
Ukraine wing of US-founded terrorist group says it was involved in killing of intelligence officer in Kyiv
Late last week, a masked assailant shot and killed Col Ivan Voronych of the Ukraine security service (SBU) as he walked through a Kyiv parking lot in broad daylight. Shocking footage of the assassination circulated in Ukrainian media and caused a stir among residents in the capital.
For months, the Base, born in the US and with a web of cells all over the world, has been offering money to supporters or willing participants for targeted assassinations and attacks on the critical infrastructure of Ukraine, coinciding with allegations that its American founder, Rinaldo Nazzaro, was a Kremlin spy. Ukrainian authorities have also been warning in recent weeks of similar Russian intelligence operations covertly paying unknowing citizens to carry out sabotage inside their country.
'The shooting of the SBU colonel is not the end, but only the beginning,' said a statement posted on a Telegram channel that appears to be linked to the the Base's supposed Ukrainian cell. 'We will continue our struggle until justice prevails.'
The same post, translated from Ukrainian, added that the group's members were 'proud of our associates' who carried out the killing and said they didn't care if naysayers thought of them as 'terrorists and extremists'. In another message to subscribers, the account also threatens other Ukrainian public figures and promises: 'The hunt continues!'
Sources in the counter-terrorism field reviewed the posts and said they appeared credible and represented an escalation from the Base, which is now either endorsing treasonous murders inside of Ukraine, actively commissioning them, or both.
On Sunday, the SBU announced it had killed the two suspects they say were instructed and supplied with a pistol to assassinate Voronych on behalf of 'Russian special services' handlers. Other media reports in Ukraine reported the assassins were foreign nationals linked to criminal groups and were remotely supported by Russian intelligence.
Although originally a stateside extremist group, the Base had never publicly allied itself to the geopolitical goals of the Russian government of President Vladimir Putin, until very recently.
In April, the Base started waging what it described as an insurgency to establish an all-white ethnostate in the western Ukrainian oblast of Zakarpattia. So far, videos of arson attacks against what appear to be police and military vehicles, electric boxes and other targets have been uploaded to its accounts on Telegram, along with dozens of other geolocated videos inside Ukraine.
Nazzaro, who is a former Pentagon contractor with the US special forces, declined to comment on the Ukraine cell of the Base and the killing when reached on his Telegram account.
'I have no personal involvement in this incident and I don't know who is responsible,' he added.
Previously, he had publicly endorsed the group's Ukraine operations on Telegram and said it was being overseen by members inside the country that he did not control.
Sign up to Headlines US
Get the most important US headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Multiple requests for comment sent to a chatbot and an active email address associated with the Ukrainian cell went unanswered.
'The Base has been highly active in Ukraine since March and has conducted at least 10 arson attacks targeting infrastructure and buildings throughout the country,' said Steven Rai, an analyst at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue (ISD) who has been closely monitoring the Base's online activities. 'They have repeatedly threatened a variety of terrorist actions, including acts of sabotage and the assassination of Ukrainian government officials.'
Rai continued: 'While we cannot confirm whether the Base was truly responsible for this recent assassination of an SBU official, this action is very much in line with what they have been threatening to do for months and shows the severity of the threat they pose.'
In 2018, the Base became the subject of a relentless FBI counter-terrorism investigation that led to dozens of arrests and governments around the world designating it as a terrorist organization. Recently, the Base has doubled down on its recruitment efforts in Europe, and, with several new national cells across the continent – it has regrown its ranks inside the US and is clearly exporting its brand abroad – just as the Trump administration continues pulling FBI resources away from domestic terrorism investigations.
Nazzaro, who lives the life of a semi-defected American in St Petersburg with his Russian wife and family, has for years denied any associations with Russian intelligence, going so far as to tell a Kremlin-controlled television channel that he had 'never had any contact with any Russian security services'.
But the digital forensics of the group and Nazzaro's public history say otherwise: the Base's online footprints rely heavily on Russian digital infrastructure, with its recruitment email using a Mail.ru address – the email service owned by a Putin ally. Nazzaro has never been charged publicly in the US, but was the subject of an FBI investigation and was once called a justice department 'matter' by a US government official.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donbas: Why Russia is desperate to capture eastern Ukraine's industrial heartland
The future of Ukraine's industrial heartland in the east is likely to play a key role in talks between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump as they prepare to meet in Alaska on Friday. The Russian leader has demanded that Ukrainian forces withdraw from Donetsk as part of any any ceasefire deal, according to Volodymyr Zelensky. The Ukrainian president has said that Putin wants the remaining 30 per cent of the eastern region, which has seen some of the fiercest battles in the three-and-a-half year long war. But losing Donetsk would give Russia control of almost all of the Donbas, the collective name for Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland which has been long coveted by Putin. Earlier this week, Zelensky vowed Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned that Putin could use it as a spring board for a future invasion. As Kyiv fights to keep Donbas from Trump's so-called 'land swap' deal, here's all you need to know about the region. Where is the Donbas? Far along Ukraine's eastern border, Donbas is a portmanteau name from 'Donets Basin', a further abbreviation of 'Donets Coal Basin', in reference to the coal basin along the Donets Ridge and river. Donbas stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, two large regions of Ukraine that have formed a significant part of the frontline in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. How long has it been occupied? The Donbas has been partially occupied by Russia since 2014. At around the same time, Putin decided to annexe Crimea, a peninsula which lies just off the south of Ukraine towards the Black Sea. Russian-backed separatists broke away from the Ukrainian government to proclaim themselves independent 'people's republics' and, as a result, Moscow captured over a third of Ukraine's eastern territory. Russia classes the Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Luhansk People's Republic, the Donetsk People's Republic, and the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as subjects of the Russian Federation. Ukraine says these territories are part of Ukraine and they are not recognised by the United Nations. Now, it is believed around 88 per cent of the Donbas region is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region, according to Reuters. Approximately 6,600 square km is still controlled by Ukraine, but Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities such as Pokrovsk. A key strategic region in the war The hyper-industrialised Donbas economy is dominated by coal mining and metallurgy. The region has one of the largest coal reserves in Ukraine, even when extraction of coal decreased elsewhere. When conflict broke out in the area in 2014, Ukraine's coal mining enterprises saw a 22.4 per cent decline in the production of raw coal from 2013, as reported by Kyiv Post, showing the country's reliance on Donbas as an energy power house. But as well as its economic significance, Donbas has been described as a 'fortress belt' by The Institute for the Study of War in terms of its strategic value in the war. Donetsk forms the main fortified defensive line across the frontline, stretching through Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and Kostiantynivka. Elina Beketova, a fellow for CEPA, said: 'Ukraine is holding a key defensive line across Donetsk,' describing a 'fortified zone build up over years because the war began 11 years ago.' She added that Russia hasn't been able to break through since 2014 and they have lost many people there. The entire region is heavily mined and Ukrainian troops have been preparing it for years. 'It's not just trenches, it's a deep, layered defence with bunkers, anti-tank ditches, minefields, and industrial areas built into the terrain. The area includes dominant heights, rivers, and urban zones that make it extremely hard to capture.' Ms Beketova said losing this fortified line would have 'catastrophic consequences' as it holds back Russia's advancement into central and western parts of Ukraine. 'The front would shift approximately 80km west, and Russia would gain open ground - flat steppe with no natural barriers - giving them direct paths toward Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro.' What Zelensky has said about the Donbas Zelensky has repeatedly rejected calls from Russia to give up the Donbas. In response to Putin's request that Ukraine withdraws from eastern Donetsk, he vowed Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned Putin's troops could use it as a spring board for a future invasion. "We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part - our territories are illegally occupied. Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said.


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour fails to rule out annual tuition fee rise to stop universities going bust
The education secretary has said the government is looking at allowing universities to hike tuition fees every year based on inflation to stop them going bust. It comes less than a year after Bridget Phillipson announced that fees would increase in England for the first time in eight years as part of a major overhaul of the higher education system. Tuition fees have been frozen at £9,250 since 2017, but in November, it was announced that they would increase in line with the Retail Price Index inflation in September 2025. Asked whether the government would allow universities an inflation-linked tuition fee increase every year to improve their financial situation, Ms Phillipson did not rule it out. She told BBC Radio 4's Today Programme: 'We did give universities an increase through the tuition fee increase that we delivered last year, but we'll be looking at all of these areas around the long-term financial sustainability of universities as part of that post-16 white paper that we'll set out later on this year. 'We do also believe alongside that further reform will be needed, but also working together with other institutions, like further education, to bring education, training opportunities and skills much closer to where people are, including those people – adults, in particular – who might be further away from the labour market.' The remarks – which came on A-level results day – appear to set Labour on course for a clash with one of their biggest voter bases, students, and come despite Sir Keir Starmer's promise to abolish university tuition fees entirely when he stood to be Labour leader in 2020. He rowed back on the pledge in 2023, saying it was no longer affordable as a result of the country's financial situation, instead promising Labour would come up with a 'fairer solution' if it formed the next government. It comes amid growing concern over the state of the education sector, with many universities facing financial crisis. As many as 40 per cent of English universities are expected to fall into a budget deficit this year, a report from the Office for Students (OfS) said. The OfS, which regulates higher education providers, said universities needed "significant reform and efficiencies" to turn the tide, despite some institutions already closing courses and selling buildings to cut costs. It said a drop in international students coming to the UK was the main reason for the worsening financial position. Speaking on Thursday, Ms Phillipson said the government had already taken action to help universities, but that there is more to do. Asked about universities' financial struggles, she told Times Radio: 'I've made it a priority to put our universities on a more sustainable footing. 'The action that we've taken in turning around the regulator, the Office for Students, much more of a focus on universities' financial health, but also the difficult but necessary decision that we took quite early on as a government to increase tuition fees to make sure that universities have a more stable funding stream into the future. 'There is more to do and later on this year we'll be setting out our plans for post-16 education overall, including universities, through a white paper we'll be publishing.' On international students, the education secretary said they made an 'important contribution' to the UK's universities and economy, and 'will always be welcome in the UK'. She added: 'It is also fair to say that some institutions, their business model has allowed them to become too dependent on international students, and therefore too open to any fluctuations that may happen around that.'


The Independent
6 minutes ago
- The Independent
Retired Army General says Trump needs to convince Putin that Russia can't win in Ukraine
Ahead of Donald Trump 's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday, retired U.S. Army Gen. Wesley Clark has said it is vital for the president to convince the Russian leader that he cannot win the war in Ukraine. Speaking on The Record with Greta Van Susteren on Newsmax on Wednesday, Clark, a former Democratic presidential candidate in 2004, warned that Putin would not respond to conventional diplomatic threats. 'We've made so many threats to Russia over the last six months about consequences, and they mostly get postponed,' Clark said. 'And so, I don't know – I hope the consequences will be a restart of U.S. military assistance from the Trump administration to Ukraine. Because really, when you get right down to it, I think the only way you're going to really halt President Putin's territorial ambitions is to convince him he cannot win.' He continued: 'Administration after administration has tried sanctions. Obama tried it. Biden tried it. It hasn't stopped anything and makes it more difficult. The Russians learn to live with it. 'And so putting sanctions on again – it sounds rough and tough. It avoids the threat of use of force, but ultimately it doesn't accomplish much.' As preparations for the Anchorage summit continue, Kremlin aide Yuri Ushakov has stated that the meeting at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson will be a one-on-one between Trump and Putin, with translators present, and that 'sensitive matters' will be discussed. In addition to the prospect of ending the war, which has raged since February 2022, enhanced economic cooperation and trade between the U.S. and Russia will also be on the table, Ushakov said. Both leaders will take part in a news conference once the summit is concluded, he added, as well as wider talks with their delegations and a working breakfast. On Wednesday, Trump attended a virtual meeting with European leaders, including Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, to discuss the goals of the summit and establish red lines that cannot be crossed. According to French President Emmanuel Macron, the American emphatically ruled out the prospect of Kyiv being invited to join NATO, a step that Moscow would have interpreted as a deliberate provocation. Trump himself warned afterwards that Russia would face 'very severe consequences' if Putin does not agree to a ceasefire but hinted that a follow-up meeting could be swiftly arranged if Friday's summit proves a success. Zelensky has since joined British Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer in London, with the latter reiterating: 'International borders must not be changed by force and Ukraine must have robust and credible security guarantees to defend its territorial integrity as part of any deal.' Putin said on Thursday that Washington was making 'sincere efforts' to resolve the conflict in Ukraine and suggested that a new deal on nuclear arms control between Moscow and Washington could be on the cards.