Longtime Newport News treasurer files as an Independent
NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (WAVY) — Longtime Newport News Treasurer Marty Eubank will seek re-election as an independent.
Eubank filed paperwork and qualified with the Department of Voter Registration in May.
For nearly three decades, Eubank has served as the Newport News treasurer. In March 2025, Eubank shared exclusively with WAVY-TV 10 that he would not seek re-election.
Previous: Longtime Newport News treasurer will not seek reelection; 3 candidates enter race
'I did not have a change of heart. I have worked for the city for 41 years. I've been the longest-serving treasurer of 28 years for Newport News. I'm very proud of that. I very much looked forward to retiring this year,' he said. 'I did everything I could to position myself to run in this campaign for one more term. But after I met Sanu Dieng-Cooper, I talked to her and realized what a perfect candidate she would be to be my successor, which is something I've been looking for the past few years! She impressed me with her ideas, her vision, her knowledge of the office already, and her understanding of what it does. I realized she'd be the perfect candidate to win the Democratic primary. That's when I decided to bow out of the primary. I fully support Sanu. I 100% still endorse being the next Treasurer of Newport News. I'm confident that the voters will see how qualified she is. They will support and vote for her on June 17.'
Your Local Election Headquarters on WAVY.com
The Newport News Department of Voter Registration confirms that Sanu Dieng-Cooper and Derek Reason are the Democratic candidates for the June primary. There are no Republican candidates. Justin Kennedy, an independent candidate for treasurer, will appear on the November 4th ballot.
Eubank told 10 On Your Side he filed as an independent following the 2025 NAACP Newport News Candidate Forum on April 30.
'I am confident she [Sanu] will win the Primary. But you can't predict an election, and that 1% off chance that Sanu might not win. Then I position myself to come back into the general election,' said Eubank. 'After watching the NAACP forum and listening to both sides, I was in the audience. I became concerned that Sanu Cooper has to be elected as our next treasurer. She has to!'
Eubank also received a Freedom of Information (FOIA) request regarding the legitimacy of one of the candidates' businesses. WAVY-TV 10 received an independent copy of the FOIA from the Newport News Office of the Commissioner of the Revenue, which states the business in question 'does not hold a City of Newport News business license, as such a license is not required for the type of activity this business performs. The USDOT number associated with this business is currently listed as inactive in the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) database. The business's status with the Virginia State Corporation Commission (SCC) is also listed as inactive per SCC records.'
WAVY.com asked Eubank about 'integrity' following the recent filing.
'I'm doing it for the right reason, not the wrong reason. I'm not going back on my word. I still fully support Sanu. I fully expect her to win. She has my 100% endorsement. Come June 17, I will be by her side celebrating. But I am trying only to position myself [just] in case. Elections can be unpredictable in the event that 1% off the chance the Sanu is not elected. I will be here to protect this office,' said Eubank.
Eubank urges residents to watch the candidate interviews and forum to 'judge for yourself.'
'I have always been a Democrat. I will always be a Democrat. I view myself at this point as an Independent-Democrat, but I'm doing what I have to do. I'm doing this for the right reasons. For the citizens of Newport News,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
11 minutes ago
- New York Times
Lisa Murkowski Says ‘It's Dangerous for Us in the Legislative Branch'
In many ways, Senator Lisa Murkowski is the last of a dying breed of politician. She eschews bombast, preferring to speak softly and with deliberation. In our hyperpartisan times, she is a proud Republican but has sided with Democrats on several crucial votes, notably to save the Affordable Care Act in 2017 and, more recently, to oppose the confirmation of Pete Hegseth for secretary of defense. She acknowledges she has never voted for President Trump but has also worked with him to expand oil and gas drilling in her native Alaska. In the closely divided Senate, she is courted by both sides of the aisle, which has made her powerful and also an object of hope and suspicion. Murkowski did something in April very rare for her: She went (inadvertently) viral. At a meeting of nonprofit and tribal leaders in Alaska, in response to queries over cuts to the federal government, she responded that 'we are all afraid' and said 'retribution is real.' The remarks, captured on video, ricocheted across the internet and into the halls of power, where few politicians in her party have been bold enough to publicly acknowledge that it is often fear that keeps them loyal to Trump. It was with all of that in mind that I sat down for two wide-ranging interviews with Murkowski. When we first spoke, the major political news of the week was the G.O.P.'s infighting over President Trump's so-called Big, Beautiful Bill and the fallout between President Trump and Elon Musk. When we spoke again earlier this week, the president had just deployed Marines to Los Angeles in response to anti-ICE protests. We talked about all the tumult, but we began by discussing her new memoir, 'Far From Home,' which publishes later this month and details Murkowski's early days in Alaska, her historic 2010 Senate write-in victory after losing to a MAGA-like figure in the Republican primary and her 23 years as a senator in a brutal Washington. Subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | YouTube | Amazon | iHeart | NYT Audio App Normally, I understand why a politician has written a book. It's in advance of a run for higher office, or it's with an eye to their legacy. Your term, though, is not up for several years. So why did you write this book now? I don't want to be president. But there was a story after 2010 with the write-in. The last time that had happened was in 1954 with Strom Thurmond. So there was a lot of interest in what happened in Alaska that could actually allow for this — the phoenix rising, because I was political roadkill after I'd lost that primary. But I didn't have time, and I didn't know how to write a book. After that write-in, I was returned to the Senate in a very unconventional way, without the ties or the burdens that may come with support from your party. So it was kind of a newfound, unleashed Lisa, if you will. So why now? I'm trying to offer a little bit of hope to people about a political process that seems to get more mired in partisan infighting with every passing day. And at the same time trying to explain that my groundedness, my centeredness in Alaska is kind of what keeps me in my place today. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
CNN
15 minutes ago
- CNN
A protest over immigration broke out next to a Compton restaurant. The owner, an immigrant, offered help to both protesters and cops
Elizabeth Mendoza watched nervously as demonstrators protesting President Donald Trump's immigration raids and policies clashed with police outside of her Compton restaurant, Restaurante Y Pupuseria La Ceiba. 'It started with just a few people, then it started growing very quickly,' she told CNN in an interview translated from Spanish. Mendoza, herself an immigrant from El Salvador, has gained notoriety after videos of her and her staff sheltering protesters and helping law enforcement agents in her Los Angeles County restaurant spread across social media. In the late afternoon hours on Saturday, June 7, the protest began to ramp up significantly as demonstrators and officers clashed right in front of her business. At one point, Mendoza recalled seeing the police push the protesters away from her storefront and deploying chemical irritants. 'I don't know what happened with the tear gas they threw. It was so strong at one point that we all felt like we were suffocating,' Mendoza told CNN. 'Then they came in. It wasn't something planned, it wasn't something I was thinking about, but it just happened,' she said. Inside the restaurant, video at 5:30 p.m. shows Mendoza and her employees getting water for LA County Sheriff's deputies, fanning their blinking, watering eyes and applying wet towels to their faces. An employee guided one of the officers toward the walk-in refrigerator at the back of the store after wiping off his face, surveillance video shows. In a video Mendoza uploaded to TikTok, three of her employees can be seen taking care of two officers: One employee holds a cloth to the face of an officer while another fans his face. 'I looked for masks and gave them to different people … The only thing I managed to grab for some protesters were towels, towels we use to clean. And I told them to cover yourselves with this. And then they covered themselves,' Mendoza said. 'I also offered them milk. I ran out of milk.' Clashes between protesters and law enforcement have resulted in hundreds of arrests in Los Angeles, and Trump invoked a rarely used law to federalize the National Guard over the objection of Democratic California Gov. Gavin Newsom and local officials, which further inflamed the response. The Trump administration also mobilized 700 Marines to the Los Angeles area on Monday, though it is not yet clear when they will be deployed onto the streets to help with protests, according to a US Northern Command spokesperson. Mendoza said she never directed her staff to help the people suffering after the confrontation just outside the restaurant – they acted of their own accord. 'I was at the door, just letting everyone in,' she said. 'They just acted the way they felt they should have done to other people themselves.' Almost half of Los Angeles County's nearly 10 million residents are Latinos or Hispanics, according to US Census data. Over one-third of Angelenos are immigrants. Mendoza came to the United States without her family – 'without a father, without a mother, without siblings,' she told CNN, and first found work at a restaurant. She opened her own restaurant 15 years ago and has since found her place in the community. 'I was afraid something bad would happen and they would destroy my restaurant, which you hear about,' Mendoza said. 'So I decided to stay there, and looking at that whole situation, thank God, I sympathize with many protesters. I live in the area, and I can practically tell you that I know several of them, and they are good people and are my clients.' Multiple friends contacted Mendoza and urged her to close her restaurant for the day after seeing all of the chaos surrounding the protests in her neighborhood. Mendoza felt that she had to stay open to provide for her clients that had stayed with her 'through the good and the bad.' 'I have to take care of them and, above all, of my clients, who have always been with me through thick and thin, and who are my Latino people and people of any other race,' she said. While the restaurant workers' compassion has been praised by many, Mendoza said some have criticized her for helping both demonstrators and authorities. 'I just want them to know that we did it as human beings,' she said. 'I'm happy to have helped those people, just like I did with the people who were there for the protests.' Mendoza said the world could use more 'empathy and humanity for all people,' and that as an immigrant, she wants people to know most immigrants who come to the United States do so to work hard and make a better life for themselves and others. 'Sometimes we're treated like aliens; we're not like that. The fact that we're darker-skinned doesn't make us different,' she said. 'We've all seen it as a wonderful country, and we've all seen a country with better opportunities for our lives. Yes, and maybe that's why we decided to come here, and maybe some of us haven't done it the right way. But in the same way, we've all come with a purpose, which is to work and put in the effort. And often, I think they don't realize that it's us Latinos who come to do the most difficult jobs.' More demonstrations are planned nationwide this week and weekend, when the military parade honoring the Army's 250th birthday is planned in Washington, DC.
CNN
25 minutes ago
- CNN
Explaining New York City's ranked-choice voting system and when to expect results
Voters in New York City will once again be asked to rank up to five candidates in the Democratic primary for mayor, four years after the process was slow and marred by a major tabulation error. City officials are confident that the ranked-choice voting process will be faster and smoother this time, due in part to a change in state law that should result in most votes being reported on Election Day, June 24. This year's Democratic primary features 11 candidates on the ballot, including former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and several progressive challengers with state Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani leading the way. If no candidate tops 50% of first-choice votes, support for the lowest vote-getters is then redistributed in rounds based on voters' other rankings until only two candidates remain. Advocates say the 'instant runoff' system allows voters to have more of a say over who wins beyond choosing just one person. Critics argue the system is overly confusing and could disadvantage less engaged voters. Here's what to expect and more detail about how the system works. June 14-22: Early voting is underway. June 24: Election Day. First-choice results are released from Election Day and early votes and from mail ballots received by Friday, June 20. July 1: The receipt deadline for mail ballots postmarked by Election Day. Initial ranked choice results are released, with further releases every Tuesday. July 15: New York City Board of Elections certifies primary results. The ballot is a grid, with candidate names on the left and columns for each numbered choice. (View the ballot here.) Each voter ranks up to five choices. Then the votes are counted. If more than half of voters rank a candidate as their first choice, that person wins. If no candidate wins a majority of first-choice votes, ballots are tabulated round by round. In each round, the candidate with the fewest votes is eliminated, with those votes reallocated to whoever their voters listed as their next choice. That process continues until only two candidates are left. The candidate with the most votes wins. On Election Night, the New York City Board of Elections will report first-choice results for what is likely to be the majority of ballots cast. The results will include Election Day ballots, early-voting ballots and mail ballots that were received by Friday, June 20. One week later, on July 1, officials will take those votes, plus any additional ballots they've counted since Election Day, and release a first look at the ranked-choice results. These results will show who is ahead after all the rounds of tabulation, but because they won't include all the ballots cast in the race, they won't be the final results. After that, the board will release an updated count plus ranked-choice tabulation every Tuesday until the results are complete. Each update could include properly postmarked mail ballots that arrive close to or after Election Day (ballots can be received until July 1) and provisional ballots that are approved by officials after the election. The board plans to certify the results on July 15. This means that with each update, it's possible the order of candidates eliminated could change. The CNN Decision Desk will project a winner either on Election Night, if it's certain that one candidate will win more than 50% of the first-choice votes, or after a ranked choice tabulation. In a ranked-choice tabulation, there will always be fewer ballots at the end of the count then there are at the beginning. As the count continues, ballots are 'exhausted' when every candidate the voter ranked is eliminated. There are two major mistakes that voters can make. If a voter ranks multiple candidates in the same position, their vote in that position, and any further rankings in the race, are invalidated. Take the example of someone marking a single candidate as their first choice but then two candidates as their second choice. The first choice would count, but if that candidate was eliminated, the voter's second choice wouldn't be counted, and their ballot would be removed from the rest of the count. Ranking the same candidate in every position won't invalidate a ballot, but it has the same impact as just selecting a first choice and leaving the rest of the rankings blank. The voter's first choice is counted, but if that candidate is eliminated, their ballot is removed from the count. Yes. New York City's first major experience with ranked-choice voting in the 2021 mayoral primary was anything but smooth. Due in part to a quirk in state law, the city didn't report the results of any mail ballots until two weeks after the election. That state law has changed, so most of the mail results will be available on Election Night and then as part of the first tabulation a week after the election. The 2021 process was also marred by an error from the city board of elections which resulted in 135,000 test ballots being accidentally included in the ranked-choice tabulation. While the error was corrected and new results were released the next day, the incident resurfaced longstanding criticisms of the board. Vincent Ignizio, the deputy executive director of the city's board of elections, says he's confident that situation won't be repeated. 'We have implemented reforms that will prevent that this time around,' Ignizio said. 'We fully expect to run a fair and accurate election.' While ranked-choice voting is undoubtedly more complicated for voters who are used to just selecting one candidate per race, proponents say the system can both be more efficient and can lead to winning candidates who are more representative of the whole electorate. In a race with several strong contenders, the top candidate can often win with a relatively small percentage of the vote. In New Jersey's June 10 Democratic primary for governor, for example, Rep. Mikie Sherrill beat five competitors with about one-third of the vote. Ranked-choice voting eliminates the need to spend time and money on a separate runoff because it allows voters to express their top preference while also recording other candidates they'd like to support if their favorite is no longer an option. Some advocates also argue that ranked-choice voting can also lead to more positive campaigns. If Candidate A wants to win, the argument goes, that person needs the supporters of Candidate B to also rank them highly, and negative campaigning could turn off Candidate B's supporters. Opponents of ranked-choice voting argue that system is overly complicated and can lead to more rejected ballots and delayed and less transparent results. In a ranked-choice voting election, it's always better for voters to rank as many candidates as the rules allow to reduce the chance that their ballot is 'exhausted.' Critics argue this gives an advantage to voters who have more time and resources to learn about candidates and develop a long list of preferences. Amid the criticism, 17 states have banned the process in recent years, according to the conservative Stop Ranked-Choice Voting Coalition.
