Cumberland Council staff recruitment and retention concerns raised
Members of the full council met at the Civic Centre in Carlisle on Tuesday (April 29) and, during the time set aside for questions, councillor Trevor Allison (Dalston and Burgh, Conservative) raised the subject.
He asked: 'Recruitment and retention was identified as one of the principal features of the CIPFA Report on the Cumberland authority's financial position.
'Their report leading to the statutory council meeting with the external auditors, identified the need to recruit additional experienced and qualified financial staff.
'At the same time, the regular Cumberland internal updates show management's commitment to staffing is likely to remain a feature for some time to come.
'Given this pressure in what is still our formative years for the authority, this should not be at the expense of monitoring and addressing in a fair and equitable manner, the issue of absenteeism.
'High absence levels are costly to the authority and local taxpayers, especially if it involves resorting to agency staff to cover absence, as distinct from vacancies. It is reasonable to assume that this will still reflect in some measure the statistics of the four legacy authorities.'
His questions were:
Have we adopted a unified process for recording, analysing and dealing with absence, and are the figures trending up or down?
What is the current sick absence rate in days per working year and the ratio of long term to short term absence?
Councillor Barbara Cannon (St Michaels, Labour), the financial planning and assets portfolio holder, said sickness absence data was a combination of short term and long term absences and it provided 'monthly snapshot'. She added: 'The rate has begun to decelerate.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
London's new stock market for private firms will be a big draw for billionaire investors
The London Stock Exchange Group's (LSEG.L) upcoming private securities market, powered by the Pisces framework, will be a transformative innovation that will open up liquidity in the private capital space, according to CEO David Schwimmer. The Private Intermittent Securities and Capital Exchange System (Pisces), proposed by the previous Conservative government and backed by Labour chancellor Rachel Reeves, will allow investors in private companies to sell shares on regulated exchanges. The London Stock Exchange Group is one of the companies planning to operate a Pisces trading venue, where shares could be traded on a limited number of days each year. "I think it's a good innovation," Schwimmer told Yahoo Finance UK, signalling his optimism about the platform's potential impact on both private companies and institutional players. The LSEG CEO explained how the platform would enable private companies to access public market infrastructure without going public. Read more: What you need to know about UK's private stock market Pisces "The private securities market that we are launching this year, which is on the Pisces framework, is a really interesting innovation for this market," Schwimmer said, adding that there has been a growing demand for liquidity among private companies. While many private companies today remain closed off to public investors, Schwimmer said that the market for private equity is expanding rapidly. "You have a lot of companies now that are sizeable and maybe looking for liquidity but do not want to go public", he explained. These companies may seek liquidity for their limited partners (LPs), shareholders, or employees, without leaping to a complete public listing. For Schwimmer, the Pisces platform solves this dilemma, offering access to the same infrastructure and liquidity typically reserved for publicly traded firms, filling a critical gap in the market. According to Schwimmer, one of the key advantages of the Pisces framework is that it can serve as a conduit for institutional investors, who in the past have had limited access to private companies. "Historically, institutional investors have not had a lot of access to private companies unless they get to participate in an opaque kind of one-off private placement process," he said, pointing to the exclusivity of most private equity transactions. By leveraging the structure of the London Stock Exchange, Pisces should give institutional investors more transparency and access to the growing pool of private market assets. Read more: London Stock Exchange open to dual listing of Indian companies, says LSEG boss Schwimmer also suggested that the Pisces framework could reshape how liquidity is accessed and managed in the private market. "This can be a great way for [private companies] to access effectively public market infrastructure on the London Stock Exchange," he said. Through Pisces, these companies would gain access to the trading systems and liquidity that are typically the domain of publicly listed firms. London's new Pisces private company stock market will launch later this year. A marketplace for private shares Pisces is intended to serve as both a showcase and an exchange for private companies seeking capital. Entrepreneurs will be able to organise scheduled trading events where they can offer existing shares to new investors, at prices they determine. Only pre-existing equity will be traded; the issuance of new shares will not be permitted on the platform. Firms wanting to operate a Pisces venue must first apply for authorisation from the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA). Once approved, they can host intermittent auctions that enable founders, early employees, or existing shareholders to realise some value without relinquishing control through a full-scale initial public offering. Read more: UK taxpayers 'subsidising' S&P 500, says LSEG boss Company owners will retain the right to screen prospective investors under current proposals. This power would allow them to block rivals from acquiring stakes or to prevent any single investor from amassing an outsized influence on the shareholder register. A lower-bar entry to equity liquidity Pisces could offer a lower-cost and more flexible alternative to public markets for fast-growing businesses. Unlike IPOs, which require extensive regulatory disclosure and the production of detailed prospectuses, companies listing on Pisces would face a significantly lighter disclosure burden. Supporters of the scheme argue that Pisces could enhance liquidity in private markets by enabling regular share auctions, helping attract a broader base of long-term investors to companies that might otherwise be overlooked. The platform is also expected to provide a cheaper route to equity liquidity than engaging investment banks to manage private placements. Adding to its appeal, the UK Treasury has pledged to exempt trades executed on Pisces from stamp duty, the 0.5% tax levied on share purchases on public exchanges. The exemption aims to improve liquidity and make UK equity markets more competitive globally. The Pisces proposals come amid broader efforts by the government and regulators to revitalise the UK's capital markets and encourage greater economic investment.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Canada's Legal Tool to Quash Strikes Faces Mounting Resistance
(Bloomberg) -- At Toronto's biggest airport on Sunday, the national president of the Canadian Union of Public Employees tore up a back-to-work order to a cheering crowd. Why New York City Has a Fleet of New EVs From a Dead Carmaker Chicago Schools Seeks $1 Billion of Short-Term Debt as Cash Gone A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Trump Takes Second Swing at Cutting Housing Assistance for Immigrants It's an image likely to be invoked the next time a union is at loggerheads with an employer. Air Canada and its 10,500 flight attendants reached a tentative deal at 4:23 a.m. Toronto time on Tuesday after a nine-hour mediated negotiation. But before that, workers had ignored an edict from the Canada Industrial Relations Board to return to work, which the government sought after the strike began early on Saturday, crippling the nation's biggest airline. The labor board then declared the ongoing walkout illegal early Monday, but the flight attendants pressed on, repeatedly forcing Air Canada to delay plans to restart flights. Operations are now expected to resume Tuesday evening. The standoff has escalated a fight over a law that was rarely used until recently. Now, Canada's government triggers it regularly to end labor disruptions. And the cabin crew rebellion — unprecedented for this law, but not the country's first civil disobedience against back-to-work orders — is raising questions about whether defiance will be the new norm. Section 107 of the Canada Labour Code has been used by ministers to 'secure industrial peace' by directing the CIRB, a court-like administrative body, to end a strike and impose binding arbitration. But companies have become 'more dependent' on betting it will be deployed, and it removes 'significant checks we have in industrial relations to ensure that there's obviously balance between employers and employees' and the public interest, said Michael Lynk, associate professor of law at Western University in London, Ontario. 'For the union, it's a significant defensive victory,' Lynk said. 'This may be a lesson for the federal government not to rely so promiscuously on 107, when there are future strikes or lockouts on the horizon.' In 2011, under Conservative Prime Minister Stephen Harper, jobs minister Lisa Raitt used the provision to ask the board to consider imposing a deal or arbitration after Air Canada flight attendants twice voted down collective agreement proposals. 'We wouldn't actually order the CIRB to order workers back to work, partly because I assumed the CIRB would simply say no to me,' she said in a message. 'These are uncharted waters.' Last year, under Prime Minister Mark Carney's predecessor Justin Trudeau, Section 107 was used seven times. The labor minister directed the CIRB to end a strike at the nation's two main railways after less than 24 hours. The unions returned to work but challenged the order in court. Then Trudeau also used it to head off disputes at the country's biggest ports and Canada Post. (It was earlier deployed unsuccessfully to prevent a strike at WestJet Airlines Ltd.) The trend has continued under Carney, elected in April under the same Liberal banner. On Saturday, Section 107 was triggered 12 hours into the walkout. Although business groups now call for governments to invoke the law without hesitation, opponents argue it undermines collective bargaining by acting as a get-out clause the private sector can rely on, without politicians having to pass formal back-to-work legislation in Parliament, which would be difficult. 'Until just a few years ago Section 107 was something that was only used on occasion,' said Sussanne Skidmore, president of the BC Federation of Labour, at a raucous picket line protest at Vancouver International Airport on Sunday, moments before the flight attendants defied the order. 'Even then, it should never have been used, but the federal Liberals have shown us time and time again that they're prepared to use it all the time.' Canada's unions held an emergency meeting on Sunday and demanded the government kill Section 107, according to the Canadian Labour Congress, an umbrella organization. The group called the Air Canada showdown a 'decisive blow to employers who think they can sidestep fair bargaining' with the law. 'Really a Nuke' Opposition parties have also criticized Carney, who leads a minority government and will need to work with them to pass legislation once Parliament reconvenes in September. Don Davies, interim leader of the left-wing New Democratic Party, said at the Vancouver rally that employers 'don't bargain honestly when they know that big brother in government is sitting there ready to go to bail them out when they get in trouble.' 'This is really a nuke,' said Valerio De Stefano, professor at York University's Osgoode Hall Law School in Toronto. 'If I was a judge sitting in the court, I would ask myself whether it would be lawful for the court to basically sanction an order that is at odds, or possibly at odds, with the Charter and international law,' he said, referring to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which includes the right to strike. And the issue with binding arbitration, according to Western University's Lynk, is that it's not known for awarding 'innovative or new demands by a union,' but rather seeks to replicate existing agreements. Despite declaring the strike unlawful, the CIRB, government and Air Canada didn't publicly pursue court orders to enforce action. If that had happened, judges may have found the union in contempt of court, leading to fines and possibly even jail time, Lynk said. But even such measures won't necessarily deter a strike. Mark Hancock — the union leader who ripped up the order on Sunday — said he was willing to go to jail for the fight. Foreigners Are Buying US Homes Again While Americans Get Sidelined What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Women's Earnings Never Really Recover After They Have Children Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Yosemite Employee Fired After Flying Trans Pride Flag ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Canada opposition leader Poilievre wins seat, to take on Carney over tariffs
By David Ljunggren OTTAWA (Reuters) -The leader of Canada's official opposition Conservatives, Pierre Poilievre, secured a return to Parliament and a chance to grill Prime Minister Mark Carney, staging a comeback after unexpectedly losing his seat in an April election. Poilievre won 80.4% of the vote in a special election on Monday in the parliamentary constituency of Battle River-Crowfoot in the province of Alberta, a Conservative stronghold. The sitting legislator stepped down to allow Poilievre to run in his seat, thereby allowing him to return to the House of Commons. Poilievre, who accuses the Liberal government of botching its handling of U.S. relations and running up out-of-control deficits, will be able to confront Carney when the House of Commons returns on September 15. Carney, who took over as prime minister in March, secured a strong minority government in April's federal election on a promise to stand up to U.S. President Donald Trump. He has since moderated his approach even as Washington imposed more tariffs. "The deficit is spiraling out of control, inflation is up, elbows are down," Poilievre told a victory rally. Carney offered his congratulations in a post on X. Carney is in no immediate danger politically. Although the Liberals have a minority, they should be able to rely on the support of smaller parties to survive confidence votes. A Nanos Research poll earlier this month put the Liberals at 44% popular support compared with 33% for the Conservatives. Carney has pulled the Liberals more to the center and Poilievre will find it harder to draw a sharp contrast, said pollster Nik Nanos, CEO of Nanos Research. "Poilievre needs to articulate what he learned from the last federal election and how his government would be different than a Carney government," he said via email. At the start of the year the Conservatives looked set for a crushing election victory over the Liberals of then-Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, who were far behind in polls after more than nine years in power. But Liberal fortunes soared after Trudeau announced he was stepping down and Trump began threatening Canada with tariffs and annexation. Solve the daily Crossword
