New York City law allowing non-citizens to vote struck down by court
(Reuters) -New York State's top court on Thursday struck down a New York City law that would have permitted more than 800,000 legal non-citizens to vote in municipal elections.
In a 6-1 decision, the Court of Appeals ruled that the law, passed by the City Council in 2021, violates the state constitution.
"Americans have fought over the meaning of citizenship and the right to vote since the earliest days of our Republic," Chief Judge Rowan Wilson wrote for the majority. "Whatever the future may bring, the New York Constitution as it stands today draws a firm line restricting voting to citizens."
New York's law would have allowed permanent legal residents and other legally documented non-citizens, such as those with work authorization, who had lived in the city for at least 30 days to cast ballots in municipal contests. Non-citizens would still have been barred from voting in state or federal elections.
The law had been blocked from taking effect by lower court rulings, after state Republicans challenged its constitutionality.
More than a dozen U.S. cities and towns, including San Francisco and Washington, D.C., allow non-citizens to vote in some local elections.
Several Republican-controlled states have passed laws in recent years affirming that non-citizens cannot vote, prompted by President Donald Trump's false claims that millions of undocumented immigrants have voted illegally in U.S. elections.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
10 minutes ago
- Fox News
What Americans REALLY Thought of the Sweeney Jeans Ad...
That 'controversial' Sydney Sweeney jeans ad bothered almost nobody, a new poll found. I'm Tomi Lahren, more next. Liberals were OUTRAGED over that Sydney Sweeney 'good jeans' American Eagle ad, but what about everyday Americans? According to a recent Economist/YouGov poll, a meager 12% of Americans said they found the campaign offensive. Nearly 40% of respondents found the ad to be 'clever,' and another 39% said it was neither, 8% didn't know how to feel about it. Unsurprisingly, the survey also found that men were far less likely to find the ad offensive and more likely to label it 'clever.' Women were more likely to find it offensive, but even that total was only 17%. Unsurprisingly, Republican respondents viewed the ad more favorably than Democrats. All of this to say, the overblown media reaction to an ad about jeans was totally ridiculous. Those who were truly offended by a pretty girl and a play on words quite frankly need to get a grip. It's not worth getting your undies- or your jeans- in a twist! I'm Tomi Lahren and you can watch my show 'Tomi Lahren is Fearless' at Learn more about your ad choices. Visit
Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
Chuck Todd warns that Dems are falling into Trump's trap, 'taking the bait' on redistricting
Former NBC News host Chuck Todd called out Democrats on Tuesday and accused them of "taking the bait" in their response to the Republican redistricting efforts. "They're taking the bait. They've decided the only way to fight is to act just as ruthlessly. Revenge redistricting in Illinois, New York, California. And they tell themselves it's self-defense. But in reality, it's exactly what Trump wants, to make his opponents play his illegal and immoral game by his rules in his universe," Todd said during his show, "The Chuck ToddCast." The journalist also suggested Tuesday that the U.S. was headed toward a "cold civil war" amid the ongoing redistricting battles. "And here we are. It's the political version of the old saying, when you get into the mud with a pig, you both get dirty and the pig likes it. Replacing, and don't give me this crap, rationalize that, you know, he's a bad mob boss, you've got to do whatever you say, 'We'll be a good mob boss.' The answer is no mob bosses at all," he said. Beto O'Rourke, a former Democratic Texas Senate candidate, called for the Democratic Party to be "ruthless" in their pursuit of power and endorsed partisan gerrymandering last month. Todd also rejected comparisons to 1930s Germany. "Look, I don't like the lazy comparisons to 1930s Germany. I hate the quote second civil war predictions. I'd like to believe that we're a lot better than that," he said during his podcast. He also referenced Godwin's Law and summarized it by saying: "If you can't make your point without invoking the Nazis, then you're probably not very good at debating and making your point." Democratic lawmakers and members of the media have repeatedly compared Trump and his administration to 1930s Germany. Todd went on to argue that it was "uncomfortable" to see mistakes being made "from the 1850s." "But let's be honest, it's a bit uncomfortable seeing how many mistakes from the 1850s, from 1850s America or pre-war Europe in the early 1930s are happening again right here. The normalization of the unacceptable. The rationalizing of 'just this once will breach our principle.' 'Just this once we'll do this because it's in the name of something bigger and better,'" he said. "The founders gave us these tools to prevent this. They feared a king. They feared a united majority trampling on the rest of us. They didn't imagine leaders who would just refuse to use the tools. They didn't. They'd come back here and be appalled," Todd continued.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: One-man rule — Trump's DC police takeover another authoritarian step
President Donald Trump using an obscure emergency provision in federal law pertaining to Washington, D.C. to attempt to take full control over the capital's local police force is not responding to any 'emergency,' but just a pure power grab. Coming a day after he'd sent federal agents to patrol the streets and moved to deploy the National Guard, Trump's ostensible reason is to control some out-of-control crime, but we don't have to buy that just because he's selling it. It's part of his campaign to terrorize cities that don't back him politically as he tries to amass power. We don't know exactly what the Democratic Congress and Richard Nixon had in mind when they created this authority in 1973, but whatever it was, it clearly was not a president straight up lying about the city's crime rates, which are among their lowest levels ever, to justify a sudden takeover as a naked show of force. There is no state of emergency that requires the federalization of the police force or, for that matter, the deployment of the military or roving federal agents — who are not supposed to act as a national police force and who generally have specific duties like investigating drug trafficking and other serious federal crimes. Instead, Trump wants them likely tamping down on public protest and acting as a visible representation that he controls the streets. Even if he's only statutorily allowed to do it for a short time (30 days says the law), we're sure he'll try to find loopholes, and is already talking about doing the same in other cities, even though D.C. is a unique place. The word 'authoritarian' is a scary one, here in the United States, land of the free. It goes against our entire founding mythology and national self-conception, but these fundamental tenets of liberty and individual rights are not naturally occurring and must be actively preserved. Doing that requires an honest examination of the facts, and the uncomfortable reality is that Trump's actions keep fitting the definition. Again and again Trump has used state power to impose political and ideological constraints. He did it against universities. He did it against law firms. He did it against the press. He created a quasi-government department led by his biggest donor and huge government contractor to collect together all strands of government data while slashing services and enriching himself. He had non-citizen political organizers arrested by masked ICE agents and he deploying the military on the streets of the nation's second biggest city; and now has taken under his direct control, the police force of the nation's capital on obvious pretextual grounds — a move, by the way, that he notably did not take as the federal capital was being attacked by a mob of rabid supporters that he himself whipped up in an effort to stage a coup. In each of these instances, Trump wants power and the majority Republicans in Congress have been too cowed to resist him. Only the independent courts have pushed back. Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser says that she will follow the 1973 law and cooperate with the temporary federal boss of her cops, U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi, as so designated by Trump. The question is will Trump and Bondi also follow the law? _____
