
Chicago O'Hare battle: United has a tactical advantage over American
A legal battle playing out between American Airlines on one side and the city of Chicago and United Airlines on the other could shape the future competitive landscape at Chicago O'Hare.
At issue is scarce gate space at the airport, the nation's fourth busiest, in which both United and American maintain hubs. United currently utilizes 90 O'Hare gates, according to the Chicago Department of Aviation, while American utilizes 71. But the balance would shift further in United's favor if a preliminary gate space redistribution by the city is implemented.
Under the proposed decision, United would gain approximately five gates and American would lose approximately four gates, according to a lawsuit American filed against the city on May 2. Under O'Hare's formula, gate access is redistributed based on how much each carrier utilized their gates during the previous calendar year. The changes would take effect in October.
United, which has petitioned to intervene in the case on the side of the city, said that it could actually gain six or more gates. Chicago is slated to announce a final determination on June 1.
Brett Snyder, an airline industry analyst who pens the Cranky Flier blog, said that a United net pickup of 10 gates on American at O'Hare could be decisive for the airline, which has already substantially tipped the balance of power at the airport in its favor.
"This could set in motion a process for United to keep getting gates while making it harder for American to continue to keep the gates it has," Snyder said.
Post-pandemic usage gap
United built back from the pandemic much quicker at O'Hare than American, increasing its annual seat count lead at the airport between 2019 and 2024 from 9.3 million to 13 million. Last year, American offered 24.3% fewer O'Hare seats than in 2019, while United flew 99.2% of its 2019 seat count, Cirium flight schedule data shows.
This summer, United is slated to fly 10.2% more O'Hare seats than last summer. American, meanwhile, is building aggressively at O'Hare and has upped its summer schedule by 20.9% year over year.
At the heart of American's lawsuit is timing. The airline contends that the city of Chicago, at the request of United, began the gate redetermination process prematurely and in violation of a lease agreement that the Department of Aviation negotiated with airlines in 2018 to lay the groundwork for an O'Hare expansion.
During those 2018 negotiations, American declined to sign on until the city agreed to expedite the construction of three common-use gates in the airport's L Concourse, next to gates American already operates. The last of those so-called L-Stinger gates became operational on March 14.
In its complaint, American contends that it signed onto the 2018 lease agreement after extracting a commitment from the city that it would have 12 months to ramp up its gate usage after all the new L-Stinger gates became operational. Only then could the Department of Aviation conduct a usage assessment. With American aggressively growing at O'Hare this year, its allocation would presumably be higher if the process were delayed.
But language in the lease instead sets the timing of the reallocation around completion of expansion work in Terminal 5. For its argument, American is relying on a map, referenced in that same lease clause, that depicts the L-Stinger gates as well as on separate communications with the city.
Will AA fight to keep up?
In its Q1 earnings call, United boasted of its growing strength in terms of brand-loyal passengers at O'Hare and other hubs. At O'Hare, those claims are supported by the carrier's growing gap over American in terms of yield, defined as revenue per passenger mile flown: United did 13% better on per-mile yield than American in the fourth quarter of 2024, according to Cirium.
Snyder said that if United's gate lead at American increases, American could still fight back. But doing so might not be worth it.
"If United keeps up the pressure and they utilize the hell out of those gates, then they will probably get a higher percentage of total traffic," he said. "What American can do is try to keep up and keep adding and adding. Or they may decide it's not worth it and drop back in Chicago."
A status hearing in American's case is set for June 25.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Wall Street Journal
16 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Supreme Court Allows DOGE Access to Social Security Data
WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Friday cleared the way for members of the Department of Government Efficiency, a cost-cutting group once led by Elon Musk, to access sensitive Social Security Administration records. Granting an emergency request by the Trump administration, the justices lifted a lower court order that for now had barred DOGE employees or affiliates from accessing the agency's systems and directed them to delete personal information they already had gathered.


E&E News
16 minutes ago
- E&E News
What's next for DOGE after the wild Trump-Musk breakup?
The very public internet feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk this week has thrown the fate of Musk's 'Department of Government Efficiency' operation into question. A clash over the Trump-backed spending bill devolved Thursday, with Musk suggesting Trump ought to be impeached and the president suggesting halting government contracts for Musk's companies. Trump downplayed the significance of the pair's blowup Thursday evening, and Republicans appeared eager to ease tensions after their dispute dominated headlines. But their bitter public brawl has raised a host of questions about how the Trump-Musk relationship will change moving forward. Advertisement Some federal employees are hopeful that DOGE will lose power within the administration after its early push to slash funding and fire employees. The fracas also raises questions about whether Musk's allies who remain in the DOGE operation will stick around, or might leave — or be nudged out — sooner than they had planned. 'The girls are fighting, and I'm here for it,' said one Energy Department career official who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'This could bode well for shaking things loose at DOE,' that person said. 'Right now, there is an ironclad hold on all funding activities, and that freeze is mostly at the request of DOGE.' Asked Friday about DOGE's fate in the wake of the Trump-Musk fight, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email, 'The Trump administration will continue the mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse across all agencies to ensure the federal government is effectively using taxpayer dollars.' Rogers added that the passage of 'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill' and the rescissions package the White House sent to Congress are 'essential to further codifying the DOGE cuts.' EPA and the Energy and Interior departments did not respond to requests for comment about whether DOGE's stature within the administration and inside federal agencies will change in the wake of the fight. 'We were hopeful for this failure of relationships,' said an Interior Department employee who was granted anonymity because they fear retaliation. 'There is still a feeling that DOGE is heavily influencing things here,' due in part 'to contracts and agreements being scrutinized,' that person said. The public spat between Trump and Musk could give agency heads like Energy Secretary Chris Wright more leeway to make decisions independently, said a former Energy Department career staffer who was granted anonymity because they fear retribution. Musk being on the outs could also possibly make new hires and normal funding flow a little more likely, said that former staffer, who added that it's unclear whether the gutting of agency staffing and funding was due to Musk's efforts in particular. Tom Pyle, president of the conservative think tank Institute for Energy Research, said it's 'too early to tell' what the feud means for DOGE over the long term. Musk formally left his DOGE post last week, when Trump hosted a farewell event with the Tesla CEO in the Oval Office. Musk said last Friday that his exit was not the 'end of DOGE, but really the beginning.' When Trump created DOGE, he required agencies to establish their own DOGE teams. Many of the officials deployed early on by the administration have ties to Musk's companies, including SpaceX, X and xAI. Trump praised the DOGE team's work last week and said that many DOGE people would be 'staying behind' after Musk's departure. Musk contended at the time that he was leaving because his time as a temporary special government employee had come to an end, but Trump disputed that claim in one of his disparaging posts Thursday on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump posted. It remains to be seen whether DOGE was 'just a pet project that Donald Trump created for Elon Musk,' said Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist. The answer will become clear pretty quickly, Payne said. 'I think it's probably a pretty good bet that at a minimum it is not the high-profile effort that it was.' But even if there's a public effort to declare a truce, Payne said, 'I doubt the relationship between their collective worlds will ever be OK.' Despite the rift, Republicans and some agency employees aren't expecting an immediate or dramatic shift in DOGE's work at agencies. 'The DOGE folks that have been planted in these agencies have some pretty firm backing from the White House, and I don't think this changes that dynamic,' Pyle said. 'I think that they're still empowered to do their work, at least for now.' Sean Spicer, who served as White House press secretary during Trump's first term, said DOGE 'is much bigger than a group of staff. It has been a mentality that is now part of every department and agency.' Trump's energy and environmental Cabinet bosses — Wright, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin — were all together in Alaska this week to discuss energy issues and stayed out of the fray on social media. They have all previously praised Musk and the DOGE team's work. Nicole Cantello, president of an American Federation of Government Employees union local that represents employees in EPA's Chicago-based region, doesn't expect big changes in store for DOGE. 'We believe the spat between Trump and Musk will have no effect on the plan to dismantle the EPA,' Cantello said Friday. 'This administration has shown time and again that it is determined to put polluters first, over the health of the American people.'


E&E News
17 minutes ago
- E&E News
DC Circuit upholds FERC decision on Mountain Valley expansion
A federal appeals court Friday upheld a decision by federal regulators that granted developers more time to complete a natural gas pipeline expansion in Virginia and North Carolina. The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission 'reasonably found that [Mountain Valley Pipeline LLC] had satisfied the good cause standard in seeking an extension' for the MVP Southgate project, Senior Judge Harry Edwards wrote in an opinion for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Given that developers focused their 'efforts on securing authorization' for the main, 303-mile Mountain Valley pipeline project, 'MVP made a good faith effort to meet the original Southgate deadline,' said Edwards, a Carter appointee. Advertisement The MVP Southgate project, approved by FERC in June 2020, was originally conceived as a 75-mile extension to the mainline Mountain Valley project. That main pipeline started operating last year and connects West Virginia with southern Virginia. MVP Southgate would continue on into North Carolina.