UK's Reeves sets out spending plans to meet 'working people's priorities'
Britain's Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves leaves 11 Downing Street, ahead of presenting the Spending Review to Parliament, in London, Britain, June 11, 2025. REUTERS/Jaimi Joy
LONDON - British finance minister Rachel Reeves prioritised spending on health, defence and infrastructure projects to drive economic growth on Wednesday, in a bid to reboot the Labour government's offer of a brighter future to increasingly disillusioned voters.
Setting out day-to-day budgets for government departments from 2026 to 2029 and investment plans out to 2030, Reeves described the priorities of her so-called spending review as those of "working people" so that they are better off.
Keen to promote capital spending on housing, transport and cleaner energy projects, Reeves wanted to show the Labour government was delivering on its plan for change. But with more money going to health and defence, day-to-day spending in other areas of government was expected to be squeezed.
"The priorities of this spending review are the priorities of working people - to invest in Britain's security, in Britain's health and to grow Britain's economy so that working people are better off," she told a noisy session of parliament.
"The choices in this spending review are possible only because of my commitment to economic stability," she said.
Reeves set the overall total for spending in an October budget, financing her plan with the biggest tax rise in a generation and looser fiscal rules that make it easier for her to borrow to cover long-term investment.
Her choices must start paying off quickly if Labour is to achieve its goals of boosting Britain's growth rate and improving the quality of overstretched public services.
She said the government's departmental budgets would grow by 2.3% a year in real terms, offering a further 190 billion pounds for day-to-day spending on public services compared with the previous Conservative government's plans.
Among the projects announced on Wednesday was a 39 billion-pound 10-year programme to build lower-cost housing - almost doubling the annual amount spent on this compared with existing support. She also added to that by announcing an additional 10 billion pounds to build more homes in England.
Since its sweeping election victory last July, Labour has seen its popularity slide, and Reeves herself has seen her ratings slump after the government introduced cuts to winter fuel payments for the elderly and to disability benefits.
In October, she also decided to place the main burden of tax rises on employers and boost workers' rights - something the opposition Conservatives said was to blame for the jobless rate hitting its highest in nearly four years.
The Labour government has since made a partial U-turn on winter fuel payments, but the right-wing Reform UK party led by former Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage is now repeatedly ahead of Labour in opinion polls and outperformed it in English local elections last month.
"At the budget last October and again in the spring, I made the choices necessary to fix the foundations of our economy," she said. "We are starting to see the results." REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AsiaOne
7 hours ago
- AsiaOne
Air India plane crash: Reactions from across the world, Asia News
More than 200 people were killed when an Air India plane bound for London with 242 people on board crashed minutes after taking off from India's western city of Ahmedabad on Thursday, authorities said. Here's what world leaders have said so far: INDIAN PRIME MINISTER NARENDRA MODI, ON X: "The tragedy in Ahmedabad has stunned and saddened us. It is heartbreaking beyond words." "In this sad hour, my thoughts are with everyone affected by it. Have been in touch with Ministers and authorities who are working to assist those affected." BRITISH PRIME MINISTER KEIR STARMER, ON X: "The scenes emerging of a London-bound plane carrying many British nationals crashing in the Indian city of Ahmedabad are devastating." "I am being kept updated as the situation develops, and my thoughts are with the passengers and their families at this deeply distressing time." BRITAIN'S KING CHARLES, IN A STATEMENT ON X: "My wife and I have been desperately shocked by the terrible events in Ahmedabad this morning. Our special prayers and deepest possible sympathy are with the families and friends of all those affected by this appallingly tragic incident across so many nations, as they await news of their loved ones." US SECRETARY OF STATE MARCO RUBIO, ON X: "Heartbroken to hear the news of a tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. My prayers are with all who lost their loved ones in this horrible incident." THE VATICAN'S SECRETARY OF STATE, ON X: "Deeply saddened by the tragedy involving an Air India aircraft near Ahmedabad, His Holiness Pope Leo XIV sends his heartfelt condolences to the families and friends of those who have lost their lives, together with the assurance of prayers for all involved in the recovery efforts.""Commending the souls of the deceased to the mercy of the Almighty, His Holiness invokes upon all affected the divine blessings of healing and peace." BANGLADESH CHIEF ADVISER MUHAMMAD YUNUS IN A MESSAGE TO MODI: "We extend our deepest condolences to all the families who lost their dear ones at this tragic incident." "We stand in solidarity with the people and Government of India, and offer our full support in any form." PRIME MINISTER OF CANADA, MARK CARNEY, ON X: "Canada is deeply saddened by the crash of a London-bound Air India plane in Ahmedabad with 242 people on board, including one Canadian." "Canadian officials remain in close contact with counterparts in the wake of this tragedy. Our thoughts are with all those affected." EUROPEAN COMMISSION PRESIDENT URSULA VON DER LEYEN, ON X: "My deepest condolences to the families and loved ones grieving this terrible loss." "Dear @narendramodi, Europe stands in solidarity with you and the people of India in this moment of sorrow." RUSSIAN PRESIDENT VLADIMIR PUTIN TO MODI, IN AN OFFICIAL TELEGRAM PUBLISHED ON KREMLIN WEBSITE: "Please accept my deep condolences on the tragic consequences of the airliner crash at Ahmedabad airport." "Please convey words of sincere sympathy and support to the families and friends of the victims, as well as wishes of a swift recovery to all those injured in this catastrophe." FRENCH PRESIDENT EMMANUEL MACRON, ON X: "We have learned with deep emotion of the tragic plane crash in Ahmedabad, India. In this time of sorrow, I extend our heartfelt thoughts to the victims' loved ones and to Prime Minister @NarendraModi." AUSTRALIAN PRIME MINISTER ANTHONY ALBANESE, ON X: "The news of a passenger plane crash in Ahmedabad is absolutely devastating. In this time of tragedy, Australia's thoughts are with everyone affected." "Our government is receiving regular updates and we will continue to monitor the situation closely." IRISH PRIME MINISTER MICHEAL MARTIN, ON X: "My thoughts and prayers are with the people of India after the terrible plane crash in Ahmedabad earlier today. Thinking of the families of all those on board, along with the emergency services attending the scene." GENERAL SECRETARY OF BRITISH AIRLINE PILOTS' ASSOCIATION AMY LEVERSIDGE: "Pilots around the globe are deeply saddened by this news. Members of the British Airline Pilots' Association send condolences to all those affected. "It is vital a full and thorough investigation is now carried out without interference or unhelpful speculation about the contributory factors so that future tragedies can be avoided."
Straits Times
11 hours ago
- Straits Times
The Schengen Agreement at 40: Will free movement in Europe endure amid rising migrant antipathy?
BRUSSELS – Few people – even in Europe – know where the real Schengen is; it's a tiny community in southeastern Luxembourg, one of the continent's smallest states. But everyone in Europe and almost everyone coming to the continent from elsewhere around the world has personally experienced what the village's name has been synonymous with: the free movement of people and goods between the member states of the area of the same name. Or, simply put, a border-free Europe, where people travel without having to produce any document or explain the purpose of their journey. In many countries, even the physical location of national borders is no longer very obvious; markers for borders that once people fought and died for are now just historic curiosities. On June 14, Europe will mark with pride the 40th anniversary since the signature of the Schengen Treaty. All opinion surveys indicate that the border-free benefits of the agreement brought to the continent are still considered the most significant and popular achievement of European integration. Still, the celebrations will be muted. For although Schengen remains highly popular – there was joy in Romania and Bulgaria when these two nations joined the Schengen area last year – European officials are debating whether the arrangement, as originally conceived and currently applied by its 29 member-states, can survive in an age of heightened international security threats and massive migratory pressures. The story of the Schengen Agreement is a classic example of both the excellent and infuriating aspects of Europe. One of the original principles of the European Union (EU) since its foundation in the late 1950s was the idea of the free movement of people and goods. But for many decades after the EU came into being, border controls were still enforced. These were not very onerous, and increasingly, EU citizens could travel by just showing an identity card rather than a passport. Still, people had to queue at border points, and travellers from outside Europe who required visas had to apply for travel permits to each individual EU state they wished to visit. Pressure to do away with the internal EU border controls has been building up since the 1970s, but no consensus could be achieved inside the Union. On June 14, 1985, a small group comprising only five EU countries – Belgium, France, Germany, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands – gathered and signed a separate treaty abolishing their immigration controls. That agreement was outside the EU structures but – as its signatories hoped – it eventually caught on as other nations joined the arrangement. This gradual approach offered maximum flexibility. As everyone knew from the start, Britain was never likely to join Schengen. But Ireland also did not join because it was impractical to do so without the British, and Cyprus did not join because the island is part-occupied by Turkey. However, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland which are not in the EU did become Schengen members, as did the continent's smallest states of Andorra, Liechtenstein, Monaco, San Marino and the Vatican City. Schengen is now the world's largest association of independent states operating a complete freedom of travel. Still, Schengen was conceived for a continent that no longer exists. When the original five countries put their signatures to the deal, Europe was still divided by the Cold War and the eastern half of the continent was hermetically sealed with electrified barbed wire, machine guns and minefields. And while immigration pressures on Europe were already evident, most were confined to Britain and France and their former colonies. Yet only five years after the treaty was concluded, communist regimes collapsed in eastern Europe, enabling tens of millions of relatively poor east Europeans to travel. Subsequently, all European countries were hit by waves of migrants from the Middle East and Africa. And if this was not enough, terrorist attacks swept across the continent, with both criminals and weapons moving freely across borders. The ghastly terrorist November 2015 attack on the Bataclan nightclub in Paris, in which 130 people perished, was perpetrated by terrorists who lived in Belgium, and bought their weapons and explosives from traffickers across the continent. Most were known to police forces; all arguably escaped detection because of Europe's open borders. According to the Schengen Borders Code, it is within the competence of member states to reintroduce border controls for a limited period of time, but only as 'a last resort in an exceptional situation'. In 2006, France was the first country to temporarily reintroduce border controls, supposedly in response to demonstrations by Basques, an ethnic group straddling the borders of France and Spain. This pattern continued for years in France for major sporting events, political summits, or sensitive political rallies. The major turning point came in 2015 – the year in which around two million migrants flocked to Europe. Schengen states introduced border controls in droves. And then came the coronavirus pandemic. Countries got more innovative in the way they justify their 'exceptional' circumstances. Norway, for instance, once cited 'threats to critical infrastructure' to reimpose border controls. And Slovenia, a south-eastern EU nation, simply cited the 'increased global terrorist threat' to do the same. According to the available statistics, between 2006, when France pioneered the move, and 2015, there were 36 recorded cases when countries reimposed border controls. But between 2015 and 2024 – a comparable period – the number of such 'exceptional' border controls jumped to 405. It's an exception which threatens to become a rule. Yet most of these measures are ineffective because European countries no longer have the border forces or the required logistics to close their borders completely, so the moves were symbolic and of short duration. That was certainly the case with Germany in September 2024, when the country reintroduced border controls at just certain points, announced well in advance. This gave plenty of time for those trying to cross the frontiers illegally to find other routes. Still, it is remarkable that despite all these tensions and the broad political backlash against migrants throughout Europe, the Schengen arrangement has survived essentially unchanged. That's largely because it remains a powerful symbol of European integration. The reimposition of border controls would also snarl up transport and trade throughout Europe. All this discussion is largely irrelevant for the community of Schengen, now decked up with flowers and flags for the grand anniversary on Saturday, June 14. A 'Europe Museum' is operating in Schengen, telling the continent's history of border-free travel. And Princess Marie-Astrid, the boat on which the original treaty was signed, will also be on call for this weekend's celebrations. Even though the necessary land docking facilities planned to accommodate the boat were completed far too late. Some things never change in Europe. Jonathan Eyal is based in London and Brussels and writes on global political and security matters. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
15 hours ago
- Straits Times
UK economy shrinks by most in nearly two years on tariff hit
Gross domestic output shrank by a worse-than-expected 0.3 per cent in April from March. PHOTO: REUTERS UK economy shrinks by most in nearly two years on tariff hit LONDON - Britain's economic output contracted sharply in April, when shockwaves from US President Donald Trump's announcement of wide-ranging tariffs hit the global economy, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed on June 12. Gross domestic output shrank by a worse-than-expected 0.3 per cent in April from March - the biggest monthly drop since October 2023 and a much bigger drop than the 0.1 per cent fall forecast in a Reuters poll. 'After increasing for each of the four preceding months, April saw the largest monthly fall on record in goods exports to the United States with decreases seen across most types of goods, following the recent introduction of tariffs,' Liz McKeown, ONS director of economic statistics, said. A fall in real estate and legal activity in April after the end of a temporary tax break on house purchases contributed 0.2 percentage points of the 0.3 percentage point fall in output in April, the ONS said. Car makers also reported lower output and exports to both the US and the European Union. Britain's economy expanded by 0.7 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, outstripping growth in other countries in the Group of Seven advanced economies and prompting the Bank of England to revise up its full-year growth forecast to 1 per cent in May. However, the BOE revised down its growth forecast for 2026 to 1.25 per cent and said it expected the tariffs to knock 0.3 per cent off British output in three years' time. BOE policymakers who are expected to hold interest rates next week are faced with competing forces of stubborn inflation and a relatively sluggish economy. A closely-watched business survey earlier this month suggested much of the economy returned to tepid growth. Business surveys of British firms have generally been downbeat and shown firms slowed their hiring and investment plans due to big increases in labour costs announced by finance minister Rachel Reeves last October. Data published this week showed a fall in consumer spending in May. The ONS said GDP in April was 0.9 per cent higher than a year earlier, growing less than the 1.1 per cent expected in the Reuters poll. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
