Satellite launched by India and Nasa to track changes to Earth's land and ice
The $1.3bn (£980m) mission will help forecasters and first responders stay one step ahead of floods, landslides, volcanic eruptions and other disasters, according to scientists.
Rocketing to orbit from India, the satellite will survey virtually all of Earth's terrain multiple times. Its two radars – one from the US and the other from India – will operate day and night, peering through clouds, rain and foliage to collect troves of data in extraordinary detail.
Microwave signals beamed down to Earth from the dual radars will bounce back up to the satellite's super-sized antenna reflector perched at the end of a boom like a beach umbrella.
Scientists will compare the incoming and outgoing signals as the spacecraft passes over the same locations twice every 12 days, teasing out changes as small as a fraction of an inch.
It's 'a first-of-its-kind, jewel radar satellite that will change the way we study our home planet and better predict a natural disaster before it strikes,' Nasa's science mission chief Nicky Fox said ahead of liftoff.
Ms Fox led a small Nasa delegation to India for the launch. PA Media The Nisar satellite at the Indian Space Research Organisation's Satish Dhawan Space Centre (Indian Space Research Organisation/Nasa/AP)
'Congratulations India!' minister of science and technology Jitendra Singh posted once the satellite safely reached orbit, adding that the mission 'will benefit the entire world community'.
Nasa's deputy associate administrator Casey Swails, part of the delegation that travelled to India, said it 'really shows the world what our two nations can do. But more so than that, it really is a pathfinder for the relationship building'.
It will take a week to extend the satellite's 30ft boom and open the 39ft-in-diameter drum-shaped reflector made of gold-plated wire mesh. Science operations should begin by the end of October.
Among the satellite's most pressing measurements: melting glaciers and polar ice sheets; shifting groundwater supplies; motion and stress of land surfaces prompting landslides and earthquakes; and forest and wetland disruptions boosting carbon dioxide and methane emissions.
Nasa is contributing $1.2bn (£900m) to the three-year mission – it supplied the low-frequency radar and reflector.
The Indian Space Research Organisation's $91m (£68m) share includes the higher-frequency radar and main satellite structure, as well as the launch from a barrier island in the Bay of Bengal. It is the biggest space collaboration between the two countries.
The satellite called Nisar – short for Nasa-Isro Synthetic Aperture Radar – will operate from a near-polar-circling orbit 464 miles high. It will join dozens of Earth observation missions already in operation by the US and India.
Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News
Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
STV News
an hour ago
- STV News
People with ME have key genetic differences to other people, study finds
People diagnosed with ME/chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have significant differences in their DNA compared to those without the condition, according to a 'groundbreaking' new study. Scientists said the findings offer the first robust evidence that genes contribute to a person's chance of developing the disease. The DecodeME study, said to be the largest of its kind in the world, uncovered eight areas of genetic code in people with ME/CFS (myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome) that are markedly different to the DNA of people without the condition. Researchers hope the findings will boost 'validity and credibility' for patients, and help rebuff some of the stigma and lack of belief that exists around the condition. There is currently no diagnostic test or cure for ME/CFS, which is believed to affect around 67 million people worldwide, and very little is known about what causes it. A key feature of the condition is a disproportionate worsening of symptoms following even minor physical or mental activity, which is known as post-exertional malaise (PEM,) while other symptoms include pain, brain fog and extreme energy limitations that do not improve with rest. For the new study, researchers analysed 15,579 DNA samples from the 27,000 people with ME/CFS participating in DecodeME, described as the world's largest data set of people with the disease. The eight regions of DNA where scientists found genetic differences involve genes linked to the immune and nervous systems. At least two of the genetic signals relate to how the body responds to infection, which researchers said aligns with long-standing patient reports that the onset of symptoms often followed an infectious illness. Professor Chris Ponting, DecodeME investigator from the University of Edinburgh, said: 'This is a wake-up call. These extraordinary DNA results speak the language of ME/CFS, often recounting people's ME/CFS symptoms. 'DecodeME's eight genetic signals reveal much about why infection triggers ME/CFS and why pain is a common symptom. 'ME/CFS is a serious illness and we now know that someone's genetics can tip the balance on whether they are diagnosed with it.' As a person's DNA does not change over time, experts say the genetic signals identified would not have developed because of ME/CFS and are therefore likely to reflect the causes of the disease. Populations used in the initial study were limited to those from European ancestries. DecodeME research studying DNA data from all ancestries is ongoing. ME/CFS, thought to affect around 404,000 people in the UK, affects more females than males, although researchers found nothing to explain why this is the case. The DecodeME team is now calling on researchers from around the world to access its 'rich' dataset and help drive forward targeted studies into ME/CFS. Sonya Chowdhury, chief executive of Action for ME and a DecodeME co-investigator, said: 'These results are groundbreaking. PA Media Researchers at the University of Edinburgh are involved in the study. 'With DecodeME, we have gone from knowing next to nothing about the causes of ME/CFS, to giving researchers clear targets.' She also hopes the discoveries will help change the way the condition is viewed. Ms Chowdhury said: 'This really adds validity and credibility for people with ME. 'We know that many people have experienced comments like ME is not real, or they've been to doctors and been disbelieved or told that it's not a real illness. 'Whilst things have changed and continue to change, that is still the case for some people and we hear that repeatedly as a charity. 'Being able to take this study into the treatment room and say there are genetic causes that play a part in ME is going to be really significant for individuals. 'It will rebuff that lack of belief and the stigma that exists.' The findings have been reported in a pre-print publication, or unpublished study. During a media briefing about the study, researchers were asked about similarities between the symptoms of long Covid and ME/CFS. Prof Ponting said: 'It's very clear that the symptomology between long Covid and ME is highly similar. 'Not for everyone but there are substantial similarities but as a geneticist the key question for me is are there overlapping genetic factors, and we haven't found that in DECode ME with the methods that we've employed. 'One of the key things that we're doing is enabling others to use their different approaches to ask and answer the same question.' DecodeME is a collaboration between the University of Edinburgh, the charity Action for ME, the Forward ME alliance of charities, and people with ME/CFS. It is funded by the Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health and Care Research. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
Sky News
5 hours ago
- Sky News
The new space race? NASA accelerates plan to put nuclear reactor on the moon
NASA is accelerating plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon, and they claim it could happen by 2030. In a directive - a written or oral instruction issued by the US government - to NASA staff earlier this month, Sean Duffy, US transport secretary and the new interim administrator of the space agency, said it should be ready to launch a 100 kilowatt nuclear reactor in five years. Plans to get a reactor on the lunar surface are not new. The NASA website states the space agency is working on the Fission Surface Power Project to create a system capable of generating at least 40 kilowatts of power - but that is less than half of what Mr Duffy has now proposed. He also stressed the importance of America's space agency deploying the technology before China and Russia. "To properly advance this critical technology, to be able to support a future lunar economy, high power energy generation on Mars, and to strengthen our national security in space, it is imperative the agency move quickly," the directive, which was first reported on by Politico, states. A nuclear reactor on the moon would be considered a key step towards building a permanent base for humans to live on the lunar surface. But Mr Duffy warned that the first country to deploy a reactor "could potentially declare a keep-out zone" which he said could significantly inhibit NASA's Artemis mission - the lunar exploration programme which aims to land astronauts back on the moon in 2027. When quizzed about the plan on 5 August, he told reporters: "We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon. And to have a base on the moon, we need energy." Why use a nuclear reactor? Unlike solar power, which is used on the International Space Station, a small nuclear reactor can operate continuously, Dr Sungwoo Lim, a senior lecturer in space applications, exploration and instrumentation at the University of Surrey told Sky News. This is critical for infrastructure on the moon, which spends two weeks in complete darkness as it slowly orbits the Earth. Nuclear reactors therefore diminish the need for sunlight, and can be used to power life support, communications and other critical science instruments, even in darkness. "In practice, this means astronauts could use a reactor to establish sustainable bases and extend exploration to places where solar energy is impractical," Dr Lim adds, including in the moon's permanently shadowed region, where scientists believe ice water exists. Professor Mike Fitzpatrick, an expert in nuclear technology at Coventry University, adds that the proposal of a 100 kilowatt nuclear reactor, is relatively small compared to most that are built on Earth. To put it in real terms, it takes around three kilowatts to power the kettle in your home. But Prof Fitzpatrick says a smaller reactor could pose as "demonstrator technology", something small and compact that makes it easier to transport it to the moon. "Then you can have a whole array of them," he says. So, what's the catch? While scientists agree that nuclear energy seems like the necessary way to make progress on the moon, Prof Fitzpatrick says questions still remain about safety. "Shipping the fuel to the moon is relatively safe, because at that point it is not particularly toxic, it is the highly reactive fission products that become the issue," he says. "What's going to be the strategy for long-term storage and disposal on the moon after these plants have operated for certain periods of time? The sooner those conversations are had, and you have international consensus, the less likely it is you'll get future friction." 0:55 Dr Lim also questioned Mr Duffy's timescale of 2030, saying meeting the target depends heavily on the space agency's budget. NASA's future funding is currently unknown after Donald Trump's 2026 budget request sought a cut of $6bn (£4.5bn) and the termination of dozens of science programs and missions. Over 2,000 agency employees are also set to voluntarily leave NASA in the coming months under the Trump administration's "deferred resignation" programme. Is this the new space race? Last year, Russia's space agency Roscosmos said it was planning to build a lunar nuclear reactor alongside China's National Space Administration by 2035, in order to power the International Lunar Research Station (ILRS). The collaboration was never formally announced by China but the joint plan was included in a presentation by Chinese officials in April this year, which outlined the 2028 Chang'e-8 lunar mission which aims to lay the groundwork for the ILRS. "Duffy explicitly described it as a competition," says Dr Lim, adding that the move towards lunar exploration signals a renewed moon or space race among major parties like China, Russia, India and the US to claim strategic lunar territory and technology. However, Rossana Deplano a professor of international space law at the University of Leicester, says there is a lot of misunderstanding around "keep out" or safety zones, which Mr Duffy's directive mentions. "Safety zones are explicitly recognised in the Artemis Accords," she says. "They are a notification and consultation zone to be declared in advance in order to avoid harmful interference. "They must be temporary in nature and do not establish state jurisdiction, e.g. they cannot be enforced."
Daily Mail
6 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The futuristic spaceship that could take humans to the stars revealed
The phrase 'reach for the stars' has just taken on a new meaning. This futuristic spaceship has been designed to take a group of humans on a 250–year journey to the nearest star system, Alpha Centauri. The 36 mile–long (58km–long) cylinder features a range of biome ecosystems, food production rooms, libraries, parks, multi–storey living areas, schools, hospitals and sports complexes. One of the most impressive aspects is a 130m–high 'cosmos dome' with glass panels that allows inhabitants to observe the universe while floating freely around. The spacecraft, which can hold around 1,000 people, would be powered by nuclear fusion reactors while a series of concentric cylinders would rotate to generate artificial gravity. Named 'Chrysalis', it's just landed first place in the global Project Hyperion design competition, which invited teams of scientists, engineers, architects and social theorists to develop detailed plans for a 'generation ship'. Entries were only allowed to use existing technologies or those deemed to have a plausible chance of emerging in the near future – including nuclear fusion. Faster–than–light travel was also not allowed, and neither were systems that would hold the crew in states of suspended animation. An expert panel that included NASA scientists assessed nearly 100 submissions, with each entry being rated for not only design and sustainability but also how well the inhabitants would get on with each other. The international team behind Chrysalis said their design is named after 'the intriguing possibility of having a spaceship capable of keeping its inhabitants safe and united, generation after generation, until they arrive in the new solar system'. Its mission objectives will be to safely deliver its passengers to the surface of the planet Proxima Centauri b, which is four light–years from the Sun, while 'preserving cultural, biological and technological heritages from the Earth'. The ship is split into different 'shell' environments, each with a dedicated function. One shell would be home to agriculture and biomes – including a tropical forest, boreal forest and dry scrub biome. These are critical for recreating a habitat on the new arrival planet, the team said. There will also be a genetic bank on–board that stores seeds, embryos and DNA from all species aboard Chrysalis and from other species on Earth. Food production would be limited to plant species, meaning everyone on–board would be vegetarian. 'The presence of animals is reduced to a small section for diversity and aesthetic purposes, not for food production,' the scientists said. Protein could be synthetically produced – like today's lab–grown protein – they explained. Artificial light on–board would simulate daytime and seasons. Meanwhile a closed–loop system would see water and nutrients reused. Another shell would house communal spaces such as parks, recreation and relaxation areas, libraries and rooms containing various objects and cultural artefacts from Earth. Windows and walls could function as large screens to simulate panoramas and real landscapes of the Earth, the team said. Shell three would house dwellings, divided into 20 sectors which contain 'module houses' – the single dwelling unit for each inhabitant. 'The Chrysalis family structure revolves around the identity of each individual and their sense of belonging to the entire starship community,' the team said. If a couple has a child they can decide to live together but it is not 'ethically compulsory', they explained. Meanwhile individuals can decide to change their location and move to other sectors if they wish. Another shell would be home to facilities for technological and product development, while another would act as a warehouse for materials, equipment and machines. The cosmos dome, however, would be 'the only environment on Chrysalis through which the inhabitants can observe the external environment of deep space'. It is here where the 'annual Chrysalis Plenary Council' – when all inhabitants gather in a full circle – would be held. The dome would face backwards towards the origin of the spaceship's journey – the Sun and the Earth – to allow habitants to 'look back' to their distant origins. This is crucial for the craft's inhabitants who will spend the entire of their lives aboard the starship without the possibility of living on the surface of a planet, the scientists said. The judges commended the meticulous detail of the plans, which included an explanation of how its inhabitants would be psychologically screened via a decades–long vetting process spent living in isolated Antarctic bases. 'The large dome structure adds a dramatic, cinematic quality that evokes science fiction classics, while the overall system–level planning—covering not just architecture but also how to build the vessel—is notably strong,' they said. 'The radiation protection strategy is solid, and the practical structural approach is well–suited. Its overall spacecraft design seems to take inspiration from the gigantic world ship concepts of the 1980s.' Unfortunately, exactly how much the futuristic ship might could to build remains unclear at this stage. Second place was given to WFP Extreme, which resembles two 500m–wide Ferris wheels joined together. 'Project Hyperion wasn't just a design contest—it is part of a larger exercise to explore if humanity can travel to the stars one day,' said Dr. Andreas Hein, executive director of the Institute for Interstellar Studies. 'It envisions how a civilization might live, learn, and evolve in a highly resource–constrained environment, and may also provide valuable insights into our future on Earth. We asked participants to integrate architecture, technology, and social systems to conceptualize a functional society spanning centuries—and the outcome was beyond expectations.'
