
How Boston remembers Anthony Burns, a man forcefully returned to slavery
On this day 171 years ago, federal officials escorted a man in chains downtown to remove him from Massachusetts.
Anthony Burns, then age 20, had escaped bondage in Virginia only to be forcefully returned.
Why it matters: Burns' arrest became a flashpoint for Boston at a time when the nation was starkly divided, and historical reenactments and discussions are keeping his legacy alive nearly two centuries later.
Between the lines: The nation was starkly divided over slavery.
Depending on whom you asked, Burns was either kidnapped by a Virginia slave owner with the help of federal officials or returned to his rightful owner, per National Park Service archives.
Anti-slavery activists debated whether the Fugitive Slave Act or a "higher law" should take precedence in a state that had abolished slavery decades earlier, says Shawn Quigley, lead ranger for the National Parks of Boston.
State of play: National Park Service rangers in Boston revive that debate in their town meeting programming, including a recent reenactment of a May 26, 1854, meeting anti-slavery activists held in Faneuil Hall.
Rangers pass out cards and ask the audience to deliver various arguments, Quigley says.
The latest event was at the Old South Meeting House, with support from Revolutionary Space, but the Burns events will resume weekly once a restoration project at Faneuil Hall wraps up later this month.
What they're saying: "The history of Faneuil Hall in Boston is not just the American Revolution, and it's a continuation of the American Revolution," Quigley tells Axios.
Flashback: While activists debated in Faneuil Hall, they got word that a group of radical abolitionists tried to break down the courthouse entrance to rescue Burns.
The abolitionists failed, and a federal marshal was fatally shot.
Burns lost his case in court, but the day he was removed from Boston surrounded by federal troops, more than 50,000 people in Boston protested — equivalent to nearly half of the city's population at the time, Quigley says.
A far smaller coalition led by the Twelfth Baptist Church in Boston tracked down Burns and paid for his freedom in 1855.
Burns returned to Boston briefly before studying at Oberlin College in Ohio and becoming a pastor in Canada.
Today, the nation is again divided over its collective identity.
Now, instead referring to slave catchers, activists are calling immigration agents " kidnappers," like in the arrest of Tufts international student Rümeysa Öztürk, while supporters hail the detention of pro-Palestinian protesters and call them terrorists.
Americans nationwide, including in Massachusetts, can't agree on immigration policies, LGBTQ+ issues, or diversity, equity and inclusion efforts — all at a time when the federal government is embattled over federally funded research, its workforce and national parks resources.
National Parks of Boston workers, including Quigley, wouldn't discuss the current political climate, citing restrictions under the Hatch Act.
What Quigley did say is that he wants people to consider the programming like the Burns discussions as an example of how the nation's revolutionary spirit has persisted after all these years.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
9 minutes ago
- Fox News
There's a way to aid Gaza. I know, my foundation just helped deliver 7 million meals... without incident
It's time to be honest about humanitarian assistance in Gaza. The incumbent system is morally bankrupt. Grift is not a bug—it is a feature. The decades-long cycle of empty statements, inflated budgets, and institutionalized failure has created a self-sustaining machine that feeds off misery, undermines peace, and instinctively demonizes America and Israel. The current system fuels fate. Here's an example. Just days ago, the world should have celebrated the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation's week of success. Over 7 million meals were delivered free to Gazans -- no trucks seized, no aid diverted, no violence at distribution sites. The system worked despite Gaza's volatility. Gazans spontaneously thanked America and President Donald Trump. Instead of celebrating GHF, the international press swallowed a Hamas disinformation campaign wholesale. Hamas falsely claimed 31 Gazans died at our distribution site. Global media printed headlines treating Hamas' claims as fact. When GHF's denials were questioned but Hamas' statements were believed, GHF released CCTV proving the truth. Yet fabricated headlines still deceive online, even fooling U.N. Secretary General Guterres, who spread them the next morning (and has yet to correct his mistake). Guterres' statement came just hours after someone incited by this fake news set Jewish Americans on fire at a Colorado hostage vigil. What the media should be doing is joining us in telling the truth about the systemic failure for years in Gaza and the United Nations should be working with us to fix the system. The current systems, built to serve the Palestinian people, have not just been ineffective—they have been actively complicit in perpetuating suffering. These organizations speak of "human rights," yet remain silent when terrorists steal international aid, embed rockets in schools, and use hospitals as human shields. What the media should be doing is joining us in telling the truth about the systemic failure for years in Gaza and the U.N. should be working with us to fix the system. The current systems, built to serve the Palestinian people, have not just been ineffective—they have been actively complicit in perpetuating suffering. From UNRWA to the Human Rights Council, bigotry has been wrapped in bureaucracy, funded by American and European tax dollars, and aimed squarely at helping terrorists wage a never-ending war with Israel. Activists disguised as humanitarians clutch their pearls and rush out press releases in support of these failed systems, exactly as terrorists hijack aid trucks or beat dissenting Palestinians in the street trying to get to humanitarian aid. The silence is deafening, but actually, it's worse. They keep spreading with no scrutiny the profane lies of Hamas. The fact is that there were Palestinians harmed last week, but not by GHF. They were harmed by Hamas when they tried to break into warehouses where Hamas had been hoarding piles and piles of humanitarian aid meant for Gazans. We're told by beneficiaries that Hamas was selling aid or using it for coercive purposes. One beneficiary asked our aid workers five times if our aid was truly free, and we observed the decline in the price of sugar in the rudimentary markets of Gaza. Yet, this behavior is excused, explained away, or flat-out ignored while organizations like the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation are attacked constantly for trying to feed Gazans with no strings attached. What GHF is guilty of is exposing the whole charade for what it is. Unfortunately, instead of just focusing on feeding Gazans, GHF humanitarians must fight a profane information war naively parroted by those who should know better. We will press on. Our vision is that failure will no longer be rewarded. Instead, we demand results with Silicon Valley precision. The good-hearted taxpayers of rich countries should no longer be content to line the pockets of institutional elites with cushy jobs propping up failing systems. It's time to do it differently. We understand this is a threat to the system. Because if even a sliver of hope is delivered through a model based on transparency, accountability, and realism, the entire cottage industry of perpetual process collapses. The lavish conferences, the donor summits, the panel discussions where nothing gets done—gone. But, no longer can we let the weaponization of humanitarian aid, or its mismanagement, prolong this and other conflicts. There can be no peace process without peace, and there is no humanitarian aid without human dignity. There's also no time for nostalgia over broken systems. It is time to stop rewarding failure and start building the future. Not in Geneva or New York, but in Ashkelon, Khan Younis, and Ramallah—where outcomes matter more than press Gaza Humanitarian Foundation isn't perfect. But it is honest. And for those who have grown rich, powerful, and respected by keeping Palestinians poor, hopeless, and angry—that's the real threat. We say: good. Let them be afraid. To those in the humanitarian community who truly care and have witnessed press and U.N. attacks on our relief efforts: we choose the high road. You're good people who, like Gazans, recognize authentic work. It's time to deliver food—not for politics, not for process, but for people. Join us or get out of our way. But, for God's sake, tell the truth.


CBS News
13 minutes ago
- CBS News
Los Angeles Mayor, officials say tariff impacts to Angeleno wallets are coming soon
Leaders from the city of Los Angeles and the Port of L.A. held a roundtable on Wednesday morning to discuss the impacts of mass tariffs being levied on foreign nations. Tariffs on imports from other countries have been one of the defining economic policies from President Donald Trump since he took office in January. Trump has also levied a trade war against China, leading to severe tensions. Business at home Officials say the tariffs have already impacted business at local ports, and could reach the wallets of Americans shortly. During a news conference following Wednesday's roundtable, Mayor Karen Bass said Americans and Angelenos may not realize the impact of tariffs yet, but it's coming. "[We need] to communicate to Angelenos specifically how this impacts their pocketbook," Bass said. "I think that sometimes this issue seems kind of far away and people don't see the immediate impact because the bottom line is that it's a tax on individuals and their families." Port of L.A. Executive Director Gene Seroka said the port has averaged about five ships in port over the last seven days. Normally, he says, it's about 10-12 per week. Seroka said the difference in business has been noticeable in the last couple of months. Seroka added that retailers have been uncertain about the amount of money American families will be willing to spend in the upcoming Holiday season, leading to trepidation when it comes to the amount of goods they're ordering for their stores. SAN PEDRO, CALIFORNIA - MAY 06: Container ships sit docked at the Port of Los Angeles on May 06, 2025 in San Pedro, California. Los Angeles and Long Beach ports are seeing significant drops in expected cargo ships coming into port this week due to tariffs imposed by the Trump Administration. The Port of Los Angeles expects a 35 percent decline in arrivals this week compared to the same period one year ago. / Getty Images City officials say they've been meeting with workers in the importing industry in recent weeks. "Everyone was saying the same thing," said Councilmember Tim McOsker, who represents L.A.'s 15th District. "That the tariffs have had a negative impact on this economy." McOsker said thousands of workers, from those who work at the ports to train workers and even those who stock shelves at stores, have "less money in their pockets" as a direct result of tariff policy. McOsker concluded his remarks by stating that he has yet to hear a valid reason for the imposition of mass tariffs. "This is a self-inflicted wound. This is an unforced error," McOsker said. "This is a mistake for absolutely no reason." Trump's reasoning Despite legal challenges, many of the sweeping tariffs remain in place while the process plays out in the appeals system. Trump says the tariffs are being used to increase "fairness" in trade, as the U.S. operates on a deficit while trading with other countries, and says he'd like to see companies manufacture goods in the U.S. as opposed to importing. Still, Trump has acknowledged that the prices of good could still rise. "Maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls," he said in an April 30 Cabinet meeting. "And maybe the two dolls will cost a couple of bucks more than they would normally."

Associated Press
19 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses Democratic committees' lawsuit over the Federal Election Commission's independence
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block President Donald Trump's administration from implementing an executive order that Democratic Party officials claim could undermine the independence of the Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali in Washington ruled late Tuesday that there's insufficient evidence that the Republican administration intends to apply a key portion of Trump's executive order to the FEC or its commissioners. 'This Court's doors are open to the parties if changed circumstances show concrete action or impact on the FEC's or its Commissioners' independence,' the judge wrote. The Democratic Party's three national political committees sued after Trump signed the executive order in February. The order was intended to increase his control of the entire executive branch, including over agencies such as the FEC, a six-person bipartisan board created by Congress to independently enforce campaign finance law. The Feb. 18 order said the officials at those agencies 'must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected President' and demanded that no executive branch employee advance a legal view that contradicts the president or the attorney general. Trump issued the order after he abruptly got rid of FEC Chair Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat who said her ouster did not follow legal protocols. The FEC is just one of several independent agencies Trump has sought to control and targeted with firings. The plaintiffs — the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — asked the judge to rule that a law insulating the FEC from partisan control is constitutional. They also asked for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Trump administration from applying part of the executive order to the FEC and its commissioners. 'Americans are legally guaranteed fair elections with impartial referees — not a system where Donald Trump can dictate campaign rules he wants from the White House,' the plaintiffs wrote in a statement. 'Democrats will use every tool at our disposal, including aggressively confronting Trump's illegal actions in the courts, to defend Americans' right to free and fair elections.' But government attorneys told the judge that the Trump administration has no plans to apply the executive order to the FEC. The judge said he can't conclude from the text of the executive order alone that Trump or Attorney General Pam Bondi are on the verge of taking such an 'extraordinary step.' The order doesn't single out the FEC and applies broadly to all executive branch employees, the judge concluded. 'The Court does not doubt that the committees would have cause for profound concern were the FEC's independence to be compromised,' he wrote. 'Given the FEC's central role in overseeing parties and campaigns, a compromise of its independence would pose an immense threat to our democratic elections, for all the reasons Congress established the FEC's independence in the first place.' The portion of the executive order challenged by the lawsuit has raised particular concern among campaign finance watchdogs, who call it a conflict of interest. Congress created the FEC in 1974 after the Watergate scandal with the goal of having it operate independently. 'This was not a hypothetical concern,' plaintiffs' attorney David Fox said during an April 9 hearing. 'And it's not a hypothetical concern today.' Justice Department attorney Jeremy Newman said the plaintiffs' concerns are based on mere speculation that the FEC may take a regulatory action that they oppose. 'There is no live controversy here,' Newman told the judge. 'The commission is conducting its business as it was two weeks ago, two months ago, two years ago,' FEC attorney James McGinley said during the hearing. Trevor Potter, a former Republican FEC commissioner and founder of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, said the FEC is responsible for enforcing the law against the president 'as both a candidate and as a holder of federal office.' 'It is crucial that the agency retain its independence from the White House, so it is able to hold the president — any president — and their political party accountable,' Potter said in a statement. ___ Swenson reported from New York.