
Why 90% of AI Presentations Fail to Impress and What You Can Do About It
What if the sleek, AI-generated presentation you spent hours perfecting is actually sabotaging your message? Despite the promise of speed and sophistication, 90% of AI-powered presentations fail to deliver the clarity and depth needed to influence critical decisions. Imagine a polished deck filled with stunning visuals but completely disconnected from the nuanced challenges your audience faces. The problem isn't the technology itself—it's the overreliance on automation without the strategic input only humans can provide. This disconnect can leave stakeholders confused, disengaged, or worse, unconvinced. If you've ever felt like your presentations look great but fall flat in impact, you're not alone.
In this piece, Jeff Su uncovers why AI presentation tools often miss the mark and, more importantly, how you can avoid the same pitfalls. You'll discover a practical, three-step approach that combines AI's efficiency with human expertise to create presentations that don't just inform but inspire action. From using AI for research to structuring a narrative that resonates with decision-makers, this guide will help you transform your presentations into powerful tools for driving results. Because in a world where decisions are made in minutes, you can't afford to let your message get lost in translation. Balancing AI and Human Expertise Why AI Presentation Tools Fall Short
AI tools like Gamma and ChatGPT are excellent at automating repetitive tasks, such as generating visually appealing slides or summarizing data. However, they often fall short when it comes to delivering the depth required for high-stakes decision-making. Here are the key reasons why: Limited Context Understanding: AI struggles to interpret nuanced business challenges, such as evolving market trends or competitive dynamics, without human guidance.
AI struggles to interpret nuanced business challenges, such as evolving market trends or competitive dynamics, without human guidance. Shallow Insights: While AI can summarize data effectively, it often fails to prioritize actionable recommendations or align insights with specific business objectives.
While AI can summarize data effectively, it often fails to prioritize actionable recommendations or align insights with specific business objectives. Stakeholder Disconnect: Presentations created solely by AI may lack the strategic focus and clarity needed to resonate with decision-makers.
The result is often a presentation that looks polished but fails to provide the actionable insights necessary for informed decision-making. This disconnect highlights the importance of human oversight in crafting impactful presentations. A Three-Step Process for Effective Presentations
To bridge the gap between automation and actionable insights, a three-step process—research, structuring, and design—can help you create presentations that are both efficient and impactful. This approach uses the strengths of AI tools while relying on your expertise to refine and elevate the final output. 1. Research: Building a Strong Foundation
AI tools like ChatGPT can significantly accelerate the research process by synthesizing large volumes of information. These tools can help you analyze markets, competitors, and customer trends quickly. However, to ensure the insights are actionable, it's critical to apply established business frameworks such as Porter's Five Forces or SWOT analysis.
For instance, if you're exploring market opportunities for a budget skincare brand, Porter's Five Forces can help you evaluate competitive intensity, supplier power, and market growth potential. By combining AI-driven research with these frameworks, you can generate prioritized insights, such as ranked market scorecards, that guide your decision-making process. 2. Structuring: Crafting a Clear Narrative
Once you've gathered your insights, the next step is to organize them into a logical and compelling narrative. Frameworks like SEQA (Situation, Explanation, Question, Answer) can help structure your presentation in a way that minimizes decision fatigue for your audience.
For example, if your research identifies Indonesia as the most promising market for your skincare brand, your presentation should clearly address: Why Indonesia stands out (e.g., high growth potential and market compatibility).
The challenges involved (e.g., regulatory hurdles or distribution complexities).
How your strategy addresses these challenges (e.g., localized product offerings or partnerships with local distributors).
A well-structured narrative ensures that stakeholders can quickly grasp the key points and make informed decisions without unnecessary confusion or ambiguity. 3. Design: Enhancing Clarity and Engagement
The final step is to transform your structured outline into visually engaging slides. Tools like Gamma offer intuitive design features that allow you to customize layouts, themes, and visuals to enhance clarity and professionalism. However, it's crucial to review and refine the content to ensure it aligns with your narrative and supports your key messages.
For example, if your slides include market data, double-check the figures for accuracy and ensure the visuals, such as charts or graphs, effectively highlight the most important insights. Customization is key to making your presentation stand out while maintaining a professional tone that resonates with your audience. Why 90% of AI Presentations Fail
Watch this video on YouTube.
Advance your skills in AI presentation tools by reading more of our detailed content. Case Study: A Skincare Brand's Market Analysis
Consider a budget skincare brand exploring market opportunities in Southeast Asia. By using AI tools and business frameworks, the team identifies Indonesia as the top choice due to its high growth potential and market compatibility. Key recommendations include: Customizing products to align with local consumer preferences.
Securing certifications to build trust and credibility among consumers.
Using digital marketing channels, such as social media, to reach targeted audiences effectively.
This example demonstrates how combining AI-driven research with human judgment can lead to actionable strategies that align with broader business goals. The result is a presentation that not only informs but also inspires confidence in the proposed strategy. Strengths and Limitations of AI Tools
AI tools offer numerous advantages, but they also come with inherent limitations. Understanding these strengths and weaknesses is crucial for maximizing their value in your workflow.
Strengths: Significant time savings by automating repetitive tasks, such as slide creation and data summarization.
Enhanced visualization capabilities for creating professional and polished presentations.
Efficient synthesis of large datasets, allowing faster research and analysis.
Limitations: Inability to independently generate deep, context-specific insights without human intervention.
Occasional inaccuracies in data interpretation or formatting that require manual review.
Dependence on human expertise to refine outputs and ensure alignment with strategic objectives.
By recognizing these strengths and limitations, you can better integrate AI tools into your workflow, using them to complement rather than replace human expertise. Key Takeaways
The most effective presentations are the result of a collaborative approach that combines the efficiency of AI automation with the depth and nuance of human expertise. By aligning the right tool with the right task—whether it's research, structuring, or design—you can create presentations that are both efficient and impactful.
Ultimately, the key to success lies in balancing automation with oversight. This ensures your presentations deliver meaningful insights, resonate with stakeholders, and drive informed business decisions.
Media Credit: Jeff Su Filed Under: AI, Guides
Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals
Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Nippon and US Steel complete controversial merger
Japanese firm Nippon Steel has completed its long-sought takeover of a smaller American company, after agreeing to yield unusual control to the US government. The $14.9bn (£11bn) purchase of US Steel, will create one of the world's biggest steelmakers and turns Nippon into a major player in the plan, first announced in 2023, had been seen as a lifeline for the storied but struggling 124-year-old US the deal ran into trouble during last year's presidential election, when US President Donald Trump and his Democratic opponents said they were concerned about the foreign acquisition of one of the last major steel producers in the US. However, Trump reversed his stance, after Nippon made concessions which the President said had satisfied his national security gave the official green light to the deal in an executive order on agreed to pay $55 per share and take on the company's debt, a deal worth $14.9bn together. It said it had also promised the government it would invest $11bn in US Steel by 2028, including a new facility that would be completed after that year. It also granted the US government a "golden share" in the company, giving the government say over key decisions, including the transfer of jobs or production outside of the US, and certain calls to close or idle factories. Nippon also committed to maintain its headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and install US citizens to key management positions including its chief executive and the majority of its board."This partnership ensures that US Steel will retain its iconic name and headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and that it will continue to be mined, melted, and made in America for generations to come," Nippon and US Steel said in a statement as shares in US Steel stopped trading. They said the deal would "protect and create more than 100,000 jobs". Trump has made protections for the steel industry a key part of his economic agenda, raising tariffs on imports of the metal to 50% to benefit American producers. The president said he changed his mind about deal after hearing from local officials, who were alarmed by warnings from US Steel that it might cut jobs without the investment from Nippon. Leaders of the US Steelworkers union had opposed the takeover, which former president Joe Biden blocked in his final weeks of office. The companies subsequently filed a lawsuit accusing him of improperly politicising a national security review.


The Sun
36 minutes ago
- The Sun
Iconic car maker recalls over 14,000 motors due to ‘serious' fault that could see you lose control of brakes
OVER 14,000 vehicles have been recalled after a potentially dangerous fault was discovered. The cars were found to have an underlying issue which could affect the brakes. 2 The issue has occurred in thousands of electric and plug-in hybrid Volvo vehicles across the US. Volvo Car USA, LLC issued the safety recall due to a serious software defect. It was concluded that this problem could potentially lead to a loss of brake function. The issue is said to stem from the Brake Control Module, which can cause a failure in the braking system under specific driving conditions. Therefore, this defect could significantly increase the risk of the vehicle crashing. This recall impacts 14,014 select models from the years 2020 through 2026. The two models recalled are the Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) and Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles (PHEV). It was found that a temporary loss of braking functionality may occur after coasting downhill for an extended period in certain driving modes. Pressing the brake pedal after this occurs may then disable the brakes entirely. This safety issue can occur when a vehicle is coasting downhill for at least one minute and 40 seconds. Ford is forced to immediately shut down factories and halt car production as CEO admits 'day to day' struggle for brand It is specific to vehicles operating in 'One Pedal Drive' mode (for BEVs) or 'B' drive mode (for PHEVs) without the driver applying the brake or accelerator pedals. It is significantly dangerous if the driver then presses the brake pedal, as this action may cause a complete loss of braking function, elevating the risk of a collision. The root of the problem is attributed to Brake Control Module software version 3.5.14. Volvo said it will provide a free software update for all affected vehicles. Until the recall remedy is performed, owners are advised to avoid using the 'One Pedal Drive' and 'B' drive modes. Find Your Next Car by What You Can Actually Afford Sun Motors has created the UK's First Finance-First Marketplace You can check in less than 60 seconds if you are eligible for financing, and then search for your dream used car within your monthly budget. Here's how... Soft credit check, with no impact on your score 60-second approval, get a real finance decision in less than a minute Instant match, only see cars that fit your real budget AI-powered help, get tailored advice, suggestions, and instant answers from an AI advisor called Theo Find out what you can afford in just 60 seconds here. Finance Powered by DSG Finance who are a Credit Broker Not A Lender. Representative 12.9%. Your rate may differ depending on individual circumstances Owners of affected models will be officially notified by mail from Wednesday, August 6. Volvo announced the recall population was traced to a specific software version released on April 25, 2025. The recall covers a wide range of Volvo's electrified lineup: 2023-2024 C40 BEV, XC40 BEV, EC40, and EX40 2020-2025 XC90 PHEV 2022-2025 XC60 PHEV 2023-2025 S60 PHEV 2024-2025 V60 PHEV 2025 S90 PHEV The remedy involves a software update, performed at no cost to the owner. Owners who have already paid for repairs related to this issue may be eligible for reimbursement. Dealers were notified of the recall on June 12, 2025. And owners can check if their vehicle is included in the recall by entering their Vehicle Identification Number (VIN) on the NHTSA website after June 20, 2025. For more information, owners can visit the Volvo customer help website. 2


The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
America is sleepwalking into another unnecessary war
As the United States inches closer to direct military confrontation with Iran, it is critical to recognize how avoidable this escalation has been. 'We knew everything [about Israel's plans to strike Iran], and I tried to save Iran humiliation and death,' said Donald Trump on Friday. 'I tried to save them very hard because I would have loved to have seen a deal worked out.' As two of the last analysts from an American thinktank to visit Iran, just three weeks ago, we can report that Iran's own foreign ministry and members of the nuclear negotiating team were eager to work out a deal with Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy to the Middle East, and showed no indication they were interested in slow-walking talks. Over the course of conversations held on the sidelines of the Tehran Dialogue Forum, high-level foreign ministry officials expressed concern about the potential for a spoiling effort by the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, and various staff and officials showed themselves open to considering a variety of scenarios including a regional nuclear consortium for uranium enrichment under international oversight and bilateral areas of diplomatic and economic engagement with the United States. What we heard should have been cause for cautious optimism – yet instead, Washington squandered a rare diplomatic opening, seemingly allowing Israel to start a disastrous war of choice that may soon drag in the US. Contrary to the narrative that Iran was dragging its feet in negotiations, we saw no evidence of deliberate stalling. In fact, Iran's worsening economic crisis had created a strong incentive for Tehran to strike a deal – one that would provide sanctions relief in exchange for limits on its nuclear program, with even the possibility of broader normalization with the US on the horizon. Middle-class Iranians we spoke with elsewhere in Tehran were frustrated with the economic situation and, despite a highly developed sanctions-resistant economy, eager for sanctions relief allowing them greater access to international travel and trade. Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi emphasized flexibility on nearly every issue outside Iran's red line on low-level uranium enrichment. That was echoed in private conversations we held with foreign ministry staff and members of the nuclear negotiating team. Domestic enrichment is non-negotiable for Iran but they believed they had front-loaded their concessions to Witkoff, offering up a 3.67% limit on their enrichment with whatever monitoring and surveillance mechanisms were necessary for the US to feel confident the deal was being honored. Enrichment, even at a low level, is a matter of national pride, a symbol of scientific achievement and a defiant response to decades of sanctions, the red line consistently stated in our conversations and one which they thought was agreeable to Witkoff. Iran claimed to be completely blindsided by Witkoff's 18 May statement that zero enrichment was the only acceptable terms for a nuclear deal but was open to returning to talks to discuss ways forward. After weathering immense economic pain to develop this capability, no Iranian government – reformist or hardline – could feasibly surrender to the zero enrichment demand. The idea that Tehran would dismantle its enrichment program in 60 days, as the Trump administration demanded, was never realistic. This was not mere stubbornness – it was rooted in deep mistrust sown by Trump. The US had already violated the 2015 nuclear deal (JCPOA) by unilaterally withdrawing during Trump's first term, despite Iran's verified compliance. Why would Tehran now accept another agreement requiring total denuclearization, with no guarantee Washington wouldn't renege again? Iranian officials signaled openness to creative solutions, including shipping excess low-enriched uranium to Russia; forming a regional consortium for enrichment; allowing US inspectors to join International Atomic Energy Agency teams – a major shift from previous positions. Other ideas were also floated at the Tehran forum, albeit not from official sources – temporary suspension of enrichment and a pause on advanced IR-6 centrifuges as confidence-building measures. Araghchi's expressed willingness to return to JCPOA-permitted enrichment levels (below 4%) – was a concession so significant that it drew criticism from Iranian hardliners for giving too much, too soon. This was not the behavior of a regime trying to stall; it was the posture of a government eager for a deal, engaged in an effort to avoid spoilers in Jerusalem, Washington and at home in Tehran, and knowing full well that long, drawn-out negotiations would offer more, not less, opportunities for enemies of diplomacy to strike. The US team, led by Witkoff and mediated by Oman, seemed to share this urgency. The Iranian government seemed empowered enough to make a deal – if the US had been willing to take yes for an answer. Yet here we are, on the brink of another Middle East conflict – one that was entirely preventable. Instead of seizing this rare moment of Iranian flexibility, the US chose escalation. The consequences may be catastrophic: a wider regional war, soaring oil prices and the total collapse of diplomacy with Iran for years to come. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion It is still possible to step back from the brink. Tehran has signaled willingness to re-engage in talks if Israeli ceases attack. Omani channels remain open. Yet, after the start of the Israeli bombing campaign, the political space for negotiations has shrunk. The US is sleepwalking into another Middle East quagmire, an open-ended war with unclear goals, loose talk of regime change and the potential for a regional conflagration if Iran attacks US military installations in the Persian Gulf. And this war comes after Iran extended a real offer for compromise. If Washington chooses bombs over diplomacy, history will record this as a war not of necessity, but of tragic, reckless choice. Eli Clifton is senior adviser at Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft Eldar Mamedov is non-resident fellow at Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft and member of the Pugwash Council on Science and World Affairs