Obama Library Update: Foundation Hits Back At Trump Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Obama Presidential Center in Chicago, originally envisioned as a new landmark for the city's South Side, has hit back at claims of mismanagement from President Donald Trump.
Despite the Obama Foundation's optimistic public updates, the project has faced major cost overruns, construction disputes and criticism from Trump.
Newsweek contacted the Obama Foundation for comment on this story via email.
The Context
The delay and ballooning budget have made the project a flashpoint. The center's cost has nearly doubled from its original estimate and is now projected at close to $1 billion. The Obama Foundation has said that the project is privately funded and does not rely on taxpayer dollars.
What To Know
In a statement on Tuesday, the Obama Foundation reaffirmed its commitment to the center's vision, saying on X (formerly Twitter): "We can't wait to open our doors to the Obama Presidential Center next spring!
"In addition to a world-class museum, the 19.3-acre campus will feature a gymnasium, a fruit and vegetable garden, a branch of the Chicago Public Library, a playground, and so much more."
The Obama Foundation's official updates say that work has proceeded to close the exterior of the main building, install glass and granite, and fit interior windows on museum levels. Additional insulation has been completed in other structures.
However, Trump weighed in on the project during an Oval Office meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney on Tuesday, calling the project a "disaster," sharply criticizing its management and blaming "woke" hiring practices for its issues.
Former President Barack Obama points out features of the proposed Obama Presidential Center, which is scheduled to be built in nearby Jackson Park, during a gathering at the South Shore Cultural Center on May 3,...
Former President Barack Obama points out features of the proposed Obama Presidential Center, which is scheduled to be built in nearby Jackson Park, during a gathering at the South Shore Cultural Center on May 3, 2017 in Chicago, Illinois. More
Getty Images
In response, the Obama Foundation pushed back on the president's remarks.
"Everyone who sees the Obama Presidential Center is blown away by its beauty, scale and the way it will be an economic engine for Chicago and a beacon of hope for the world," Emily Bittner, the foundation's vice president of communications, said in a statement to Newsweek.
"We look forward to welcoming all visitors to the 19.3-acre campus next spring, to experience a presidential center that not only honors the Obamas' legacy but also lifts up the next generation of leaders."
The foundation also responded to the suggestion from Trump that work on the project had "stopped," saying that the president's characterization was not based on fact, and that it was instead a minor dispute between subcontractors that did not directly involve the foundation.
The center was first announced with a budget of around $500 million. However, in 2022, the project cost had increased to about $830 million.
What People Are Saying
President Donald Trump said on Tuesday: "I mean look, President Obama—and if he wanted help, I'd give him help because I build on time and on budget—he's building his presidential library in Chicago. It's a disaster. And he said something to the effect, 'I only want DEI, I only want woke.'
"He wants woke people to build it. Well, he got woke people and they have massive cost overruns; the job is stopped. I don't know, it's a disaster."
What's Next
The Obama Foundation says work will continue at pace to ready the site for public visitors in 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
WIRED
29 minutes ago
- WIRED
Trumpworld Is Fighting Over 'Official' Crypto Wallet
Jun 4, 2025 1:27 PM The President's sons are feuding with the organization behind the TRUMP memecoin, as both parties claim to be involved in launching Trump-affiliated crypto wallets. Photograph: Bloomberg/Getty Images As Donald Trump and his family stretch into nearly every corner of the cryptocurrency sector, a dispute has broken out over which corporate entities are permitted to wield the Trump brand to promote the crypto products they launch. On Tuesday, the X account for the US president's TRUMP memecoin—which is administered by Fight Fight Fight LLC, formed by longtime Trump ally Bill Zanker—announced plans to launch a crypto wallet and trading platform in partnership with NFT marketplace Magic Eden. The corresponding website, first identified by independent crypto researcher Molly White, pitches the product as 'the official $TRUMP wallet by President Trump.' However, in X posts of their own, Eric and Donald Trump Jr. later repudiated the announcement, which they claimed had not been greenlit by the family. Eric Trump implied that The Trump Organization, the holding company for many of the family's business ventures and intellectual property, could take action against Magic Eden. 'This project is not authorized by [The Trump Organization],' wrote Eric on X. 'I would be extremely careful using our name in a project that has not been approved and is unknown to anyone in our organization,' he added, tagging the Magic Eden handle. In a separate post, Donald Trump Jr. revealed that a separate crypto wallet is under development at World Liberty Financial, a crypto company that he and Eric helped to launch in September last year. 'Stay tuned—World Liberty Financial, which we have been working tirelessly on, will be launching our official wallet soon,' he wrote. World Liberty Financial and Fight Fight Fight did not respond immediately to requests for comment. The White House and Magic Eden declined to comment. Eric Trump did not respond directly to questions from WIRED, saying only, 'I know nothing about this project nor is there any contractual relationship.' To some cryptowatchers, the initial wallet announcement made by Fight Fight Fight had the ring of truth about it, not least because it was coming from the organization behind the TRUMP memecoin. In the last year, despite a chorus of complaints relating to alleged abuses of office and conflicts of interest, the Trump family has forged into almost every segment of the crypto market, from stablecoins, to memecoins, crypto investment products, and bitcoin mining. To launch a crypto wallet appeared to some as a plausible next step: 'It makes perfect sense for anyone who has their eye on where the puck is going,' says Brad Harrison, head of crypto platform Venus Labs. The dispute over the wallets soon to be launched by World Liberty Financial and Fight Fight Fight, though, marks the second time in as many weeks that Trump-affilitated entities have thrown themselves into competition with one another as expansion on multiple fronts complicates the family's crypto empire. On May 27, Trump Media and Technology Group, a publicly traded company in which the Trump family owns a majority stake, announced it had raised $2.5 billion to accumulate a 'bitcoin treasury.' The deal puts the conglomerate in competition with a growing stable of bitcoin accumulation stocks, which act as a substitute of sorts for investing in bitcoin—among them American Bitcoin, the crypto mining firm launched recently by Eric and Donald Trump Jr., which is pursuing a similar strategy. The wallet conflict also underlines the inscrutability of the relationships and interplay between The Trump Organization, Trump Media and Technology Group, World Liberty Financial, American Bitcoin, Fight Fight Fight, and the Trump family. The full ownership structure of Fight Fight Fight is obfuscated by layers of corporate filings unavailable to the public. The X posts by Eric and Donald Trump Jr. on Tuesday appear to allege that, as the leaders of The Trump Organization, they reserve the right to limit the company's use of their family name to the TRUMP memecoin. Meanwhile, though World Liberty Financial has sought to underline its independence from Donald Trump's political affairs—'We're a private company having private-sector conversations,' wrote World Liberty Financial cofounder Zak Folkman in a recent statement—the wallet dispute has underscored its entanglement with the president's family brand. In his X post on Tuesday, Donald Trump Jr. appeared to present the crypto wallet soon to be issued by World Liberty Financial as the real Trump family wallet, as set against what he alleges is the unauthorized Trump-branded wallet backed by Magic Eden. In cryptoland, confusion reigns: 'Not really sure what's real and what's not,' says Tom, the pseudonymous leader of peer-to-peer crypto exchange Raydium. In the wider crypto industry, the ease with which anybody can put any name to an undifferentiated crypto product has long created problems, claims Cory Klippsten, CEO at bitcoin services company Swan Bitcoin. 'In crypto, it's far too easy to spin up scams masquerading as innovation,' alleges Klippsten, 'especially when you can hijack a brand and pump a token before anyone asks who's behind it.'
Newsweek
29 minutes ago
- Newsweek
High Schooler Suspended for Saying 'Illegal Alien' in Class Wins $20,000
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A North Carolina high school student who was suspended in April 2024 for using the term "illegal alien" during class has secured a $20,000 settlement, a public apology, and the removal of references to racial bias from his school record, according to court documents first obtained by The Carolina Journal. The settlement between the Davidson County Board of Education and the student's family is pending judicial approval in federal court. Newsweek reached out to the lawyer for the student and the school district via email for comment on Wednesday. Why It Matters This case raised national questions about free speech, students' rights, and school discipline policies in the United States. The legal dispute tested the limits of First Amendment protections in educational settings, and the resulting settlement has been cited as a notable development in debates over language, race, and disciplinary practices in public schools. The story has garnered widespread media attention and sparked discussion about the balance between promoting inclusive school environments and safeguarding constitutionally protected speech. What To Know The Davidson County Board of Education agreed to issue a public apology, pay $20,000 in compensation, and expunge all references to racial bias from the student's school records as part of a lawsuit settlement, according to filings with the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. The $20,000 award is to help defray the cost of the new private school he transferred to following the incident and ongoing litigation, the outlet said. McGhee, then a sophomore at Central Davidson High School in Lexington, North Carolina, was disciplined after using the phrase "illegal alien" in a vocabulary lesson. School administrators cited his remark as "offensive" and "disrespectful to Hispanic classmates," resulting in a three-day suspension for what was classified as a "racially insensitive remark" that disrupted the class, according to the outlet. His family, represented by the Liberty Justice Center, filed a lawsuit against the Davidson County Board of Education and former Assistant Principal Eric Anderson, alleging the suspension violated McGhee's rights to free speech, due process, and access to education. File photo of a blackboard in a schoolhouse at the Carillon Historical Park in Dayton, Ohio. File photo of a blackboard in a schoolhouse at the Carillon Historical Park in Dayton, Ohio. Getty While the school board maintained the disciplinary action was warranted due to classroom disruption, it agreed in the settlement to acknowledge that its characterization of the incident as racially biased was an error. The board committed to issuing a formal apology and amending the student's record to remove any mention of racial bias, according to the court records. During the yearlong legal dispute, Ashley Carroll, a member of the school board, resigned. Reports indicate this resignation was due to personal reasons unrelated to the case, The Carolina Journal reported. The Liberty Justice Center described the resolution as a step toward clearing McGhee's name and protecting students' constitutional rights. What People Are Saying Dean McGee, senior counsel for educational freedom at the Liberty Justice Center, said in a statement to The Carolina Journal: "On Friday, we filed a motion asking the court to approve a settlement that would resolve this matter. Because Christian is a minor, a court hearing is required before the settlement can become final. We'll have more to say after that hearing, but we're pleased to take this important step toward clearing our client's name." What Happens Next The proposed settlement is pending approval by a judge in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina. Once approved, the Davidson County Board of Education will issue a public apology and clear the student's record of any reference to racial bias, finalizing the terms of the agreement.
USA Today
32 minutes ago
- USA Today
Musk is 'flat wrong' about Trump tax bill, GOP speaker says
Musk is 'flat wrong' about Trump tax bill, GOP speaker says The House speaker responded to Elon Musk calling Trump's tax bill a 'disgusting abomination' and threatened its supporters with political payback Show Caption Hide Caption Donald Trump doubling tariffs on foreign steel President Trump, during a visit to a U.S. Steel facility in Pennsylvania, announced he will double tariffs on foreign steel to 50%. WASHINGTON – House Speaker Mike Johnson said he was surprised by Elon Musk's blistering opposition to President Donald Trump's sweeping tax bill and that the world's richest man is "flat wrong" about the legislative proposal. Musk in his June 3 tweet called the bill a 'disgusting abomination" that Trump and Johnson helped push through the U.S. House last month by the slimmest of margins and with only GOP support. In 2024, Musk spent more than $250 million to help Trump win back the White House, and now he's threatening political payback against the GOP lawmakers who voted with the president. 'It surprised me, frankly, and I don't take it personal,' Johnson told reporters on June 4 in the U.S. Capitol. 'We don't take it personal. You know, policy differences are not personal. I think he's flat wrong. I think he's way off on this, and I've told him as much, and I've said it publicly and privately. I'm very consistent in that.' More: Elon Musk slams President Trump's big tax and policy bill as a 'disgusting abomination' Johnson added that Musk did 'a 180' to oppose the bill after they left on a 'great note' with the former DOGE adviser's recent departure from the Trump White House. The tiff between Musk and Republicans continued as the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the House bill would add roughly $2.4 million to the deficit over the next decade. The bill would extend Trump's tax cuts, fund Trump's deportation plans and increase defense spending. The tax and policy bill is currently in the Senate, where Trump is lobbying lawmakers as they prepare to make changes to the House-passed measure. Some Republicans have already come out and opposed the cost of the House bill, including Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul and Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johenson. 'I agree with Elon,' Paul said in a tweet on June 3 in response to Musk. 'We have both seen the massive waste in government spending and we know another $5 trillion in debt is a huge mistake. We can and must do better.' Trump and GOP leaders have set a self-imposed deadline of July 4 to try to get the tax bill through both chambers of Congress and to the president's desk for signature into law.
