logo
US, China formalize deal on rare earth shipments

US, China formalize deal on rare earth shipments

CNN5 hours ago

China on Friday signaled it would approve the export of rare earth minerals to the US, hours after White House officials said the two sides had reached a deal, in what would be a major breakthrough following weeks of negotiations over US access to the key materials.
Rare earths – essential in everything from everyday electronics to fighter jets – had become a key focus of trade frictions between the world's two largest economies in recent weeks as their tit-for-tat tariff escalation morphed into a supply chain struggle.
'China will approve the export application of controlled items that meet the conditions in accordance with the law. The United States will cancel a series of restrictive measures taken against China accordingly,' China's Ministry of Commerce said in a statement.
The statement was framed as a response to a question that specifically referenced how 'China will accelerate the export of rare earths to the United States.'
The Chinese statement followed comments from US President Donald Trump and his Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick Thursday confirming that the two sides had reached a deal.
The agreement appears to formalize an understanding reached between the two sides earlier this month in London, which the US at the time said needed to be approved by Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.
On Thursday, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick was quoted by Bloomberg News as saying that China is 'going to deliver rare earths to us' and once they do that, 'we'll take down our countermeasures,' referring to the export curbs US imposed on China in May as US officials accused Beijing of not honoring a deal reached that month in Geneva, by holding up rare earth exports.
At a White House event on Thursday Trump said: 'we just signed with China yesterday,' without elaborating.
In its statement Friday, China's Commerce Ministry said it hoped that the two sides could 'continuously enhance consensus, reduce misunderstandings, strengthen cooperation, and jointly promote the healthy, stable and sustainable development of China-US economic and trade relations.'
China controls around 90% of global rare earth processing, according to the International Energy Agency.
The two countries last month in Geneva reached an agreement to de-escalate hefty tariffs that had resulted in a de-facto trade embargo, but that agreement quickly fell apart due to the Trump administration's frustrations that China was not lifting export controls on rare earths that it had imposed following Trump's so-called reciprocal tariffs placed on China in April.
The US, in retaliation, imposed export curbs on chips software, ethane and jet engines, while threatening to revoke the US visas of Chinese students. China said it was complying with the agreement and blamed Washington for reneging on its promises.
Officials from both sides then returned to the negotiating table in London in June.
Following those talks, Trump announced a deal had been reached, pending approval from both national leaders, and that both sides had agreed to ease export restrictions. The US will also allow Chinese college students to attend American universities, Trump suggested.
'Magnets and any necessary rare earths will be supplied up front by China,' he wrote on social media at the time.
Reuters reported this week that the US Commerce Department has allowed ethane traders to load ethane on vessels bound for China. But it has prohibited them from unloading in China without authorization – signs experts interpret as the administration is preparing to lift the curbs.
Under the dual use licensing regime China introduced for rare earths in April, exporters are required to seek approvals for each shipment to customers in any country and submit documentation to verify the intended end use of these materials.
While China has in recent weeks repeatedly said that it has been 'speeding up' approvals of rare earth export licenses for 'compliant' applications, experts and industry insiders have told CNN that many companies are still struggling to secure sufficient supplies of these critical elements and magnets.
Analysts also expect China's dual use export restrictions still prohibit shipments to military suppliers, leaving US defense contractors without access to such materials.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship
Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship

Associated Press

time15 minutes ago

  • Associated Press

Live updates: Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship

The U.S. Supreme Court will issue decisions on the final six cases left on its docket for the summer, including those that are emergency appeals relating to U.S. President Donald Trump's agenda. Cases on the court's emergency docket are handled swiftly, and decisions often come without explanations of the justices' reasoning. Decisions released today will be related to appeals on birthright citizenship, an online age-verfication law in Texas, the Education Department's firing of nearly 1,400 workers and DOGE-related government job cuts. Update: Date: 2025-06-27 13:23:15 Title: The justices will take the bench at 10 a.m. Content: Once they're seated, they'll get right to the opinions. The opinions are announced in reverse order of seniority so that the junior justices go first. It's likely that the birthright citizenship case will be announced last by Chief Justice John Roberts.

Trump admin live updates: White House sticks to megabill deadline despite Senate GOP's Medicaid setback

time16 minutes ago

Trump admin live updates: White House sticks to megabill deadline despite Senate GOP's Medicaid setback

President Donald Trump is back in Washington after his trip overseas for a NATO summit, where allies committed to an increase in defense spending long pushed for by Trump. On Thursday morning, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Dan Caine provided more information about U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, with Hegseth pushing back against a preliminary U.S. intelligence report that said Tehran's nuclear program may have only been set back months. Meanwhile, the Senate is making changes to the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" as Republicans try to meet Trump's Fourth of July deadline for passage.

It's the final opinion day this term— but there's plenty of Supreme Court action to come
It's the final opinion day this term— but there's plenty of Supreme Court action to come

Politico

time19 minutes ago

  • Politico

It's the final opinion day this term— but there's plenty of Supreme Court action to come

The biggest mystery of the day: Will we even get a decision in arguably the most high-profile case the justices heard this year? There's already uncertainty about what the justices will actually decide in a case tied to President Donald Trump's effort to end automatic birthright citizenship — but we also don't know for sure whether the court will even issue a formal opinion or opinions on the matter. That's because the case did not come up through the court's usual process for cases argued before the justices: the merits docket. The case, Trump v. CASA, is actually a trio of emergency applications the Trump administration submitted to the justices in March seeking to sharply cut back nationwide injunctions judges issued against Trump's executive order purporting to end the right to birthright citizenship in the U.S. In a twist, the Justice Department did not ask the court for a quick decision on the legality of Trump's anti-birthright order. (Several lower courts have ruled it blatantly unconstitutional because it conflicts with the text of the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause.) Instead, the administration is attempting to use the dispute as a way to get the Supreme Court to declare that judges can't issue broad orders that protect people with no connection to a pending lawsuit. In an unusual move, the justices agreed to hear arguments on the emergency applications and did so last month. The oral arguments revealed no obvious consensus on the court about how to proceed or whether the case is a good vehicle to address broader concerns about the scope of nationwide injunctions. There were even some indications that the justices might want to dig into the birthright citizenship issue, which was not the focus of the legal briefs. Because the case is up as an emergency matter, the court could forgo an opinion and simply deny the applications — at any time — in a terse order with little or no explanation of its reasoning. It could also decide it wants to get full briefing and argument on the substance of the birthright citizenship issue this fall and punt on the injunctions issue until then, leaving Trump's birthright policy on hold.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store