logo
"Never meant to be ruled by a dictator or a king": The DOGE backlash hits Trump districts

"Never meant to be ruled by a dictator or a king": The DOGE backlash hits Trump districts

Yahoo21-02-2025

It's been a month since Donald Trump was inaugurated and it feels like a year. When they said they were going to be hit with "shock and awe" they meant it and when Trump said he was going to be a dictator on day one, he actually told the truth for once. It's been one of the most fearful, distressing political events in most of our lifetimes and it's gotten worse every day.
As a result of his many escapes from accountability for his crimes and a Supreme Court that gave him the green light to commit more with impunity, Trump believes that he is invincible, even recently quoting a (possibly apocryphal) line from Napoleon Bonaparte: 'He who saves his Country does not violate any Law.' He's carrying on about "manifest destiny" and dreaming aloud about expanding American territory and starting wars with neighbors. He is convinced that he can bully everyone into submission, whether it's a political opponent, an ally or a foreign adversary. He has even called himself a king.
Over the course of this past month, it has appeared that he's not wrong. The Republican Congress has completely abandoned any pretense of integrity and independence. He's sending migrants to Guantánamo and flobbing off others on foreign countries to suffer who-knows-what fate. His followers have physically threatened those few who showed any inkling that they might oppose him and his executioner, Elon Musk, a man charged with the destruction of the federal workforce. In record time he has managed to storm through the government like an Abrams tank, crushing everything in his path and leaving anyone who survives stunned and disoriented.
I have to spend my days poring over every news story because that's my job but I understand if people are choosing to limit their exposure to this carnage so that they can keep their sanity. But I confess that I've been worried that too many Americans have been averting their gaze in order to maintain some sense of emotional equilibrium. I worried that perhaps we are failing to fully understand the seriousness of our current moment. The last couple of days have given me reason to hope otherwise.
Trump has been telling his followers that he now has a 71 percent approval rating:
https://twitter.com/Acyn/status/1892738484273873394>
That's a complete fantasy. While it's true that his approval numbers have been higher in this first month than they were the first time, he still has the lowest numbers of any president at this point in his term, except one — himself. In fact the latest rash of polls this week show that his numbers in the high 40s are rapidly declining. A new Reuters Ipsos poll has him at 44%, down from 47% in January. The Washington Post poll has him at 43% and Quinnipiac University, CNN and Gallup all range from 44 to 47%. In other words, he's pretty much back to where he's always been.
But these polls are finding massive discontent over his policies. In the Reuters poll, the wrong track number rose to 53% from 43% percent in just one month and his economic approval number is now at 39%. Only 41% are in favor of Trump's tariffs with 53% opposing the policy.
How about the DOGE cuts? You might have assumed from the commentary that Americans don't care about foreign aid so putting USAID in the "woodchipper," as Musk described it, wouldn't be particularly unpopular. Not so. In the Post poll, 59% oppose Musk's scheme while only 38% approve. In the CNN poll, it was 53-28. The Post also reports that the mass firing of federal workers is opposed by 58% to 39% as well.
And while 51% in the Post poll say they support mass deportation of undocumented immigrants, it's not that simple. According to the Post:
Americans strongly oppose deporting undocumented immigrants who aren't criminals (57-39), who arrived as children (70-26) and who have U.S. citizen children (66-30).
Quinnipiac reports that only 38% of voters think the system of checks and balances is working well while 54% do not. And they find that 55% think Elon Musk has too much power while 36% think it's just fine.
CNN reports that 62% feel Trump hasn't gone far enough in trying to reduce the cost of living and that includes 47% of Republicans. And from their opinions on the tariffs, it's pretty clear they understand that he's only going to make things worse.
These polls numbers indicate that people are paying attention and they understand what's going on. Trump may be fantasizing about a 71% approval rating, and there's no telling him otherwise, but other elected Republicans are apparently starting to panic. After all, they have to face the voters in two years. Politico reported that while they are all being very good boys and girls in public, in private they are freaking out:
[M]any are feeling helpless to counter the meat-ax approach that has been embraced so far, with lawmakers especially concerned about the dismissal of military veterans working in federal agencies as well as USDA employees handling the growing bird flu outbreak affecting poultry and dairy farms.
They are being inundated with phone calls and the town halls are starting to look like they're about to get a taste of some of their own tea party medicine. Atlanta Journal-Constitution reporter Greg Bluestein reported on a Thursday night meeting with Rep. Rich McCormick, R-Ga., in which an overflow crowd of very angry constituents in this very red district denounced Trump as a tyrant and a king.
"It's clear from all of the writings of our founding fathers and mothers," one constituent noted, "that our great republic was never meant to be ruled by a dictator or a king."
Some California Republicans were greeted by some very angry protesters in Los Angeles on Thursday as well:We haven't yet seen the mass street protests we saw in 2017 or the aftermath of the 2020 George Floyd murder, but they are springing up organically all over the country. People are showing up at Tesla showrooms to protest Musk and closing down streets to oppose the deportations. Federal workers who are being treated despicably by the DOGE operation are rallying in Washington and elsewhere. High school kids are walking out of classes and boycotts are being organized to oppose corporate America folding to Donald Trump's crusade against DEI.
So far, most Republicans are sticking with Trump. The opposition consists of Democrats and a surprisingly large majority of independents and it's growing rapidly. This could matter when it comes to whether the judiciary actually stands up for the Constitution (yes they do pay attention to public opinion) which remains the best hope to slow down Trump and Musk.
Meanwhile, the Republican Party still has a job to do, which is to pass a budget. Public opinion has a strong effect on how Congress is going to deal with that and those GOP House members in marginal districts (and possibly even in some presumably safe districts if that town hall in Georgia is any indication) are going to be squeezed from both sides, giving the Democrats some real leverage.
It took a while to shake off the despondency and depression many of us felt after Trump was restored and then deputized a weird billionaire to wreck the government. But the opposition is awake and clear-eyed about what they are doing to our country and they aren't going to take it lying down. It won't be a one-sided battle after all.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel
Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Utah Rep. Maloy pushes against amendment to reinstate military reimbursements for abortion travel

WASHINGTON — Utah Rep. Celeste Maloy is pushing back against efforts to reinstate Biden-era policies directing the Defense Department to reimburse costs for service members who travel across state lines to obtain an abortion. During an appropriations hearing on Thursday, Maloy rejected an amendment seeking to implement a 2022 policy allowing for reimbursements for abortion-related travel and attach it to legislation funding the Defense Department for the 2026 fiscal year. Maloy argued the proposal runs afoul of the Hyde Amendment, a federal statute passed in 1976 prohibiting federal funds from going toward abortion costs, with few exceptions. 'The Hyde Amendment is a clear federal ban on abortion funding, except in the cases of rape, incest and life of the mother,' Maloy said in her remarks. 'It's been in place every appropriation cycle for 40 years. And I've been here, I've heard a lot of talk about partisanship and how this should not be a partisan bill, but this is a completely partisan amendment, whereas the Hyde Amendment has been a bipartisan consensus for four decades.' The amendment, proposed by a Democrat during the appropriations hearing, was ultimately rejected. The DOD issued a policy shortly after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 that would allow military members to receive travel reimbursements and approved leave for abortion-related reasons. That policy was largely approved to allow service members in states where abortion was banned locally to travel across state lines if needed. That provision was criticized by Republicans and was rescinded shortly after Donald Trump took office in January and signed an executive order enforcing the Hyde Amendment and restricting taxpayer dollars from being used for any abortion-related reasons. Maloy pushed against reinstating that policy, arguing it forces taxpayers to fund travel and lodging costs for a procedure they may disagree with. 'The federal government must exercise restraint and respect diverse moral values of American people,' Maloy said. 'This amendment is not in the spirit of that neutrality, not in the spirit of the Dobbs decision or the Hyde Amendment.' 'This would allow the DOD to make federal abortion policy that isn't in keeping with what Congress has done through the Hyde Amendment, and that's a path that I don't think we should start to go down,' she added. 'Federal abortion policy should be uniform like it has been for 40 years through bipartisan consensus in the Hyde Amendment. Abortions, including abortion travel or enhanced leave policies designed to facilitate abortions, have no place in this bill.' Republicans overwhelmingly rejected the amendment and the House Appropriations Committee advanced the larger bill, the Fiscal Year 2026 Defense Appropriations Act. The legislation seeks to provide more than $830 billion to the Defense Department and includes policies to increase pay for military personnel, modernize weapons systems, codify some DOGE suggestions to cut 'waste, fraud and abuse' within the department, and more.

Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song
Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's Least Favorite Words, in One Terrifying Song

The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. Last year, a lot of indie-music fans—including myself—got someone else's packing list stuck in their head. I'd walk around muttering 'Milk thistle, calcium, high-rise, boot cut / Advil, black jeans, blue jeans'—lyrics hissed out by the art-punk legend Kim Gordon on a song called 'Bye Bye.' The track led off her album The Collective, one of the most acclaimed releases of 2024. Over hard hip-hop beats and snarling guitar distortion, Gordon stammered about daily banalities, reframing modern life as a psychological war zone. Now the 72-year-old co-founder of Sonic Youth has released a new version of the song, called 'Bye Bye 25.' The music is largely the same, but the lyrics are new, and they start like this: mental health electric vehicle Gulf of Mexico energy conversion gay bird flu These are among the terms that the Trump administration has tried to minimize from public life. PEN America has assembled a list of at least 350 phrases that federal authorities have, this year, scrubbed from government websites and materials (including school curricula), flagged as necessitating extra review in official documents and proposals, or discouraged the use of among staffers. The attention paid to these words reflects Trump's crusade against diversity, equity, and inclusion, as well as his team's stances on policy issues such as energy and vaccines. Gordon picked some of these words to rework 'Bye Bye'—making her, somewhat curiously, one of the few established musicians to release music directly inspired by Trump's second term. For all the chaos and consternation caused by the president this year, the entertainment world's response has been relatively muted. Bruce Springsteen, that liberal stalwart, kicked off his tour with an anti-Trump sermon; stars such as Doechii and Lady Gaga have made awards-show speeches in support of immigrants, trans people, and protesters. But outright protest music responding to recent events has been rare. 'I think people are kind of mostly just still stunned and don't know what to do,' Gordon told me in a video chat earlier this week. The memory of what happened the last time around might be contributing to the hesitation. Trump's rise to power in 2016 spurred a quick response from popular culture, resulting in diss tracks (Nipsey Hussle and YG's 'FDT') and provocations from luminaries (remember Madonna wanting to explode the White House?). The indie-rock world united for a compilation called Our First 100 Days: one track released for each of Trump's first 100 days in office. But today, many of those efforts feel like either artifacts of a bygone movement—the pink-hatted #Resistance—or simply inconsequential. When I spoke with Gordon, she said, with a laugh, that she had no memory of contributing to the Our First 100 Days project. The new version of 'Bye Bye' caught my attention because it's deadpan funny, and because it avoids some of the pitfalls that await many anti-Trump protest efforts. The president and many of his supporters seem to use liberal outrage as fuel, which means strident criticism has a way of backfiring. Steve Bannon's stated strategy to 'flood the zone with shit'—to stoke multiple incendiary media narratives every day—can make knowing what to protest first difficult. The firing of human-rights workers? The extrajudicial deportations? The dehumanization of trans people? The bid to turn Gaza into a resort? How do you pick? Gordon's song cuts across topic areas by highlighting the dark absurdity of an ascendant political tactic: controlling policy by controlling language. It also doesn't sloganeer; instead, it presents a patently ridiculous jumble of terms for listeners to reflect on. (Theoretically, a MAGA loyalist might even enjoy the sound of diversity-related jargon becoming a heavy-metal hit list). 'I wanted to have some really mundane, weird words in there like allergy or measles or tile drainage,' she told me. 'It's unrealistic to think they could actually ban these words, because everyone uses them every day. But I think if they had their ultimate fantasy, maybe.' Gordon and her former band, Sonic Youth, emanate the kind of inscrutable hauteur that might seem at odds with outright protest. But this is not her first such effort in this vein. Sonic Youth arose out of the punk-rock underground of the 1980s that was boiling with outrage against Ronald Reagan. In 1992, their song 'Youth Against Fascism' featured Thurston Moore—the band's other singer, and Gordon's now-ex-husband—sneering, 'Yeah, the president sucks / He's a war pig fuck.' That same year, the Gordon-led 'Swimsuit Issue' skewered male chauvinism, a topic she returned to with the hilarious 'I'm a Man' on The Collective. Talking with her, I remembered that though Gordon is often associated with Gen X disaffection, she's really a Baby Boomer who came of age attending Vietnam War protests and listening to folk music. The video for 'Bye Bye 25' splices images from the recent anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles with shots of her holding cue cards in the style of Bob Dylan's 'Subterranean Homesick Blues' video. She told me her favorite protest song is Neil Young's 'Ohio,' which decried the state violence at Kent State University in 1970. Young, she suspected, didn't intend to write an out-and-out rallying cry. 'Those lyrics were describing a time,' she said. 'That's what I hope I'm doing with my music and my lyrics—really describing what's going on.' Article originally published at The Atlantic

Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'
Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'

Yahoo

time33 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tucker Carlson splits from Trump, advocates ‘dropping Israel'

Talk show host Tucker Carlson broke with President Donald Trump on Iran on Friday, writing in a scathing commentary in his daily newsletter that the United States should 'drop Israel' and 'let them fight their own wars.' 'If Israel wants to wage this war, it has every right to do so. It is a sovereign country, and it can do as it pleases,' Carlson wrote of Israel's preemptive strike on Iran's nuclear facilities. 'But not with America's backing.' Trump, for his part, has endorsed Israel's attacks, which he called 'very successful,' and underscored in an interview with Fox News on Thursday night that the U.S. would defend Israel if Iran retaliates. He also warned that the situation 'will only get worse' if Iran does not agree to a nuclear deal 'before there is nothing left.' TRUMPS TAKE Trump to Fox News: U.S. will defend Israel if Iran retaliates Read more In recent days, Carlson has argued that fears of Iran obtaining a nuclear weapon in the near future are unfounded and said that a war with the Islamic Republic would not only result in 'thousands' of American casualties in the Middle East but 'amount to a profound betrayal of' Trump's base and effectively 'end his presidency.' Carlson reiterated that claim in his newsletter, accusing Trump of 'being complicit in the act of war' through 'years of funding and sending weapons to Israel.' Direct U.S. involvement in a war with Iran, he said, 'would be a middle finger in the faces of the millions of voters who cast their ballots in hopes of creating a government that would finally put the United States first.' 'What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency,' he concluded.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store