logo
Chicago O'Hare battle: United has a tactical advantage over American

Chicago O'Hare battle: United has a tactical advantage over American

Travel Weekly20-05-2025
A legal battle playing out between American Airlines on one side and the city of Chicago and United Airlines on the other could shape the future competitive landscape at Chicago O'Hare.
At issue is scarce gate space at the airport, the nation's fourth busiest, in which both United and American maintain hubs. United currently utilizes 90 O'Hare gates, according to the Chicago Department of Aviation, while American utilizes 71. But the balance would shift further in United's favor if a preliminary gate space redistribution by the city is implemented.
Under the proposed decision, United would gain approximately five gates and American would lose approximately four gates, according to a lawsuit American filed against the city on May 2. Under O'Hare's formula, gate access is redistributed based on how much each carrier utilized their gates during the previous calendar year. The changes would take effect in October.
United, which has petitioned to intervene in the case on the side of the city, said that it could actually gain six or more gates. Chicago is slated to announce a final determination on June 1.
Brett Snyder, an airline industry analyst who pens the Cranky Flier blog, said that a United net pickup of 10 gates on American at O'Hare could be decisive for the airline, which has already substantially tipped the balance of power at the airport in its favor.
"This could set in motion a process for United to keep getting gates while making it harder for American to continue to keep the gates it has," Snyder said.
Post-pandemic usage gap
United built back from the pandemic much quicker at O'Hare than American, increasing its annual seat count lead at the airport between 2019 and 2024 from 9.3 million to 13 million. Last year, American offered 24.3% fewer O'Hare seats than in 2019, while United flew 99.2% of its 2019 seat count, Cirium flight schedule data shows.
This summer, United is slated to fly 10.2% more O'Hare seats than last summer. American, meanwhile, is building aggressively at O'Hare and has upped its summer schedule by 20.9% year over year.
At the heart of American's lawsuit is timing. The airline contends that the city of Chicago, at the request of United, began the gate redetermination process prematurely and in violation of a lease agreement that the Department of Aviation negotiated with airlines in 2018 to lay the groundwork for an O'Hare expansion.
During those 2018 negotiations, American declined to sign on until the city agreed to expedite the construction of three common-use gates in the airport's L Concourse, next to gates American already operates. The last of those so-called L-Stinger gates became operational on March 14.
In its complaint, American contends that it signed onto the 2018 lease agreement after extracting a commitment from the city that it would have 12 months to ramp up its gate usage after all the new L-Stinger gates became operational. Only then could the Department of Aviation conduct a usage assessment. With American aggressively growing at O'Hare this year, its allocation would presumably be higher if the process were delayed.
But language in the lease instead sets the timing of the reallocation around completion of expansion work in Terminal 5. For its argument, American is relying on a map, referenced in that same lease clause, that depicts the L-Stinger gates as well as on separate communications with the city.
Will AA fight to keep up?
In its Q1 earnings call, United boasted of its growing strength in terms of brand-loyal passengers at O'Hare and other hubs. At O'Hare, those claims are supported by the carrier's growing gap over American in terms of yield, defined as revenue per passenger mile flown: United did 13% better on per-mile yield than American in the fourth quarter of 2024, according to Cirium.
Snyder said that if United's gate lead at American increases, American could still fight back. But doing so might not be worth it.
"If United keeps up the pressure and they utilize the hell out of those gates, then they will probably get a higher percentage of total traffic," he said. "What American can do is try to keep up and keep adding and adding. Or they may decide it's not worth it and drop back in Chicago."
A status hearing in American's case is set for June 25.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Howard Marks Sees a Bubble Brewing--And He's Not the Only One
Howard Marks Sees a Bubble Brewing--And He's Not the Only One

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Howard Marks Sees a Bubble Brewing--And He's Not the Only One

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Oaktree's Howard Marks (Trades, Portfolio) isn't screaming fireyetbut he's definitely pointing at the smoke. In a Wednesday interview with Bloomberg, the famed credit investor said U.S. equities are in the early days of bubble territory, with valuations that feel disconnected from reality. Some of the market's current behavior, he said, reminds him of the late '90s tech craze, when Alan Greenspan warned of irrational exuberanceand the market still marched on for years before collapsing. People get out of the habit of thinking about market corrections, Marks warned, adding that a reversion to the mean is not just possible, but likely. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Sign with HON. What's fueling this exuberance? According to Marks, the market has been enjoying a relief rally since Donald Trump's April tariff announcement. But that rally, he argued in a recent memo, needs a firmer foundation to justify today's price levels. One red flag he's watching: the total market cap of U.S. equities has reached a record high relative to GDP. And with more companies being taken private or staying private longer, that figure could be even more distorted than it looks on the surface. For investors looking to play defense, Marks is leaning into credit over stocks. Even with tight spreads, he sees credit as the safer corner of the room compared to richly priced equities like Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA). He still calls the U.S. the best place in the world to invest, but with a twist: it's like buying a luxury car at full sticker pricestill world-class, just not cheap. The fundamentals may not be broken, but they're no longer doing all the heavy lifting. Sign in to access your portfolio

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed
Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Federal Reserve Vice Chair Pushes for Small Crypto Stakes at the Fed

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Federal Reserve Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman thinks Fed staff should be able to dip a toe into crypto literally. Speaking at the Wyoming Blockchain Symposium on Tuesday, she argued examiners need real-life experience with digital assets if they're going to regulate them effectively. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 5 Warning Signs with NVDA. Our approach should consider allowing Federal Reserve staff to hold de minimus amounts of crypto, Bowman said, comparing it to learning a sport. I wouldn't trust someone to teach me to ski if they'd never put on skis. She stressed this isn't about encouraging speculation, but about giving examiners the hands-on perspective they need. Bowman also warned that strict investment bans might be scaring off talented people who could help the Fed shape crypto oversight. Her comments come just as the landscape is shifting. Congress recently passed the GENIUS Act, aimed at stablecoins, and the Fed shut down its Biden-era crypto monitoring program last week. Trump administration officials now say they want a clearer, more permanent regulatory framework. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Delta and United Sued Over Windowless 'Window Seats'
Delta and United Sued Over Windowless 'Window Seats'

Yahoo

time2 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Delta and United Sued Over Windowless 'Window Seats'

This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Delta Air Lines (DAL, Financials) and United Airlines (UAL, Financials) were hit with lawsuits Tuesday claiming they charged passengers extra for window seats that turned out to be next to blank walls. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with UAL. Proposed class actions were filed in Brooklyn federal court against Delta and in San Francisco federal court against United. Each seeks millions of dollars in damages on behalf of more than 1 million passengers. The complaints cite Boeing 737s, Boeing 757s and Airbus A321s, where window rows are blocked by air-conditioning ducts or electrical conduits. Rivals including Alaska Airlines (ALK, Financials) and American Airlines (AAL, Financials) flag such seats during booking, but Delta and United allegedly do not. Passengers said they purchased window seats to ease fear of flying or motion sickness, entertain children, or simply enjoy the view. Had plaintiffs and the class members known that the seats they were purchasing were windowless, they would not have selected them much less have paid extra, one complaint said. The lawsuits add pressure on airlines already leaning on ancillary fees for revenue, from seat selection to baggage and cabin upgrades. United and Delta did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store