Trump wants to erase people. They're fighting back.
In the first 100 days of Donald Trump's second term in office, we have seen an American president attempting to swiftly and dramatically reshape our culture and our country, in an effort to redefine who and what makes America great.
He's largely done this through a slew of executive orders that are not new laws, but directives that are already being followed and implemented by federal agencies, universities, state governments and school districts. But these orders are also being challenged in our courts, and in the court of public opinion, as millions of Americans have begun to take to the streets in protest of the Trump administration's agenda.
At this milestone in Trump's tenure, the politics of exclusion and erasure are defining his presidency.
'This was always about dismantling the multiracial freedom project,' said Brittany Cooper, author and a professor of women's, gender and sexuality studies and Africana studies at Rutgers University. 'We had some notable wins. This administration sees those wins as a series of historical missteps that they now have endless power to undo.'
There are consequences for the people on the receiving end of the president's actions and rhetoric. Many Americans, including women, people of color and the LGBTQ+ community, are grappling with how Trump's policies are transforming workplaces and institutions, setting new legal precedent and undoing established ones.
In January, I wrote about the Americans Trump and his administration are trying to leave out. These are the people I wanted to speak to at the 100-day mark of his presidency, to hear from them about why what Trump is doing matters, if it has changed their relationship to our democracy, and how his actions are already affecting their lives.
For more than a generation, My Brother's Keeper has focused on reducing health disparities, particularly for people with HIV. Based in Ridgeland, Mississippi, the organization typically processes 8,000 tests a year for sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) across the state, many for people without health insurance.
In the last month Dr. June Gipson, the CEO of My Brother's Keeper, has received letters from both state and federal agencies informing her that her organization would lose millions in funding. She is now scrambling to figure out how to keep the tests available and affordable to the patients who need it, in a state that consistently has some of the highest STD rates in the country.
'We don't want to leave the communities without any resources,' said Gipson. 'We pivoted the last time Trump was in office. We know how to pivot. But now we're just left scrambling because all the rules have changed. Unchecked STDs are going to be a huge problem for us, particularly in the South. This is not making America great again.'
For Gipson, the mental strain of the last several weeks — mourning the progress that could have been made with the federal funding that has now disappeared as she considers the toll this will take on the community — has been difficult personally and professionally.
'There's so many conflicting and compounding issues,' Gipson said. 'I can't catch my breath and even talk to people about what's happening. You don't even know how something is affecting you, because every day there's something else on top of you.'
Trans journalist Imara Jones wasn't surprised to see all of the actions the administration has taken against transgender Americans, but she does describe the actual experience as 'disorienting.'
'It's one thing to know these things are going to happen; it's another thing to experience them happening,' said Jones, the creator of TransLash Media. 'It is reality-altering.'
Jones likened the swiftness and scope of the administration's executive orders targeting the transgender community to the Supreme Court's decision to end federal protections for abortion in 2022 and the chaos and uncertainty that was unleashed in the weeks and months since the decision.
'One day you largely assume you can get access to the health care you need. The next … it's all in jeopardy. It's this cascading impact on what you understand to be. It's like a Dobbs ruling every other day.'
Cooper said Trump's targeting of 'wokeism'; taking aim at transgender Americans; attempting to ban pronouns; or scrap diversity, equity and inclusion efforts in government and society all point to a vision of 'the most reductive, most limited, most basic version of America that we have been.' She pointed out that the rejection of 'wokeness' in particular is a code word for embracing the vision of Black women.
'We have tried mightily to become different,' Cooper said. 'The only purpose we serve in his imagination of the world is one where we are in service.'
Headed into the next phase of Trump's presidency, there are already signs that not everyone is on board with his agenda, and that he does not have the mandate he has touted since his election to reshape the country in his image.
A Pew Research poll conducted this month showed Trump's approval rating at 40 percent, down seven points from February. And more than half of Americans said he is setting too much policy via executive order.
Americans are showing up and speaking out at congressional town halls hosted by members of both parties, standing up for their neighbors as the administration attempts to deport immigrants they say are in the country illegally, and protesting in communities across the country.
After weeks of being horrified by headlines about the administration's actions, Lora Weingarden decided to attend her first protest at the April 19 #HandsOff rally in Livonia, Michigan. The 64-year-old, who works as a lawyer for the state, said she is particularly concerned about the future of the rule of law in American democracy.
'As a lawyer, we're trained in the Constitution,' Weingarden said. 'We know what the rules are. There have always been consequences for defying the Constitution. If anyone gets away with violating a court order, we will live in a lawless society. I'm fearful we won't recognize our country.'
She made a couple of signs, one reading, 'WHERE IS THE DUE PROCESS?' and another, 'GOP CONGRESS STEP UP — NOW!' Weingarden invited former colleagues, friends from her cardio drumming group, her tennis and pickleball teammates, and her husband to come along. She showed up with nine friends in tow.
'I want the public to know, I want the government to know that the regular people are not going to stand for what's going on,' she said. 'The more protesters we have, the stronger the message is.'
Weingarden described the experience of gathering with like-minded people, of hearing horns honking in support as people drove past the protest, as 'exhilarating.' She plans to keep protesting.
'The message has to be loud and clear over time,' Weingarden said. 'It's not a hard thing to do. As citizens opposed to what's going on, we have to band together to send a message.'
Whether the president sees them or not, these Americans are here, asserting their claim to what makes America great as participants in our democracy. Beyond resisting, they are fighting for recognition, for the right to be counted and not erased.
The lesson of these first 100 days: Theirs is a fight that is just beginning.
The post Trump wants to erase people. They're fighting back. appeared first on The 19th.
News that represents you, in your inbox every weekday. Subscribe to our free, daily newsletter.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNBC
19 minutes ago
- CNBC
Trump says no imminent plans to penalize China for buying Russian oil
U.S. President Donald Trump said on Friday he did not immediately need to consider retaliatory tariffs on countries such as China for buying Russian oil but might have to "in two or three weeks." Trump has threatened sanctions on Moscow and secondary sanctions on countries that buy its oil if no moves are made to end the war in Ukraine. China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. The president last week imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing its continued imports of Russian oil. However, Trump has not taken similar action against China. He was asked by Fox News' Sean Hannity if he was now considering such action against Beijing after he and Russian President Vladimir Putin failed to produce an agreement to resolve or pause Moscow's war in Ukraine. "Well, because of what happened today, I think I don't have to think about that," Trump said after his summit with Putin in Alaska. "Now, I may have to think about it in two weeks or three weeks or something, but we don't have to think about that right now. I think, you know, the meeting went very well." Chinese President Xi Jinping's slowing economy will suffer if Trump follows through on a promise to ramp up Russia-related sanctions and tariffs. Xi and Trump are working on a trade deal that could lower tensions - and import taxes - between the world's two biggest economies. But China could be the biggest remaining target, outside of Russia, if Trump ramps up punitive measures.


CNN
19 minutes ago
- CNN
Trump-Putin End Summit With Talk Of Progress But No Deal - Laura Coates Live - Podcast on CNN Podcasts
Trump-Putin End Summit With Talk Of Progress But No Deal Laura Coates Live 45 mins US President Donald Trump said he and Russian President Vladimir Putin made 'great progress' but did not emerge from today's summit with a deal on the war in Ukraine.


San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined. Under the name of his Making D.C. Safe and Beautiful Task Force, Trump put some 800 National Guard troops on Washington streets this past week, declaring at the outset, 'Our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals.' Grunge was also on his mind. 'If our capital is dirty, our whole country is dirty, and they don't respect us.' He then upped the stakes by declaring federal control of the district's police department and naming an emergency chief. That set off alarms and prompted local officials to sue to stop the effort. 'I have never seen a single government action that would cause a greater threat to law and order than this dangerous directive,' Police Chief Pamela Smith said. On Friday, the Trump administration partially retreated from its effort to seize control of the Metropolitan Police Department when a judge, skeptical that the president had the authority to do what he tried to do, urged both sides to reach a compromise, which they did — at least for now. Trump's Justice Department agreed to leave Smith in control, while still intending to instruct her department on law enforcement practices. In a new memo, Attorney General Pam Bondi directed the force to cooperate with federal immigration enforcement regardless of any city law. In this heavily Democratic city, local officials and many citizens did not like the National Guard deployment. At the same time, they acknowledged the Republican president had the right to order it because of the federal government's unique powers in the district. But Trump's attempt to seize formal control of the police department, for the first time since D.C. gained a partial measure of autonomy in the Home Rule Act of 1973, was their red line. When the feds stepped in For sure, there have been times when the U.S. military has been deployed to American streets, but almost always in the face of a riot or a calamitous event like the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. Trump's use of force was born of an emergency that he saw and city officials — and many others — did not. A stranger to nuance, Trump has used the language of emergency to justify much of what he's done: his deportations of foreigners, his tariffs, his short-term deployment of National Guard troops to Los Angeles, and now his aggressive intervention into Washington policing. Washington does have crime and endemic homelessness, like every city in the country. But there was nothing like an urban fire that the masses thought needed to be quelled. Violent crime is down, as it is in many U.S. cities. Washington is also a city about which most Americans feel ownership — or at least that they have a stake. More than 25 million of them visited in 2024, a record year, plus over 2 million people from abroad. It's where middle schoolers on field trips get to see what they learn about in class — and perhaps to dance to pop tunes with the man with the music player so often in front of the White House. Washington is part federal theme park, with its historic buildings and museums, and part downtown, where restaurants and lobbyists outnumber any corporate presence. Neighborhoods range from the places where Jeff Bezos set a record for a home purchase price to destitute streets in economically depressed areas that are also magnets for drugs and crime. In 1968, the capital was a city on fire with riots. Twenty years later, a murder spree and crack epidemic fed the sense of a place out of control. But over the last 30 years, the city's population and its collective wealth have swelled. A cooked-up emergency? Against that backdrop, Philadelphia's top prosecutor, District Attorney Larry Krasner, a Democrat, assailed Trump's moves in Washington. 'You're talking about an emergency, really?' Krasner said, as if speaking with the president. 'Or is it that you're talking about an emergency because you want to pretend everything is an emergency so that you can roll tanks?" In Washington, a coalition of activists called Not Above the Law denounced what they saw as just the latest step by Trump to seize levers of power he has no business grasping. 'The onslaught of lawlessness and autocratic activities has escalated,' said Lisa Gilbert, co-chair of the group and co-president of Public Citizen. 'The last two weeks should have crystallized for all Americans that Donald Trump will not stop until democracy is replaced by vindictive authoritarian rule.' Fifty miles northeast, in the nearest major city, Baltimore's Democratic mayor criticized what he saw as Trump's effort to distract the public from economic pain and 'America's falling standing in the world.' 'Every mayor and police chief in America works with our local federal agents to do great work — to go after gun traffickers, to go after violent organizations,' Brandon Scott said. 'How is taking them off of that job, sending them out to just patrol the street, making our country safer?' But the leader of the D.C. Police Union, Gregg Pemberton, endorsed Trump's intervention — while saying it should not become permanent. 'We stand with the president in recognizing that Washington, D.C., cannot continue on this trajectory,' Pemberton said. From his vantage point, 'Crime is out of control, and our officers are stretched beyond their limits.' The Home Rule Act lets a president invoke certain emergency powers over the police department for 30 days, after which Congress must decide whether to extend the period. Trump's attempt to use that provision stirred interest among some Republicans in Congress in giving him an even freer hand. Among them, Rep. Andy Ogles of Tennessee drafted a resolution that would eliminate the time limit on federal control. This, he told Fox News Digital, would 'give the president all the time and authority he needs to crush lawlessness, restore order, and reclaim our capital once and for all.' Which raises a question that Trump has robustly hinted at and others are wondering, too: If there is success in the district — at least, success in the president's eyes — what might that mean for other American cities he thinks need to be fixed? Where does — where could — the federal government go next?