Trump-Netanyahu rift? US President ‘caught off guard' by Israeli strikes in Gaza and Syria — Explained
One particular flashpoint came after Israeli forces struck the only Catholic Church in Gaza last Thursday — a move that drew immediate condemnation from President Trump.
Trump personally phoned Netanyahu to express his anger and insisted the Israeli leader issue a public statement labelling the strike a mistake.
The US president was equally surprised by Israeli airstrikes on Syrian government buildings in Damascus, carried out at a sensitive time when his administration is actively working to rebuild the war-torn nation.
'The president enjoys a good working relationship with Bibi Netanyahu, and stays in frequent communication with him. He was caught off guard by the bombing in Syria and also the bombing of a Catholic Church in Gaza,' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday.
'In both accounts, the president quickly called the prime minister to rectify those situations,' she added.
On 21 July, a White House official speaking to Axios bluntly criticised Netanyahu's aggressive military tactics.
'Bibi acted like a madman. He bombs everything all the time. This could undermine what Trump is trying to do,' the official said.
Another senior aide revealed that Trump rang Netanyahu for an explanation following the church bombing.
'The feeling is that every day there is something new. What the f*?**' Axios quoted the official as saying.
Leavitt pointed to Secretary of State Marco Rubio's efforts to ease tensions in Syria, where the Trump administration has lifted sanctions and thrown its support behind newly installed president, former rebel leader Ahmed al-Sharaa.
Despite being long-time allies, sources familiar with Trump and Netanyahu's relationship describe it as complicated, often marked by mutual distrust and personal distance.
Trump had hosted Netanyahu at the White House earlier this month, hoping the visit would produce a breakthrough on a Gaza ceasefire — one that would also secure the release of hostages held by Hamas and allow increased humanitarian aid into Gaza.
Netanyahu's dramatic gesture during a White House dinner, presenting Trump with a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize, appeared to signal strengthening ties.
Yet, Netanyahu left Washington without announcing a deal. Now, nearly a week after mediators submitted the latest ceasefire proposal to Hamas, all parties are still awaiting a response, according to sources cited by CNN.
Hamas released a statement on Monday saying they are 'exerting all our efforts and energies around the clock' to finalise an agreement on a Gaza ceasefire and hostage release.
With the Gaza conflict intensifying and civilian deaths rising — including three fatalities in the church bombing — Trump is reportedly watching developments with increasing concern.
'The president's message on this conflict we've seen in the Middle East taking place for far too long, that has become quite brutal, especially in recent days, you've seen reports of more people dying. I think the president never likes to see that. He wants the killing to end,' Leavitt said.
Leavitt praised the administration's role in facilitating humanitarian aid into Gaza, amid criticism from 25 Western foreign ministers who accused Israel of 'drip feeding' relief supplies.
The Gaza Health Ministry reported over 1,000 deaths linked to desperate efforts by civilians to obtain aid since late May.
'The president is the reason that aid is even being distributed in Gaza at all,' Leavitt asserted. 'He wants to see this done in a peaceful manner, where more lives are not being lost.'
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt further defended Donald Trump's record, saying:
'It's a very difficult and complicated situation that the president inherited because of the weakness of the last administration. And I think he should be applauded,' she stated.
'The president wants to see peace and he's been pretty clear on that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Epstein Distraction' Backfires? Tulsi, Trump Allies Slam Obama Amid Cover-Up Claims
As calls grow louder for the full release of Epstein's files, President Trump is dismissing the uproar as yet another "witch hunt." Reports alleging Epstein's attendance at Trump's wedding and a birthday card from Trump have only intensified scrutiny. In a dramatic twist, the White House shifted focus toward Obama, with DNI Tulsi Gabbard denying intel links to Epstein and dropping a declassified GOP report accusing Obama's team of lying about Russian interference. Though the report admits Russia did meddle, it casts doubt on how intel reached that conclusion. Tulsi's surprise press appearance, along with press secretary Karoline Leavitt's media blame game, has sparked backlash online. Critics are calling it a desperate "Epstein distraction stunt" as legal shields still protect both Trump and Obama for actions taken in office. Read More
Hindustan Times
20 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Who was Robert Maxwell? Ghislaine Maxwell's father, who had alleged ties with KGB and Mossad
Ghislaine Maxwell, the notorious associate of Jeffrey Epstein, father, Robert Maxwell, influenced her world even though he had relationships with MI6, KGB, and Mossad. Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of late British publisher Robert Maxwell, reads a statement expressing her family's gratitude to Spanish authorities after the recovery of his body, Nov. 7, 1991, in Tenerife, Spain. (AP Photo/Dominique Mollard, File)(AFP) Who is Robert Maxwell? Maxwell was born into a poor Jewish family in Czechoslovakia and was lucky to avoid the horror of the Holocaust and later make it to Britain. He made an impressive niche in his writings and media world, and secondly in politics. His academic publishing house, Pergamon Press, became a staple in American schools, though critics noted its textbooks had a clear pro-Israel tilt. Reflection of Maxwell's Zionist beliefs? In 1984, he bought the Daily Mirror and turned it into one of Britain's leading tabloids. ALSO READ| South Park skewers Trump over Epstein files, puts him in bed with Satan in blistering premiere episode Maxwell controlled an empire that included Maxwell Communication Corporation, Macmillan, Pergamon, and numerous other publishing interests. Interestingly, he was photographed alongside Queen Elizabeth, Princess Diana, Margaret Thatcher, and US Presidents George H. W. Bush and Donald Trump. However, British officials reportedly suspected him of being more than just a powerful media baron. Whispers within the UK Foreign Office linked Maxwell to MI6, the Soviet KGB, and Israel's Mossad, working as a triple agent. He was said to have moved seamlessly between Washington, Moscow, and Jerusalem, trading information and influence. Robert Maxwell linked to PROMIS spyware scandal The worst claims involve him in the PROMIS software scandal. Promis is originally a US Department of Justice tool that was reportedly backdoor implanted by Israeli intelligence and sold to the rest of the world so that foreign intelligence could monitor it on a large scale. Former Israeli spy Ari Ben-Menashe claimed that 'Robert Maxwell' was the one who helped sell the doctored version of PROMIS to unsuspecting governments and corporations. Maxwell's power began to unravel in the early 1990s. It was discovered that he had raided £460 million from the Mirror Group's pension fund, money meant for his employees, to keep his collapsing empire afloat. The British public branded him 'Robber Bob.' His sons Ian and Kevin were later charged with fraud but were acquitted. ALSO READ| Epstein files row: Democrats win big amid Trump link reports; infamous logs could be out soon On 5 November 1991, Maxwell vanished from his luxury yacht, the Lady Ghislaine, off the Canary Islands. Hours later, his body was found floating in the Atlantic Ocean. Authorities ruled it a heart attack and accidental drowning. Ghislaine has maintained her belief that her father was murdered.
Hindustan Times
38 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
The Price of Winning the Trade War
The trade deal President Trump announced with Japan Tuesday evening is good news—in the narrow sense that it defuses what could have been an extended tariff war with America's most important ally in Asia. But if this is winning a trade war, we'd hate to see what losing looks like. Mr. Trump hailed the pact with characteristic modesty as 'perhaps the largest Deal ever made.' Details remain sparse, but the core appears to be a Japanese commitment to invest $550 billion in the U.S. while reducing barriers to imports of American agricultural products such as rice. In exchange, Mr. Trump will reduce his 'reciprocal' tariffs on Japan to 15% from 25%—including, apparently, on autos. The new tariff rate is good news only as relief from 25%. This is still a 15% tax increase on imports from Japan. And don't believe the White House spin that Japanese exporters will pay this tax. They might absorb some of it, depending on the product and the competition. But American businesses and consumers will pay more too and thus be either less competitive or have a lower standard of living. That $550 billion in new Japanese investment also sounds better than it may be once we know the details. Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba suggested Tokyo will offer government loans and guarantees to support these 'investments,' with the aim 'to build resilient supply chains in key sectors.' This raises the prospect that this money, if it arrives, will be tied up in Japanese industrial policy. And American industrial policy, since Mr. Trump said Japan will make these investments 'at my direction' and the U.S. 'will receive 90% of the Profits.' Yikes. By the way, more investment inflows by definition mean a larger trade deficit in the U.S. balance of payments. Has someone told the President about this? The U.S. could have had more Japanese investment all along, except Mr. Trump helped chase it away. The current President and President Biden did their best to thwart a $14.9 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel by Nippon Steel ahead of last year's election, before Mr. Trump acquiesced in June. Perhaps if Japanese companies were more confident they'd get a fair shake in the U.S., we wouldn't need all these loan guarantees and trade deals to unlock capital commitments for American jobs. One positive development is the apparent reduction in U.S. auto tariffs from 25%. Perhaps the Administration is noticing that forcing Americans to pay higher prices for the cars they want to buy isn't a political winner. Yet the 15% rate still marks a substantial increase over the 2.5% tariff that applied to passenger cars before Mr. Trump took office. The U.S. already applies a 25% tariff on imported trucks. This highlights the economic bramble into which Mr. Trump has stumbled with his tariffs-first-negotiate-later approach to trade. U.S. auto makers are worried that Japanese companies will enjoy preferential tariff rates while Detroit could be stuck paying 25% on imports of cars and parts that U.S. companies ship from Mexico and Canada. *** As for the claim that Mr. Trump is 'winning' this trade war, that depends on how you define victory. It's true Mr. Trump is showing he can bully much of the world into accepting higher tariffs. The size of the U.S. market is powerful negotiating leverage. The pleasant surprise so far is that most countries haven't retaliated, which has spared the world from a 1930s-style downward trade spiral. But Mr. Trump is showing the world that the U.S. can change access to its market on presidential whim. Countries will diversify their trading relationships accordingly, as they already are in new bilateral and multilateral deals that exclude the U.S. China will expand its commercial influence at the expense of the U.S. Beijing has also shown that two can play trade bully ball. It retaliated against Mr. Trump's 145% tariffs with export restraints on vital minerals, and Mr. Trump agreed to a truce. By the time this trade war ends, if it ever does, the average U.S. tariff rate may settle close to 15% from 2.4% in January. That's an anti-growth tax increase. The question for Trumponomics now, as in the first term, is whether the pro-growth elements of his tax and deregulatory agenda overwhelm the tariff damage. The Japan deal is at least one step toward removing harmful trade uncertainty. An important question is what this augurs for talks with other trading partners, and especially the European Union. The Japan deal in some ways has been easier, especially since a big sticking point was agricultural protectionism Tokyo can reduce if pushed. Talks with Brussels encompass thornier problems, such as Europe's tech-and-pharma excess profits taxes, and Europe's chronic complaints about U.S. financial regulations.
