharmaceutical manufacturers are restricting discounted drugs they will ship to Kentucky, he said.
The program provides an estimated $122 million a year in additional revenue for health care in Kentucky, he said. 'Why should we not be allowed to have this funding when other states are?'
Meanwhile, hospital CEOs told the panel Wednesday that income from 340B is critical to providing patient care, especially for cancer treatment where chemotherapy drugs can cost tens of thousands of dollars.
'Cancer treatment is expensive and without the 340B program many of our patients simply would not have access to it,' said Brian Springate, CEO of Appalachian Regional Healthcare's Hazard hospital.
SB 14 passed the committee on a 9-1 vote and now goes to the full Senate.
A similar bill last year sponsored by Meredith passed the Senate but died for lack of action in the House.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
14 minutes ago
- CNBC
Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery
Elon Musk was ordered on Wednesday by a federal judge to face a lawsuit by voters accusing the world's richest person of defrauding them into signing a petition to support the U.S. Constitution for a chance to win his $1 million-a-day giveaway. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas said Jacqueline McAferty plausibly alleged in her proposed class action that Musk and his political action committee America PAC wrongly induced her to provide personal identifying information as part of the giveaway, late in the 2024 election campaign. Lawyers for Musk and America PAC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump's successful 2024 presidential run. McAferty, an Arizona resident, said Musk and America PAC induced voters in seven battleground states to sign his petition by promising that $1 million recipients would be chosen randomly, as in a lottery, though the voters had no real chance to collect. She said voters who signed were also required to provide names, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers. In seeking a dismissal, Musk listed several "red flags" as proof he had not run an illegal lottery. He said these included statements that the $1 million recipients were "selected to earn" the money and expected to become America PAC spokespeople, defeating the idea that the payment was a "prize." But the judge cited other statements suggesting the defendants were "awarding" the $1 million, and the money could be "won." "It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery--even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do," Pitman wrote. The judge was appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama in 2014. Musk had also rejected the suggestion that petition signers suffered harm by providing contact information. Pitman said an expert in political data brokerage could testify what that information was worth for voters in battleground states. The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024. A day earlier, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk's giveaway, saying that city's top prosecutor failed to show it was an illegal lottery. Musk is a Texas resident, and his electric car company Tesla TSLA.O is based in Austin. The case is McAferty v Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-01346.
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Rep. Meuser backs Garrity for Governor
HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — Pennsylvania Republican Congressman Dan Meuser is throwing his support behind the Republican challenger for Governor. Meuser endorsed Stacy Garrity on Thursday, calling her 'the patriot and fighter Pennsylvania needs as our next Governor.' Garrity officially entered the 2026 race for Pennsylvania Governor on Monday. The twice-elected State Treasurer had been teasing a run against incumbent Governor Josh Shapiro for some time now. Close Thanks for signing up! Watch for us in your inbox. Subscribe Now 'She is a proven winner, and I am proud to endorse Stacy Garrity as a true America First conservative for Governor,' Meuser said. 'Our commonwealth desperately needs new leadership.' If elected, Garrity would be Pennsylvania's first female governor and the first governor with military experience since Governor Tom Corbett (2005-11). A native of Athens, Bradford County, Garrity served in the U.S. Army Reserves as a Colonel and is the former Vice President of Global Tungsten and Powders Corp. in Bradford County. Garrity entered the world of politics in 2020 with a run for Treasurer in which she narrowly defeated incumbent Treasurer Joe Torsella (D) by less than 1%. Her upset victory as a political newcomer came the same year Josh Shapiro (D) won the Attorney General's race by more than four points. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Shake Shack, Sweetgreen and Cava are flashing warning lights for the US economy
As President Donald Trump's aggressive policies on international trade and immigration gradually begin to make their presence felt, the underwhelming recent earnings results reported by some key casual food businesses are serving as flashing warning lights for the U.S. economy. Shake Shack shares tumbled 7.7 percent in response to its second-quarter results, despite their being generally positive. In comparison, Sweetgreen shares dropped 23 percent after it cut its 2025 outlook for the second consecutive quarter, and Cava's quarterly revenue disappointed estimates because of weaker-than-expected sales growth. Bloomberg columnist Connor Sen has argued that the headwinds being faced by those brands are uniquely significant because their restaurants are more likely to be based in metropolitan centers along the west and east coasts of the United States, which are likely to bear the brunt of the president's policies first. Shake Shack, for instance, has 80 of its 610 U.S. locations in New York, while one-third of Sweetgreen's branches are in New York and California, and Cava is based in D.C., which, along with Maryland and Virginia, accounts for 17 percent of its business, according to Bloomberg. Their exposure to 'critical coastal metro areas that are immigration hubs and popular international tourism destinations' contrasts with rival eateries such as Olive Garden, Longhorn Steakhouse, and Texas Roadhouse, which more typically cater to middle American diners across a wider geographic spread and have not yet suffered an equivalent financial setback. Sen points out that New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco – three of America's biggest cities, all coastal and Democrat-governed – suffered a combined 43,000 job losses in the first six months of the year, a period when the U.S. as a whole added 500,000. Over the same half-year stretch, those three locations plus Washington, D.C, saw a combined reduction in their workforces of 60,000 people, after experiencing a 160,000 increase in 2024, a phenomenon that might very reasonably be attributed to Trump's immigration crackdown. Meanwhile, New York City Tourism + Conventions has said it expects to see a 17 percent fall in international visitors this year, and Visit California is forecasting a 9.2 percent fall in arrivals, as travellers from overseas register their disapproval of Trump's administration by vacationing elsewhere. Those factors conspire to leave businesses dependent on America's coastal cities facing a smaller pool of potential customers. Furthermore, those who remain appear to be less likely to spend their disposable income, meaning a reduced likelihood of their treating themselves to a meal out. The latter point is made by a preliminary study of consumer sentiment carried out by the University of Michigan, which found left-leaning voters much less likely to spend freely in August than their Republican counterparts. While economists might traditionally look at the stock market or the unemployment rate to gauge the health of a nation's bank balance, the well-being of brands like Shake Shack, Sweetgreen, and Cava can be equally revealing, primarily by exposing regional disparities. Other surprisingly telling indicators of an economic downturn or coming recession might include declining sales of men's underwear, reduced sales of inessential goods like snacks and cigarettes in grocery stores, or, conversely, a rise in the sales of miniature bottles of alcohol, which might signal increased consumer stress. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data