Harvey Weinstein says he was duped into guaranteeing $45M loan, sues brother and other movie execs
Harvey Weinstein, 72, filed the claims Thursday in a long-running civil case in New York City involving a lender accusing him of defaulting on the loan. He is currently detained while awaiting a retrial on sex crimes charges in New York.
'Harvey Weinstein was deceived by those closest to him, and secured a $45 million dollar loan under the pretense of saving The Weinstein Company,' Imran Ansari, Harvey Weinstein's lawyer, said in a statement. 'While Harvey personally guaranteed the loan, others within The Weinstein Company enriched themselves and strategically undermined him, leaving him 'holding the bag' of debt while 'lining their pockets' when the company was in crisis.'
Ansari alleged Bob Weinstein and others at The Weinstein Co. were in on a plot to position Harvey Weinstein for a downfall in an attempt to seize control of the company, which went bankrupt in 2018 as the sexual misconduct scandal surrounding Harvey Weinstein exploded.
An attorney for Bob Weinstein, Brian Kohn, replied with a brief statement Friday saying, 'Harvey's allegations are entirely without merit,' in an email to The Associated Press.
Former Weinstein Co. chief operating officer David Glasser, now chief executive of 101 Studios, known for its production of Paramount's popular series 'Yellowstone,' is also named in Harvey Weinstein's lawsuit. He did not immediately return a phone message left at his office Friday.
AI International Holdings loaned the money to two affiliates of The Weinstein Co. and Harvey Weinstein, and later sued when it said they defaulted.
Harvey Weinstein alleges that his brother, Glasser and others duped him into guaranteeing the $45 million loan by saying the money would help the financially struggling company. Instead, his lawsuit says, they diverted millions of dollars from the company for improper purposes, leaving it short on cash and Harvey Weinstein liable for repaying the loan.
'As a direct result of these actions, the Companies were drained of, at the very least, $12 million in cash that should have been allocated to repay the Loan owed to AI International,' the lawsuit says. 'This mismanagement left the Companies unable to satisfy their financial obligations, resulting in insolvency and placing Weinstein at substantial personal financial risk as the guarantor of the Loan.'
The lawsuit, filed in the state Supreme Court in Manhattan, says Weinstein was made to suffer 'severe and outrageous financial and reputational harm.'
It also makes several allegations of financial misconduct against Bob Weinstein, Glasser and others.
It accuses Bob Weinstein of withdrawing at least $6 million from company accounts under false pretenses, to give himself priority over creditors including AI International.
The lawsuit alleges Glasser approved and received $5 million in excessive bonuses and unauthorized financial transactions, and used company funds to pay his father $1 million despite no legitimate business reason.
AI International Holdings sued Harvey Weinstein and the two affiliates of The Weinstein Co. in late 2017. The lawsuit said they defaulted on the loan after AI International had ordered the entire balance to be paid immediately because Harvey Weinstein had been dismissed as co-chairman amid the sexual misconduct allegations.
According to Harvey Weinstein, Bob Weinstein and Glasser settled their liability for the loan with AI International for about $15 million due to 'bad faith negotiations,' leaving Harvey Weinstein responsible for the remaining $30 million plus interest.
Harvey Weinstein's lawsuit seeks to shield him from any financial liability for the loan, as well as punitive damages for alleged fraud and financial misconduct and his legal fees.
Bob Weinstein recently asked the judge to reject subpoenas for documents and a deposition issued by Harvey Weinstein's lawyer.
Harvey Weinstein, who also co-founded the film company Miramax, was once one of the most powerful people in Hollywood, having produced films such as 'Pulp Fiction' and 'The Crying Game.'
In 2017, he became the most prominent villain of the #MeToo movement, which erupted when women began going public with accounts of his behavior.
He has long maintained that any sexual activity was consensual.
Harvey Weinstein is being retried on charges that he forcibly performed oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant in 2006 and raped an aspiring actor in 2013. Another charge filed in September alleges he forced oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
His 2020 conviction and 23-year prison sentence were overturned last year, as an appeals court found the trial judge unfairly allowed testimony against Weinstein based on allegations that weren't part of the case.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Condé Nast Traveler
2 hours ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
Wish You Had More PTO? These European Countries Have the Most Paid Time Off
Do you ever wish you had more PTO? Thanks to Moorepay's Global Paid Leave Report, we have a list of countries with the most paid time off, and it's easier than ever to see how we stand up against the rest of the world. The 2025 report reveals that the US ranks dead last with no guarantee of paid days of annual leave, paid public holidays, or even days off. While some companies in the states can be more generous than others, it's clear that the US falls way behind the paid leave policies of European countries including Italy, Spain, France, Greece, and Cyprus. Across the pond, UK bank holidays are a part of statutory paid leave, and Moorepay's report classifies all 28 days as 'paid annual leave days'—meaning the UK comes 10th in the world behind countries including Togo, France, and Bahrain. On the other end of the global chart is Yemen, where workers are entitled to 30 paid annual leave days and 16 paid public holidays, resulting in a world-leading 46 days of total paid leave. That said, the total time off workers are entitled to across the year, based on the average salary, adds just $108 to their bank accounts. Below, we've crunched the numbers and rounded up the Europe-specific data—these are the countries with the most paid time off. 10. Luxembourg Paid annual leave days: 26 Paid public holidays: 11 Total time off days: 37 Average earnings during time off: $11,315
Bloomberg
5 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Norway's $1.9 Trillion Wealth Fund Sells Off Israeli Assets
Norway's $1.9 trillion sovereign wealth fund has divested from 11 Israeli companies and is terminating all contracts with external managers in Israel following public outcry over its investments linked to the war in Gaza. Pressure on Norges Bank Investment Management — the official name of the fund — has grown in recent months, reflecting domestic concern over the suffering in Gaza. The fund held stock in some 61 Israeli companies as of the end of June this year, NBIM said in a statement.
Harvard Business Review
7 hours ago
- Harvard Business Review
Should You Stop Investing in AI (for Now)?
The conventional wisdom—AI is the future; keep investing—is pushing corporate leaders to spend and scale, faster, faster, faster. Leaders around the world are greenlighting massive investments in AI. The International Data Corporation (IDC) projects that global spending on AI will reach $632 billion by 2028. There's good reason to be bullish about the long-term potential of AI to change how businesses work. A pivotal third wave— agentic AI —is here, and it has the potential to shift the way companies unlock value. But most companies aren't on the right track to achieve that value. Despite AI's growth, 51% of companies lack mature capabilities, and only 4% leverage AI for competitive advantage. Companies aren't generating ROI on their AI investments because they're still thinking about AI as a siloed, piecemeal solution instead of the data, software, and process foundation for a completely different way to power a business. Leaders urgently need an approach to help them make smarter, value-focused decisions about AI—one that will help them avoid throwing money at new solutions and hoping something will stick. Instead, they must ensure they're investing in tomorrow's core value-driving areas to build competitive advantage. Our prescription for every business is simple. Stop to Reflect Few businesses are creating value or disrupting their sector using AI today. That's why we recommend stopping further investment in AI that could be eroding value. If you're investing in areas that aren't your company's value core for today and tomorrow, you're just spinning your wheels. If you're investing in solutions that massive tech companies are already building, you're duplicating efforts. Instead, wait. The market will evolve and create solutions for you. In the near future, you'll probably be able to buy a solution for much less than you could build it now or maintain it in the longer run. We worked with a global company in the chemical industry that was experimenting with AI here and there around the organization, doing small-scale tests but not committing to a clear strategy. Their actions showed they were thinking about AI as an interesting ad-hoc solution, not an industry game-changer. To develop a more strategic stance on AI, the company's leaders stopped spending AI dollars on random experimentations. They realized that even if some of the tests proved valuable, most would fail, eating up time and resources. They needed to stop chasing tech solutions and start investing in the game-changing business outcomes they wanted to drive. Reflect to Reframe Industries are going through value migration, and in most cases they are not linear in nature. Leaders must understand those shifts to always have one eye on what's next, why, and where that will come from. Think about how your sector will evolve in the next three years. What trends can you observe now? What scenarios are most likely? Then, consider how you can invest in or build to compete and win in the future against your peers. The key is investing in tomorrow, not optimizing yesterday. Value creation is non-linear, so you must think tomorrow-first, then work backward to make the right investments in areas where your organization can leverage disproportionate value. If you already have a competitive advantage in your supply chain, don't assume that your AI investments should also be in the supply chain. Instead, consider future areas that will drive the most return in the market for your sector and for you as a company. Ask: What is our core competitive differentiator today? How will that change over time? What will possibly be the biggest differentiator to win in the future, and why? What are some adjacencies and forces that will play out, and how do those suggest you should play differently? After they paused current spending, the global company we worked with reflected on the future of the chemicals industry. They identified a few key predictions: Their industry would become more cost-driven, and customers would pay for differentiation. To win the cost game, they needed to focus on supply-chain efficiency—however, they also realized this would become table stakes over time. AI-driven R&D would be an important differentiator, critical for diversification and growth. R&D would need to balance product/service innovation with engineer-to-cost and time-to-market expectations. How the company relates to customers and delivers what they truly need would amplify their positioning and create real market differentiation. Reframe to Focus Once you've stopped the free-flowing investment in all things AI and paused to consider future market opportunities, you can invest in the areas that will assure value and differentiate your positioning. Double down on investments in those core areas that will guarantee you a first-mover advantage, and use AI to unlock tomorrow's value. The companies that will win in the next era of AI will invest in people and processes as well as tech. Investing solely in solutions is definitely not enough. The chemical company we worked with reframed their strategy to ruthlessly focus on value by investing in AI-powered innovation in R&D and commercial. They adopted a VC mindset, which means they stay agile, build on success where they see positive outcomes, and aren't afraid to pause or kill a project or idea if it isn't working. They considered how to invest in people + process + technology to design a transformation that brings people along and gets the most out of their current workforce. They recognized that AI is a game-changer, not an incremental change. Therefore, their strategy needed to be much bigger than chasing a point solution. . . . The reality is clear: AI-innovation will keep coming, bigger and faster. The time to establish a strong foundation for that world-rocking business transformation enabled by AI is now. Every leader needs a clear-eyed strategy in order to leave their company better than they found it, with AI investments that will drive value, not distraction or destruction. No matter what industry a company is in, it's time for leaders to flip the conversation on AI investment. The most successful leaders will move from a spend-speed-scale mentality to a smarter, more value-based approach.
