US vetoes UN Security Council resolution demanding Gaza ceasefire
The United States on Wednesday vetoed a UN Security Council resolution calling for an 'immediate, unconditional and permanent' ceasefire between Israel and the militant group Hamas in Gaza.
The US was the only nation to oppose the resolution. Fourteen others, including the United Kingdom, voted in favor. There were no abstentions.
Dorothy Camille Shea, the United States ambassador to the UN, said the US opposed the resolution because it did not call for Hamas to disarm and leave Gaza.
'(The resolution) is unacceptable for what it does say, it is unacceptable for what it does not say, and it is unacceptable for the manner in which it has been advanced,' she said in comments before the vote took place.
The US 'has taken the very clear position since this conflict began that Israel has a right to defend itself, which includes defeating Hamas and ensuring they are never again in a position to threaten Israel. In this regard, any product that undermines our close ally Israel's security is a nonstarter,' she added.
This is not the first time the US has vetoed a UN Security Council draft resolution on Gaza. In November 2024, it vetoed one calling for an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire, on the grounds it would not have secured the release of hostages.
The United Kingdom said it 'regrets' that the latest resolution 'was unable to reach a consensus.'
'The United Kingdom voted in favor of this resolution today because of the intolerable situation in Gaza,' the UK's Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York Barbara Woodward said following the vote.
'We are determined to see an end to this war, secure the release of the hostages held by Hamas and alleviate the catastrophic humanitarian situation for Palestinians in Gaza,' she added.
Palestinians gather to receive a hot meal at a food distribution point at a refugee camp in central Gaza on May 21.
Eyad Baba/AFP/Getty Images
Woodward described Israel's expansion of its military operations in Gaza and its severe restrictions on aid as 'unjustifiable, disproportionate, and counterproductive.'
Israel in mid May launched a major new offensive in Gaza it says is aimed at destroying Hamas and freeing hostages, sparking condemnation from the United Nations and aid organizations who warn civilians are bearing the brunt of the expanded assault.
The ambassador also said the UK condemned Hamas' October 7, 2023, attack on Israel and demanded the militant group release all the hostages 'immediately and unconditionally,' saying 'Hamas can have no role in the future governance of Gaza.'
The ambassador also restated the UK's position that 'a two-state solution is the only way to bring the long-lasting peace, stability and security that both Israelis and Palestinians deserve.'
Meanwhile, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar thanked US President Donald Trump and the US administration 'for standing shoulder to shoulder with Israel and vetoing this one-sided resolution in the UN Security Council.'
Protesters in Tel Aviv on May 24 demand the release of Israeli hostages kidnapped during the deadly October 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas.
Nir Elias/Reuters
'The proposed resolution only strengthens Hamas and undermines American efforts to achieve a hostage deal,' he added in a post on X shortly after the voting.
The draft text had demanded 'an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties' and the 'immediate and unconditional lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza and its safe and unhindered distribution at scale.' It also demanded 'the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups.'
Israel launched the war in Gaza after Hamas and other Palestinian armed groups carried out a surprise attack on southern Israel on October 7, 2023, killing 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and taking 251 hostages. It was the deadliest terror attack in Israel's history.
The Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza said the number of people killed by Israel's offensive in Gaza in the wake of the October 7 attacks now exceeds 54,000, most of whom are women and children.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily News Egypt
10 hours ago
- Daily News Egypt
Arab, global backlash follows Netanyahu's ‘Greater Israel' remarks amid escalating Gaza war
Arab and international condemnation intensified on Wednesday over Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's remarks linking himself to what he called the 'Greater Israel vision,' as fighting in Gaza escalated and the death toll continued to rise amid warnings of a deepening humanitarian catastrophe. The Jordanian Ministry of Foreign Affairs denounced Netanyahu's comments as a 'dangerous provocative escalation,' a threat to state sovereignty, and a violation of international law and the UN Charter. Ministry spokesperson Ambassador Sufian Qudah dismissed the remarks as 'futile illusions' that would not undermine Jordan or other Arab states, saying they reflected 'the embattled state of the Israeli government and its international isolation' amid the war on Gaza and the occupied West Bank. He urged urgent international action to stop such incitement, which he warned threatened regional security. According to The Times of Israel, Netanyahu—wanted by the International Criminal Court on war crimes charges—told an interviewer he saw himself on a 'historic and spiritual mission' encompassing territory earmarked for a future Palestinian state as well as parts of Jordan and Egypt. In Cairo, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and Saudi counterpart Prince Faisal bin Farhan reiterated their 'absolute rejection' of an Israeli ministerial decision to plan for the occupation of Gaza. In a phone call, the two described the move as an attempt to 'entrench illegal occupation' and perpetuate a 'genocidal war' in violation of international humanitarian law. Abdelatty said Egypt was working with Qatar and the United States to broker a deal for detainee and prisoner exchanges, a ceasefire, and the unimpeded delivery of humanitarian aid. On the ground, Gaza's Health Ministry reported 123 deaths and 437 injuries in the past 24 hours, bringing the toll since fighting resumed on March 18 to more than 10,200. Since the war began on October 7, 2023, over 61,700 Palestinians have been killed and 154,500 wounded. The ministry also reported eight new famine-related deaths—including three children—in the past day, bringing the total from hunger and malnutrition to 235, including 106 children. Palestinian media said seven people were killed and 20 wounded when Israeli aircraft targeted aid security personnel in northern Gaza. Meanwhile, the Associated Press cited sources claiming Israel was in talks with South Sudan to take in Palestinians from Gaza as part of a broader Israeli-U.S. displacement plan. The South Sudanese government denied the report as baseless. New Zealand Prime Minister Christopher Luxon sharply criticised Netanyahu, saying he had 'lost his mind' and condemning annexation, forced displacement, and the Gaza blockade as 'utterly appalling' and 'completely unacceptable.' Abdelatty's remarks that nothing precluded the deployment of international forces in Gaza—echoed by French President Emmanuel Macron's proposal for a UN-mandated coalition—rekindled debate over postwar governance of the enclave, including a possible Palestinian Authority return and prospects for a broader political settlement. Meanwhile, a Hamas delegation arrived in Cairo for talks with Egyptian officials on the war and developments in the West Bank, Jerusalem, and Al-Aqsa Mosque. Israeli Channel 12 reported that Tel Aviv was considering sending a senior delegation to Doha later this week to negotiate a comprehensive agreement covering all issues, rather than a partial deal.
Mada
10 hours ago
- Mada
Some questions for Avichay Adraee
Avichay Adraee, spokesperson for the Israeli occupation forces, posted on X in the first hours of August 11, addressing a dead Anas al-Sharif in Arabic. 'Anas al-Sharif: Your truth has been unveiled. The documents of Hamas and Jihad which were found in Gaza and which we reveal today do not leave a place for doubt. Anas al-Sharif is active in the military wing of Hamas. You may present yourself as a journalist pained by the pleas of the people of Gaza. But now everyone knows you are a Hamasawy, by belonging and by profession. Everyone knows now that you joined Hamas's East Jabalia Brigade in 2013, and that you were hit in a training incident as part of the brigade in 2017. You were the head of a cell in the field of firing rockets. You were a fighter, I have no idea if you were a good or a bad one, in the elite units of Hamas. All the support statements that will be published by Al Jazeera for you don't matter. Now everyone knows the truth. You, who were supposed to be a journalist from the north of Gaza, have been exposed: Your real job is among the most terrorist, criminal and assaulting movements for the people of Gaza. I am not surprised that you work for a media organization that covers up Hamas's crimes and its use of the people while lying to the world — ayb w ar [disgrace and shame].' Parking one's disdain for the man for a moment, a few questions: Why is he speaking to a dead person his military just killed? What compels him to address the lifeless? Is it guilt, fear, the need to hear himself justify the death? Is he haunted? Would he be able to deliver these accusations face-to-face to an alive Anas? What kind of evidence is this — held up to a supposedly enlightened civilized world? And why is it being circulated in an animated social media world, with Adraee blasting his 'facts' into the void, only to be recycled by his army's mouthpieces, as well as most international media? It betrays even the pretense of professional, credible, Western-style journalism. With this genocide, has Israel given up on posing to the world as the luminous democracy in the midst of the darkness of our jungle that is the Arab World? Or does it need a different spokesperson? Or perhaps there is really no propaganda possible for genocide. Does Adraee's opinion on whether Anas was a good or bad combatant matter, was it part of the decision to kill him? There is a demeaning suggestion in the statement 'I have no idea if he was a good or a bad combatant.' Maybe if he was a bad combatant, he could have been spared being targeted and killed? Is the killing in Gaza a moral punishment or a functional strategy? Or are these two categories collapsed in the scheme of genocide, manifesting in the killing of those who tell the world about it [1]. Is it simply a vulgar slip from Adraee, mobilizing a whole chain of imperial vulgarity in the mainstream media apparatus? Not that imperialism is polite, but in trying to lock itself within some modern boundaries of reason, it seems unable to contain its own vulgarity. Does time matter in military calculus? Adraee admits that Anas is a journalist at the end of his post, and that said military activities are in the past. Is this a retroactive punishment for military activity (for which we have no evidence), or a current punishment for thinking? And if it is a current punishment for thinking, is the plan to keep killing all those who hate Israel? What will be the evidence and the means to justify the killings, in a world brewing Israeli hatred? Why is Adraee concerned with disgrace and shame — ' ayb w ar ' as he put it in Arabic — when he could have simply applauded the bravery of his military for ending the disgraceful and shameful life of Anas? Is it because the way Anas was killed by the Occupation doesn't quite end the disgrace and shame, because essentially, Israel's aerial and technological supremacy are sites of shame, primarily for Adraee and his people, as they fight the land at a distance from the sky? And is there 'evidence' as well against Mohamed Qraiqea, Ibrahim Zaher, Moamen Elewa, Mohamed al-Khalidi and Mohamed Noufal, the five other journalists who were killed alongside their driver by the airstrike that targeted Anas? Or is it a lack of precision on the part of Israel's supreme aerial and technological capacity that made them collateral damage? And where does more shame lie: in the distant cold killing from above or in the lack of precision? The truth is that these questions may be rhetorical, repetitive and naive. They might be a waste of time, when the coverage needs to continue, as Anas would say. Perhaps they carry a not-so-invested invitation to stop the PR accompanying the killing and just stick to the killing. But more importantly, they signal the mountains of anger. They are also a way to note the shame (my own) and the powerlessness. It is the anger at such direct witnessing of imperial brutality, of its boundlessness and capacity to introduce new frontiers, while still dressing it up in the rational language of evidence and justice. It is the shame of being a journalist, a five-hour drive away from Gaza, and surviving Anas. It is the powerlessness of journalism in the face of the military state. I joined the journalism squads in a moment of danger, that of the second Palestinian intifada, followed by the United States invasion of Iraq. Too colossal for my early introduction to politics, the events demanded to be captured, to be translated. Becoming a journalist was an act of belonging, of being in the midst, of staying. It was an act of understanding the scope of what is happening by giving it a language. Such were the politics of truth in this journalism. It wasn't an aspiration to belong to an aerial category called 'journalism,' where the truth descends from above like bombs. Like its own subject of coverage, the event, and its own channel of mediation, language, the truth was always fragile, chaotic, experiential, constantly unfolding, morphing, shocking, distressing and rarely reassuring. It was personal, full of sedimented histories, and we admit it. The truth about the truth is that it was never ready-made or pre-written. In a temporal horizon, this truth holds a future, unknown, uncertain. Adraee and Israel's truth about Anas, Gaza and Palestine hold no futurity. They are in the captivity of their ready-made truth [2]. It's the doom of repetition in the face of uncertainty. Anas is resting in the powerlessness of death ceasing his journalism, just as we are resting in the powerlessness of our lives as journalists. Perhaps there is a truth there too, a power to this powerlessness: the only journalism possible today is that of Anas and his colleagues broadcasting the genocide from the ground until they themselves are swallowed up by it. They say in the enlightened world that journalism is not a crime. But in ours, especially after Gaza, journalism is not a profession. It's a commitment to an enmeshment of people and land in crisis, the messy here and now where history crashes into the present and its capitulation to power. That's how Anas, Hassan Eslaih, Hossam Shabat, Fatima Hassouna and the rest of the over 240 journalists killed in Gaza did the job. That's what I learn from them. One tries to stick to a hope that a new world must be born to counteract this carnage, a rewriting of civilization from the flaws of our times, or at least of the catalog of journalism, because of all the happy endings we were force fed in popular culture. But this is not a film; it's the reality of living a life unto death. A life unto death holds space for dreamworlds, our own version of a ' Riviera ' in Gaza: a newsroom by the sea for all the surviving journalists, a universal school of journalism in the mainland, a place from which philosophy might begin again. Footnotes: [1] In Sarah Rifky's edit, she responds in the place of Adraee: To me the admission is also a revelation, without moral discernment, where Hannah Arendt's 'banality of evil' meets Achille Mbembe's 'necropolitics,' and death comes from a system that knows nothing, cares nothing, except that it can.
Mada
10 hours ago
- Mada
Israel conducts double strike on aid security teams in northern Gaza, killing 5
In one of its largest attacks on aid security personnel since the start of the war on Gaza, Israeli aircraft carried out two simultaneous strikes on Wednesday, hitting teams in the Saftawy area of northern Gaza City and in Karama, northwest of the city, eyewitnesses told Mada Masr. The strikes have killed at least five people, according to Gaza officials. The aid security groups, some of which are coordinated by families and clans in the northern governorates of Gaza, play a crucial role in ensuring that the little aid that does enter the strip reaches warehouses for wider distribution. Israeli surveillance aircraft fired on an aid security team as they waited for aid trucks set to arrive through the Zikim crossing in northern Gaza en route to international relief agency warehouses. One eyewitness told Mada Masr that at around 1 pm, a powerful explosion was heard in the Saftawy area, where several security team members had been gathered. Thick smoke filled the air along with the cries of the injured, they said. When the smoke cleared, it became evident that many had been killed and others wounded, including civilians. Bodies lay scattered across the street, the eyewitness said. ' I counted eight dead,' the eyewitness said. Some of the injured were rushed to northern Gaza's Sheikh Radwan Clinic in civilian cars before ambulances arrived minutes later to collect the bodies. Concurrently, Israeli aircraft struck another aid security group in the Karama area. Several security personnel had been standing near the Andalus Tower in northern Karama, awaiting aid trucks, Mahmoud Adas, who witnessed the attack, said. The location, he noted, is somewhat far from Israeli troops' positions, but was nonetheless struck by a surveillance aircraft flying overhead, killing many on the spot. Faris Afanah, head of ambulance and emergency services in northern Gaza, told Mada Masr that emergency teams recovered one body and several wounded from the Karama strike, along with four bodies and six wounded from Saftawy. He confirmed that civilians had transported other victims from both sites to medical facilities in their own cars. The Israel military has repeatedly targeted aid convoy security teams, whether organized by Hamas police or other community initiatives, throughout nearly two years of war. The targeting has disrupted the delivery of desperately needed humanitarian aid to international organizations' warehouses and ultimately prevented its distribution. Deaths due to malnutrition, many among children, have accelerated over recent weeks as families and medics struggle to care for one another six months into Israel's aid blockade. Israeli aircraft struck a vehicle carrying aid security personnel in central Gaza's Deir al-Balah on Sunday, killing everyone inside and wounding several civilians. The repeated attacks have fueled a surge in looting by armed gangs — stealing supplies and attacking aid-seekers in full view
