Pierce County exec, sheriff at odds over working with immigration authorities
A Pierce County Council resolution to be voted on Tuesday affirming the county's position on limiting cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities reveals a brewing feud between the Democratic-majority council and the county's conservative sheriff.
The resolution would commit the county to fully complying with the Keep Washington Working Act, a bipartisan state law passed in 2019 that determined a person's immigration status isn't a matter for police action. The law was intended to give immigrants and refugees confidence that going to work or calling police for help in an emergency wouldn't land them in the custody of federal immigration enforcement.
The council's resolution also expresses support for a directive from County Executive Ryan Mello describing how county departments should interact with federal immigration officials.
'Residents must feel confident they can safely seek county services and assistance from all county departments,' Mello wrote in the directive.
Issued in March, the directive instructs county employees not to interfere with federal investigations but also to request to see a warrant if a federal official asks to inspect a non-public area of a county building. It asks employees to report interactions with federal law enforcement officers to a department representative.
Sheriff Keith Swank has said he thinks the Keep Washington Working Act is not constitutional, and, in a phone call with The News Tribune, he described feeling caught between federal directives to enforce immigration detainers and state law that forbids it. An immigration detainer is a request from federal immigration authorities to keep a person detained so federal authorities can take custody of them.
Since Swank began his term as sheriff on Jan. 1, he said, the Sheriff's Office hasn't received any detainers from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. He said the office had arrested a person for a violent crime this year who Swank said is an 'illegal alien.'
Earlier this month, Swank traveled to Washington, D.C., with other sheriffs from across Washington, including Adams County Sheriff Dale Wagner, who is in a legal battle with state Attorney General Nick Brown over allegedly helping federal authorities with immigration enforcement.
Swank said he went to Washington, D.C., to give moral support to Wagner and to bring what he sees as a conflict between state and federal law to the attention of the federal government. While in the capital, Swank and the other sheriffs met with representatives from the Department of Justice, including a brief meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi.
'We need to get this resolved, and ultimately … my whole purpose of going there and still doing this stuff is to bring attention to the matter because I want to have it in front of the U.S. Supreme Court so they can rule once and for all what's what,' Swank said.
An equity note on the County Council's proposed resolution states that its intended to ensure all residents feel confident in their ability to seek county services and assistance without fear, noting that recent executive orders from President Donald Trump sow fear and concern among immigrants and refugees that they'll be targeted by federal law enforcement.
Bernal Baca is executive director of Mi Centro, a decades-old nonprofit in Tacoma that provides services to the Latino community. Baca provided a public comment on the resolution, calling it a 'crucial step' from the local government to ensure residents don't have to worry about being tricked when they renew their driver's license, show up for an appointment or other activities to live normal lives.
'Much of what President Trump has stated about his intentions is concerning, but what the administration has done so far to subvert due process and intimidate honest, hardworking, and god-fearing Americans is deplorable,' Baca said.
Swank doesn't agree with the argument that limiting cooperation between local law enforcement and federal immigration authorities has the effect state law claims it does. He called it a fallacy.
'If people are in America legally, they have nothing to worry about calling 911,' Swank said. 'If they're here illegally and they call 911 because they're a victim of a crime, we're not going to be running their name to see if we can deport them. That doesn't happen.'
'We'll have our hands full in the meantime with violent criminals, citizens and noncitizens,' Swank added.
The County Council's resolution affirms that county property, personnel, funds and equipment can't be used to support federal immigration enforcement activities unless legally required.
Swank described the resolution as a 'broad overreach,' saying he doesn't think the County Council has the authority to impose those restrictions on his office. He also is displeased with the council for not asking for his input on the resolution.
'They do the budget, but they don't have control over how I run the Sheriff's Office,' Swank said. 'But I believe many people think that they should have that control or that they do. So that's kind of a little bit of the rub right there, too.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
10 minutes ago
- Axios
California to sue Trump administration amid LA protest standoff, Newsom says
California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a Monday post that California will sue President Trump, saying he "illegally acted" to federalize the National Guard during protests against federal immigration enforcement in Los Angeles. The big picture: Trump on Saturday signed a memorandum calling in the National Guard — despite opposition from the state's and the city's Democratic leadership. Driving the news: Newsom, after saying Sunday that the Golden State would be taking Trump to court, wrote in a Monday X post that the president had "flamed the fires." He added, "The order he signed doesn't just apply to CA. It will allow him to go into ANY STATE and do the same thing. We're suing him." Trump's order cited "[n]umerous incidents of violence and disorder" and "violent protests" but did not specifically mention California or the Los Angeles area. The other side:"Gavin Newsom's feckless leadership is directly responsible for the lawless riots and violent attacks on law enforcement in Los Angeles," White House spokesperson Abigail Jackson said in a statement provided to Axios. Jackson continued, "Instead of filing baseless lawsuits meant to score political points with his left-wing base, Newsom should focus on protecting Americans by restoring law and order to his state." Friction point: Newsom, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other Democrats have argued Trump's deployment of the National Guard was an unnecessary escalation, while Trump administration officials have railed against their leadership. Border czar Tom Homan did not rule out arrests for Democratic officials in the state should they impede law enforcement or harbor undocumented immigrants in a Saturday interview with NBC News, but said he does not believe Bass had "crossed the line yet." "Come and get me, though guy," Newsom wrote in response. Homan, in a Monday morning interview on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" argued the NBC report was "dishonest." "I was clear they haven't crossed the line," Homan said Monday. "But they're not above the law either." Zoom in: Hegseth in his Monday post included a clip from an interview with commentator Brian Tyler Cohen in which the governor described Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth as "a joke" and characterized Trump as "unhinged." "This is a preview for things to come," he said. "This isn't about LA, per se. It's about us today, it's about you, everyone watching, tomorrow." Context: Trump's Saturday memorandum, which called into federal service some 2,000 National Guard personnel for 60 days, cited rarely used federal powers and sidestepped Newsom.
The Hill
16 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats are drawing closer to the crypto industry despite Trump divisions
WASHINGTON (AP) — As President Donald Trump builds a crypto empire — including hosting a private dinner with top investors at his golf club — Democrats have united in condemning what they call blatant corruption from the White House. But the Democratic Party's own relationship with the emerging crypto industry is far less cut and dried. Work in the Republican-led Senate to legitimize cryptocurrency by adding guardrails has drawn backing from some Democrats, underscoring growing support for the industry in the party. But divisions have opened over the bill, with many demanding it prevent the Republican president and his family from directly profiting from cryptocurrency. 'I'm all on board with the idea of regulating crypto,' said Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn. 'But at this moment, when cryptocurrency is being so clearly used by Donald Trump to facilitate his corruption, I don't think you can close your eyes to that when you're legislating.' The legislation is moving ahead more rapidly than Congress usually acts when an industry is new. But the big money and campaign donations flowing from cryptocurrency firms have made them a new powerhouse on the political scene, one that's increasingly gaining allies and capturing the attention of lawmakers. A look at what to know about the industry's clout and the political fight over what's known as the GENIUS Act: To understand the growing clout of the crypto industry, look no further than the 2024 election. Fairshake, a crypto super political action committee, and its affiliated PACs spent more than $130 million in congressional races. Fairshake spent roughly $40 million supporting Republican Bernie Moreno in Ohio in an effort to defeat Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown. Brown, who lost to Moreno by more than 3 percentage points, was seen as a chief critic of the industry as the chairman of the Senate Banking Committee. 'DC received a clear message that being anti-crypto is a good way to end your career, as it doesn't represent the will of the voters,' Brian Armstrong, the CEO of Coinbase, wrote in a social media post the day after the 2024 election. Coinbase — the largest crypto exchange in the U.S. and biggest contributor to Fairshake — does not view support for its industry as partisan, according to Kara Calvert, the company's vice president of U.S. policy. The industry also spent heavily to support Democrats Ruben Gallego and Elissa Slotkin in their races for open Senate seats in battleground states. Fairshake spent $10 million in support of Slotkin during her successful Senate run against Republican Mike Rodgers, and Slotkin, who won the Michigan race by fewer than 20,000 votes, spoke in favor of crypto on the campaign trail. Slotkin declined to be interviewed. Similar dynamics are setting up ahead of 2026 in contested House and Senate races. Fairshake said in January that it already had $116 million in cash on hand aimed at the 2026 midterm elections. 'We're not slowing down, and everything remains on the table,' Josh Vlasto, a spokesperson for Fairshake, told The Associated Press. Hours before a May 19 vote to move forward on cryptocurrency legislation in the Senate, an advocacy group tied to Coinbase sent an email to the offices of U.S. senators warning that the vote would count toward their crypto-friendliness scores. 'What the spending does is put crypto on the map. It lets members know that this is not a phase, this is real industry, with real dollars, that is developing its hold in Washington,' said Calvert. A significant number of Democrats, 16, joined Republicans in advancing the crypto legislation. The GENIUS Act would create a new regulatory structure for stablecoins, a type of cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar. It is viewed as a step toward consumer protections and greater legitimacy for the industry. The sticking point for many Democrats is that while the bill prohibits members of Congress and their families from profiting off stablecoins, it excludes the president from those restrictions. Trump, once a skeptic of the industry, has vowed in his second term to make the U.S. the global capital of crypto. Meanwhile, he and his family have moved aggressively into nearly every corner of the industry: mining operations, billion-dollar bitcoin purchases, a newly minted stablecoin and a Trump-branded meme coin. Days after Trump's interests in the industry became public in early May, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York urged the Democratic caucus to unite and vote against the package to have a stronger hand in negotiations, according to a person familiar with the matter who insisted on anonymity to discuss private discussions. On May 8, a bloc of Senate Democrats who had previously backed the GENIUS Act reversed course — ultimately voting to block the bill from advancing. Negotiations between Senate Democrats and Republicans followed. The White House was also involved, and in contact with senators' offices on both sides of the aisle, according to a senior official granted anonymity to discuss private conversations. The new version of the bill is now expected to pass the 100-member Senate this month. Amendments are still possible. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore. has filed an amendment — cosponsored by Schumer — that would bar the president and his family from profiting off stablecoins, though it's unlikely to pass. 'There is room for improvements as there often is with a lot of legislation. But with this in particular, we've got issues with the president,' said Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona 'Having said that, this was negotiated with Democrats and Republicans. We got to a place. We voted on it. I expect this is the version we're going to pass.' Still, the legislation is stirring unease. Schumer, asked if he's urging members to vote against the bill, noted that he has opposed the legislation and said 'there's division in our caucus on that issue.' 'There's a gaping hole in this bill that everybody sees,' Murphy said. 'After it's passed, it will be illegal for me to issue a cryptocurrency, but it's legal for the president of the United States.' 'If this bill passes, we kind of go from a dirt road to a paved road,' he said. If the Senate approves the stablecoin legislation, the bill will still need to clear the House before reaching the president's desk. Crypto advocates say the next priority is pushing Congress for market structure legislation, a far more sweeping effort than simply regulating stablecoins. 'Stablecoin is one step of the path. Then you need market structure. We're hopeful that the Senate works together to pass something quickly,' Calvert said. Some Democrats view the legislation as a chance to impose basic guardrails on a rapidly growing industry that's particularly popular among men and younger voters, two groups that drifted from the party in 2024. ___ Associated Press writers Alan Suderman, Lisa Mascaro, Matt Brown and Mary Clare Jalonick contributed to this report.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Downtown L.A. businesses looted overnight; anti-ICE protests expected to continue Monday
Several businesses were looted and vandalized overnight as law enforcement worked to restore order following a weekend of protests that turned violent in Downtown Los Angeles. The protesters had mostly dispersed as of Monday morning, but streets are closed, and a heavy law enforcement presence is in place around several DTLA federal buildings, where National Guard troops have been posted. Graffiti could be seen on business after business, including the Los Angeles Times building, for several blocks. Video recorded just after midnight showed looters going in and out of a T-Mobile store after smashing through the glass front door early Monday morning. Armed officers also responded to an Adidas store after reports of looting near 8th and Broadway. Some of the merchandise taken from the store had been recovered by law enforcement and could be seen on top of their vehicles. One person was taken into custody following a physical altercation with officers, according to freelance media firm KNN. Police have declared all of DTLA an unlawful assembly area; however, a fourth day of protests is expected on Monday. There are early indications of a rally being scheduled for noon in Los Angeles' Grand Park. Police have reported 42 arrests resulting from Sunday's protests, including 19 by the California Highway Patrol, who were called to a demonstration that closed the 101 Freeway through DTLA for several hours. Trump's decision to bring in the National Guard has been heavily criticized by Democratic lawmakers, who claim the use of force may only make the situation worse. Trump has responded by saying he is prepared to bring the U.S. Marines into Los Angeles if needed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
