logo
Barefoot Investor exposes the huge cost-of-living issue both Albo and Dutton have failed to solve: 'Sardine tins sold at caviar prices'

Barefoot Investor exposes the huge cost-of-living issue both Albo and Dutton have failed to solve: 'Sardine tins sold at caviar prices'

Daily Mail​28-04-2025

The Barefoot Investor has compared Aussie homes to 'sardine tins sold at caviar prices' in a brutal swipe at both political parties' attempts to solve the housing crisis.
Scott Pape said he spent four hours of his long weekend driving across Melbourne with his 11-year-old son who quickly noticed a key phrase on election billboards splashed around the city: ' Cost of living '.
The finance guru noted his son was 'spot on' but claimed neither Labor or the Coalition were doing much to address the issue.
'The biggest cost? The roof over our heads - rent or mortgage. That's where the squeeze is,' he wrote in a column for the Herald Sun.
'Australian homes are now some of the least affordable on Earth. And to afford them we've racked up world-class debt.
'Back in the mid-2000s, the average house cost four times the average income. Now it's more than eight.'
Mr Pape claimed the current housing market had 'priced ordinary Australians out of their own neighbourhoods'.
With the election coming up in just five days' time, many Aussies had hoped the two major parties would battle to come up with the best solution.
Yet, Mr Pape claimed both have only offered options that will put more money into the hands of pre-existing property owners.
'Labor wants to slash deposits to five per cent. Which is as dumb as it is dangerous. Remember, the US subprime crisis was created by politicians making it easier for broke people to buy homes,' he wrote.
'Not to be outdone, Dutton, the so-called economic conservative, is promising to allow first home buyers to raid their super and write off their mortgage interest.
'It's madness. Both policies are like turning up at an auction and handing everyone a suitcase full of cash. It doesn't make homes cheaper. It just lets buyers bid higher - and history shows they always do.'
With both policies likely to drive house prices and rent higher, Mr Pape believed the Australian dream of homeownership was all but dead for many.
'It seems like both sides have designed their housing policies to fit on a highway billboard: Big font. Feel-good slogan. Eye-roll logic. Paid for with borrowed money,' he said.
'In doing so they've turned the great Australian dream into a financial trap.'
However, there is some good news for borrowers.
Macquarie Bank last week cut its one to five-year rates by 20 basis points, with borrowers now able to fix their mortgage for two or three years at 5.19 per cent.
Those wanting more certainty for longer can fixed their home loan for four or five years at 5.39 per cent.
Outside of eco loans, Australia's fifth biggest lender, Macquarie, now offers the lowest fixed rates.
The major banks and the futures market are now expecting the Reserve Bank to cut interest rates again on May 20, before embarking on more cuts in 2025.
Canstar data insights director Sally Tindall said competition in the fixed-rate mortgage space was heating up.
'Macquarie has taken the knife to its fixed rates ahead of next month's RBA meeting as it ramps up competition in the fixed mortgage market,' she said.
Borrowers who fix now, however, could miss out on more relief for variable rate customers should the Reserve Bank keep on cutting interest rates.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ben Fordham unleashes withering spray as Albanese fails to meet housing target because of immigration
Ben Fordham unleashes withering spray as Albanese fails to meet housing target because of immigration

Daily Mail​

time39 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Ben Fordham unleashes withering spray as Albanese fails to meet housing target because of immigration

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and his government has been slammed by radio host Ben Fordham over Australia's worsening housing crisis. It follows the release of a report from the Government's National Housing Supply and Affordability Council (NHSAC), showing Australia will miss its own housing targets. According to the report, housing construction is at its lowest point in a decade, with just 177,000 new dwellings completed in 2024, well short of the government's 233,000 target. The Council warned that housing is not being built quickly enough to meet growing demand and relieve affordability pressures. 'The Council's analysis shows that expected new housing supply will be insufficient to meaningfully improve housing affordability for all households,' the report stated. It forecasts that only 938,000 new dwellings will be completed across Australia over the five-year Housing Accord period ending 30 June 2029, far below the 1.2 million target. No state or territory is expected to meet its allocated share. On Thursday, Fordham lashed out at the government, blaming slow building rates and rising immigration for exacerbating the crisis. 'The Albanese government promised to build more houses, today they're building less. They promised to lower immigration, today, they're bringing in more,' he said. 'The PM will tell us he's bringing down the migration numbers... and building as many homes as he can, but we're not seeing it.' 'We simply can't build the houses fast enough. What we need is a sharp focus on skilled migration and coordination of housing supply policy with immigration numbers.' The NHSAC report also pointed to persistent challenges such as labour shortages, low productivity, and rising material costs as major factors dragging down new supply. Shadow Minister for Housing and Homelessness, Senator Andrew Bragg, has slammed at Labor's performance, saying the government had failed to support the very people responsible for delivering new housing. 'Labor has failed to get the houses built because they have done nothing to help the people who build houses: builders, tradespeople and developers,' Bragg said. He further highlighted that the government's flagship $10billion Housing Australia Future Fund (HAFF) failed to deliver a single new home during the previous term. 'Instead, it was acquiring existing housing, thereby making the supply problem worse... Labor's Housing Infrastructure Fund also failed to build any homes with $1.5 billion,' he added. Housing Minister Clare O'Neil last week pointed to bureaucracy as a major barrier to construction. 'It's just too hard to build a house in this country,' O'Neil told the ABC. 'And it's become uneconomic to build the kind of housing that our country needs most: affordable housing, especially for first home buyers.' One person arrives to Australia to live every 44 seconds according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). Under the Albanese government, overseas migration reached record highs. In 2022–23, net overseas migration hit 536,000, the highest in Australia's history. While in 2023–24, it dropped to 446,000, and is expected to fall to 340,000 in 2024–25. As of March 2025, the national median dwelling price surpassed $1million for the first time, reaching $1,002,500, following a 0.7 per cent quarterly increase. The annual growth rate slowed to 5.9 per cent in March 2025, down from 9.5% the previous year New data about Australia's migration will be released on Friday.

Taxing actual rather than unrealised super gains would mean ‘significant' costs for millions of Australians, Treasury says
Taxing actual rather than unrealised super gains would mean ‘significant' costs for millions of Australians, Treasury says

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Taxing actual rather than unrealised super gains would mean ‘significant' costs for millions of Australians, Treasury says

Treasury says taxing actual instead of unrealised gains would have meant millions of super fund members were hit with 'significant' compliance costs as part of a policy aimed at trimming concessions for just 80,000 of the country's wealthiest savers. Labor's proposal will put an extra 15% tax on earnings generated from super balances over $3m in an effort to make the super system more equitable and sustainable. The Coalition and interest groups have attacked the policy's method of taxing changes in the value of super assets (unrealised gains), rather than on cash profit (realised gains), saying it transgresses tax norms. Nationals senator Matt Canavan vowed earlier this month to 'fight to the death' against the proposed change, arguing that taxing unrealised gains was 'incredibly unfair'. In its impact analysis document released in 2023, Treasury concluded that taxing cash profits 'would be the most accurate method for determining taxable earnings'. However, the trade-off would be imposing an unacceptably high compliance and regulatory burden on the large super funds which manage the super accounts of millions of Australians with smaller benefits, and who would not be affected by the tax change. Super funds currently calculate and report taxable income at the fund level and not at the member level, Treasury noted. As such, taxing cash earnings would 'involve a substantial burden on the superannuation industry to implement as it would involve developing and maintaining a complex new accounting and reporting regime to calculate taxable income at a member level,' the policy document says. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email 'These significant compliance costs would be borne across all funds and all members, including the 99.5 per cent of account holders who are not impacted by this policy, despite this proposal impacting only approximately 30,000 high balance members with accounts in APRA [Australian Prudential Regulation Authority]-regulated funds.' David Knox, one of the country's leading actuaries and a former senior partner at Mercer, said it was more appropriate to think of the proposed additional levy as a tax on wealth, rather than income. Knox said the approach of taxing unrealised gains was not as radical as some have suggested, saying it was similar to the way council rates (a cash levy) increased with the market value of the land. He also pointed to the fact that pension payments were reduced when a pensioner's home value went up. In both cases, an individual paid in cash – either through higher rates or lower pension payments – for what is a change in notional wealth. The super industry is split into two 'subsystems': Apra-regulated funds – including the big industry and for-profit funds such as AustralianSuper and AMP, respectively – and self-managed super funds. The Apra-regulated funds account for about 94%, or 16m of the 17m Australians with super accounts – but only 76% of the more than $4tn in the super system. There are about 1.1 million people in SMSFs, but this 6% share accounts for 24% of total assets. The Self-Managed Super Fund Association has been among the loudest opponents of the bill. It has highlighted the risk that SMSFs with big holdings in illiquid assets could be forced to sell in order to raise the cash to pay for the notional change in the value of their balances. Treasury's policy document noted that 'some stakeholders have noted that as a result of the changes, there may be a greater focus on investing in income generating assets, such as shares and bonds, as opposed to property and other more illiquid assets'. 'This could represent a positive shift as it would better align with the intention of superannuation to provide income in retirement.' The Treasury documents show that this risk applies to a sliver of those likely to be caught up in the new tax. Fewer than 5% of the estimated 77,400 Australians who will be affected by the changes – or fewer than 4,000 people – have more than 80% of their retirement savings in non-residential retail property, such as farms. Bob Breunig, the director of the ANU's Tax and Transfer Policy Institute, had previously said: 'Running businesses and property portfolios inside super, they shouldn't be doing that, that's not what it's for.'

Lululemon to source 20 percent of fibre needs through Samsara Eco
Lululemon to source 20 percent of fibre needs through Samsara Eco

Fashion United

time2 hours ago

  • Fashion United

Lululemon to source 20 percent of fibre needs through Samsara Eco

Canadian sportswear, footwear and accessories brand Lululemon Athletica Inc. has entered into a 10-year agreement with Australian recycling company Samsara Eco. Through this partnership, Lululemon aims to source approximately 20 percent of its future nylon and polyester needs from Samsara's circular materials. The agreement forms part of Lululemon's broader sustainability strategy. The Canadian athleisure brand has faced scrutiny regarding the environmental impact of its products. For instance, the brand uses nylon 6,6 as a base fibre in many of its best-selling products, such as the Align and Wunder Train leggings. This fibre is difficult to recycle. In recent years, the company has taken several steps towards greater sustainability. It has collaborated with organisations such as the Clean Energy Buyers Association (CEBA), the Asia Clean Energy Coalition (ACEC) and material innovation companies like Geno, ZymoChem and Samsara Eco. Samsara Eco developed a patented enzymatic technology called EosEco, which can break down synthetic fibres (including polyester and nylon 6,6) into their original raw materials. These can be reused in production processes without any loss of quality. The company was founded in 2020 at the Australian National University, with support from Main Sequence and W23, the venture capital arm of Woolworths Group. In 2023, Samsara Eco raised 100 million dollars in a Series A+ funding round led by investor Temasek. According to Samsara Eco founder and chief executive officer Paul Riley, the collaboration with Lululemon demonstrated that the technology for circular materials was ready for large-scale application. 'I am optimistic about what we can achieve together in the next ten years,' Riley told Forbes. On LinkedIn, Samsara Eco called the agreement 'one of the most significant offtake commitments for advanced recycled materials in recent years'. As part of the collaboration, Samsara Eco will expand its production capacity in Jerrabomberra, New South Wales, Australia. In addition, the opening of a commercial recycling plant is planned for 2028. Meanwhile, Lululemon continues to grow financially. The brand began in 1998 as a yoga label for women and has since grown into a global player. In the first quarter of the 2025/26 financial year, the company reported revenue growth of 17 percent to 2.37 billion dollars. Net profit decreased by over two percent to 314.6 million dollars. Lululemon has 711 stores worldwide, including locations in the Netherlands and Belgium. This article was translated to English using an AI tool. FashionUnited uses AI language tools to speed up translating (news) articles and proofread the translations to improve the end result. This saves our human journalists time they can spend doing research and writing original articles. Articles translated with the help of AI are checked and edited by a human desk editor prior to going online. If you have questions or comments about this process email us at info@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store