Australia's last paper mill, Boyer, told power grid insufficient for electric conversion
The Boyer Mill is a piece of history.
It is also reliant on some historical technology — coal burners.
Coal-fired boilers have been creating the steam used in the paper manufacturing process since the mill opened in 1941.
"That steam is used for softening [wood] chips in the pulping process, but its primarily used for drying paper in the paper machines, it's critical to our operation," the mill's general manager, Patrick Dooley said.
The mill's new owner, businessman David Marriner, wants to cut off its coal connection and bring in electric boilers.
The Boyer Mill is Tasmania's fourth-largest carbon emitter.
The switch to electric would cut the plant's on-site emissions by about 95 per cent — roughly the same as taking one third of Tasmania's cars off the road.
There is just one problem — getting the extra electricity needed.
Mr Marriner said he had been told by state-owned power company Hydro Tasmania that it could not supply him with power from the Tasmanian grid, due to a lack of availability.
Instead, it would have to import electricity from Victoria, which Mr Marriner said was offered a much higher price.
The Boyer Mill is one of the state's largest power users.
It currently uses around 100 megawatts — the electric boilers would require another 45 megawatts.
"I feel stressed and somewhat frustrated in the discussions and negotiations we've been having," Mr Marriner said.
The new boilers have been purchased from a Norwegian company and would be ready for installing in 15 months' time.
Hydro Tasmania chief executive Rachel Watson said Tasmania's power and supply were in balance.
"Until new generation is built, any large base load increases would be met by increased gas generation or imports from the mainland," Ms Watson said.
She said any energy it sourced would be based on the cheapest available.
"At times, that can be above what a customer wants to pay.
"Hydro Tasmania remains focused on achieving a sustainable commercial return for its owners, the people of Tasmania."
Boyer's Boiler No. 5, which was installed in 1991, chews through about 88,000 tonnes of coal a year.
Since the mill lost its Tasmanian coal source three years ago, all of it has been brought in by a chartered ship from Newcastle, New South Wales.
"It's unloaded and stored at a Bell Bay site then we utilise our contract with TasRail to bring the coal on a daily basis," Mr Dooley said.
That coal comes with a $12 million a year price tag.
"Now we've added [up] all of that logistics in terms of chartering the ship, storing it, unloading it and storing it at Bell Bay and then reloading it and bringing it down here," Mr Dooley said.
The upgrades received backing at this year's federal election, with Labor tipping in $24 million.
Of that figure, $9 million was to "stabilise its operations and prepare major investments to decarbonise and diversify its production", with the remainder to be spent on the electrification upgrades themselves.
This is not the first time the Boyer Mill's electrification plans have been knocked back due to its energy supply.
Under the previous ownership of Norwegian company Norske Skog in 2023, the company's plans for electric boilers were halted, when its request for 50 megawatts was refused by Hydro Tasmania.
When Mr Marriner purchased the mill in February this year, Liberal spokesperson Nick Duigan downplayed concerns about a lack of power.
In response to Mr Marriner's concerns, Mr Duigan told the ABC there was energy "through" Hydro Tasmania.
"Our major industrials have significantly discounted rates, as we've encouraged the economic development these businesses offer the state," he said.
"When additional supply is requested, Hydro Tasmania commercially negotiates a price."
Hydro Tasmania said the total capacity of its system was more than 2,600 megawatts.
The last major addition to Tasmania's power grid was the 112 megawatt Granville Harbour Wind Farm in 2020.
The Northern Midland Solar Farm will provide another 288 megawatts when it is commissioned in 2027, and Hydro has agreed to purchase energy.
Many other projects have been tied up in approvals processes for years.
Last week, a decision on approvals under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act for the proposed Robbins Island wind farm was delayed for the seventh time.
However, a new 250 megawatt solar farm at Weasel Hill in the Central Highlands received federal approval this month. It does not have an expected completion date.
Adding to frustrations, Mr Marriner said Hydro had exercised a contractual right to cut off power supply "multiple times" since he took ownership of the factory earlier this year.
"We get a credit for that, but it doesn't necessarily offset the cost of a total shutdown," he said.
He said it comes with little warning, and impacted production schedules.
Ms Watson said the trigger was one reason why Tasmania's major industrial customers received cheaper power.
"It is part of their contract and we always give advanced notice. This is a very common arrangement for major industrials in the National Electricity Market," she said.
Mr Marriner also said Hydro had been unsure it could supply power from Tasmanian sources for another of his business interests.
His pre-cast concrete factory at Bridgewater produced the 1,082 concrete segments for the new Bridgewater bridge.
Last year he unveiled plans to expand and convert the factory, so it could create 1,700 homes a year, made from precast concrete.
The Tasmanian Chamber of Commerce and Industry's Michael Bailey has been saying for two years that Tasmania is in an "energy crisis".
He is frustrated that nothing has changed.
"We're trying to grow industry, we're trying to build business, and it's impossible to do that without enough power," Mr Bailey said.
He said the key piece in getting new generation projects moving was the Marinus Link.
"What Marinus will bring then is the business case for those major wind production sites that we desperately need."
It is a proposal for two 750 megawatt high voltage energy cables between Tasmania and Victoria, and would allow for more energy trading between the two states.
The federal, Victorian and Tasmanian governments are due in August to make a final investment decision on the first cable.
Ray Mostogl from the Tasmanian Minerals, Manufacturing and Energy Council said the state should be focusing on building a few very large generation projects, close to existing transmission corridors.
Mr Mostogl said that could help avoid the cost of building new transmission lines and potentially cause less community angst.
"It's not just power, it's power at the right price," he said.
Mr Bailey said if any of the state's four major industrials — Boyer Mill, Liberty Bell Bay, Bell Bay Aluminium and the Nystar zinc smelter — were to close, it would have ramifications on the entire state's power grid.
"Not only would we see the cost of transmission increase for all Tasmanian households, but we'd see much more insecurity across our network. We'd see blackouts," Mr Bailey said.
He also said Hydro's ability to switch off power to the major industrials helped balance the network.
Mr Marriner said he hoped "common sense" would prevail, and that the Boyer Mill would be able to access power at a cheaper rate, even if it were sourced from Victoria.
But the first choice is for Tasmanian-made green energy.
"If you go back in our history, the one great asset we do have is in fact clean energy, and we should be all very appreciative for that," he said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Uncertainty still surrounds government pay deals with police, teachers, and nurses and midwives
Most people know at least one nurse, midwife, police officer or teacher. They make up a tick over 63 per cent of Queensland's key frontline workforce, and right now the state government is negotiating new pay deals with all of them. Griifith University industrial relations expert Ben French said dealing with three such influential groups all at once put the government in a "tricky spot". The situation is a result of enterprise bargaining agreements "rolling over" during the COVID-19 pandemic. "Now they've all come up at the same time for the new government," Dr French said. It's been tough going for negotiators. The police union has agreed in-principle to a deal, but the government is in conciliation with both the nurses' and the teachers' unions in front of the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission (QIRC). In early August, teachers across the state went on strike for the first time in 16 years. Earlier in the month, nurses and midwives took industrial action by refusing to do tasks not related to critical care. Pandanus Petter from Australian National University's School of Business and Politics said as opposition leader, David Crisafulli was keen to paint himself as someone who would not repeat "the mistakes of the Newman era". "He positioned himself as someone who was not going to radically cut the public service," Dr Petter said. "He was saying, 'You know, what I want to do is empower the public service.' The government has offered an 8 per cent raise over three years to the police and teachers, while nurses and midwives have been offered an 11 per cent wage rise. This "fairly prescriptive model" has come with various add-ons and extras for each industry, Dr French said. He said these one-off payments "that are not part of the actual increase" are a way the government can save money down the track. "If you get a pay rise and you get an increase, it's on the base rate … the next time you come around your base rate is higher and you can build on that," he said, adding bonus payments did not feed into employees' super or overtime. Already those differing extras have caused friction. The Queensland Nurses' and Midwives' Union (QNMU) publicly derided the government for offering some police officers an $8,000 retention bonus over two years. Secretary Sarah Beaman said it was "outrageous" that the government had already struck a "better deal" with the police union after months of negotiating with the QNMU. The nurses and midwives EBA nominally ended on March 31, while the teachers and police ended on June 30. "Does this government have a problem with nurses and midwives?" Ms Beaman asked. Dr French said none of the three deals were set in stone. The state legislation allows for six months of negotiations from the day the EBA nominally ends or three months from the beginning of conciliation. After that, the parties can apply for arbitration, where the QIRC will decide what's fair. In the case of nurses and midwives, who are chasing a 13 per cent wage rise they say will deliver "nation-leading pay", the last scheduled conciliation meeting is September 2. At the behest of QIRC deputy president John Merrell, the QNMU agreed to pause industrial action until then, but said they would take further steps if negotiations failed. The Queensland Teachers' Union sent a letter to members on Thursday, seen by the ABC, confirming they had given the government until the end of the month to come up with a better deal or risk further strike action. QTU vice president Leah Olsen said more work stoppages would be a "last resort" option for the union, adding the union's members did "not take industrial action lightly". "Further strike action during school hours can be avoided if the government delivers a package members see value in," Ms Olsen said. As for the police, while there is an in-principle deal in place, union members still have to vote on whether to approve it next month. "My guess is they will vote it down," Dr French said. Both Education Minister John-Paul Langbroek and Health Minister Tim Nicholls have expressed their commitment to getting deals over the line through the conciliation process. Mr Langbroek said the government met with QTU negotiators 18 times over five months before the conciliation process began. The QNMU said they had met with the government for a total of more than 150 hours before they took industrial action last month. Dr Petter said with an election just gone there was little political risk for the government to come off as "tough but fair" in this round of negotiations. However, if three-year deals were signed all round, the next time they would be negotiating would be in the lead up to the 2028 election.

News.com.au
6 hours ago
- News.com.au
Qantas to be given penalty for unlawfully sacking hundreds during Covid-19 pandemic
Qantas is braced to find out how much it is expected to pay in penalties after it unlawfully sacked more than 1800 ground staff. The airline was found to have acted unlawfully three times when it fired 1820 staff in favour of outsourced contractors during the height of the Covid pandemic. While an earlier compensation hearing before Justice Michael Lee found Qantas should pay $120m to impacted workers, a further three-day hearing May sought to decide the additional penalty Qantas must pay for the 2020 decision. The maximum penalty Qantas can be ordered to pay is $121m, on top of the compensation fund that is now in the process of being administered to workers. Since Justice Lee reserved his decision in May, many sacked Qantas workers have anxiously awaited the final figure. On Monday, he is expected to reveal the full amount, which should be well into the millions. The Federal Court earlier found that Qantas had acted against protections in the Fair Work Act in its outsourcing and was partly motivated by a desire to prevent industrial action. The airline appealed the decision to the full bench of the Federal Court and later the High Court, both of which were unsuccessful. After losing the appeal, the union and Qantas went to mediation to determine how much Qantas would have to pay the outsourced workers for economic losses linked to lost wages. TWU secretary Michael Kaine told media ahead of the hearing the airline's decision to get rid of a 'loyal workforce' was 'appalling' and the 'biggest case of illegal sackings in Australian corporate history'. 'The penalty to Qantas must reflect this and send a message to every other company in Australia that you cannot sack your workers to prevent them from using their industrial rights,' he said. Meanwhile, Noel Hutley SC told the court in May that Qantas should pay the maximum penalty given its decision was the 'largest ever instance of the contravention of the Fair Work Act'. He said Qantas was faced with an 'once-in-a-lifetime opportunity' during the pandemic to save more than $100m per year by outsourcing workers and were driven by the 'temptation of the potential to produce a massive profit'. However, Qantas barrister Justin Gleeson SC said any penalty close to the maximum would be 'manifestly unfair'. 'Qantas has accepted the seriousness of its conduct,' he said. 'The court can and should impose a significant deterrent penalty. However, it is in effect a first contravention (of the Fair Work Act).' On the first day of the hearing, Qantas people manager Catherine Walsh took the stand and issued an apology on the airline's behalf. 'I want to reinforce that we are deeply sorry, and we apologise for the impact on the workers, the TWU (Transport Workers Union), to the court for their time and to the family and friends that felt the impacts, we are deeply sorry,' she said. However, the airline was later criticised for failing to call Qantas chief executive Vanessa Hudson during the hearing, and instead calling Ms Walsh, who was not employed by Qantas at the time of the sackings. 'One would have thought if you were truly contrite, you would put someone in the witness box who was there at the relevant time,' Justice Lee said. The TWU is seeking a large majority of the penalty and also argued affected workers should receive further compensation. The funds may otherwise will go directly to the Commonwealth.

ABC News
6 hours ago
- ABC News
Short-term rental advocates say restrictions hurt tourism, not help housing
Advocates of short-term rentals say regulations in the sector are shifting the blame away from governments and towards property owners. Short-stay rentals, typically associated with websites like Airbnb and Stayz, have drawn criticism for taking properties away from the long-term rental market. In other parts of the world, jurisdictions are putting restrictions on short-stay accommodation, including in New York City and Barcelona, amid housing shortages. But research from the University of South Australia has claimed restrictions and bans have done little to help housing stocks. Tourism expert and study author Peter O'Connor said jurisdictions that had banned short-stay accommodation failed to see any meaningful growth in housing access. He said the main consequence was limiting tourism accommodation, in turn increasing prices. "If you reduce the number of short-term rentals which are available, one of the things you do is make it more difficult for tourists to find accommodation," Professor O'Connor said. "Here in Australia, tourism is our number one service export and it has a lot of knock-on effects in terms of the local community and spending in bars, restaurants and shops." A South Australian parliamentary committee is looking into the short-stay accommodation sector, including possible regulations on short-stay rentals. Wendy Roeters owns two homes in Mount Gambier which she rents out for short stays. She said the sector was needed in regional areas where workers travel and stay for extended periods and where there were fewer large hotels. "For companies, the short-term stays are the better option," she said. "You get a lot of people for the hospital, like doctors and nurses. I've just had a nurse stay for three weeks. "You'll have work crews who might be working on construction who might be doing it for a period of six months." Ms Roeters added it was unfair to penalise short-stay property owners for there being a wider shortage of housing. "I can understand that the government wants housing, but that's not the responsibility of people that have a property, that's the government's responsibility," she said. Property reform advocacy group Grounded produced its own report into the short-stay sector in Australia, released in June. It found the profits on short-term rentals were 81 per cent more than if the property was placed on the long-term market in 13 of Australia's busiest tourism towns. Grounded managing director Karl Fitzgerald said it was clear short-stay accommodation was impacting local housing supply. "It's more supply coming out of the long-term rental market and out of the ownership market," he said. "When government is talking about supply on every front, it's strange that Airbnb is not considered as a factor. Mr Fitzgerald said a plan to limit the growth of short-stay accommodation would be more effective, such as a "cap and trade" scheme, which would give licenses to property owners. "That's where having at least a licensing system that regulates the growth and the supply and perhaps caps it and reduces it over time until there's enough funding to channel some of the profits away from Airbnb," he said. "Use that money to fund long-term affordable housing under a community land trust model." Professor O'Connor argued short-stay accommodation had become a "quick fix" for governments in favour of more complicated plans to ease the housing crisis. "It's a lot easier for a state government or a council to introduce a regulation that limits the number of short-term rentals than it is to introduce some way of encouraging the building of new houses," he said. South Australian Greens MLC Robert Simms is leading the state's parliamentary committee into short-stay accommodation. He agreed the sector was not solely to blame for the state's housing crisis, but said it still needed regulation. "I think there's no doubt that short stay is here to stay, but the question is whether or not we've got the balance right," he said. "It is concerning that people might be running a property that is, in effect, a business, and yet they might be paying at the same rates as their neighbour who is living in a private residence. "That doesn't really seem fair, and that's why I think there's a level of community interest in the idea of regulation of the sector."