Family sues Philadelphia funeral home over claims staff gave unmarked box with son's brain
According to the lawsuit, the parents of Tim Garlington hired Philadelphia-based Nix and Nix Funeral Homes and Georgia-based Southern Cremations and Funerals to have the body of their son, who lived in Georgia, shipped back to Philadelphia.
Garlington's parents said when they visited Nix and Nix Funeral Homes to view his body, they were also given his personal belongings that allegedly included a box with his brain inside.
The family is suing both funeral homes, claiming gross negligence over the handling of their son's body.
"To find out it was his remains was just overwhelming, even to this day. That they could do that. You rely on their professionalism to avoid this kind of situation. Tim was the baby, a good young man. This just doubled up on the fact we lost him," said Lawrence Butler, Garlington's father.
The complaint claims the box was never included in the list of items that belonged to their son. The family said they were unaware of what was inside, but they took it home and left it in the car. They later discovered what was inside when it began to smell.
"I got in my car, and I smelled death," Butler said. "I had to get rid of that car. I couldn't stand the idea that the remains were in that car."
The family's attorney said both funeral homes have yet to issue an apology, and there is no excuse for what happened.
"How devastating of a mistake that was made by both funeral homes, not only making a family suffer once but twice," said L. Chris Stewart with Stewart Miller Simmons.
A representative for Nix and Nix Funeral Homes tells CBS News Philadelphia that they had no responsibility for what was inside the box. The representative went on to say the funeral home has since been cleared of any wrongdoing by a state board investigation.
We reached out to the Department of State. A spokesperson said they could not confirm or deny the investigation. We also reached out to Southern Cremations and Funerals, but have yet to hear back.
As for Carlington's parents, the incident has them reliving their son's death over and over, but they say they came forward in hopes the lawsuit will help other families.
"We just pray that this doesn't ever happen again," Butler said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Prosecutors cite Diddy's freak offs in opposing his latest bail try: He's no 'ordinary John'
Sean "Diddy" Combs is no "mere John," federal prosecutors say in urging he be kept behind bars. Combs is "far from being an ordinary and casual consumer of commercial sex," they argue, lambasting the rap mogul and his baby oil-soaked history of freak offs in an 11-page court filing opposing his latest bail effort. Combs hopes to be set free from a notorious Brooklyn jail pending his October 3 sentencing. He argues that last month's split verdict found him guilty of being, at most, a "John" who paid for male escorts he didn't even sleep with. Instead, his lawyers argue, trial testimony consistently described Combs sitting in the corner of a series of luxury hotel suites in Miami, New York, and Los Angeles, watching, masturbating, and recording as his girlfriends had sex with muscular strippers and porn stars. But if Combs is a John, he's a very, very bad one, prosecutors say in opposing bail in a filing made public early Friday. "The defendant transported individuals for the purpose of prostitution on hundreds of occasions over the course of decades," wrote the five remaining members of the Manhattan-based prosecution team — minus lead attorney Maurene Comey. (Comey, who also prosecuted Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, is the daughter of former FBI director and longtime Trump nemesis James Comey. She was fired by the Department of Justice two weeks after the Combs verdict.) Far from being a "mere John," the remaining team wrote, Combs "plied Cassie Ventura and Jane (as well as male commercial sex workers) with drugs to ensure their continued participation in the days-long freak offs." R&B artist Ventura spent four days on the stand describing Combs' violence and her own regret and humiliation in the decade ending in 2018. The second girlfriend, who testified as Jane Doe, told a similar tale from dating Combs in 2021 to 2024. Combs "used violence against both Ms. Ventura and Jane in connection with freak offs, and employed a small army of personal staff to ensure that his every need was met during freak offs," the prosecutors' filing tells US District Judge Arun Subramanian.. "The defendant's actions surely distinguish him from an ordinary 'John.'" In his own filing earlier this week, Combs had asked Subramanian to let him live at his Miami mansion on $50 million bail in the two months between now and sentencing. His lawyers argued that the stakes are lower now, because he has been cleared of the most serious charges against him. On July 2, the jury in Combs' six-week Manhattan trial rejected prosecutors' allegations that he sex-trafficked two girlfriends. The jury also rejected a racketeering charge that alleged he ran Combs Global, his multimillion-dollar media, entertainment, and lifestyle empire, as a criminal enterprise. Combs was found guilty only of the least serious counts he had faced. The jury convicted on two violations of the federal Mann Act, finding that Combs caused the two girlfriends and several male escorts to be transported across state lines for purposes of commercial sex acts. The felony Mann Act convictions are flawed and should be tossed out, Combs argues. Combs "lacked a commercial motive and did not intend for paid escorts to have sex with him," his lawyers argued Wednesday night in a legal filing signed by defense attorney Alexandra Shapiro. Instead, Combs was creating "amateur porn," filming as the male escorts had sex with longtime girlfriend Shapiro argued. Combs was "primarily a bystander" to the encounters, Shapiro argued. "Paying people to film them in sexual performances is protected by the First Amendment," she also argued. This is Combs' fifth attempt at bail since his September arrest. In denying the previous bail attempts, Subramanian said that by law, Combs' felony conviction requires that he remain in jail pending sentencing. In previous bail denials, Subramanian and two other judges cited Combs' admitted domestic violence against his girlfriends, including in the months before his September arrest, when he knew he was under investigation. They also cited prosecution allegations that Combs possessed illegal drugs when he was arrested and had tried to obstruct the trial by reaching out to witnesses from jail before it started, claims the defense has denied. Prosecutors have said they plan to seek a sentence of five years or more on the two Mann Act convictions.
Washington Post
4 hours ago
- Washington Post
‘The Man No One Believed' recounts a shocking murder and delayed justice
Justice gone off the rails in the rural South? Not surprising, we think, surmising that a Black man with limited resources has been convicted of a crime he didn't commit. But it turns out that corruption, incompetence and bad luck imperil a wide range of victims. The title character in Joshua Sharpe's involving but labyrinthine work of nonfiction, 'The Man No One Believed,' happens to be White. Dennis Perry, a carpenter, was found guilty in 2003 of murdering Herbert and Thelma Swain, a Black couple who were shot in 1985 at the Rising Daughter Baptist Church in front of numerous witnesses. The killing shocked the South Georgia community of Spring Bluff, stymied investigators and reverberated through the state for decades. The crime was featured on the television show 'Unsolved Mysteries' in 1988, and 30 years later it was the subject of 'Undisclosed,' a multi-episode podcast produced by the Georgia Innocence Project. It took nearly two decades to put someone behind bars — and it was, we know from the start of Sharpe's book, the wrong man. All that time, the motive remained baffling. Sharpe describes the Swains' church as 'a place of refuge against the terror of Jim Crow.' Herbert Swain was the deacon, and the couple were beloved by their neighbors. Yet there were almost too many possible motives and suspects. Spring Bluff was nestled along a popular drug-smuggling route, and the Swains had a family tie to a man police had linked to that world. Could their killing have been an attempt to a deliver a message to a delinquent or turncoat drug dealer? Was it a murder-for-hire plot with an eye on life insurance money? An armed robbery gone wrong? Or possibly a racially motivated hate crime? As Sharpe repeatedly stresses, investigators initially discounted the hate-crime theory, which could have led in a fruitful direction. Despite the shadow of drug smuggling, the town was 'one of the most peaceful, low-crime corners' in its South Georgia county. In the mid-1980s, Sharpe writes, Black people there 'didn't voice their concerns around white people,' and 'white community members liked to imagine that racism was history.' As a result, investigators had 'enormous blind spots,' Sharpe suggests, and 'didn't think racism made much sense as a motive.' As they sorted through tips, suspects, reported confessions and conflicting witness statements, what followed was a 'seemingly endless investigation fraught with lies, missteps, and tragedy.' One suspect, Donnie Barrentine, an alleged drug smuggler convicted on gun charges in another case, had reportedly boasted of complicity in the double murder. But he denied any involvement to police. Another, Erik Sparre, a serial domestic abuser and avowed white supremacist, was caught on tape confessing to the murders. But he, too, proclaimed his innocence — and produced a work-related alibi. As the years passed, the community clamored for closure, the Swains' relatives and friends endured an agonizing wait, and witnesses died. In 1998, a former sheriff's deputy, Dale Bundy, was hired to reexamine the case. Working on a tip, he homed in on Perry, the carpenter, whom previous investigators cleared. The evidence was sufficiently flimsy that prosecutors offered Perry a sweetheart plea deal. Perry, knowing he was innocent, decided to take his chances at trial. Big mistake. In the end, the jury chose to believe the testimony of a mentally unstable (and possibly bribed) witness, even though no forensic evidence — or plausible motive — tied Perry to the crime and he, too, had an alibi. Perry escaped the death penalty only by promising not to appeal his conviction. He got two life sentences instead. It was a bitter fate mitigated only by a loyal family, a devoted new wife and a congenial cellmate. And the hope that, in the end, justice would prevail. Enter Sharpe, an award-winning investigative reporter for the Atlanta Constitution-Journal who grew up just 40 miles from Rising Daughter Baptist Church. Sharpe had an emotional, as well as geographic, connection to the story: One of his great-uncles had died in prison after being convicted of a murder that his family believed he didn't commit. Sharpe had never heard of the Georgia church murders before the Georgia Innocence Project approached him in August 2019. In the face of intense cost-cutting pressures, his editors at the newspaper gave him the time and resources to pursue the story. As he dove into the voluminous file and knocked on doors, he learned that the crime had sparked 'multiple confessions by different suspects, major disagreements between the detectives, and a rumor mill that was still spinning.' Much of 'The Man No One Believed' describes the investigations prior to Sharpe's involvement. But its serpentine narrative really springs to life when he digs into the case. Probably his greatest contribution was to discredit the alibi of a former suspect, who had claimed to be working at a grocery store that night. A year after the crime, one investigator had confirmed the story with a phone call to a man he believed to be the suspect's boss. But Sharpe discovered that none of the boss's identifying details were accurate, and the actual supervisor had no memory of any such call. Could the man who vouched for the suspect have been the suspect himself? There was no proof to the contrary. Improved forensic technology supplied another important piece of the puzzle. The Georgia Innocence Project managed to procure a DNA sample from the mother of that same suspect. It matched a hair sample found at the murder scene. Despite the district attorney's resistance, the new evidence was enough, finally, to exonerate Perry, who spent more than two decades in prison before his release. In December 2024, another suspect was arrested in the case. (Spoiler alert: It was Sparre, whose DNA was found at the scene, and whose trial is pending.) Even after all the investigations, the motivations behind the double murder remain murky, and it is unclear whether other people may have been involved. In the end, 'The Man No One Believed' inspires powerful, mixed emotions: fury at the failings of the justice system, and gratitude for organizations like the Georgia Innocence Project and indefatigable journalists like Sharpe. He deserves the victory lap he has taken in this illuminating book. Julia M. Klein is a cultural reporter and critic in Philadelphia whose work has appeared in the Atlantic, the Nation, the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Los Angeles Times, Slate, Mother Jones and other publications.
The Hill
5 hours ago
- The Hill
Judge blocks DHS from stripping protections for 60K from Nepal, Honduras, Nicaragua
A federal judge ruled against Trump administration plans to end protections from deportation for citizens of Nepal, Nicaragua and Honduras, barring their removal while the case continues. San Francisco-based U.S. District Court Judge Trina Thompson agreed the plaintiffs had shown there was sufficient racial animus behind the decision and that the Trump administration had failed to undertake an 'objective review of the country conditions' before ending protections. 'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek. Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood,' Thompson wrote. 'The Court disagrees.' The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) ended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Nepal in June and for Nicaragua and Honduras in July. Each country initially was initially designated after natural disasters, but the protections can also be offered to those unable to be deported to their home country due to civil unrest. The moves would require 51,000 Hondurans and nearly 3,000 Nicaraguans who have been in the country for roughly 25 years to leave the county by September. Some 7,000 Nepalese citizens were also set to lose protections in just days. Thompson reviewed a number of prior comments from President Trump as well as Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem, including comments from the secretary referring to migrants as criminals and gang members while the president has stated that migrants were 'poisoning the blood of our country.' 'Indeeed, code words may demonstrate discriminatory intent,' she wrote. 'Color is neither a poison nor a crime.' Thompson said DHS failed to do the fulsome review required to end TPS, determining that the Trump administration did not consider conditions beyond recovery from the hurricanes that rocked the Central American countries and the earthquake that sparked the designation for Nepal. 'Unlike previous iterations of DHS notices on Honduras, the Honduras notice does not mention political violence or crime,' the judge wrote. 'The new notice also omits the anti-democratic human rights violations and the humanitarian crisis which has led to 108,000 people fleeing the country,' Thompson said of Nicaragua. She added, 'The notice concedes that 'Nepal has continued to experience subsequent regional environmental events, including flooding and landslides' and that 'Nepal remains one of the poorest countries in the world' but nevertheless finds that modest economic growth (two percent) and reconstruction efforts support a termination of Nepal's TPS designation.' The Trump administration has argued citizens of all three nations have remained in the country well beyond the natural disasters that ignited TPS and that past administrations have abused a protection that is designed to be temporary. But Thompson determined that administration failed to rebut arguments that citizens of the three countries should be allowed to remain in the U.S. while the trial continues. 'Although Defendants argue that a delay in the Secretary's decisions would undermine United States foreign policy and national interests, Defendants have failed to identify the exact foreign policy or national interest at stake,' she wrote.
