
Walmart Calls, But India's Garment Worker Woes Blunt Tariff Edge
In a garment hub in south India, R.K. Sivasubramaniam is fielding requests from Walmart and Costco who want to sidestep higher U.S. tariffs faced by rival Asian suppliers, Bangladesh and China. But rows of idle sewing lines at his factory lay bare his biggest challenge.
'Even if orders come, we need labour. We don't have sufficient labour,' said the managing director of Raft Garments which supplies underwear and t-shirts priced as low as $1 to US brands.
Considered India's knitwear capital, Tiruppur city in the southern state of Tamil Nadu accounts for nearly one-third of the country's $16 billion in apparel exports, and is staring at a huge opportunity as US buyers explore ramping up sourcing from India in the face of heftier tariffs on other Asian hubs.
US President Donald Trump plans to hit India, the world's sixth largest textile and apparel exporter, with a 26 percent tariff from July, below the 37 percent imposed on Bangladesh, 46 percent on Vietnam and 145 percent on China — all of which are bigger American suppliers.
Those tariffs will make apparel from India much more competitive with both Bangladesh and China.
But the mood is somber at the Tiruppur textile park as it faces a reality check: India's hopes of capitalising on its tariff advantage are hindered by a skilled labour crunch, limited economies of scale, and high costs.
Raft Garments wants to expand production to tackle new orders but is importing high-end machines to automate some stitching processes, given the business for now heavily depends on migrant labour, which is very tough to find or retain.
Garment exporters in India say workers have to be trained and many leave within months to work at smaller, unorganised units that allow longer hours and pay more. The larger manufacturers can't match them due to foreign clients' requirements on cost and workers' conditions, according to Reuters interviews with 10 manufacturers and apparel exporter trade groups representing 9,000 businesses.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has for years courted foreign investors to his 'Make in India' programme to turn the South Asian nation into a global manufacturing hub. A shortage of skilled workers in a nation where 90 percent of the labour force operates in the informal sector is seen as a big roadblock, especially in labour-intensive sectors like garments.
Tiruppur offers a glimpse of India's labour strain.
'We need at least 100,000 workers,' said Kumar Duraiswamy of the exporters association in Tiruppur, where he said more than 1 million people currently work.
Modi's government last year said it was extending a programme to specifically train 300,000 people in textile-related skills, including garment making.
In the textile hub, some have taken matters into their own hands.
Amid a hum of sewing machines at the Cotton Blossom factory, which makes 1.2 million garments a month, including for American sporting goods retailer Bass Pro Shops, Naveen Micheal John said he has set up three centres thousands of miles away to train and source migrant workers.
And even then, most return to their home towns after a few months.
'We skill them there for three months, then they are here for seven months. Then they return back,' John said during a tour of his garment unit, adding he wants to look at other states where labour and government incentives both may be better. Capacity Woes
China's $16.5 billion worth of apparel exports, Vietnam's $14.9 billion and Bangladesh's $7.3 billion made them the three biggest suppliers to America in 2024, when India shipped goods worth $4.7 billion, according to US government data.
US companies have for years been diversifying their supply chains beyond China amid geopolitical tensions. And even before the news of tariffs in April, now paused until July, Bangladesh's garment industry began losing its sheen amid political turmoil there.
A survey of 30 leading U.S. apparel brands by the United States Fashion Industry Association showed India had emerged as the most popular sourcing hub in 2024, with nearly 60 percent of respondents planning to expand sourcing from there.
With the tariffs, India's exports would cost $4.31 per square metre of apparel, compared with $4.24 for Bangladesh and $4.35 for China, a sharp improvement on India's competitiveness without the levies, according to Reuters calculations based on 2024 import data from the US Office of Textiles and Apparel.
But it's in the economies of scale where India loses.
Bangladesh Garment Manufacturers and Exporters Association says an average garment factory there has at least 1,200 workers, whereas in India, according to its Apparel Export Promotion Council, there are only 600 to 800.
'Bangladesh capacities are huge. ... We have issues of capacity constraint, lack of economy of scale due to smaller size of factories, labour unavailability during peak seasons,' said Mithileshwar Thakur of the Indian trade group.
To address those challenges, garment makers have started to set up factories in states where migrant workers come from, he said.
In Tiruppur, its exports association says the largest 100 exporters contributed 50% of its $5 billion sales last fiscal year, with the rest from 2,400 units, a telling sign of the fragmented and largely smaller-scale operations.
Raft makes 12 million garment pieces a year with a workforce of just 250 people. A US client is close to placing an order for 3 million units, which will stretch the factory to its limit and force it to consider expansion.
'This one order is more than enough for us,' said Sivasubramaniam. Pricing Roadblock
Data from shipping consultants Ocean Audit showed Walmart imported 1,100 containers of household goods and clothing between April 2 and May 4 from India, nearly double the same period last year, including cotton shirts and pleated maxi skirts.
In a statement, Walmart said it sources from more than 70 countries around the world as it aims to find the right mix of suppliers and products.
While US retailers are lodging more queries in Tiruppur, pricing negotiations remain contentious due to higher labour and other costs.
Indian brokerage Avendus Spark said in March Bangladesh's cost of labour stood at $139 per month, compared to India's $180 and China's $514.
P. Senthilkumar, a senior partner at India's Vector Consulting Group, said India had stricter rules for overtime policies and worker shifts, further raising costs.
In Dhaka, Anwar-ul-Alam Chowdhury of Evince Group said most of their U.S. buyers were sticking with Bangladesh, given the 'large production capacity, lower costs, and reliable quality give us a clear edge.'
In India, though, Tiruppur exporters said they are in hectic talks with many US clients who love the Bangladesh cost advantage and are aggressively bargaining.
At Walmart-supplier Balu Exports, Mahesh Kumar Jegadeesan said US clients had conveyed 'we will not budge on the price' and were willing to move some orders only if Indian exporters can match prices.
Inside the nearby Raft Garments factory, where women were stitching underwear, the smile on managing director Sivasubramaniam's face sparked by 14 new business inquiries of recent weeks faded quickly.
'All want us to match Bangladesh prices. Price is a big problem,' he said.
By Dhwani Pandya, Praveen Paramasivam, Manoj Kumar and Ruma Paul; Edited by Aditya Kalra and Sonali Paul
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Paramount-CBS And Trump Legal Teams Say They Are In 'Continued Mediation' To Settle '60 Minutes' Lawsuit, Ask Judge To Extend Some Filing Deadlines
The CBS-Paramount Global legal team and representatives for Donald Trump said that they were in 'continued mediation' to settle the president's $20 billion lawsuit against the network over the way that a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris was edited. The update came in a new filing in federal court in Texas in Friday, as the sides asked the judge for an extension of deadlines in filing motions to compel and responses. More from Deadline Networks Return To Special Reports On Iran's Retaliatory Strikes On Israel - Update Taylor Tomlinson Says Goodbye To 'After Midnight', Wishes CBS Had Replaced Her 2025 Premiere Dates For New & Returning Series On Broadcast, Cable & Streaming Trump claimed that CBS was deceptive in the way that the Harris interview was edited, as she was shown giving a different answer to the same question on the 60 Minutes broadcast in October than one shown on a Face the Nation preview the day before. CBS has maintained that there was no deception and, in standard industry practice, one part of her answer was shown on Face the Nation and the other on 60 Minutes, due to time constraints. Trump sued the network under Texas' Deceptive Trade Practices Act and the Lanham Act, typically used in cases of false advertising. The president claims that the interview cost his media entities, including Truth Social, an audience that was diverted to 60 Minutes. A number of legal experts see the lawsuit as meritless, but CBS parent Paramount Global is seeking administration approval for its merger with Skydance Media. Paramount-CBS has offered millions to settle the case, in what has been described to Deadline as an 'eight-figure discussion.' The Wall Street Journal reported that Paramount offered $15 million, but Trump's team is seeking $25 million and apology. There also has been speculation that a settlement could go even higher. The settlement talks have created consternation within the news division. Last week, in an interview with CNN, 60 Minutes correspondent Scott Pelley said that a settlement and apology would be 'very damaging' to the reputation of CBS and Paramount. The legal teams told the judge that they are not asking him to extend a June 23 deadline for CBS to file a response to Trump's opposition to their motion to dismiss the case. Best of Deadline 2025 TV Series Renewals: Photo Gallery 2025 TV Cancellations: Photo Gallery 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Tonys, Emmys, Oscars & More
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST): 'I Wish It Would Go Up,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST) is one of the largest retailers in America, a frequent appearance on Cramer's morning show, and one of his top stocks. Throughout the year, the CNBC TV host has maintained that Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST), along with Walmart, has the necessary scale to survive and thrive in any headwinds generated by tariffs. In fact, Cramer believes that Costco is perhaps the only retailer that can compete with Walmart in the dynamic environment. He has also remained appreciative of the firm's strategy to leverage its scale to eke out the lowest prices for consumers through bargaining with merchants. Here are his recent remarks about Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST): "Costco is very difficult because Costco you have two month's data already and it's good so it's never surprised and it almost always goes down. I wish it would go up in anticipation because it almost always go down. We do have a new CFO, Gary Millerchip. We do not have, remember, Richard Galanti, David, Gary Millerchip is not related to the Enforcer in Severance." In his previous comments about Costco Wholesale Corporation (NASDAQ:COST), Cramer lamented weak share price performance and gave viewers some advice: 'Next, on Thursday, after the close, we hear from the company that I think has the most consistent earnings and also the most persistent sell-off after we see the earnings, even when they're good, and I'm talking about Costco. It's unnerving to watch a fantastic quarter and still see a stock go down. And that's just how it's done with this one, even as we have a fairly good idea how the company's doing, because you know what? Overall, COST ranks 8th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of COST as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at . Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (CLF): 'I Wanted It To Win,' Says Jim Cramer
We recently published a list of . In this article, we are going to take a look at where Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) stands against other stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) has featured several times on Cramer's morning show in 2025. Most of these appearances have surrounded Japan's Nippon Steel's purchase of US Steel. The deal has created quite a bit of controversy, particularly surrounding the ownership of American firms in key industries in foreign hands. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) has ardently opposed the deal, and Cramer has speculated that the firm might end up buying US Steel instead. His previous remarks about the firm have remained appreciative of the firm's CEO and asserted that the firm has been hurt by cheap Chinese steel flooding the US market. His recent comments about Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. (NYSE:CLF) surrounded the US Steel deal after co-host David Faber pointed out that the deal was going to close and Nippon was going to own US Steel: "Well I think that I wanted it [CLF] to win because I have been very suspicious of Nippon Steel which has had a history I believe of dumping in our country. And that is I'm getting that Dan DiMicco, the former CEO of Nucor who has continually told me the kind of dumping that we've seen around the world. In his previous remarks, Cramer commented on some problems: 'I think the problem [with] Cleveland- it's two problems, one is the balance sheet's not that good, and two, there's got to be demand. If the auto companies are really cutting back – and I think you're gonna have to after the initial spur – that is going to make it so that the the numbers have to go lower. If the numbers go lower, Cleveland Cliffs and the stock's going to go to 65.' Overall, CLF ranks 7th on our list of stocks that Jim Cramer discussed. While we acknowledge the potential of CLF as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. This article is originally published at . Related Content NYSE Sign in to access your portfolio