Francesca Albanese sanctions ‘create chilling effect' on UN experts, warn rapporteurs
'It's a dangerous precedent because it creates a chilling effect for all special rapporteurs,' said Agnes Callamard, head of human rights giant Amnesty International and a former UN special rapporteur on extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions.
'It undermines their independence and their commitment to do their job without fear or pressure of any kind,' she told Middle East Eye.
'There is also the risk that other governments may engage in copycat if they are unhappy or dissatisfied with a special rapporteur's report.'
UN special rapporteurs are independent experts appointed by the Geneva-based United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) to monitor, report on and advise on specific human rights issues or country situations.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
Nevertheless, their effectiveness can be limited by a lack of political will or cooperation from states, particularly when access is denied or recommendations are ignored.
Special rapporteurs enjoy diplomatic immunity under international law, including protection from legal measures such as sanctions.
However, due to their criticism of human rights policies, they are often subject to retaliation by states. Some, including Callamard and Albanese, have been declared persona non grata or threatened with lawsuits.
Yet the sanctions targeting Albanese's mandate mark a first.
'Special rapporteurs have been around since the 1980s and, frankly, I am not aware of any one of them having been sanctioned in that way,' said Callamard.
Balakrishnan Rajagopal, the UN rapporteur on the right to adequate housing, said the sanctions 'send a chilling message'.
'Rapporteurs are independent experts who do their jobs pro bono and need support for their critical work,' he told MEE.
'I urge immediate reversal of such sanctions. If allowed to stand, such sanctions send a chilling message: that any attempt to uphold law and speak truthfully will be met by a crackdown.'
Ben Saul, the UN special rapporteur on human rights and counterterrorism, said the sanctions have targeted Albanese over her 'legitimate work in defence of Palestinian human rights'.
'States must enable, not impede, the work of United Nations independent experts,' he told MEE.
'I've hit a nerve'
Speaking to MEE's live show on Thursday, a day after the sanctions, Albanese said she remains undeterred.
'It looks like I've hit a nerve,' she said.
'My concern is there are people dying in Gaza while you and I are speaking, and the United Nations are totally unable to intervene.'
The sanctions follow Albanese's scathing report published on 30 June, in which she named over 60 companies - including major US technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft - she said were involved in "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide".
The report called on the International Criminal Court (ICC) and national judicial systems to investigate and prosecute corporate executives and companies. It also called on UN member states to pursue sanctions and asset freezes.
Albanese is one of the most outspoken critics of Israel's war on Gaza, which she has labelled a genocide. Over the past 20 months, she has backed international justice efforts seeking to hold Israel accountable for its actions.
She is the latest target of US sanctions linked to the work of the ICC, which in November issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defence Minister Yoav Gallant.
The chief prosecutor of the ICC, Karim Khan, and four of the court's judges have also been sanctioned by the Trump administration over investigations into the US and its ally, Israel.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
41 minutes ago
- Middle East Eye
China expresses 'serious concern' over Israel plan to control Gaza
China expressed "serious concerns" on Friday over Israel's plan to take control of Gaza City, urging it to "immediately cease its dangerous actions". "Gaza belongs to the Palestinian people and is an inseparable part of Palestinian territory," a foreign ministry spokesperson told AFP. "The correct way to ease the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and to secure the release of hostages is an immediate ceasefire," they added. "A complete resolution to the Gaza conflict hinges on a ceasefire; only then can a path to de-escalation be paved and regional security ensured."
Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
Israel approves plan to take control of Gaza
Israel's political-security cabinet approved a plan to take control of Gaza early on Friday, hours after Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel intended to take military control of the entire strip. "The IDF will prepare to take control of Gaza City while providing humanitarian aid to the civilian population outside the combat zones," Netanyahu's office said in a statement, referring to the Israeli Defence Forces. Gaza City, in the north of the strip, is the largest city in the enclave. Axios reporter Barak Ravid, citing an Israeli official, said on X the plan involved evacuating Palestinian civilians from Gaza City and launching a ground offensive there. Netanyahu on Thursday told Fox News Channel's Bill Hemmer in an interview "we intend to" when asked if Israel would take over the entire coastal territory. "We don't want to keep it. We want to have a security perimeter. We don't want to govern it. We don't want to be there as a governing body." He said Israel wanted to hand over the territory to Arab forces that would govern it. He did not elaborate on the governance arrangements or which Arab countries could be involved. Netanyahu made the comments to Fox News ahead of a meeting with a small group of senior ministers to discuss plans for the military to take control of more territory in Gaza. Israeli officials described a previous meeting this week with the head of the military as tense, saying military chief Eyal Zamir had pushed back on expanding Israel's campaign. In its Friday statement, Netanyahu's office said the vast majority of the political-security cabinet members believed that "the alternative plan presented in the cabinet would not achieve the defeat of Hamas nor the return of the hostages". Two government sources said any resolution by the security cabinet would need to be approved by the full cabinet, which may not meet until Sunday. Among the scenarios being considered ahead of the security meeting was a phased takeover of areas in Gaza not yet under military control, one of the sources said, speaking on condition of anonymity. Evacuation warnings could be issued to Palestinians in specific areas of Gaza, potentially giving them several weeks before the military moves in, the person added. Total control of the territory would reverse a 2005 decision by Israel by which it withdrew Israeli citizens and soldiers from Gaza, while retaining control over its borders, airspace and utilities. Right-wing parties blame that withdrawal decision for Hamas gaining power there in a 2006 election. It was unclear whether Netanyahu was foreseeing a prolonged takeover or a short-term operation. Israel has repeatedly said it aims to dismantle Hamas and free Israeli hostages. Hamas in a statement called Netanyahu's comments "a blatant coup" against the negotiation process. "Netanyahu's plans to expand the aggression confirm beyond any doubt that he seeks to get rid of his captives and sacrifice them," the statement said. Arab countries would "only support what Palestinians agree and decide on," a Jordanian official source told Reuters, adding that security in Gaza should be handled through "legitimate Palestinian institutions". Hamas official Osama Hamdan told Al Jazeera that the group would treat any force formed to govern Gaza as an "occupying" force linked to Israel. Earlier this year Israel and the US rejected an Egyptian proposal, backed by Arab leaders, that envisaged the creation of an administrative committee of independent, professional Palestinian technocrats entrusted with the governance of Gaza after the war. Opinion polls show most Israelis want the war to end in a deal that would see the release of the remaining hostages. The White House had no immediate comment. US President Donald Trump has declined to say whether he supported or opposed a potential full military takeover of Gaza by Israel. Netanyahu's government has insisted on total victory over Hamas, which ignited the war when it staged the October 2023 attack on Israel from Gaza. The UN has called reports about a possible expansion of Israel's military operations in Gaza "deeply alarming" if true. The idea, pushed especially by far-right ministers in Netanyahu's coalition, of Israeli forces moving into areas they do not already hold in the enclave has also generated alarm in Israel. Outside the prime minister's office in Jerusalem on Thursday evening, hundreds of demonstrators protested against an expanded war, demanding an immediate end to the military campaign in return for the release of all the hostages. Protesters held signs bearing the faces of hostages still held in Gaza and voiced deep frustration with the government's handling of the crisis. There are 50 hostages still held in Gaza, of whom Israeli officials believe 20 are alive. Most of those freed so far emerged as a result of diplomatic negotiations. Talks toward a ceasefire that could have seen more hostages released collapsed in July. A senior Palestinian official said Hamas had told Arab mediators an increase in humanitarian aid entering Gaza would lead to a resumption in ceasefire negotiations. Hamas, which has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades but now controls only fragmented parts, insists any deal must lead to a permanent end to the war. Israel says the group has no intention of going through with promises to give up power afterwards. The Israeli military says it controls about 75 per cent of Gaza. Most of Gaza's population of about 2 million has been displaced multiple times over the past 22 months and aid groups are warning that the enclave's residents are on the verge of famine.
Dubai Eye
an hour ago
- Dubai Eye
US plan sees Hezbollah disarmed by year-end, Israeli withdrawal
The US has presented Lebanon with a proposal for disarming Hezbollah by the end of the year, along with ending Israel's military operations in the country and the withdrawal of its troops from five positions in south Lebanon, according to a copy of a Lebanese cabinet agenda reviewed by Reuters. The plan, submitted by US President Donald Trump's envoy to the region, Tom Barrack, sets out the most detailed steps yet for disarming the group, which has rejected mounting calls to disarm since last year's devastating war with Israel. Lebanese Information Minister Paul Morcos said following the cabinet meeting on Thursday that the cabinet approved only the objectives of Barrack's plan but did not discuss it in full. "We did not delve into the details or components of the US proposal. Our discussion and decision were limited to its objectives," Morcos said. The objectives of the US proposal would include phasing out the armed presence of non-state actors including Hezbollah, deploying Lebanese forces to key border and internal areas, ensuring Israel's withdrawal from the five positions, resolving prisoner issues through indirect talks and permanently demarcating Lebanon's borders with Israel and Syria. The US welcomed the Lebanese government's decision to task the Lebanese Armed Forces to bring all weapons under state control, a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday. The Israeli prime minister's office declined to comment, while the defence ministry did not immediately respond. Hezbollah had no immediate comment on the proposal, but three political sources told Reuters that ministers from the group and their allies withdrew from Thursday's cabinet meeting in protest at discussions of the proposal. Iran's Foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told Iranian state TV on Wednesday that this was not the first time attempts have been made to disarm the group, adding that the final decision rests with the group itself. "We act as a supporter but we do not interfere in their decision-making," Araqchi added. Israel dealt major blows to Hezbollah in an offensive last year, the climax of a conflict that began in October 2023 when the Lebanese group opened fire at Israeli positions at the frontier, declaring support for its Palestinian ally Hamas at the start of the war on Gaza. The US proposal aims to "extend and stabilise" a ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel brokered in November. "The urgency of this proposal is underscored by the increasing number of complaints regarding Israeli violations of the current ceasefire, including airstrikes and cross-border operations, which risk triggering a collapse of the fragile status quo," it said. Phase 1 of the plan would require the Beirut government to issue a decree within 15 days committing to Hezbollah's full disarmament by December 31. In this phase, Israel would also cease ground, air and sea military operations. Phase 2 would require Lebanon to begin implementing the disarmament plan within 60 days, with the government approving "a detailed (Lebanese army) deployment plan to support the plan to bring all arms under the authority of the state". This plan will specify disarmament targets. During Phase 2, Israel would begin withdrawing from positions it holds in south Lebanon and Lebanese prisoners held by Israel would be released in coordination with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). During Phase 3, within 90 days, Israel will withdraw from the final two of the five points it holds and funding will be secured to initiate rubble removal in Lebanon and infrastructure rehabilitation in preparation for reconstruction. In Phase 4, within 120 days, Hezbollah's remaining heavy weapons must be dismantled, including missiles and drones. In Phase 4, the US, Saudi Arabia, France, Qatar and other states will organise an economic conference to support the Lebanese economy and reconstruction and to "implement President Trump's vision for the return of Lebanon as a prosperous and viable country".
