
Ontario environment minister apologizes for ‘confusion' over clean water bill letter
TORONTO — Ontario's environment minister has apologized to First Nation chiefs for any 'confusion' his letter caused when he asked the federal government to not reintroduce a bill that would enshrine clean drinking water rights in law.
But many First Nations are not accepting what they call a meaningless apology and still want Todd McCarthy fired.
'The intention of my previous letter was to highlight the urgent need for the federal government to ensure a regulatory environment that fosters economic growth and prosperity for all of Canada, including for First Nations communities, while respecting provincial jurisdiction,' McCarthy wrote in a letter sent to all First Nation chiefs and grand chiefs across the province.
'We strongly believe this is not an either-or proposition: we can and need to bring clean drinking water to First Nations communities, while also bringing the kind of regulatory certainty that attracts investment in businesses and communities. I apologize for the confusion caused by the previous letter.'
Anishinabek Nation Grand Council Chief Linda Debassige was fuming on Friday.
She called McCarthy 'absolutely incompetent' and said his latest letter was insulting. The biggest issue, she said, was that he did not withdraw his request to the federal government.
'It's all smoke and mirrors because he got caught and now he's trying to cover his tracks,' said Debassige, whose organization represents 39 First Nations in northern and southern Ontario.
'This is not a meaningful apology and he's assuming that our leadership is not intelligent in this letter.'
He needs to lose his job, Debassige said.
'I think the premier has both now a moral and ethical obligation to respond to this insanity by removing this minister,' she said.
The province has said McCarthy will remain in his post.
Last month, McCarthy and Alberta Environment Minister Rebecca Schulz wrote to federal Environment Minister Julie Dabrusin asking her to move away from legislation that they say would 'delay project development and undermine competitiveness.'
They singled out Bill C-61, legislation introduced in the last Parliament that sought to ensure First Nations have access to clean drinking water and can protect fresh water sources on their territories.
The bill faced a lengthy committee process but was not passed into law before Parliament was prorogued earlier this year. Dabrusin said last week that her government plans to reintroduce it in the fall.
Now Debassige, who helped draft the legislation with the federal government, is worried Ottawa may change the clean drinking water bill and weaken it in response.
There are 37 First Nations across the country that have long-term boil-water advisories, and 26 of them are in Ontario. Neskantaga First Nation in northern Ontario has not had clean drinking tap water for more than 30 years.
The Chiefs of Ontario, which represents all 133 First Nations in the province, and Nishnawbe Aski Nation, which represents 49 First Nations in northwestern Ontario, condemned McCarthy's request.
New Democrat and official Opposition Leader Marit Stiles said she's met young First Nation women in their 20s and 30s who have never been able to drink water from the taps.
'The minister of environment had the gall to ask the federal government to suspend any actions to solve that problem,' Stiles said. 'It is depraved and outrageous.'
The environment minister's original letter to the federal government came at a fraught time for the province.
Premier Doug Ford's government recently passed Bill 5 into law. The aim of that legislation is to speed up the approval and construction of large projects, including mines.
One part of that bill gave cabinet the power to suspend provincial and municipal laws through the creation of so-called 'special economic zones.'
Ford has said the mineral-rich Ring of Fire in northern Ontario will be the first such zone.
That law sparked numerous protests at Queen's Park in Toronto. A similar bill introduced by Prime Minister Mark Carney's Liberal government that recently passed into law strips away many land protections in an effort to quickly build projects deemed in the 'national interest.'
In response, community members from Attawapiskat First Nation and Neskantaga First Nation have begun building permanent encampments along the Attawapiskat River at two proposed bridge crossings for the road to the Ring of Fire.
McCarthy's apology was the second by the province to First Nations in recent weeks.
Debassige and several dozen First Nation chiefs met with Premier Doug Ford a few weeks ago to discuss Bill 5. Ford had said the day before that First Nations should stop coming to him 'hat in hand' if they don't get on board with the bill.
He then apologized to Debassige and those chiefs in a private meeting before repeating it at a news conference on live television. Debassige and the chiefs accepted that apology and agreed to move forward with extensive consultations on the new law.
Debassige said Ford told them that day he was in full support of clean drinking water for all Ontario First Nations and was going to figure out a way to help.
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 11, 2025.
Liam Casey, The Canadian Press
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
16 minutes ago
- National Post
Jesse Kline: Air Canada strike brought to you by the Liberal government
For years, the Liberals have worked to increase the power of Canada's labour unions, and the monster they created is now coming back to bite them as Air Canada's flight attendants walk off the job, grounding hundreds of flights. But Ottawa can start to fix the mess it created by opening the airline market to more competition, thus lessening the impact that strikes have on consumers. Article content Article content It's no coincidence that the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), which represents more than 10,000 Air Canada employees, chose this moment to go on strike and throw the country's air transportation network into chaos. Article content Article content Article content The contract between the airline and its flight attendants ended in March, but the union waited until the height of the summer travel season to walk off the job, in a move that has so far affected around 500,000 travellers. Article content Thanks to legislation passed last year that banned the use of replacement workers in federally regulated industries, including air travel, the union knew the airline would have little recourse if its members hit the picket line. And given the Liberals' penchant for intervening in labour disputes, CUPE could also be fairly certain the government would try to order the striking flight attendants back to work, after doing so in disputes involving Canada's major railways and postal service last year. Article content And so it was that after Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu ordered the Canada Industrial Relations Board (CIRB) to force the flight attendants back to work and send the parties to binding arbitration on Saturday, Mark Hancock, CUPE's national president, tore up the back-to-work order and vowed to challenge it. Article content Article content On Monday morning, the CIRB declared the strike 'unlawful' and ordered workers back on the job 'immediately.' As of this writing, it's unclear whether the union intends to continue to defy the mandate. Article content Article content The situation highlights the catch-22 the Liberals now find themselves in: their interventionist, pro-labour policies have reduced the incentive for unions to settle disputes at the bargaining table, forcing Ottawa to step in to alleviate the resulting political headache caused by major disruptions in markets that are dominated by a few large players. Article content It's a classic case of the state stepping in with Big Government policies to fix problems caused by other interventionist measures. But it's also an opportunity for the Liberals to read the room and enact reforms that will attract foreign investment, make the country more competitive and reduce prices for consumers. Article content To do that, the government should follow the advice of its own Competition Bureau, which released a report in the spring advocating for more competition in Canada's airline market. Article content To be sure, there have been some noticeable improvements in recent years. According to the competition watchdog, thanks to upstart airlines like Porter and Flair, market concentration dropped by 10 per cent between 2019 and 2023. Article content But Air Canada and WestJet still account for between 56 and 78 per cent of all domestic passenger traffic departing from Canada's major airports. This is a direct result of government policies that favour incumbent carriers, increase costs and limit foreign ownership and competition. Article content One of the major barriers faced by new airlines, according to the Competition Bureau, is the high cost of government taxes and fees that are tacked onto ticket prices. Article content Some of them are designed to ensure the cost of running Canada's air transportation network is paid by travellers, which makes perfect sense. But ticket prices are also affected by fuel taxes and high airport fees, which Ottawa simply treats as a cash cow. Article content This assertion is backed up by research released Monday by the Montreal Economic Institute (MEI), which found that the exorbitant rents the federal government charges airport authorities is significantly driving up the cost of air travel. Article content Article content According to MEI, airports sent Ottawa close to $500 million in rental fees last year, which is up 68 per cent since 2014. Article content All told, the think tank found that the average airport improvement fee paid in Canada is four times higher than in the United States. Airport security charges and fuel taxes are also far higher in Canada than in peer countries, such as the U.S. and Australia. Article content These costs make it harder for discount carriers to compete based on price. The Competition Bureau says that taxes and fees constitute 30 per cent of the ticket price on major carriers, but that those 'costs take up an even higher share of what passengers pay for flights on ultra-low-cost carriers,' which makes them less profitable. Article content New carriers are also constrained by airport procedures, which often favour incumbents. Smaller, secondary airports in major cities can provide consumers and airlines with more options, but are hamstrung by the size of their runways and legal restrictions that only allow one international airport in certain regions. Article content Article content A good example is Toronto's Billy Bishop Airport, which is often cheaper and more convenient than Pearson Airport, but was prevented from hosting long-haul flights when the Liberals kiboshed plans to extend its runway to accommodate passenger jets in 2015. Article content Yet the biggest impediments to airline competition are the government's restrictions on foreign ownership and its prohibition on foreign carriers flying domestic routes. Article content In 2018, Ottawa increased the share of Canadian airlines that foreigners are allowed to own, but the Competition Bureau doesn't think it went far enough. Article content It recommends the rules be changed so that a single foreign investor can own up to 49 per cent of a Canadian carrier, and that the government create a new class of airline that can only serve domestic routes but can be fully owned by non-Canadians. Article content The competition watchdog also suggests Ottawa start allowing 'airlines from partner countries to fly domestic service within Canada.'


CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Dalhousie University faculty to be locked out Wednesday unless deal is made
Dalhousie University will lock out more than 1,000 faculty members Wednesday unless both parties agree to a new collective agreement. The Dalhousie Faculty Association – which represents full-time professors, librarians, counsellors and instructors – and the board of governors have been engaged in negotiations for a new deal since May. The previous three-year collective agreement expired at the end of June. Last week, Dalhousie president Kim Brooks issued the university's final offer to the union, proposing a wage increase of two per cent per year for three years. David Westwood, president of the Association, previously told CTV News Atlantic the union is looking for a seven per cent wage increase in the first year, followed by four per cent increases in the second and third years. The university, which reported a $20.6-million deficit in its 2025-2026 operating budget, previously said it had 'significant financial challenges' in meeting the Association's wage increase request. In a statement on Monday, the university put out its intention to lock out members of the union at 9:30 a.m. Wednesday unless a deal is reached. 'An August lockout would disrupt a lot of teaching,' Westwood previously said. 'It's also a top month when graduate students are defending their theses. All those defences would be terminated if there's a lockout. Our members would be unable to do the preparations to get ready for September.' The Dalhousie website says the campus would remain open during a lockout, but all classes taught by Association members would be suspended. If the lockout extends into the fall term, students will receive further instruction about possible course suspensions. All other employees outside the Association will report to work as usual. For more Nova Scotia news, visit our dedicated provincial page


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Air Canada flight attendants ordered back to work but remain on strike: What's next?
There is chaos in the skies — or more precisely, on the ground — as the labour dispute between Air Canada and its 10,000 flight attendants, represented by the Canadian Union of Public Employees (CUPE), drags on. Article content On Saturday, the federal government ordered the striking attendants back to work and declared there would be binding arbitration between the two parties by the Canadian Industrial Relations Board (CIRB). But the union said no, a decision that could end in jail time for its leaders. Here's what to know. Article content Article content Article content 'Air Canada has really refused to bargain with us, and they refused to bargain with us because they knew this government would come in on their white horse and try and save the day,' CUPE national president Mark Hancock said. He said the union felt the 'whole process has been unfair.' Article content On Monday, the CIRB reiterated that the strike by the flight attendants was illegal, and has ordered the union's leadership to direct its members to return to work. The union said it has received National Post's request for comment and will respond soon. Article content Meanwhile, labour experts say this has happened before, but rarely. Article content Sundeep Gokhale, an employment and labour lawyer and partner at Sherrard Kuzz LLP, told CTV News on Monday: 'We haven't seen this type of defiance in quite a long time in terms of an outright refusal despite government orders as well in legal decisions requiring employees to return to work.' Article content Article content In 1978 a strike by the Canadian Union of Postal Workers was met with back-to-work legislation. When the workers refused, the government arrested the entire CUPW national executive. A month later, a federally appointed judge sentenced union president Jean-Claude Parrot to three months in jail and 18 months' probation for defying Parliament. Article content Article content Hancock seemed aware of the precedent when he told reporters on Monday: 'We will not be returning to the skies. If it means folks like me (are) going to jail, so be it.' Article content In a word, stranded. Air Canada cancelled hundreds of additional flights on Sunday in the wake of the union's response. The airline has said it will do what it can to rebook passengers on other airlines, but this is a busy time of year for flying, and there are limited alternatives available.