logo
League of Cities brief local officials on new hurricane-response legislation

League of Cities brief local officials on new hurricane-response legislation

Yahoo16-05-2025
The Florida League of Cities briefed local government officials on May 15, 2025, about the implications of a new law controlling post-storm planning.
Local government officials are attempting to come to terms with recent legislation (SB 180) intended to make sure they are better prepared to handle the aftermath of a a major storm or hurricane.
Pinellas County Republican Sen. Nick DiCeglie sponsored the measure. He said it was 'personal' for him, having observed homeowners' frustrations dealing with their local governments in the aftermaths of Hurricanes Helene and Milton last fall.
After the Senate initially passed the bill last month, he issued a statement saying that, following a major storm, citizens need a 'clear path to recovery, not roadblocks.'
'When local bureaucracy overshadows the needs of citizens, Floridians are left picking up the pieces,' he said. 'We're fighting for families to focus on rebuilding without additional delays or burdens, especially for those who sustained damage or lost their homes. Working with our state and local responders, we can streamline restoration efforts and improve emergency response coordination, fortifying and strengthening our communities before the next storm.'
The bill contains more than a dozen provisions affecting everything to do with emergency management preparedness and response, as described during a Zoom conference call Thursday organized by the Florida League of Cities,
Perhaps most controversially for local governments is that it prohibits a county or a city located entirely or partially within 100 miles of a hurricane's track from proposing or adopting moratoriums on construction, reconstruction, or redevelopment of any property.
It also prohibits adopting a 'more restrictive or burdensome amendment' or 'burdensome procedure' to their comprehensive plans or land development regulations concerning review, approval, or issuance of a site plan, development permit, or development order until Oct. 1, 2027, applied retroactively to Aug. 1, 2024.
'You may be asking what is 'burdensome' and what is 'more restrictive?' said Matt Singer with the League, who cited a lack of a clear definition as the reason the League opposed the measure.
The bill allows for a 'cause of action,' meaning citizens and/or business owners would be able to challenge any local update on the ground that it is burdensome or more restrictive to them.
'And so it's really, really important that you check this language and see if any of your local updates that have already been made would be affected, and whether's there's any liability created there,' Singer said.
'As a result of that, there's a lot of legal uncertainty,' he said, adding that the League worked closely with DiCeglie and the House bill (HB 1535) sponsor, Sarasota Republican Fiona McFarland, to have that provision removed, but it was ultimately placed back in the House bill.
That provision is already drawing attention from local lawmakers who say that it could prevent them from making changes to prevent future flooding from storms.
'It affects every county and every city in the state that you can't control the way that you're developing and the way that you're managing your own land,' Volusia County Commission Chairman Jeff Brower told WESH-TV in Orlando this week. 'And local governments should be doing that.'
The bill requires local governments to develop post-storm permitting plans to expedite recovery and rebuilding by providing for special building permitting and inspection procedures following a hurricane or tropical storm. Plans must include adequate staffing for building inspection, permitting, and enforcement and provide multiple locations offering building permit services.
The measure says that local governments participating in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) may not adopt what is known as a 'lookback' period. That means any work completed on a house within a specified period (which can be as long as 5+ years) when determining what counts towards FEMA's 50% rule. The NFIP's 50% Rule states that repairs made to a home in a designated flood zone cannot exceed 50% of the home's market value unless the entire structure is brought into full compliance with current flood regulations.
Singer did tell members of the League that 'there are positive things in this bill,' specifically a $5,000 penalty for breach of contract for goods and services during a storm.
'This is in response to some local perspectives that we were able to share with the legislators where cities have had contracts in place with debris removal, and contractors unfortunately just no-show, no-call, and go to another place where they can get some more money,' he said.
'The bottom line here is that Senate bill 180 would reshape many aspects to municipal emergency response across the board, and it imposes a lot of new planning and publication duties,' Singer added.
The measure has yet to be sent to Gov. DeSantis desk.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era
States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era

Politico

time11 minutes ago

  • Politico

States are trying to keep disasters apolitical in the new Trump era

'This decision was petty. This decision was partisan, and this decision was punishing.' Moore said. And after the Los Angeles wildfires in January, California Gov. Gavin Newsom was quick to propose that politics could play a role in Trump's approval or denial of funding for his state. 'He's done it in the past, not just here in California,' Newsom said on Pod Save America. 'The rhetoric is very familiar, it's increasingly acute, and obviously we all have reason to be concerned about it.' A review by Seattle-based public radio station KUOW in June found that FEMA denied six of the 10 major disaster requests that Democratic states filed between February and June, while denying just one of 15 requests from Republican states. Asked about the analysis, a White House official said that 'Democrat state requests were denied in the first six months because they were not disasters. In the past, states have abused the process. President Trump is right-sizing FEMA and ensuring it is serving its intended purpose to help the American people.' Democratic Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs became the rare governor to criticize the federal government's disaster management in mid-July when she called for an investigation following a destructive fire on federal land that burned down a beloved Grand Canyon lodge. Hobbs said that she does not intend her call for an investigation to be viewed as a criticism of the Trump administration. 'I don't, and I think it's really important,' Hobbs said in an interview, adding that good working relationships between officials managing tribal, federal and state land are key. 'This is not intended to undermine that collaboration, but … we need to look at what led to that decision being made.' Steve Ellis, former deputy director of the Bureau of Land Management who worked for the agency and the U.S. Forest Service under multiple administrations, said that any federal agency involved in managing a fire of the magnitude and destructiveness as the one in the Grand Canyon should be launching an investigation without a governor's need to call for it.

More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown
More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown

New York Post

time40 minutes ago

  • New York Post

More than 700 National Guard troops from 3 GOP-led states will be deployed to DC to bolster Trump crackdown

Three Republican-led states will be deploying hundreds of National Guard members to Washington, DC, to bolster President Trump's crackdown on crime and homelessness in the nation's capital. West Virginia will be sending up to 400 troops, South Carolina has pledged 200 and Ohio will dispatch 150 in the coming days, the three states announced on Saturday. 'We stand ready to support our partners in the National Capital Region and contribute to the collective effort of making our nation's capital a clean and safe environment,' Maj. Gen. Jim Seward of the West Virginia National Guard said. The Mountain State's governor, Patrick Morrisey, added: 'West Virginia is proud to stand with President Trump in his effort to restore pride and beauty to our nation's capital,' adding that the mission 'reflects our shared commitment to a strong and secure America.' Three Republican-run states are sending an additional 750 National Guard personnel to Washington DC. AP South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster announced the deployment of 200 National Guard personnel from the Palmetto State to DC, but said the troops could be recalled in the event of a major national disaster such as a hurricane. He said the deployment was part of Trump's efforts to restore law and order in Washington, and in response to a request from the National Guard Bureau at the Pentagon. Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, meanwhile, said he was sending 150 military police officers to support the DC National Guard. It follows protests in the capital on Saturday. Getty Images 'These Ohio National Guard members will carry out presence patrols and serve as added security,' he said in a statement. None of the members — who are expected to arrive in DC within the coming days — are currently serving as law enforcement officers within the Buckeye State, DeWine said. The deployments of 750 troops from the three states would bring the total number of National Guard personnel within the capital to over 1,450. So far, National Guard members have played a limited role in the federal intervention. Troops have been spotted patrolling landmarks such as the National Mall and Union Station, as well as assisting law enforcement with tasks such as crowd control. With Post wires

GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.
GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.

Time​ Magazine

time41 minutes ago

  • Time​ Magazine

GOP States Send Hundreds of National Guard Troops to D.C.

Governors from three Republican states announced this weekend that they would send hundreds of National Guard troops to support President Donald Trump's already 800-strong deployment in Washington, D.C. Joining the D.C. Guard members deployed by Trump last week, West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey said the state would send 300 to 400 of its Guard troops, South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster pledged 200 troops, and Gov. Mike DeWine of Ohio said 150 Guard members would arrive in the coming days. McMaster said he was sending troops 'to support President Trump in his mission to restore law and order to our nation's capital,' and that the Guard members would return home if an emergency affected South Carolina. Morrisey said that the troops are being sent 'at the request' of Trump and as a show of 'regional cooperation.' 'WVNG involvement will include providing mission-essential equipment, specialized training, and approximately 300-400 skilled personnel as directed,' Morissey's office added. The new contributions amount to a near-doubling of National Guard troops in D.C. and a significant escalation of Trump's takeover of policing in the city, which has already been marked by protests and criticism over his attempts to expand his executive power. Though the escalation has not been addressed specifically by D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser, she posted on X late Saturday: 'American soldiers and airmen policing American citizens on American soil is #UnAmerican.' Trump invoked emergency powers to take control of the D.C. police department and call in the National Guard last week, claiming the city had been overrun by "bloodshed, bedlam and squalor." That claim is disputed by experts. Trump also mentioned other major cities where he wants to put police under federal control, including New York City, Baltimore, and Oakland. 'They're so far gone," Trump said. 'This will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C." Bowser's Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) Chief Pamela Smith still technically has day-to-day command over MPD following a failed attempt by the Trump Administration to place the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) as an "emergency police commissioner." But, Bowser and city leaders are still required to cooperate with Trump and his Executive Order declaring a state of emergency in the district. Bowser has been adamant that Trump's response to crime in D.C. has been overblown and unnecessary, as crime has decreased in the city in the last two years after a spike in 2023. In addition to National Guard troops, Trump also deployed federal officers from the U.S. Park Police, ICE, the FBI, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, and the U.S. Marshals Service on night patrols in D.C. In the first week, federal officers have set up checkpoints around the city, and police have arrested almost 200 people, including 75 arrests by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency (ICE)—utilizing the city takeover to further Trump's aggressive immigration tactics since his return to office in January.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store