Does India's alleged forced repatriation of Rohingya refugees breach international law?
Earlier this month, reports surfaced alleging that Indian authorities had transported dozens of Rohingya refugees to the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and subsequently abandoned them in international waters, in an attempt to deport them to Myanmar. However, on May 16, a Supreme Court Bench comprising Justices Surya Kant and N. Kotiswar Singh declined to pass any interim order to halt the purported deportation. The Court also cast doubt on the credibility of the evidence submitted before it. Meanwhile, the United Nations has launched an inquiry into the incident and has called on the Indian government to cease the inhumane and life-threatening treatment of Rohingya refugees, including their repatriation to perilous conditions in Myanmar.
Does India's alleged forced repatriation of Rohingya refugees constitute a violation of international law? Does the deportation of refugees without adherence to due process infringe upon constitutional protections? In the absence of treaty ratification, is India nonetheless bound by the customary international law principle of non-refoulement? What policy reforms are needed to ensure a humane and rights-compliant refugee framework in India?
Guest: Colin Gonsalves, senior advocate and founder of Human Rights Law Network (HRLN)
Host: Aaratrika Bhaumik
Edited by Jude Francis Weston
For more episodes of In Focus:
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
What is Canada's Bill C-3? How will it help Indian-origin residents, 'lost canadians'?
Canada amends its Citizenship Act to making Canadian citizenship easier to obtain. Canada decided to amend its Citizenship Act, widening the scope of who can become a Canadian citizen in a relief to many Indian-origin residents at a time when Indians are facing hard times in the US owing to the crackdown of the Donald Trump administration. Bill C-3 would allow a Canadian parent who was not born in Canada to pass on citizenship to children born abroad beyond the first generation. This would be applicable to even child adopted abroad and beyond the first generation. But the parent must have a substantial connection to Canada which means he or she must have stayed in Canada for cumulative 1095 days, three years, before the birth or the adoption of the child. The bill would also benefit 'lost Canadians', a term that refers to those who lost Canadian citizenship or were denied a Canadian citizenship before due to certain provisions of the former citizenship law. "Most cases were remedied by changes to the law in 2009 and 2015. These changes allowed people to gain Canadian citizenship or get back the citizenship they lost. Despite this, additional amendments are needed to include other categories of 'Lost Canadians' and their descendants who did not benefit from the 2009 and 2015 changes," the government said. "Bill C-3 will restore citizenship to remaining 'Lost Canadians,' their descendants and anyone who was born abroad to a Canadian parent in the second or subsequent generations before the legislation comes into force. This includes people who lost their citizenship as a result of requirements under the former section 8 of the Citizenship Act," it said. The present citizenship law has a first-generation limit which means a Canadian parent can only pass on Canadian citizenship to a child born outside Canada if the parent was either born or naturalized in Canada before the birth of the child. Because of this limitation, Canadian citizens who were born outside Canada and obtained their citizenship through descent cannot pass on citizenship to their child born outside Canada, and cannot apply for a direct grant of citizenship for a child adopted outside Canada.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Indian ambassador, Chinese official discuss ties, Kailash Mansarovar Yatra
Top diplomats from India and China met recently to review bilateral relations and work towards implementing the understanding reached by their leaders last year, the Ministry of External Affairs said on Friday. The meeting, held on Thursday, was between Indian Ambassador to China Pradeep Kumar Rawat and China's Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, according to a report by the Press Trust of India. It marked the first diplomatic engagement between the two countries since Operation Sindoor. According to a statement from the Chinese Foreign Ministry, 'Both sides expressed their willingness to work together to earnestly implement the important consensus reached by the leaders of the two countries.' Plans for cultural and strategic cooperation The two sides also discussed ways to enhance cultural exchanges and mutually beneficial cooperation. The statement said both nations would 'properly manage differences, and promote the development of China-India relations along a healthy and stable track.' In addition, the diplomats 'exchanged views on the issues of common concern,' the Chinese statement added. Sun, who is currently in charge of South Asia affairs at the Chinese Foreign Ministry, previously served as China's Ambassador to India. Thursday's meeting also comes as preparations are being made to resume the Kailash Mansarovar Yatra in Tibet for Indian pilgrims. If resumed, this would be the first such step following a prolonged military standoff in eastern Ladakh that had stalled bilateral ties for over four years. Earlier on April 26, India's Ministry of External Affairs had announced that the Yatra would be held from June to August via two routes — the Lipulekh Pass in Uttarakhand and Nathu La in Sikkim. The pilgrimage was first suspended in 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and later due to the border tensions. It is worth mentioning that after the complete disengagement of troops at Demchok and Depsang, based on an agreement reached in October last year, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Chinese President Xi Jinping met in Russia's Kazan. There, they agreed to revive multiple bilateral dialogue mechanisms. Since then, several meetings have taken place to help restore normal diplomatic relations. Rawat and Sun had earlier met on April 9 to discuss ties and cooperation in different sectors. Impossible to ignore China: Shashi Tharoor The recent meeting came against the backdrop of Operation Sindoor, launched by India after the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam that claimed 26 lives. After the Pahalgam attack, India carried out precision strikes targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. Four days of military action followed from both sides, ending after military officials from both nations held talks on May 10 and agreed to cease further operations. On Thursday (June 5), Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said it was 'absolutely impossible' to ignore China during India's confrontation with Pakistan. 'China is an absolutely impossible factor to ignore in what has been our confrontation with Pakistan,' Tharoor said. He noted that before tensions escalated with Pakistan, India was making 'good progress' in its ties with China. Speaking from the US, where he is heading an all-party delegation for Operation Sindoor outreach, Tharoor added, 'I'm not going to mince my words, but we are aware that China has immense stakes in Pakistan.' The timing of the Rawat-Sun meeting also aligns with rising concerns in India over China's export restrictions on rare earth metals. China currently produces 61 per cent of the world's mined rare earths and controls 92 per cent of the global output, according to the International Energy Agency.
News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
NRI Slams Indian Landlords In Canada Over ‘Moronic' Rental Ads: ‘Blatant Exclusion…'
Last Updated: The woman expressed her frustration and embarrassment with the exclusionary nature of rental listings like preferences based on caste, religion, language within Indian communities. An Indian woman in Canada has voiced her frustration over discriminatory rental practices within Indian communities abroad. In a now viral Reddit post, the woman expressed her frustration and embarrassment with the exclusionary nature of rental listings like preferences based on caste, religion, language or dietary choices, frequently seen in South Asian circles. 'I'm an Indian living in Canada and honestly, I'm beyond frustrated and embarrassed by the kind of rental ads I keep seeing," she said. 'It's always something like 'Only Gujarati girl,' or 'Punjabi-speaking vegetarian girl preferred,' or 'South Indian girls only, no boy inquiries please.' Some go as far as saying 'Strictly vegetarian, no non-veg even from outside,' or 'We are looking for someone who speaks our mother tongue only,' 'follow our religion only,'" she described. Questioning the landlords' intentions, the woman accused them of ignoring housing discrimination laws. 'You're not in India anymore, where you can get away with putting up caste, language and dietary restrictions in rental ads like it's normal," she added. 'If you're that picky about language, food, and background, maybe just don't rent the place out? Or live with your family? This isn't a matchmaking service. They're not requesting to marry you. I can eat whatever I want or speak in whatever language I want as long as I'm following the lease agreements and paying you the rent. I also don't have to be an 'Indian only' to rent from you. This is so insanely moronic," she wrote. Netizens React The post has garnered significant support online. 'Been in vancouver for a few years now & from my experience, never rent from desi landlords. No sense of privacy, basic manners like taking permission & minimum 24 hour notice before showing up.. etc. Funniest for me was this one ad went like : Need a sister for 5 brothers currently living in 6 bedroom house. No rent required, only make fresh food daily for her new 5 brothers.. true story!," a user commented. Another wrote, 'When I moved to Vancouver pre Covid, I was looking for an accommodation and some Indian landlord showed me a place where I had to share a room with another person with a screen which divided our bed. From then never went with Indian landlords and am happy with that decision till now." Others, however, argued that since the landlords owned the property, they had the right to choose who lived there according to their preferences. First Published: June 06, 2025, 20:44 IST
