For Trump administration, US air drops of Gaza aid were never a serious option: Sources
But the option hasn't been seriously considered by Donald Trump's administration, US officials and other sources say, even as he voices concern over starvation in Gaza amid Israel's nearly two-year-old military campaign against Hamas.
One source said it is seen as an unrealistic option because airdrops would not come close to meeting the needs of 2.1 million Palestinians.
This comes even as close US allies including Jordan, the United Arab Emirates and Britain have carried out air drops of assistance to Gaza.
Humanitarian aid groups have long been critical of air drops of aid, calling them more symbolic than truly effective when the scale of the need in Gaza requires open land routes for large amounts of aid to enter the enclave.
The heavy packages could also present a danger to civilians on the ground rushing toward the parachuting aid.
'It just hasn't been part of the discussions,' said one US official, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss internal Trump administration deliberations.
A source familiar with the issue said: 'It hasn't been a serious consideration because it's not really a serious option at this moment.'
Some US officials war-gamed the option and found 'it's absolutely unrealistic,' said the source familiar with the matter. The source said it was unknown how 'big a lift capacity' could be managed even if the Israelis approved US use of the airspace.
A diplomatic source, speaking on condition of anonymity, said he was unaware of any US interest in participating in the air drop effort.
Another official in a US-allied country which is taking part in the airdrops said there had been no conversations with the United States about Washington taking part in the effort.
The official added that the United States was not providing logistical support for the airdrops being carried out by other countries.
Asked for comment, a White House official said the administration was open to 'creative solutions' to the issue.
'President Trump has called for creative solutions 'to help the Palestinians' in Gaza. We welcome any effective effort that delivers food to Gazans and keeps it out of the hands of Hamas,' the White House official said.
Israel began allowing food air drops in late July, as global concern mounted about the humanitarian toll in Gaza from the war.
Mounting pressure on Israel
Trump has backed efforts by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to distribute aid to Gazans. He has said the US would work with other countries to provide more humanitarian assistance to the people of Gaza, including food and sanitation.
But he has also expressed frustration with the ongoing conflict, saying Hamas leaders would now be 'hunted down', telling reporters on July 26: 'Hamas really didn't want to make a deal. I think they want to die. And it's very bad. And it got to be to a point where you're going to have to finish the job.'
Israel faces intensifying international pressure over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza and its promotion of GHF's aid operation, which has distribution sites only in southern Gaza and has been called dangerous and ineffective by aid groups and the United Nations - claims the group denies.
As the death toll from two years of war in Gaza nears 60,000, a growing number of people are dying from starvation and malnutrition, Gaza health authorities say, with images of starving children shocking the world and fueling international criticism of Israel over sharply worsening conditions.
Biden faced enormous pressure from fellow Democrats to alleviate the humanitarian suffering in Gaza. In addition to aid drops of food assistance including ready-to-eat meals, Biden ordered the US military to construct a temporary pier off Gaza for aid to be delivered to the enclave.
The pier, announced by the former president during a televised address to Congress in March 2024, was a massive endeavor that took about 1,000 US forces to execute.
But bad weather and distribution challenges inside Gaza limited the effectiveness of what the US military says was its biggest aid delivery effort ever in the Middle East. The pier was only operational for about 20 days and cost about $230 million.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arab News
2 minutes ago
- Arab News
Saudi Arabia sends an important message to Lebanon
The Saudi Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Saturday extended its 'sincere condolences to the Lebanese Republic over the death and injury of several Lebanese army personnel while carrying out their duties in southern Lebanon.' In its statement, the ministry praised 'the efforts of the Lebanese army to uphold the Lebanese government's sovereignty over all the country's territory, in a manner that ensures its security and stability and contributes to the prosperity of Lebanon and its people.' This statement goes beyond a standard humanitarian gesture or formal condolence; it conveys a clear political stance. At its core, it reaffirms the Lebanese army's vital role as one of the state's main pillars for restoring authority and strength, projecting control across all Lebanese territory, protecting borders and airspace from ongoing Israeli aggression, and preserving internal stability. That role will be especially critical in the upcoming 'weapons confiscation' phase — arguably the most challenging stage — which will require the cooperation of all political forces and movements to prevent any escalation into armed clashes that could drag the country into a devastating sectarian conflict. From the outbreak of the Lebanese Civil War in 1975 to the signing of the Taif Agreement in 1989 — brokered under Saudi Arabia's auspices — Riyadh served as a pivotal mediator among the warring factions, dedicated to ending the conflict and laying the foundations for political stability. In the years that followed, the Kingdom played a major role in the reconstruction of downtown Beirut — later hailed as a symbol of Lebanon's renaissance — providing sustained financial and political support that reflected an investment in the state as a whole, rather than in any single sect. The Kingdom did not shape its Lebanese partnerships through sectarian considerations or favor any side based on religious affiliation. For instance, King Faisal and former Lebanese President Suleiman Frangieh shared a relationship rooted in mutual respect. As reported by the Saudi newspaper Al-Jazirah on Sept. 28, 1971, Frangieh hosted a dinner banquet at Baabda Palace 'in honor of His Majesty King Faisal, attended by His Majesty's accompanying delegation.' At the time, an informed Lebanese source noted that 'the official talks between His Majesty King Faisal and His Excellency President Suleiman Frangieh aim to strengthen the bonds of cooperation and brotherhood between the two countries, expand trade exchanges and encourage tourism between them. The broader Arab situation will be at the forefront of the discussions.' This statement goes beyond a standard humanitarian gesture or formal condolence; it conveys a clear political stance. Hassan Al-Mustafa For his part, King Fahd was a steadfast supporter of Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, not out of favoritism toward the esteemed Sunni community over others, but to promote the values Hariri embodied at the time: advancing education, fostering scholarships and driving state-building projects that served all of Lebanon. While still a prince, King Abdullah maintained a close friendship with Imam Musa Al-Sadr. Sources close to him recall that he had warned Al-Sadr against traveling to Libya, cautioning that 'Qaddafi could not be trusted.' Following Al-Sadr's disappearance, King Abdullah reportedly mobilized all his resources in support of the imam's family, determined to help uncover the truth about his fate. Today, King Salman maintains long-standing ties with Lebanon, anchored in media and cultural exchanges. Renowned for his broad intellect and close follow-up on media, publications and libraries, he has built enduring relationships with prominent Lebanese journalists, writers and intellectuals. These enduring and multifaceted ties underscore a deliberate political stance: engaging with national figures over sectarian affiliations with the aim of safeguarding Lebanon's unity and preventing it from becoming a stage for factional conflicts. In March, President Joseph Aoun paid his first visit to Saudi Arabia as head of state, meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. The talks centered on key strategic priorities, including confining weapons to the authority of the Lebanese state, strengthening the army and ensuring the withdrawal of Israeli forces from the south. They also explored lifting the Saudi ban on Lebanese imports and reopening the Kingdom's doors to Lebanese tourists. The visit aimed to revive Beirut's stature as a prominent Arab capital with a rich and significant history. Prime Minister Nawaf Salam also visited the Kingdom, joining the crown prince in performing Eid prayers, a symbolic act underscoring national brotherhood and expressing a shared hope for revitalized bilateral relations founded on greater trust and deeper integration. The Kingdom's engagement in Lebanese affairs is not motivated by short-term gains but by the pursuit of lasting stability. Hassan Al-Mustafa What is the meaning and purpose of this gradual Saudi Arabian involvement in Lebanon? Riyadh's approach centers on the principle of 'the state over the sect' and 'the state over the militias,' as demonstrated by its clear support for the Lebanese army and firm stance that arms must remain under state authority. This strategy bolsters Lebanon's stability, safeguards it from internal conflicts and aligns it with Saudi interests, while laying the groundwork for a strong, sovereign state. Such a state would be capable of ending the Israeli occupation, ensuring the return of displaced communities to their villages and driving forward national reconstruction. If security and stability are achieved, they will pave the way for sustainable economic growth by reopening channels for trade, investment and tourism, thereby helping to break the cycle of economic collapse afflicting both the Lebanese state and its people. The influx of capital would directly improve living conditions, regardless of the people's views of its source, and restore a sense of hope for the future. All this stems from a long-term vision. The Kingdom's engagement in Lebanese affairs is not motivated by short-term gains but by the pursuit of lasting stability in the Eastern Mediterranean and the creation of a barrier against the spread of conflicts into the Arab world. This approach also opens the door to wider regional agreements or truces that could help prevent future wars. In contrast, what steps can Lebanon take to move forward, especially at this critical stage in its history? If Lebanon's elite — across its political, cultural and spiritual spheres — truly wish to translate this Saudi political interest, and that of the wider Gulf-Arab world, into tangible progress for its people, it must commit to deep and credible reforms that restore confidence in the state. Foremost among these are asserting full state control over borders and weapons, strengthening the army, dismantling sectarian quotas and adopting a governance model that uproots corruption and favoritism. Such a model must make every Lebanese citizen feel like they live in a state that is genuinely committed to reform, justice and equality, while being free from the grip of sectarianism, militias and partisan economics. • Hassan Al-Mustafa is a Saudi writer and researcher interested in Islamic movements, the development of religious discourse and the relationship between the Gulf Cooperation Council states and Iran. X: @Halmustafa
Arab News
2 minutes ago
- Arab News
What next for India in South Caucasus region?
US President Donald Trump on Friday took on a role in the ongoing Azerbaijan-Armenia peace process and presided over the signing of a draft peace deal by Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan. Observers immediately noted that this 'agreement' was a mere repackaging of the framework deal the two countries signed in March. It had been negotiated bilaterally and achieved without outside involvement. At that time, it was also recognized that several issues still had to be addressed before the peace process could be completed. The disputes between Azerbaijan and Armenia are only one part of the issues that bedevil the South Caucasus region, which foreign policy analyst Jeffrey Mankoff described in a December 2024 Center for Strategic and International Studies report as a 'shatter zone and choke point' that links Europe with Eurasia. The region consists of three states — Azerbaijan, Armenia and Georgia — that obtained sovereignty following the breakup of the Soviet Union. The fallout of that breakup has been untidy: Russian maintained claims on Georgia's Abkhazia and South Ossetia areas, two wars took place between Azerbaijan and Armenia over the disputed territory of Nagorno-Karabakh, and Russia invaded Georgia in 2008 to prevent it drifting further toward the EU and NATO. The geography of the South Caucasus has attracted the attention of Turkiye and Iran, as well as global powers the US and Russia. More recently, China and India have also entered the region, with their competition in South Asia being reflected in the South Caucasus. As the corridor from Europe to the heart of Eurasia, much of the competition in the region has centered on rival connectivity projects. In 2018, Brussels initiated the EU-Asia Connectivity Strategy to pursue land transport, energy, digital and people-to-people links. The South Caucasus has attracted the attention of Turkiye and Iran, as well as global powers. Talmiz Ahmad China has entered the scene with its Belt and Road Initiative. The project's Northern Corridor takes goods from China through Russian territory to Europe. But the Ukraine war means attention has now shifted to the Middle Corridor, which goes through the South Caucasus and the Caspian basin to reach Europe. While the Middle Corridor is being developed, the Trans-Caspian International Transport Route has brought together traders from China, the South Caucasus, Central Asia, Turkiye and Lithuania in an intraregional embrace. India's interests in the South Caucasus include economic and geopolitical considerations. Over the last decade, New Delhi has built economic ties with each state in the region. There are 200 Indian companies in Azerbaijan, while India imports Azerbaijani oil valued at more than $1.6 billion annually. It has relatively modest trade ties with Georgia but has emerged as the largest supplier of arms to Armenia, making up for shortfalls in Russian supplies due to the Ukraine war. India has also viewed with concern the expanding ties between Azerbaijan, Turkiye and Pakistan. In 2021, the 'Three Brothers' issued the Baku Declaration to strengthen strategic ties, particularly military-technological cooperation. Azerbaijan's partners back Baku over its conflict with Armenia, while Azerbaijan and Turkiye support Pakistan on the Kashmir issue. This has encouraged India to pursue a rival bloc with Armenia and Iran. India provides Armenia with its best military equipment. It is also seeking to consolidate its strategic presence in the region by using Armenia to build ties with the Russia-sponsored Eurasian Economic Union by obtaining observer status in the grouping and negotiating a free trade agreement with it. India and Iran also share an interest in developing the 7,200 km International North-South Transport Corridor that goes from Iran's Chabahar port through Azerbaijan to Moscow, as well as the Gulf-Black Sea trade route from Iran to Armenia and on to Europe, which complements the former. China has emerged as a significant presence in the South Caucasus, largely through its Belt and Road Initiative projects. Talmiz Ahmad Obviously, there is no zero-sum scenario in the region: Azerbaijan is India's principal trade partner in the South Caucasus and is also a crucial presence in ensuring the success of the International North-South Transport Corridor. The completion of the final missing link, the Rasht-Astara railway in Azerbaijan, by 2028 will make the corridor fully operational. To complicate the picture, China has now emerged as a significant presence in the South Caucasus, largely through its Belt and Road Initiative projects and other infrastructure investments linked with the Middle Corridor. China has close economic ties with all the South Caucasian states and their neighbors, Turkiye and Iran. It has strategic partnership agreements with Turkiye, Georgia and Azerbaijan, a comprehensive strategic partnership agreement with Iran and substantial economic ties with Armenia. Its total bilateral trade with these five states totals $120 billion. Despite the opportunities for significant connectivity projects and the vast untapped potential for expanded economic ties, there can be little doubt that the US' entry into South Caucasus affairs to compete with Russia and China and promote its own geopolitical interests will increase regional tensions. India's interests therefore lie in promoting the long-term stability of the fragile regional security landscape by seeking opportunities for cooperation with Azerbaijan and China, rather than allowing South Asian rivalries to resonate in the region. • Talmiz Ahmad is a former Indian diplomat.
Al Arabiya
2 minutes ago
- Al Arabiya
Former UK defense minister and Republican Chair clash over Ukraine future
In this episode of Global News Today, presented by Tom Burges Watson, a fiery debate erupts over the future of Ukraine ahead of the summit in Alaska this week between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. We also bring you the latest on the humanitarian situation in Gaza, as Saudi Arabia's cabinet condemns Israel's decision to expand military operations in the Palestinian territory.
