Robert Burns portrait sells for more than 160 times original estimate
The picture, painted in the manner of Sir Henry Raeburn, fetched £84,320 (including buyer's premium) at auction in London this week.
Scotland's national bard is said to have been a reluctant sitter and very few contemporary portraits of him exist.
The most well known, by Alexander Nasmyth, is on display at the Scottish National Portrait Gallery in Edinburgh.
The painting of Burns sold at Wimbledon Auctions this week is thought to have been influenced by the Nasmyth painting with a similar pose and outfit.
It was found during a house clearance in Surrey.
Felix Turner, director of Wimbledon Auctions, said: 'I am delighted to have achieved such a great price for this very rare portrait of Robert Burns.
'Consigned as part of a local house clearance, the painting fetched a whopping £68,000 hammer plus 24% buyer's premium (£84,320).
'Four telephone bidders and numerous online bidders competed for the lot in a 10-minute bidding battle.
'I am thrilled to have discovered the painting, which depicts such an important figure in Scottish history as Robert Burns.'
The painting, originally valued at £300-£500, had been in the house from which it was cleared for many years and has been sold on behalf of the family who owned it.
Robert Burns was born on January 25 1759 in Alloway, Ayrshire, and died in Dumfries aged 37 on July 21 1796.
The painting sold at Wimbledon Auctions on Monday has not been given a precise date and is described as being in the manner of Sir Henry Raeburn, the acclaimed Scottish portrait painter who lived from 1756 to 1823.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
23 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
I'm fed up – what's the point in Spider-Man taking over Glasgow?
Once again, the streets of Glasgow are being taken over by some uncanny valley New York City simulation. Spider-Man: Brand New Day continues filming for most of this month, with The Herald reporting that its stay in the centre has just been extended. Read more: Marvel extends Glasgow shoot for new Spider-Man movie The spectacle of major Hollywood productions arriving in Glasgow still draws huge fanfare. Spectators are crowding the set even on non-filming days just to soak up the scene. On filming days, curiosity peaks when large-scale movie magic is being constructed and executed right in front of our eyes. And who could miss the small chance of power couple Tom Holland and Zendaya possibly making an appearance in front of the little people? But it is a disruption with diminishing returns. Glasgow has already suffered through this rodeo before with Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny and The Batman – and saw a huge waste of resources and labour thrown at the Batgirl film that was eventually cancelled and shelved altogether. In the end, its $90 million budget resulted in a neat little tax write-off for Warner Bros, but not much else. As Glasgow continues to transform into a playground for Hollywood executives taking advantage of tax, labour, and location incentives to keep their budgets down, how long will the public accept the everyday disruption to their lives? It may still seem novel at this point, and able to capture stars in eyes, but there will come a time when the glossy façade becomes second nature, and the logic and purpose behind these elaborate shoots in the dense city will come up empty. I suppose the people of Glasgow could just be eternally grateful that Hollywood continues to prefer the city as a shooting location, but then I would like to think Glasgow has more dignity than that. The story of Glasgow becoming a satellite state for Hollywood production is twofold. On one side, Hollywood studios are contracting more production work outside of their native California, citing the large toll of the state's tax and labour costs. Read more: Trump film tariff proves Scottish film cannot afford to sell out to Hollywood One egregious example is the game show The Floor, hosted by Rob Lowe. It is standard trivia game fare that doesn't require much more than a soundstage (something that Hollywood studio backlots are full of), yet it films on a soundstage in Ireland. That's right, it is somehow cheaper for Hollywood to ship the set, the crew and its star host over to Ireland than it is to film in their literal back garden. The entire system of production is backwards and hilariously broken. From this broken mess comes the other side, where ministers in the Scottish Government observed the beneficial scraps that other smaller countries like Ireland and Denmark were receiving and wanted in on the action. Now, Scotland competes with these other countries and will need to provide ever-increasing incentives to stay in the picture. There's nowhere to go except a race to the bottom in accommodating the ever-bigger demands of the major studios. How much longer will large-scale productions continue to dazzle a spectating public? (Image: Colin Mearns) The government and Screen Scotland's rallying cry when pushback arises to the spectacle is that such large productions boost the local economy and promote tourism. In what ways and how is still a mystery, and there is little transparency, as if they are being wilfully obtuse about the tangible benefits of it all. And it seems counterintuitive, considering how such shoots block off and shut down chunks of the local economy while filming runs. Councils pay off the businesses to shut down, but that's to the businesses, not the workers. Many of the workers based on these streets are under zero-hour contracts and won't see a penny of restitution. These workers, who likely survive month to month, are seeing their income shrivelling the more production takes up space and resources. Read more: How the Scottish Government's deal with Hollywood failed I'm sure the whole operation works out nicely for a governmental body looking to promote something, but is this really the way for government and councils to seek economic opportunity? It, in effect, turns our arts and culture sector into a business, with all its major decisions branching from its economic standpoint. Something never, ever asked is this: what artistic and cultural value do these large-scale public shoots contribute? Forget the suit talk of economic and tourist benefits – you're never going to personally experience that money – what about these shoots enriches Glasgow and Scotland in its heart, its soul, or its spirit? My guess is nothing. Zilch. Nada.
Western Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Edinburgh Council remarks about Oasis fans ‘snobby', Scottish Secretary says
Ian Murray suggested the comments, made before the band's sold-out reunion tour, were 'classist'. He said it was part of a wider issue, referencing the alcohol ban at football matches, which is not in place for rugby, which he also described as 'snobby'. Liam and Noel Gallagher on stage (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Speaking at the Fringe, comedian Matt Forde told Mr Murray the council was not 'excited' about Oasis after it suggested the city should be 'prepared for an influx of overweight, middle-aged men who drink too much'. Mr Murray joked the description 'sounds like a full council meeting', before adding: 'I think it's snobby. 'I mean, Murrayfield is a great example. You can go and see Scotland versus the All Blacks on a Saturday at three o'clock and get as ratted as you want sitting watching the rugby, and people do, they spend most of their time at the bar. 'And I remember my team, Hearts, played Celtic there the following day on the Sunday, when Hampden was out of use for the Commonwealth Games, and there was a complete ban on drinking in the stands for the football fans. That's just classist and snobbery.' Asked if he wanted to bring back drinking at football stadiums, the Scottish Secretary joked it was either that 'or not have rugby drinking'. In June, Edinburgh council came under fire from Oasis fans, and the band itself, after safety briefings showed officials' concerns about the crowds descending on the city for the group's performance at Murrayfield, which clashes with the Fringe. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray (Ben Whitley/PA) One note from the documents showed council officials warning that 'middle-aged men take up more room, consider this when working out occupancy'. Another detailed 'concern about crowds of Oasis on weekends as they are already rowdy and the tone of the band'. It added: 'Concerned about the safety of the Fringe and its performers. Many performers are considering not attending for that weekend.' One document suggested there would be 'medium to high intoxication' at the concert, and to expect a 'substantial amount of older fans', but added there had been 'minimal arrests' at recent events involving either of the Gallagher brothers. Responding on social media at the time, Liam Gallagher said: 'To the Edinburgh council I've heard what you said about Oasis fans and quite frankly your attitude f****** stinks I'd leave town that day if I was any of you lot.' In a second post, he added: 'I'd love to see a picture of all the people on the Edinburgh council bet there's some real stunning individuals.' City of Edinburgh Council has been approached for comment.
Rhyl Journal
43 minutes ago
- Rhyl Journal
Edinburgh Council remarks about Oasis fans ‘snobby', Scottish Secretary says
Ian Murray suggested the comments, made before the band's sold-out reunion tour, were 'classist'. He said it was part of a wider issue, referencing the alcohol ban at football matches, which is not in place for rugby, which he also described as 'snobby'. Speaking at the Fringe, comedian Matt Forde told Mr Murray the council was not 'excited' about Oasis after it suggested the city should be 'prepared for an influx of overweight, middle-aged men who drink too much'. Mr Murray joked the description 'sounds like a full council meeting', before adding: 'I think it's snobby. 'I mean, Murrayfield is a great example. You can go and see Scotland versus the All Blacks on a Saturday at three o'clock and get as ratted as you want sitting watching the rugby, and people do, they spend most of their time at the bar. 'And I remember my team, Hearts, played Celtic there the following day on the Sunday, when Hampden was out of use for the Commonwealth Games, and there was a complete ban on drinking in the stands for the football fans. That's just classist and snobbery.' Asked if he wanted to bring back drinking at football stadiums, the Scottish Secretary joked it was either that 'or not have rugby drinking'. In June, Edinburgh council came under fire from Oasis fans, and the band itself, after safety briefings showed officials' concerns about the crowds descending on the city for the group's performance at Murrayfield, which clashes with the Fringe. One note from the documents showed council officials warning that 'middle-aged men take up more room, consider this when working out occupancy'. Another detailed 'concern about crowds of Oasis on weekends as they are already rowdy and the tone of the band'. It added: 'Concerned about the safety of the Fringe and its performers. Many performers are considering not attending for that weekend.' One document suggested there would be 'medium to high intoxication' at the concert, and to expect a 'substantial amount of older fans', but added there had been 'minimal arrests' at recent events involving either of the Gallagher brothers. Responding on social media at the time, Liam Gallagher said: 'To the Edinburgh council I've heard what you said about Oasis fans and quite frankly your attitude f****** stinks I'd leave town that day if I was any of you lot.' In a second post, he added: 'I'd love to see a picture of all the people on the Edinburgh council bet there's some real stunning individuals.' City of Edinburgh Council has been approached for comment.
