FIDE says way Vladimir Kramnik presents his points (on cheating in chess) brings a lot of harm to the community
Kramnik recently filed a defamation lawsuit against the online chess platform chess.com, chess news organisation chessdom and Grandmaster David Navara.
Navara had written an open letter on May 23 after cheating insinuations from the Russian. In that letter, Navara wrote how he lost sleep after reading the comments from the former world champion and went into depression and had to take professional help from a psychiatrist and a psychotherapist.
Now, FIDE too has told Kramnik that 'he must recognise that it is not just his opinion or questions – it is a very clear narrative, and coming from the former World Champion it could be ruinous for the careers and a very well-being of certain players.'
As the world governing body of chess, FIDE takes the issue of fair play – both OTB and online – very seriously, especially considering the current widespread popularity of online platforms and their impact on the growth and development of the game worldwide.
In this regard, the methods publicly proposed by GM Vladimir Kramnik deserve careful review and assessment for practical applicability. FIDE will establish a dedicated task force to evaluate these methods and invites GM Kramnik to present the details of his approach and statistical data for an official FIDE evaluation.
At the same time, we are gravely concerned that the way Mr. Kramnik presents his points brings a lot of harm to the chess community. Mr. Kramnik must recognize, that it is not just his opinion or questions – it is a very clear narrative, and coming from the former World Champion it could be ruinous for the careers and a very well-being of certain players.
The current discourse has significantly affected such a respected member of the chess community as GM David Navara and has now led to a defamation lawsuit being filed by GM Kramnik against GM Navara.
We wish to emphasize once again that throughout his chess career, GM Navara has earned an unquestionable reputation as a paragon of a fair play. The chess community is well aware that David is a person of a great sensitivity and integrity, particularly vulnerable to any implication of unfair play.
Without entering into legal or stylistic analyses of the statements made, we believe that – above all – mutual respect and empathy among colleagues must take precedence. We are firmly convinced that the lawsuit against GM Navara should be withdrawn as soon as possible in the interest of the entire chess community. We sincerely hope that GM Kramnik will take this morally justified step, which we believe will be welcomed by the broader chess world.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Wimbledon controversy erupts as organisers apologise to furious Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova for 'stolen game'
A technical outage in Wimbledon's line-calling system left Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova visibly enraged following a controversial umpiring decision during her fourth-round clash. Russia's Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova talks to the umpire during her round of 16 match against Britain's Sonay Kartal(REUTERS) The Russian star was locked in a tense battle with local favourite Sonay Kartal on Centre Court. With both players exchanging two breaks apiece, the match looked set for a gripping first-set tie-break. The drama unfolded in the ninth game, with Pavlyuchenkova serving. She had just saved three break points and appeared poised to hold serve when Kartal fired a shot that landed long, visibly beyond the baseline. However, the automated line-call system delayed its response, calling 'Stop. Stop' several seconds late, which created mass confusion. Pavlyuchenkova, standing well behind the baseline, paused, expecting an immediate call. The delayed verdict came just as she was about to take a 5-4 lead. Umpire Nico Helwerth spoke to the line-calling team over the phone as both players waited. Replays clearly showed Kartal's shot was out, but the final decision stunned everyone—'The system was unable to track the last point, so we will replay it,' Helwerth announced. The 34-year-old Russian was furious but tried to stay composed. She battled for another game point but couldn't convert. Kartal eventually broke serve and took the lead. Pavlyuchenkova voiced her frustration during the changeover: 'I don't know if it's in or out. You can't prove it… You took the game away from me. You stole the game from me.' The All England Club later issued an apology, stating: 'We have apologised to the players involved. We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology. However, there was a human error in this instance, and we've made appropriate changes.' Despite the controversy, Pavlyuchenkova showed immense resilience, eventually winning the opening set 7-6 (7-3). After the match, she revealed that even the chair umpire privately admitted the ball was out. 'It was very confusing. The umpire also saw it out. I expected him to take initiative—that's what he's there for—but he didn't. Maybe it's because she's local, I don't know... but that was a crucial moment,' she said. The incident has reignited debate over the full reliance on technology for line calls. Emma Raducanu expressed scepticism, saying, 'I don't think it's great. Most players would agree there were questionable calls.' In contrast, British No.1 Jack Draper called the system '100% accurate' after his own second-round exit.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Wimbledon 2025: Henry Patten, Adrian Mannarino among 12 players slapped with four-figure fine for staff abuse and on-court outbursts
Wimbledon 2025 so far has been thrilling for both the players and the fans, but the controversies around it have also kept the audiences on edge. Most recently, British doubles player Henry Patten has been hit with the heaviest fine of Wimbledon till now. The 29-year-old player has been asked to pay £9,000 for verbally abusing staff as they tried to cut his practice session short. According to Express UK, after this, the second-highest fine was issued at £4,400 to Adrian Mannarino for his unprofessional behaviour in his second-round clash with Valentin Royer. Following this, Mannarino won that tie but crashed out to Andrey Rublev in the round of three. Defending champs moving on! 🤜🤛Henry Patten & Harri Heliovaara beat Henry's fellow Brits to progress to the last 16#BackTheBrits 🇬🇧 | #Wimbledon Other players who have been slapped with fines for their unprofessional behaviour At the third highest place stands Russian star Elena Pridankina, at £3,600. She has also been slapped with a fine because of her unsportsmanlike conduct during her first-round doubles defeat to Jelena Ostapenko and Hsieh Su-wei. Other than them, four more players were fined £2,900. While Zizou Bergs and Halley Baptiste were punished for an audible obscenity, and Varvara Gracheva has been charged with abuse of rackets. Anna Kalinskaya has also been charged with a fine for her unsportsmanlike conduct. German Jule Niemeier has been docked with £1,800 for her behaviour during her second-round qualifying loss. Finally, the last four players were fined £1,500 each, including Alex Bolt and Chloe Paquet, who were charged for audible obscenities; Colton Smith for abuse of rackets and equipment; and Luca Van Assche for unprofessional behaviour. Kyrgios's absence cuts into Wimbledon's fine totals With Kyrgios absent from the main draw at Wimbledon, the tournament is reclaiming far less in fines than it typically might when the outspoken Aussie is competing. Nick Kyrgios says he's likely paid close to 800,000 Australian dollars in fines throughout his career. 'Yeah, I've copped some hefty ones,' he admitted. 'Altogether, I'd say I'm nearing around 800 grand.' To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
The Hindu
4 hours ago
- The Hindu
Three children among 27 wounded in Russia's drone attack on Kharkiv, Ukraine says
At least three children were among 27 people wounded as a result of a Russian drone attack on Ukraine's second-largest city of Kharkiv overnight that damaged apartments and a kindergarten, Ukrainian authorities said on Monday (July 7, 2025). Kharkiv, which lies in northeastern Ukraine near the border with Russia, has been the target of regular Russian drone and missile attacks since the start of the war that Moscow launched with a full-scale invasion more than three years ago. A fire broke out in a multi-storey residential building in Kharkiv as a result of the attack, Mayor Ihor Terekhov said. Oleh Sinehubov, Governor of the broader Kharkiv region of which the city of Kharkiv is the administrative centre, said that most of the injuries occurred in the city's Shevchenkivskyi district. Emergency services were working at the site, Mr. Sinehubov said on the Telegram messaging app. The full scale of the attack was not immediately clear. There was no comment on the attacks from Moscow. Both sides deny targeting civilians in the war, but thousands of civilians have died in the conflict, the vast majority of them Ukrainian. A Russian attack on the region of Sumy, also in Ukraine's northeast, on Sunday afternoon killed two people and injured another two, while damaging about 20 buildings, State Emergency Service of Ukraine said on Telegram. An overnight attack damaged several buildings and cars in three of the 10 districts of the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv, Mayor Vitali Klitschko said on Telegram. There were no reports of injuries, he added.
