logo
Hyflux issued preference shares to fund Tuaspring as it had problems getting bank loans: Prosecution, Singapore News

Hyflux issued preference shares to fund Tuaspring as it had problems getting bank loans: Prosecution, Singapore News

AsiaOne11-08-2025
SINGAPORE — Hyflux issued preference shares to fund its Tuaspring project because it had trouble getting bank loans, the prosecution said on the first day of the trial involving former senior executives of the failed water treatment plant.
Deputy Chief Prosecutor Christopher Ong noted that a consortium of banks had raised concerns in 2011 over Hyflux's strategy of selling electricity to subsidise the sale of water to PUB.
This led Hyflux to consider other avenues of raising funds. Its eventual collapse left about 34,000 investors of perpetual securities and preference shares, who had sunk in a combined $900 million, with nothing.
Former Hyflux employees and bank representatives who were involved in negotiations on financing the Tuaspring integrated water and power project are expected to testify for the prosection.
In total, seven people have been charged over Hyflux's intentional failure to disclose information relating to Tuaspring, among other things.
Six of them — Hyflux founder and former chief executive Olivia Lum Ooi Lin, former chief financial officer Cho Wee Peng, and former independent directors Teo Kiang Kok, Christopher Murugasu, Gay Chee Cheong, and Lee Joo Hai — are contesting their charges in a 56-day trial scheduled to run from Aug 11 to Feb 5, 2026.
The prosecution will proceed on 11 charges, including two of the six charges Lum faces. The remaining four charges against Lum are stood down.
The prosecution, in an opening statement to the State Court on Aug 11, said Hyflux won the tender for Singapore's second and largest desalination plant with the lowest submitted bid. It had proposed to sell water to PUB at a first-year tariff price of $0.45/m3, undercutting its competitors by at least 27 per cent.
"At this price, the desalination plant would operate at a loss," Ong said.
"To make the project financially viable, and also fulfil PUB's requirement to procure or produce electricity for the desalination plant at Hyflux's cost, Hyflux intended for the power plant to supply electricity to the desalination plant, while actually selling the vast majority of the power that it generated to the national grid."
It was only from this sale that Hyflux would be able to make up for the desalination plant's losses and make the project profitable.
But Hyflux had no prior experience in power generation, much less selling electricity. The Tuaspring Project would be the first time Hyflux entered the electricity market, the prosecution said.
How it all unfolded
To finance the Tuaspring project, which was initially projected to cost $890 million, Hyflux sought a term loan of about $527 million from a consortium of banks.
Six banks signed in-principle commitment letters in October 2010 indicating their willingness to finance the project. But they had not been told of Hyflux's plan to build a power plant and sell excess electricity to the grid at the time, Ong noted.
In November 2010, when they found out about Hyflux's power strategy, they "raised serious concerns". In January 2011, they told Hyflux that they could not lend it money on the terms previously indicated, as the power plant introduced new "merchant sale risk and operational risk".
On 4 July 2011, only three of the original six banks — DBS, Mizuho Corporate Bank and Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation — extended Hyflux financing of $150 million for the construction of the desalination plant. This financing was eventually terminated by Hyflux.
Tuaspring was ultimately financed by a shareholder's loan of $840.4 million by Hyflux in October 2011, which was in turn refinanced with Maybank Singapore and Maybank Kim Eng Securities in September 2013.
The case against Lum
In January 2011, in the midst of their negotiations with the banks, Hyflux's management began to contemplate issuing of preference shares to raise funds.
On Jan 19, 2011, Hyflux senior vice president, legal (business) Yang Ai Chian informed the Board of the need to issue preference shares to "increase our funding options" for "several new major projects" that Hyflux was expected to win that year.
In reality, this money was meant to fund Tuaspring because of the challenges Hyflux faced in getting bank financing.
On April 13, 2011, Hyflux lodged an offer information statement with the Monetary Authority of Singapore to issue up to $200 million in six per cent preference shares. These were oversubscribed and the offer amount was increased. Hyflux ultimately raised $400 million.
But the statement did not mention risks arising from Hyflux's entry into the electricity business, or those associated with Hyflux's strategy for Tuaspring, which could affect the company's financial position or results, the prosecution said.
The information was omitted because Lum wanted to downplay Tuaspring's significant exposure to the electricity market, both in Hyflux's announcement that it had been named the "preferred bidder" for the desalination project, as well as in the offer information statement, the prosecution said.
"Lum was determined that Hyflux had to win the bid and cement its status as a global leader in the water treatment and desalination industry. Hyflux was facing setbacks in its Middle Eastern ventures and winning the Tuaspring bid was critical for strengthening the company's order book," Ong said.
"She did not want to detract from the positive news of winning a landmark water project, by revealing the Tuaspring Project's reliance on electricity sales, and the fact that the low tariff price — the key to winning the tender — was only viable because of such electricity sales."
The prosecution also said Lum was well aware of the banks' negative reactions regarding the power plant component of the project, and feared that full disclosure might deter investors and compromise Hyflux's ability to raise funds through the planned preference shares.
This, in turn, could jeopardise financial close for the project and potentially result in losing the bid, the prosecution said.
The desalination plant of the Tuaspring Project became operational on Sept 18, 2013. But its power plant only became operational nearly two years later, on or around August 2015. It began selling electricity commercially on Feb 18, 2016.
In March 2011, the average Uniform Singapore Energy Price had been around $187 per megawatt hour (MWh). By February 2016, this had fallen to around $49.10 per MWh.
As the profitability of Tuaspring depended on electricity sales, this fall in electricity prices hit Hyflux hard. In its 2017 annual report, it reported a $115.6 million after tax loss.
The report stated that the weak power market in Singapore drove losses for the first time in Hyflux's history, with the Tuaspring Project accounting for the majority of the losses.
On May 21, 2018, Hyflux suspended trading of its shares. The next day, Hyflux announced that it had applied to seek court protection for debt reorganisation.
On May 18, 2019, PUB took over the Tuaspring desalination plant. On June 1, 2022, a wholly owned subsidiary of Malaysia-based YTL Power International, YTL Powerseraya, completed its acquisition of the Tuaspring power plant.
By Nov 16, 2020, Hyflux entered judicial management and into liquidation on July 21, 2021.
Other witnesses include a lawyer from Stamford Law Corporation, who was Hyflux's external legal counsel on the April 2011 offer information statement; an SGX representative who will provide evidence on the sequence of events that led to this case being investigated; and a PUB representative, who will testify to PUB's dealings with Hyflux and its employees and management during the tender and award process for Tuaspring.
The Prosecution will also adduce evidence from a securities expert, Kevin Gin who will address why the omitted information ought to have been disclosed by Hyflux.
The hearing continues.
[[nid:721222]]
This article was first published in The Straits Times . Permission required for reproduction.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What's next for the Ukraine peace talks?
What's next for the Ukraine peace talks?

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

What's next for the Ukraine peace talks?

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed with Mr Trump only that the level of representation at any talks should be higher than in previous rounds. For all the extraordinary spectacle involved in President Donald Trump's talks with Russia's president last week and with Ukraine's president, accompanied by European leaders, on Aug 18, the most likely outcome so far is more meetings. Mr Trump stressed that his first priority would be to help organise direct talks between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to bring the war in Ukraine to a close. The US president said that he could then join them for subsequent rounds to help iron out remaining differences. After emerging from the Oval Office, Mr Zelensky summed up the discussion about a key issue, security guarantees, in a way that could apply to the entire process: 'There is still a lot of work to be done.' When will Zelensky and Putin meet? Mr Putin has agreed to meet with Mr Zelensky in the coming weeks as the next phase of the peace process, Ms Karoline Leavitt, the White House press secretary, said on Aug 19. The US National Security Council is working on a framework, she added. But Mr Putin had previously stated that he would hold such a meeting only after all the details of a peace treaty were hammered out, and there is no indication that has changed. State news media in Russia on Aug 19 played down any potential meeting, with Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov suggesting that it would require intense preparation. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Proposals sought to develop Changi East Urban District next to T5 World Top officers hold Ukraine talks after Trump rules out sending US troops Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Opinion The era of job dating? It's all about matching employers and talent Opinion Singapore's next phase of growth requires a refreshed blueprint Business SGX wants to woo private companies to list in Singapore, says its head of research A foreign policy aide to Mr Putin said that the Russian leader had agreed with Mr Trump only that the level of representation at any talks should be higher than in previous rounds. Mr Zelensky has said that he is ready for talks in any format, and suggested at a news conference in Washington on Aug 18 that it might require pressure from the United States to get Mr Putin to attend. Mr Putin has made it clear that he does not consider Ukraine a viable state, and therefore does not view Mr Zelensky as a worthy interlocutor. On Aug 19, Mr Lavrov dismissively referred to the Ukrainian leader, who first became famous in Russia as a television comedian, as 'this character' and 'this man'. During three earlier rounds of talks, Russia sent Mr Vladimir Medinsky, a former culture minister and a Kremlin adviser in anti-Ukraine propaganda efforts, as its lead negotiator – a move that was interpreted as a stick in the eye to Ukraine. Is Putin using a meeting with Zelensky as a stalling tactic? Mr Putin has a reputation for slow-walking any crisis, hoping that circumstances will turn more favorable to him. There is a consensus among war analysts that Mr Putin favors continuing the fighting because he feels that he is winning on the battlefield, and that would give him leverage in future talks, even if the gains are negligible and come with massive loss of life. Even some Russian analysts expect the Kremlin to suggest at least one more round of negotiations in Istanbul to work on a possible format for a Putin-Zelensky meeting. 'Each of these stages can be dragged out endlessly by diplomatic and bureaucratic negotiations, even under American pressure,' Mr Andrei Nikulin, a Russian political commentator, wrote on the Telegram social media app. What are the 'security guarantees' that Ukraine wants? Mr Trump has said the United States would support security guarantees provided by Europe, and that became the focus of the White House talks on Aug 18. While Ukraine and its European allies wanted the first step in any peace process to be a ceasefire, Mr Trump has stressed that an overarching peace plan can be negotiated without a ceasefire. Putin has agreed to meet with Mr Zelensky in the coming weeks as the next phase of the peace process. PHOTO: DOUG MILLS/NYTIMES The basic idea of the security guarantees, first broached by Britain and France last February, is that some nations, likely but not necessarily European, would provide soldiers to Ukraine to bolster its forces and create a kind of tripwire that would make Russia hesitate to invade again. Russia said on Aug 18 that it would refuse any such force from Nato countries. Ideally, Ukraine wants weapons, foreign troops and an ironclad plan of how another invasion would be parried. No American soldiers will be deployed to Ukraine, Mr Trump said on Aug 19 on Fox News, but he did not clarify what exactly he would do to support the security guarantees. 'We can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies,' Ms Leavitt told reporters Tuesday. 'The president understands security guarantees are crucially important to ensure a lasting peace, and he has directed his national security team to coordinate with our friends in Europe and also to continue to cooperate and discuss these matters with Ukraine and Russia as well.' What are Putin's red lines? From the outset, Mr Putin has tried to justify invading Ukraine by accusing the West of using the country, once a pillar of the Soviet Union, as a stalking horse to undermine Russia. Mr Putin has repeatedly referred to eradicating what he calls the 'root causes' of the war in Ukraine – his shorthand for achieving his geopolitical goals – as his red line for ending it. Those goals include keeping Ukraine out of Nato and preventing the alliance from expanding farther into former Soviet states. Among his other conditions for ending the war are annexing territory in eastern Ukraine populated mostly by ethnic Russians and ensuring that the Ukrainian military cannot threaten Russia and that the government in Kyiv is not hostile toward Moscow. The Russian military largely failed to achieve those outcomes on the battlefield, so Mr Putin is trying to obtain them through negotiations, by leveraging the fact that Russia controls about 20 per cent of Ukrainian territory. What if the talks collapse? Having made a campaign promise that he would end the war in Ukraine in 24 hours, Mr Trump has acknowledged in recent days that it was a lot harder than he had expected. Some analysts have suggested that he might just walk away, although the quest for a Nobel Peace Prize is also seen as a factor that keeps him engaged. French President Emmanuel Macron said after the talks on Aug 18 that new sanctions on Russia and on countries that trade with Russia, as well as new tariffs on Russia or its trading partners, were still possible. Mr Putin, he noted, has continued to bomb Ukraine even after talking to Trump about peace. While threatening punishing tariffs against Russia's trading partners earlier this summer, Mr Trump rowed back the threat after meeting with Mr Putin in Alaska on Aug 15. NYTIMES

Forum: Accept diversity of perspectives to realise ‘we first' Singapore
Forum: Accept diversity of perspectives to realise ‘we first' Singapore

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: Accept diversity of perspectives to realise ‘we first' Singapore

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox In his National Day Rally, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong called on Singaporeans to build a 'we first' society, one where 'we' must precede 'me'. It is a vision worth embracing. At its heart, 'we first' recognises that government alone cannot create a caring society. Change spreads through countless small acts, through communities and institutions, and through people who look out for one another. Civil society groups are part of this ecosystem by providing help on the ground, gathering lived experiences, and shaping policies so they better reflect the realities of Singaporeans. We see every day how care and courage can transform lives: survivors of sexual violence who choose to make a police report, not only for themselves, but also so the next woman may be spared. We see it in volunteer helpliners who give their time to listen with patience and compassion, guiding callers through difficult options, and in advocates who push for reforms so that laws protect families from harm. These are the voices of 'we first' – people who know the well-being of others is their concern too. But solidarity requires more than neighbourly goodwill. It also needs systems that guard against inequality and abuse. Survivors of sexual violence need not only support services, but also police officers trained to respond sensitively, and laws that recognise emotional and physical abuse. These are not 'me' issues; they are 'we' issues because when women are safe, families and communities are stronger. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail At Aware, we try to make the 'we first' spirit practical. Through our bystander training, people learn how to step in safely when they witness harassment or abuse. When multiplied across society, such skills help create a culture where everyone knows they have a role in preventing harm. Crucially, 'we first' should never mean only one view. Respectful critique and alternative perspectives are part of caring for society. Different voices are not a threat; they are an expression of collective responsibility. If we engage in good faith and listen across divides, policies will be stronger and trust deeper. A 'we first' Singapore is an important aspiration. To realise it, we must embrace not only small acts of kindness, but also the diversity of perspectives that move us closer to justice. Corinna Lim Executive director Aware

Forum: Take lessons in curbing speeding from other states
Forum: Take lessons in curbing speeding from other states

Straits Times

time6 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Forum: Take lessons in curbing speeding from other states

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox I refer to the report ' Over 118,000 speeding violations in first half of 2025 ' (Aug 11). The 45.5 per cent increase in offences over the same period last year highlights an urgent road safety issue. Despite the activation of speed enforcement function in new red-light cameras, the measures remain ineffective. These cameras are found predominantly at traffic junctions, while the most dangerous speeding takes place on expressways. Those on the expressways have fixed locations and are well known. Many drivers simply slow briefly before the cameras and accelerate immediately after, creating the illusion of enforcement without real deterrence. The lack of visible police presence compounds the problem. Other countries have shown better results. In the United Kingdom, the use of permanent average speed cameras, which track the speed of a vehicle over several kilometres, were found to reduce injury collisions, especially more serious ones. Australia and Sweden combine mobile or unmarked patrols with automated enforcement, creating unpredictability that makes drivers think twice before speeding. Singapore can adopt similar measures. Average speed cameras on expressways, more mobile enforcement units, and rotating their presence unpredictably would raise the perceived risk of being caught. Using accident and GPS data via AI to target hot spots would also make enforcement more effective. The planned increase in penalties in 2026 is welcome, but the surge in offences shows we cannot wait. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore NDP 2026 to be held at National Stadium to accommodate more Singaporeans Singapore Girl, 14, among 3 injured after minibus falls into Bukit Panjang canal Singapore Man to be charged after allegedly slashing another man with Swiss knife at City Plaza Singapore Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and ex-CFO gave input to 'play down' energy component of Tuaspring project Singapore FairPrice apologises after worm found in salmon bought from Bedok North outlet Singapore What led to Changi Airport runway incident involving 2 China Eastern Airlines planes in Aug 2024 Singapore Married man who offered cash to 12-year-old girl for sexual acts gets 19 months' jail Every delay risks losing more lives. Stronger enforcement, backed by public education, is needed now to change driver behaviour more effectively than with static cameras alone. Alex Chan

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store