Blueprint bill receives preliminary approval in the Senate
For anyone thinking the Blueprint for Maryland's Future is no longer needed, Sen. Ron Watson (D-Prince George's) points to the disparity in the coach-to-teacher ratio between school systems as proof that it is.
Where Baltimore City has 43 teachers for every one instructional coach in the school system, for example, Baltimore County's rate is 68 to 1, while Prince George's County ratio of teachers to coaches is a staggering 276 to one.
'That should tell you something,' Watson said during Senate debate Monday. 'There is a significant disparity about the equitable distribution' of coaches in the state.
His comments came as the full Senate debated the Blueprint, the state's 10-year, multibillion-dollar education reform effort now in is third year. The Senate gave preliminary approval to its version of the plan Monday, after rejecting a series of Republican amendments to the bill during about 30 minutes of debate.
The Senate also advanced the House version of the bill, which it amended to make identical to its own — changes the House is likely to reject, setting the stage for a conference committee later this week to work out differences before the session ends Monday.
The House approved its version of the Blueprint reform bill earlier this month, rejecting cuts in per pupil funding and a four-year pause on teacher collaborative time, both elements of the bill proposed by Gov. Wes Moore (D).
Senate Bill 429, and the conformed House version, agrees with the governor on the collaborative time and per pupil funding provisions.
Like the House, which rejected Republican amendments to the bill in a vote earlier this month, the Senate on Monday also rejected amendments from three GOP lawmakers.
Tbe House amendments were all rejected on a roll call, but in the Senate on Monday, the first two Republicans' amendments were rejected with a loud 'No!' by some Democrats that cascaded throughout the chamber.
Sen. Jack Bailey (R-Calvert and St. Mary's) offered slightly more than three pages of amendments that included a freeze for all increases of per pupil funding, and for the Accountability and Implementation Board (AIB) to develop metrics to measure student outcomes directly related to programs in the Blueprint. The AIB is charged with overseeing the multiyear school reform plan.
Sen. Mary Beth Carozza (R-Lower Shore) introduced two amendments, which were similar to those she presented unsuccessfully last week before her Education, Energy, and the Environment Committee.
Her amendments would have required the state Department of Education, in collaboration with the AIB, to convene 'a certain' work group to study the long-term sustainability of the Blueprint. She also proposed the department and AIB convene a work group to not only study the Blueprint 'based on its mandates and costs,' but also analyze overall public school funding on items such as health services, school security and transportation.
Sen. Jason Gallion (R-Harford and Cecil) sought to eliminate a new Academic Excellence Program, which was first presented by Gov. Wes Moore (D) in the bill known as the 'Excellence in Maryland Public Schools Act.'
The estimated $17 million program for next fiscal year includes the hiring of instructional coaches, who would work with teachers and administrations at schools with low-proficiency rates and declining achievement results in recent years.
Education officials told the Education, Energy and Environment Committee last week that up to 200 coaches would be needed in the next five years. The state currently has about 800, but 63% of them are in only five of the state's 24 school systems.
'I think that's not fiscally responsible,' said Gallion, who serves on that committee. 'It was brought out that these coaches would make, like, $120,000 each. By my quick math, that would be two teachers for every coach that we could pay for by this funding.'
But Watson, who served as the floor leader on the bill, summarized the coach-to-teacher ratio in five counties:
54 teachers to one coach in Anne Arundel;
43-to-1 in Baltimore City;
68-to-1 in Baltimore County;
79-to-1 in Montgomery; and
276-to-1 in Prince George's County.
'The AIB is going to continue to make these decisions to ensure the fair and equitable distribution of these things that are going to close the achievement gap and help all of our students achieve,' he said.
The House and Senate will need to agree and pass identical bills by Monday, the last day of the legislative session.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats alarmed over new data showing voters fleeing to GOP
Democrats are sounding the alarm on new data showing they are losing voters to Republicans across the country. A devastating New York Times report Wednesday showed that of the 30 states that maintain voter registration records by political party, Democrats fell behind Republicans in all of them between the 2020 and 2024 elections. In total, Republicans added up to 4.5 million voters compared to Democrats, creating a huge hold that could set Democrats back for years. 'I think it should be an alarm' for the Democratic Party, said party strategist Eddie Vale. 'I think it's a real problem.' The new data comes as Democrats struggle to figure out how to get out of the political wilderness after losing the presidency to Donald Trump and control of both chambers of Congress to the GOP. California Gov. Gavin Newsom has found traction with attacks on Trump, mimicking the president on social media and energizing many in his party. But the Democratic brand itself has taken a number of big hits, and The New York Times data is just the latest point suggesting the party has lost its way. Vale noted that a span of voters, including people of different races and ages, were abandoning the party, according to the Times reporting. He said his worry is that all of these different kinds of voters feel like the Democratic Party left them. They 'all shared the broader fact that they are working class and not feeling like we were talking to them or actually going to help them, so that needs to be fixed,' he said. Another Democratic strategist found the report disheartening at a time when Democrats are feeling rudderless and leaderless and lacking a coherent message for voters. 'Two things need to happen for Trump's political movement to fail: Trump and MAGA popularity plummets and Democrats' brand popularity rises,' the strategist said. 'The former is happening but not the latter.' 'You have to have something clear to offer an alternative vision,' the strategist added. 'The voter registration lag is directly related to this because the Democratic brand is flat. It's one of the reasons why the most successful Democrats in this environment run against both parties.' Democrats have been feeling dejected since their devastating defeat in November, when they lost control of not just the presidency but the House and the Senate, which they had previously controlled. Recent polls show that Democrats view their party as weak. An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll in July revealed that about 1 in 5 Democrats described their party in a positive light. And a poll by the Democratic super PAC Unite the Country obtained by The Hill last month showed that voters perceived the Democratic Party as 'out of touch,' 'woke' and 'weak.' The struggle to connect with voters has been a running theme for months, with even Democrats acknowledging that they have yet to put forward a compelling message. A Wall Street Journal poll out late last month showed Democrats' popularity had hit the lowest point in 35 years, as 63 percent of voters had an unfavorable view of the party. At the same time, 33 percent of those surveyed held a favorable view. The drop in voter registration for Democrats 'matches what we see in the polls,' said Republican strategist Susan Del Percio, who does not support Trump. 'People are unsatisfied with what the Democrats are offering.' 'It shows how Democrats took things for granted and got out-hustled by Republicans, and I don't say that with glee or anything else,' Del Percio added. 'But the numbers are there, and this is proof in the pudding.' A major Democratic donor was more scathing: 'Our party sucks. Our leadership sucks. Our message sucks. Why would anyone want to be a Democrat?' 'We're completely out of touch,' the donor said. Democrats also say they are aware of voters' perceptions and views of the party and have sought to make inroads with key demographics that have strayed from their party. They have been conducting a series of postmortems and focus groups in an effort to win the voters back. Steve Schale, the veteran Democratic strategist, said the only voter registration that has 'really moved the needle in the last 20 years has been centered around the party and candidates' and that Democrats should return to that model. 'Not only does party-based voter registration accomplish the rote goal of registering voters, it also requires the kind of outreach in key communities that we have long rightly been criticized for abandoning,' Schale said. 'But to this, donors have to be willing to support the DNC [Democratic National Committee] and state parties.' 'It won't happen on its own,' Schale added. At the same time, Vale cautioned that the Democratic Party should not simply mend what's broken. They have to be forward-looking. 'We need to make sure that while we fix it we don't only fight the last war and not be attuned to things possibly changing again,' Vale said. 'Because we have already seen in a lot of polling that younger people, Latino and African American men are souring on Trump and that can be something that can be the leading edge of winning them back registration-wise.' In the end, Democratic strategist Anthony Coley said, the numbers amount to trust with voters and 'a larger problem with the Democratic brand.' 'Voters have run away from the party for a variety of reasons but trust — or the lack of it — tops the list,' Coley said. 'Too many voters just don't trust the Democratic Party to deliver on issues they care about.'
The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Fiscal cliff looms as public media braces for Trump cuts
Supporters of public media on Capitol Hill and beyond are scrambling to find solutions to address a fiscal cliff that public media is staring down this fall following cuts directed by President Trump and executed by his allies in Congress. Senators on both sides of the aisle say they were working to protect local stations after Congress cut funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB), the government-funded body that said it will shut down as a result. At the same time, public media leaders are looking for ways to blunt the blow for stations most at risk, but have warned that filling the gaps could be next to impossible. 'Nobody can replace $600 million a year,' Tim Isgitt, CEO of the Public Media Company, said Tuesday. 'CPB was the largest funder of local news and information in this country, and no, philanthropy can't make up that gap.' Isgitt's organization is the driving force behind a philanthropic effort, known as the Public Media Bridge Fund, which has raised more than $26 million for stations at risk of shuttering in wake of the CPB cuts. 'For these at-risk stations, CPB typically sends about $55 million a year, just to these 115 that we've identified,' Isgitt told The Hill. He said the goal is to raise about $100 million over two years to help cover that gap for these stations, while exploring ways for them to become 'more sustainable over time,' including finding other sources of revenue or reducing expenditures. In total, a group of philanthropic organizations including The Knight Foundation, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Schmidt Family Foundation, all longtime backers of public media, pledged to commit nearly $37 million this week to provide immediate relief to public media stations at risk of closure following federal funding cuts. 'Local public media stations are trusted community anchors that connect people to vital news, culture and civic life,' Maribel Pérez Wadsworth, president and CEO of Knight Foundation said in a statement. 'This is an urgent moment that calls for bold action.' Public broadcasting stations have also seen a boost in donations in response to the cuts, with reports showing tens of millions of dollars in increased support in recent months. But advocates for public media say much more is needed to fill a more than $500 million hole for the coming fiscal year. Some say the void left by the closure of local public media stations would pose a risk to public safety and quality of life, particularly in rural communities. 'Like many people, I learned to read and count because of public media. It's the lifeblood of so many localities,' said Pete Loge, who teaches communications and media at George Washington University. 'Trump is a really good big national theatre and spectacle … the irony is a move like this is made to seem like it's attacking liberals, but it's actually harming a lot of Republican constituents.' The CPB said earlier this month it would begin an 'orderly wind-down of its operations' after the GOP-led Congress approved about $1 billion in cuts to the corporation, or combined funding previously made available for the organization for fiscal years 2026 and 2027. It also said this week that it 'no longer can absorb costs and manage the Next Generation Warning System (NGWS) grant program' as a result of the cuts to its operating costs. CPB partnered with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to implement the program. Congress currently has until Sept. 30 to pass legislation to keep the government funded into fiscal 2026, which begins Oct. 1, or risk its first government shutdown in years. Some on Capitol Hill are hopeful that lawmakers could still pull out a bipartisan fix to protect local stations, mainly in rural areas, that rely on funding from the federal government to operate. 'I think that the discussion around their decisions really was focused on national programming and concerns that people had about NPR and PBS, and I think that really what got missed in that whole discussion was the impact that this rescission was going to have on local stations,' Kate Riley, the president and chief executive officer for America's Public Television Stations (APTS), said. 'We've talked to a wide range of members, including many Republicans, who strongly support their local stations and recognize the essential role that their local stations provide in serving their community and their constituents, and are realizing now that this broad rescission has had some unintended consequences on their local stations,' Riley said. Funding for CPB was notably excluded in the annual funding bill for the departments of Labor and Health and Human Services that was passed by the Senate Appropriations Committee last month. The CPB said it marked the first time in more than five decades the funding had been left out. Sen. Tammy Baldwin (Wis.), the top Democrat on the subcommittee that crafts the annual funding bill, suggested funding for local stations could find bipartisan support in Congress, separate from the administration's efforts to dismantle CPB. 'A priority for most of the Republicans who have announced their support or their opposition to defunding the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, is that they have many small rural stations' Baldwin told The Hill. 'Their capacity to do private fundraising is very limited if you serve a very, you know, rural population with a small population, but they need it for emergency alerts and educational programming and local news. And so, I think that's where we're going to be able to come together.' But for some stations, the time crunch is tighter. NPR said multiple stations began their fiscal 2026 budget in July. Isgitt also noted that November, when many public stations would typically receive funding from CPB, will also be a critical time for other outlets. 'I don't know what cash flow or assets look like for every one of these stations, but you can be assured that, in the months after November, several stations will begin to fail, and then more will fail, and more will fail after that,' he said. 'It's going to happen. This is a cash-strapped industry.' Republicans said they had worked out a deal with the administration aimed at helping shield tribal stations from the cuts by repurposing other funds for the effort. But Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), a senior appropriator, has raised questions about the funding and noted that many stations in her state, which has a significant indigenous population, could still fall through the cracks because they aren't considered tribally-owned or serving tribal land. 'I have to figure out a way to maintain not just the tribal stations, because half of those stations are not tribal,' Murkowski told The Hill. 'They're pretty dang important, and so, yeah, I got to find a way. I don't know what the path is, but I'm working on it.' Native Public Media CEO Loris Tiller said the organization conducted a recent poll of 19 tribal stations so far that all said anywhere from 40-100 percent of their annual budget came from CPB funds. 'We also asked them whether staff layoffs will be necessary, and you can see that the majority of them are affirmative in that response,' Taylor said, while also adding she still doesn't have many answers about the administration's side deal with Senate Republicans to protect tribal stations. 'We just haven't heard anything about that. I don't know if it's moving,' Taylor said. 'I don't know where the money's coming from. The details haven't been forthcoming.' Advocates have also raised concerns about public stations at historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) they say are at risk in wake of the CPB cuts. About a dozen NPR members are affiliated with HBCUs. Cuts to public media have long been on the wishlist of President Trump and conservatives more generally. The president earlier this year sent a special request to Congress to secure the cuts without Democratic support. Upon passage of the legislation, Trump cheered the measure on social media for cutting 'atrocious NPR and Public Broadcasting.' Many Republicans in both chambers share the same view, often singling out NPR and PBS, which receive some funding from CPB, for what they allege is political bias. About one percent of NPR's current operating budget comes directly from the federal government, compared to 15 percent for PBS, multiple outlets report. In the previous fiscal year, NPR received upwards of $13 million from CPB, the corporation's grants and allocations data shows. More than $70 million went to PBS, based in Arlington. At a hearing on Capitol Hill earlier this year, the CEOs of NPR and PBS faced an intense grilling from angry lawmakers over their editorial decision making and funding models. Other lawmakers have argued public media has been outpaced by major changes to the media ecosystem and the emergence of alternative news platforms. 'Because of technology today, I don't think there's a role for public radio anymore,' Rep. James Comer (R-Ky.) said during a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing in March. In a statement after the Senate passed cuts to the CPB, PBS President and CEO Paula Kerger said the moves 'goes against the will of the American people, the vast majority of whom trust PBS and believe we provide excellent value to their communities.' 'These cuts will significantly impact all of our stations, but will be especially devastating to smaller stations and those serving large rural areas,' she said. 'Many of our stations which provide access to free unique local programming and emergency alerts will now be forced to make hard decisions in the weeks and months ahead.'
Boston Globe
26 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
New Englanders grade Trump harshly on education
Coppola was one of many respondents who cited fears about the future of education A long litany of complaints from the respondents included Trump's aggressive efforts to reshape American education, including dismantling the US Department of Education, penalizing school districts over diversity and transgender issues, seeking to bar international students from colleges, and freezing university research funds. Advertisement 'Make no mistake about it,' said Joann Flaminio, a 69-year-old Democrat from Providence. 'The dismantling of the Department of Education sends a stark and clear message that President Trump does not care about public school education.' Previous surveys in this ongoing series asked these voters about the economy, Advertisement The eight voters who supported former vice president Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential race delivered harsh critiques of Trump's education policy, while two of three Trump supporters offered only qualified backing for his efforts to remake the US education system. Since Trump took office in January, the Education Department has been in his budgetary crosshairs. In March, the president announced plans to fire 1,300 of its 4,000 employees, and the US Supreme Court in mid-July agreed that he had the power to make such a massive cut. He also has targeted billions of dollars in research funding at top universities, including Harvard, Brown, and Columbia; assailed diversity, equity, and inclusion programs; and backed the use of immigration agents on public-school grounds. 'Local programs that have been funded federally are being impacted. And it's putting good programs run by good people in very precarious positions,' said Darryll White, 66, an unenrolled voter from Skowhegan, Maine, who cast his ballot for Trump last year. 'I'm fine and supportive of moving the leadership of education back to the states,' but not at the cost of sacrificing federal funding for quality programs, such as after-school help, said White, who directs a nonprofit community park. But for ardent Trump supporter Seth Sole-Robertson, a 45-year-old Republican from Medway, the president's assault on the federal education bureaucracy, diversity initiatives, and funding for research projects at major universities is not only warranted, but long overdue. 'I don't know why we have a Department of Education,' said Sole-Robertson, who owns a marine-repair business. 'I really don't know what it does. I think that should be something that the states regulate and handle.' Advertisement Most of the department's disbursements go to college students in the form of grants and loans. The agency also provides assistance for disabled students and is tasked with enforcing civil rights laws pertaining to racial minorities, women and girls, and LGBTQ+ students, among other groups. This means that local education already falls under the control of states and school districts, which determine what pupils read and what standards they are encouraged to meet. Moriah Wojciechowski, a 39-year-old Democrat from Quechee, Vt., called Trump's actions 'an effort to reduce higher education at a national level,' which will hurt young people who have aspirations for college but limited finances, and can use federal education loans. 'It is an attempt to stifle folks who do not have the ability to fund themselves, but have this level of ambition where they want to succeed and give more to their children and themselves,' said Wojciechowski, a licensed nursing assistant. 'Less-educated folks equals easy-to-boss-around.' Most respondents assailed Trump's executive order to withhold funding from K-12 schools that allow transgender athletes to join teams based on how they identify themselves. They also criticized the president's attacks on DEI, or diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, at both the K-12 and college levels. 'It's villainizing DEI, and it's creating this view of it that it's harmful and that equity is harmful,' said Justina Perry, 37, a Democrat from New Bedford who runs a physical-therapy clinic. Perry said she is worried that her husband, who recently completed a doctorate in anti-racist education, could have trouble finding a job because of the federal assault on DEI initiatives. The president also faced criticism for freezing billions of dollars for university research that is a major economic driver for New England, which also has some of the best public K-12 schools and colleges in the nation. Advertisement For Sidney Trantham, a 56-year-old Democrat from Boston, canceling research funding 'is an example of the weaponization of government that the Republican Party has decried for years.' 'I think that it is an attempt to establish a conservative ideological perspective that is not grounded in science or in fact,' said Trantham, a clinical psychologist who teaches at Boston College. Rosemary Shea, a 62-year-old unenrolled voter from Hampton, N.H., said Trump is trying to bend American education toward his political perspective. 'It goes against what schooling is all about,' Shea said. 'I mean you, you send your children to school not to parrot back what you believe, but you send them to school to learn about all options, all options of learning, all the ideas that are out there.' Most respondents said school districts should not cooperate with immigration officials in their efforts to locate students who are not legal US residents. 'Schools have a right to protect students. When students are on campus to learn, I mean, especially K through 12 ... the school's job is to protect those students,' Perry said. However, Brian Jankins, 56, an unenrolled voter from Sutton who voted for Trump in 2024, said schools and ICE should work together 'within certain boundaries.' 'Generally, I think there should be better cooperation at all levels between local, state, and federal officials,' said Jankins, who works in banking. 'And there isn't. So I think there's so much room for improvement there." For White, the Maine park director, the parameters for interaction between ICE and public schools are clear-cut, and there should be cooperation. Advertisement 'It's the law,' White said. 'If you don't like the law, change the law.' ICE agents are permitted to enter public areas on school grounds, such as lobbies for enforcement activity, but they are not allowed into private areas, such as classrooms and offices. Respondents also overwhelmingly opposed Trump's efforts to restrict the admission of international students at American universities. In June, a federal judge in Boston temporarily blocked the administration's attempt to bar foreign students from Harvard. 'It just seems foolish, and universities shouldn't be attached to a particular country or patriotism or whatever sort of thing he's spinning on it,' said Ruth Bristol, a 24-year-old Democrat from Somerville. 'If you really wanted to do all that, then you would make college more accessible for American students rather than barring international students,' added Bristol, who works three jobs. Jankins, the Trump voter from Sutton, said foreign students benefit the country. 'If an international student goes through the proper channels and procedures, I don't have any issue with that. When I went to school my freshman year, I met somebody from India,' Jankins said. 'I never met somebody from India before, and he was a nice guy, and we had a friendship. So, you know, I'm for that.' Sole-Robertson, the Trump supporter from Medway, said he supported barring foreign students. 'We need to make sure that our students here, Americans, can get into these colleges before international students do,' Sole-Robertson said. 'I am totally for that.' Brian MacQuarrie can be reached at
