HC orders fresh look at hijack convict's early release plea
Delhi high court
has granted relief to a man denied premature release while serving a life term for hijacking an Indian Airlines flight in 1993, saying his conduct in jail bore signs of reformation.
A single judge bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula set aside a decision of a Sentence Review Board (SRB) against Hari Singh and asked it to consider his case afresh within eight weeks.
"Petitioner's conduct in jail does indicate elements of reformation as even over a long period of incarceration (almost 18 years of actual imprisonment), there is no record of any untoward incident which would indicate that the petitioner still harbours elements of criminality," Justice Narula said in his recent order.
According to the prosecution, Singh hijacked the plane because he was not happy with riots that year in the aftermath of Babri Masjid's razing in Dec 1992. He was convicted by a trial court in 2001 under Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 and several IPC sections. His appeal was rejected by the HC in 2011. His Supreme Court plea was withdrawn.
Singh told the HC that his name was periodically taken up for consideration of premature release by SRB, but rejected on grounds of gravity of his offence. Justice Narula held that SRB's reasons to reject Singh's plea were inadequate and did not meet standards of reasonable justification necessary for an executive authority's order.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
ED Seeks 7-year Imprisonment For Robert Vadra In Gurugram Land Deal Case
The Enforcement Directorate has asked a special PMLA court in Delhi to award the highest punishment — seven years in prison — to Robert Vadra and others accused in the 2008 Gurugram land deal case. According to the agency's prosecution complaint, the ED has also urged the court to permit the government to seize 43 immovable properties that it claims were bought by Vadra and his associates using using proceeds of crime (PoC) generated through money laundering. The Special PMLA court in Delhi has fixed August 28 to take cognisance of the ED complaint and issued a notice to Vadra. While elaborating on the mode of generation of PoC of money laundering by Robert Vadra in the land deal, the ED alleged in the complaint that the husband of Congress MP Priyanka Gandhi Vadra and other accused also committed a penal offence of dishonest or fraudulent execution of a deed of transfer containing false statements (Section 423 of Indian Penal Code). In its prosecution complaint filed in a Special PMLA court in Delhi, the ED sought a maximum of seven years imprisonment for Vadra and other accused under Section 4 (Punishment for money laundering) and suggested penal or criminal action for the fraudulent execution of the deed. 'The transfer deed was executed containing a false statement of consideration with regards to receipt of sale consideration by the seller from the buyer and with regards to the total amount of consideration as well, thereby violating the provisions of section 423 of IPC. The buyer had never issued the cheque to the seller and the cheque mentioned in the sale deed did not pertain to the buyer,' said the chargesheet. Alleging a loss of Rs 44 lakh caused to Haryana government in stamp duty, the ED said: 'The sale deed refers the valuation of the said land at Rs 7.50 crore, on the contrary the seller got the payment of Rs 7.95 crore on August 9, 2008 (against sale consideration and stamp duty); and Rs 7.43 crore on August 16, 2008 (additional sale consideration). The undervaluation of the land directly leads to evasion of stamp duty.' Earlier, the ED justified its decision to file the PMLA case in the Special Court in Delhi by claiming that all the accused, except one, reside in Delhi and all the entities associated with the accused, which are involved in the process of money laundering, are registered in the Delhi jurisdiction. It is submitted that the FIR in this case was filed by the Gurugram Police. However, the offence of money laundering was committed by the accused at various places/states including Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat and Rajasthan. 'Further, most of the bank accounts of the entities associated with Vadra, identified as accused number 1, are also situated in Delhi and used by the accused in Delhi to acquire assets or to satisfy the liabilities of companies registered in Delhi,' it said. The ED said that Vadra received Rs 58 crore as proceeds of crime (PoC) of the involved money laundering and claimed that its investigation led to the provisional attachment of 43 immovable properties, totalling Rs 38.69 crore, identified as direct or value equivalent to Proceeds of Crime. Seeking confiscation of the 43 immovable properties, the ED said: 'The complaint is filed with the prayer to punish the accused persons under Section 4 (Punishment for money laundering,) which is a rigorous imprisonment for three to seven years and confiscation by the government of the properties earned by the accused as proceeds of crime.' (With IANS Inputs)
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Encrypted messaging apps aid in the sale of narcotics, says ADGP A. Amalraj
The proliferation of encrypted messaging applications and social media groups has made tracking drug sales and transactions more complex, according to A. Amalraj, Additional Director-General of Police, Enforcement Bureau-CID. Drug-law enforcement agencies tightened vigil on habitual offenders and known drug syndicates, but those who smuggle narcotic substances through land and sea borders are transacting on social media platforms. 'Social media platforms are now being used to sell narcotics disguised as candies or chocolates — a trend that has prompted swift police crackdowns. Nightlife venues, hostels, and college campuses remain the prime targets for drug-peddlers,' Dr Amalraj said. Based on a robust strategy encompassing prevention, detection, enforcement, inter-agency coordination, destruction of contraband, financial investigations, and youth awareness programmes, Tamil Nadu's response stood out as a model for other States, he said. The State police had intensified operations under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act, targeting hotspots of drug activity and adopting advanced surveillance methods. The illicit drugs were mostly trafficked from other States. Between 2021 and 2025, the Tamil Nadu Police had seized over 107 tonnes of Ganja, 3.2 lakh tablets of pharmaceutical drugs, and 1,223 kg of other narcotic substances. Ganja-infused chocolates Dr. Amalraj said the seizure of 5,250 ganja-infused chocolates in July, 'which were meant to be sold discreetly to college students', was one example of the evolving tactics of drug syndicates and the proactive response of law-enforcement agencies. Underscoring the need for community participation in eradicating the menace of drugs, he said an appeal had been made to the people to report suspected drug activities on designated helplines (10581), WhatsApp (9498410581), and email (spnibcid@ Dr. Amalraj said Tamil Nadu's proximity to States where the drugs originated and its extensive coastline made it a strategic location for drug-traffickers. To control the trafficking of drugs into the State, regular coordination was established with the Anti-Narcotic Task Forces of the neighbouring States. These partnerships facilitated enhanced surveillance, intelligence-sharing, and joint raids, particularly in border areas and on drug-smuggling routes. He said the drugs were not just a social problem but an illegal business often tied to elaborate financial networks. In this backdrop, the State had aggressively pursued financial investigations to dismantle the economic infrastructure supporting narcotics trade. Between 2021 and 2025, law-enforcement agencies froze 8,949 bank accounts and 45 properties valued at more than ₹21 crore. Recognising that prevention was more sustainable than cure, the State launched awareness campaigns targeting schools and colleges. The 'Enakku Vendam, Nammaku Vendam' initiative reached over 74 lakh students who pledged to stay away from narcotics. The Chief Minister administered an anti-drug pledge every year to students on August 11. Dr. Amalraj said the State had turned its educational institutions into frontline battlegrounds against substance abuse. Anti-drug clubs now functioned at almost all colleges, coordinated by district-level monitoring teams that reported to the Collector and the Superintendent of Police. Volunteers were trained in identifying early signs of drug usage and counselling. New threat While traditional narcotics like ganja and heroin continued to pose challenges, Tamil Nadu was facing a new threat — the misuse of pharmaceutical drugs. Between 2023 and 2025, seizure of pharmaceutical drugs rose sharply from 39,910 to over 1.42 lakh tablets. These included prescription drugs, such as painkillers, anti-anxiety medications, anti-depressants, and stimulants, often diverted from legal channels or procured from online platforms. This alarming trend prompted increased regulation of pharmacies and monitoring of e-commerce platforms. Investigators cracked down on the prescription drug trafficking networks. Reports suggested that illegal distribution networks spanned States like Maharashtra, Telangana, and Andhra Pradesh. Dealers employed various methods, including the crushing of tablets for injection, combining drugs with nitrous oxide, and selling them in the form of a candy, the ADGP said. He said the State's anti-drug strategy went beyond punitive action. The State had inaugurated 25 de-addiction centres at government hospitals to offer free treatment, counselling, and vocational training. In parallel, Kalangarai Centres offered integrated support for addicts seeking reintegration into society. This was a positive step to wean off those caught in the web.
Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Court convicts ex-MCD engineer in 2006 case registered by CBI
New Delhi, A court here has convicted a former assistant engineer of the Municipal Corporation of Delhi under IPC section 217 . Court convicts ex-MCD engineer in 2006 case registered by CBI Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Nishant Garg was hearing allegations against accused Vijay Kumar Jain, against whom the Central Bureau of Investigation had registered a case. According to the prosecution, the owners of 15 properties in the west Punjabi Bagh area were booked by the civic body for unauthorised construction in July 2004 but Jain, the then assistant engineer of the MCD, retained the files to prevent action against the properties. In an order dated August 7, the court said, "It can be concluded that accused V K Jain intentionally retained the subject 15 files with him", despite knowing that orders were passed for issuing demolition notices regarding 12 properties and that demolition orders were passed for the three remaining properties. It said Jain retained the files to prevent action being taken against these properties, despite being aware of the Delhi High Court's direction on April 11, 2005, where it had asked the MCD to take action in accordance with law against the properties and file a compliance report within four months. "The prosecution has led sufficient evidence to establish the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the accused is held guilty for the commission of the offence under section 217 of the IPC and is convicted for the said offence," the court said. The matter has been posted for hearing the arguments on sentencing on Monday. The magistrate rejected the defence's argument that the CBI, despite being aware that, at most, it was a case of misconduct, deliberately lodged an FIR for an offence under the Prevention of Corruption Act to bypass the requirement of obtaining permission from the magistrate to investigate a non-cognisable offence. "I am not in agreement with the contention of the defence counsel. Perusal of the preliminary enquiry report reveals that it specifically mentions that accused Jain has committed criminal misconduct and abused his position as a public servant to cause favour to the owners of 15 properties," he said. The magistrate said along with Jain, other MCD officials and the 15 property owners were also made accused in the FIR. "Hence, it cannot be said that the FIR was intentionally registered by the investigating agency under the stringent provisions of the PC Act," the magistrate said. The CBI had registered the FIR under PC Act provisions regarding criminal misconduct by a public servant and under the penal provision for criminal conspiracy against Jain and others. The court had, however, framed charge against Jain under IPC section 217 in July 2018. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
