IoD urges States to fund independent colleges
The Institute of Directors (IoD) has warned deputies against voting in favour of proposals that could see funding cut for independent colleges in the island.
Blanchelande College, Elizabeth College and The Ladies' College are expected to receive funding of £2.85m for 2025/2026.
But if deputies vote in favour of proposals, funding for independent colleges could be phased out and reinvested in the States-maintained education system.
A spokesman for the IoD said it was "critical for deputies to consider the economic contribution and benefits of independent education".
They added: "We must acknowledge the risks to economic growth, confidence, competitiveness and therefore our future success from removing some or all of the funding."
The committee for education, sport and culture has said it wants to phase out financial support for the colleges as is "not the best use of taxpayer money".
It adds that funding private education is an "unfair allocation" of funding which widens inequality and that it is not necessary for the colleges to continue running.
However, the IoD maintains the independent colleges represent value for money, delivering high-quality educational outcomes at a low cost to the States.
The IoD said: "Guernsey would be putting itself at a distinct disadvantage at exactly the moment when ensuring educational stability and outcomes is vital for long term economic growth and success."
The grant given to the colleges was £723k in 2019/20, which has increased to an expected cost of £2.85m by 2025/26.
The issue will be debated by the States of Deliberation on 19 March.
Follow BBC Jersey on X and Facebook. Send your story ideas to channel.islands@bbc.co.uk.
Independent colleges could lose taxpayer cash
Colleges to be exempt from some education changes
Catholic college buys large estate for £1.4m
States of Guernsey
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court
Get ready for a flurry of activity from the Supreme Court Show Caption Hide Caption Protesters line up outside Supreme Court birthright citizenship hearing Protesters shouted "birthright citizenship belongs to us!" outside the Supreme Court in Washington D.C. WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court is picking up the pace as it announces some of its most consequential decisions of the term before adjourning for the summer. The next cluster of opinions will drop on June 5, though the biggest outstanding decisions may not come until later. Those include whether the court will allow President Donald Trump to enforce his changes to birthright citizenship while his new policy is being litigated and whether the court will uphold Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors. In addition to the court dispensing with the cases it debated in oral arguments in recent months, the justices are continuing to field an unusual number of emergency requests from the Trump administration to intervene in the many legal challenges to the president's policies. That could push the regular work of the court into July. Here's a look at the decisions expected in the coming weeks: Limiting challenges to Trump's executive authority Trump's executive order limiting birthright citizenship has been put on hold by judges across the country who ruled it's probably unconstitutional. During the May 15 oral arguments, none of the justices voiced support for the Trump administration's theory that the president's order is consistent with the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause and past Supreme Court decisions about that provision. But several of the justices have expressed concern about the ability of one judge to block a law or presidential order from going into effect anywhere in the country while it's being challenged. It was unclear from the oral arguments how the court might find a way to limit nationwide – or 'universal' – court orders and what that would mean for birthright citizenship and the many other Trump policies being challenged in court. Religious expression versus separation of church and state Of the three cases the justices heard about the First Amendment's protections for the right to practice religion, the biggest was the Catholic Church's bid to run the nation's first religious charter school. But the court deadlocked 4-4 over whether they could do that. That left in place a lower court's rejection of the school but without setting a precedent that must be followed for similar attempts in the future. More: Supreme Court blocks Catholic charter school in big setback for religion advocates In the other cases about the free exercise of religion, the court is likely to side with Catholic Charities in a dispute over when religious groups have to pay unemployment taxes. And the court's conservative majority sounded sympathetic to Maryland parents who raised religious objections to having their elementary school children read books with LGBTQ+ characters. The battle over transgender rights Transgender rights cases were already making their way to the Supreme Court from state actions and now the Trump administration policies regarding transgender people will accelerate that trend. The court has already granted the administration's emergency request that it be allowed to enforce its ban on military service by transgender people while that restriction is being challenged. In one of the court's biggest pending decisions, the justices will decide whether states can ban minors from receiving puberty blockers and hormone therapy. During December's oral arguments, a majority seemed to agree states can do that. But how they reach that conclusion will affect how much their decision applies to other transgender rights case including those about transgender athletes, whether health plans have to cover gender affirming care, where transgender inmates must be housed and if transgender people can serve in the military. Implications for parental rights While the court seems likely to rule against the parents challenging Tennessee's ban on gender affirming care for minors, they sounded poised to back the Maryland parents who want their elementary school children excused from class when books with LGBTQ+ characters are being read. And in a case about Texas' requirement that websites verify users are 18 or over, one justice expressed her own parental frustration over trying to control what her children see on the internet. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, who has seven children, said she knows from personal experience how difficult it is to keep up with the content blocking devices that those challenging Texas' law offered as a better alternative. But while the justices were sympathetic to the purpose of Texas' law, they may decide a lower court didn't sufficiently review whether it violates the First Amendment rights of adults so must be reconsidered. Gun cases could bring mixed results In one of the court's biggest decisions so far this year, a 7-2 majority upheld the Biden administration's regulation of untraceable 'ghost guns,' ruling that the weapons can be subject to background checks and other requirements. But the court is expected to reject Mexico's attempt to hold U.S. gunmakers liable for violence caused by Mexican drug cartels armed with their weapons. A majority of the justices sounded likely to agree with the gunmakers that the chain of events between the manufacture of a gun and the harm it causes is too lengthy to blame the industry. Neither case is directly about the Second Amendment's right to bear arms. And the court narrowly decided against taking up two cases about that right – Maryland's ban on assault-style weapons and Rhode Island's ban on high-capacity magazines. More: Supreme Court won't review bans on assault-style weapons and high-capacity magazines Planned Parenthood, but not abortion directly, is an issue Unlike last year when the court considered two cases about abortion access, that hot button issue is not directly before the court. But the justices are deciding whether to back South Carolina's effort to deprive Planned Parenthood of public funding for other health services because it also provides abortions. The issue is whether the law allows Medicaid patients to sue South Carolina for excluding Planned Parenthood from its Medicaid program. If the court says the patients can't sue, other GOP-led states are expected to also kick Planned Parenthood out of Medicaid. And anti-abortion advocates are pushing for the same action nationwide. Conservative challenges to Obamacare and internet subsidies The court is considering conservative challenges to Obamacare and to an $8 billion federal program that subsidizes high-speed internet and phone service for millions of Americans. The justices seemed likely to reject an argument that the telecommunications program is funded by an unconstitutional tax, a case that raised questions about how much Congress can 'delegate' its legislative authority to a federal agency. The latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act takes aim at 2010 law's popular requirement that insurers cover without extra costs preventive care such as cancer screenings, cholesterol-lowering medication and diabetes tests. Two Christian-owned businesses and some people in Texas argue that the volunteer group of experts that recommends the services health insurance must cover is so powerful that, under the Constitution, its members must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. Multiple discrimination challenges The court is deciding a number of cases about alleged discrimination in the workplace, at school and in drawing congressional boundaries. The justices appeared likely to rule that a worker faced a higher hurdle to sue her employer as a straight woman than if she'd been gay, a decision that would make it easier to file 'reverse discrimination' lawsuits. The court may also side with a Minnesota teenager trying to use the Americans with Disabilities Act to sue her school for not accommodating her rare form of epilepsy that makes it difficult to attend class before noon. It's less clear whether the court will agree with non-Black voters in Louisiana that the state's congressional map, which includes two majority-Black districts, discriminates against them. Decisions in all the cases are expected by the end of June or early July.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner
YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner Denver, CO, June 04, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Denver, Colorado, June 2nd, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- - YES Communities, a Denver-based operator of manufactured housing, has named Agustin R., a student at Arrupe Jesuit High School, as one of the 2025 recipients of its Building Futures Scholarship. As a recipient, Agustin will receive a $5,000 scholarship to help support his college education. 'We are excited to provide our fifth scholarship to another talented Arrupe Jesuit student,' said Julie Elkins, CFO of YES Communities. 'At YES, we're dedicated to creating opportunities for growth. Assisting these outstanding students in furthering their education reflects our ongoing commitment to developing the leaders of tomorrow.' Agustin is a senior at Arrupe and will attend Santa Clara University this fall to pursue his dreams of becoming a mechanical engineer. "At Santa Clara University, I'm committed to building a supportive community through leadership, dedication, and hard work, not just to improve my own future, but to help others succeed too. By studying mechanical engineering and connecting with fellow first-generation students, I hope to create a community where we lift each other up, both academically and personally." said Agustin. Arrupe Jesuit deeply appreciates the continued support YES Communities provides to our students,' said Michael J. O'Hagan, President of Arrupe Jesuit. 'We are thankful for the scholarship awarded to Agustin and the opportunities it creates for his future. Our partnership with YES Communities has a meaningful and lasting impact on the lives of our students.' Since the inception of the partnership with Arrupe Jesuit High School in 2010, YES Communities has provided 64 Corporate Work Study opportunities and 5 Building Futures Scholarships to students. About Arrupe Jesuit High School: Arrupe Jesuit High School is a Catholic, college preparatory school offering students with limited economic resources a premier educational experience through rigorous academics, formation in faith and discernment, and a unique work study program – fostering community, leadership, personal growth, and opportunity for all. To learn more, visit About YES Communities: YES Communities is a nationwide leader in the manufactured housing industry, offering high-quality, attainable housing solutions across the United States. Through meeting the unique needs of residents, our mission is to enhance the quality of life for everyone who calls a YES community home. For more information, visit Attachments YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner YES Communities Announces 2025 Building Futures Arrupe Jesuit High School Scholarship Winner CONTACT: Vanessa Jasinski YES Communities 1-833-625-0269 vjasinski@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Ex-Rams long snapper Jake McQuaide disrupts church by demanding answers in porn scandal
It's not easy for NFL long snappers to stand out, their exacting trade hinging exclusively on repeating the same action without fail or fanfare. Yet Jake McQuaide, the former Rams two-time Pro Bowl long snapper and veteran of 14 NFL seasons, drew attention Saturday when he stood up. McQuaide rose during Mass at an Ohio Catholic church and snapped at Jason Williams, chancellor of the Cincinnati Archdiocese, demanding answers about rumors that two priests had viewed pornography on a parish computer. Shortly thereafter, McQuaide was removed from the sanctuary by police officers. During the outburst, McQuaide seemed to channel Sister Aloysius — Meryl Streep's character in the 2008 film "Doubt," — when he loudly questioned Williams, saying 'We want to put these rumors to rest. Can you answer this for me, fact or fiction?' Read more: Rams' Puka Nacua is learning a lot from new teammate Davante Adams According to video from Cincinnati news station WCPO, when someone at the alter told McQuaide, 'this is not the time for this," McQuaide responded by shouting, 'I'm sorry, sir, this is the time and the place. I will stand up. Did the priest use our parish computer to look at pornography? …True or false? True or false?' McQuaide's challenge occurred while Williams was reading a letter from Archbishop Robert Casey to the Our Lady of Visitation congregation that said the rumors were investigated and "no wrongdoing — either criminally or ecclesiastically — has been substantiated." The letter also said that one of the priests was taking a 'previously planned sabbatical." "Like gossip, the spreading of rumors is sinful, and we should all work to overcome this tendency of our fallen human nature," the letter said. Two Green Township police officers escorted McQuaide from the church. McQuaide was not charged, according to the police. Read more: Caleb Williams explains why he and his dad schemed to avoid going to the Bears from USC McQuaide grew up near Green Township and attended Cincinnati Elder High, an all-male Catholic diocesan school within the Archdiocese of Cincinnati founded in 1912. After attending Ohio State, McQuaide served as the Rams long snapper for 10 years, beginning in 2011 when the franchise was in St. Louis and ending after the 2021 season. Since then he has played for the Dallas Cowboys, Detroit Lions, Minnesota Vikings and Miami Dolphins, having appeared in 197 career games. Get the best, most interesting and strangest stories of the day from the L.A. sports scene and beyond from our newsletter The Sports Report. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
