logo
Idaho's tax cuts proposed by the Legislature are a risk to our children's future

Idaho's tax cuts proposed by the Legislature are a risk to our children's future

Yahoo14-03-2025

The rotunda at the Idaho Capitol as seen on Jan. 17, 2022, in Boise. (Otto Kitsinger for Idaho Capital Sun)
The Idaho Legislature is at a crossroads.
With over $450 million in proposed tax cuts on the table — more than four times what Gov. Brad Little set aside in his budget — lawmakers must decide whether these cuts serve the best interests of Idaho's children. At the heart of the debate is whether Idaho can afford these sweeping tax cuts without jeopardizing the programs and services that directly impact kids' education, health care and overall well-being.
Idaho Gov. Brad Little concerned about magnitude of tax cuts that reduce state revenue
Last week, on the 59th legislative day, the Joint Finance-Appropriations Committee (JFAC) finally set a revenue target for fiscal year 2026. The governor recommended a revenue target of $6.407 billion, closely aligned with the Economic Outlook and Revenue Assessment Committee's (EORAC) projection of $6.4 billion. However, when JFAC attempted to vote on the matter in January, it failed to pass the revenue target. The committee ultimately passed a revenue target on March 5, just two and a half weeks before its target adjournment date of March 21.
This uncertainty raises a critical question: How could legislators justify massive tax cuts when they hadn't even established the revenue framework until so late in the legislative session? Is this responsible legislating?
If these tax cuts pass without corresponding budget adjustments, Idaho's children will bear the consequences. Education funding could face significant reductions, forcing larger class sizes, fewer resources and reduced support for teachers. Health care programs for low-income children could see cutbacks, leaving many families struggling to afford essential care. Infrastructure projects, including safe school facilities and community services, could be left underfunded.
Let's break down the proposed tax cuts:
House Bill 40 reduces the income tax rate from 5.8% to 5.3%, exempts certain precious metals from capital gains tax and excludes certain military benefits from income taxation. Cost: $253 million.
House Bill 260 increases the grocery tax credit from $120 to $155 per person (up to $250 if itemizing). Cost: $50 million.
House Bill 304 allocates an additional $50 million to the Homeowner Tax Relief Fund and another $50 million to the School District Facilities Fund. Cost: $100 million.
House Bill 93 introduces a parental choice tax credit for private education expenses. Cost: $50 million.
While tax relief is a popular talking point, responsible governance requires balance. The state must fund critical services that support children and their futures. Slashing taxes without a plan to offset lost revenue puts these essential functions at risk.
Some lawmakers argue that lower taxes will spur economic growth and eventually offset the lost revenue. But that theory is speculative at best. Idaho already enjoys a competitive tax climate, and drastic cuts could deplete reserves needed to weather economic downturns, leaving children's services particularly vulnerable.
Instead of rushing into nearly half a billion dollars in tax cuts, the Legislature should focus on sustainable tax relief that aligns with realistic revenue projections. A more measured approach — one that considers both taxpayer relief and the state's long-term financial stability — would better serve Idaho's children and their future.
The question lawmakers must answer is this: Are they building a better future for Idaho's children, or are they gambling with their well-being?
Editor's note: Fred Wood, Cindy Wilson and Julie Yamamoto are writing on behalf of Idaho Children are Primary. ICAP is a nonprofit 501(c)4 organization led by a group of child care experts with the common goal of advocating for the well-being of children and families in the state of Idaho.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Opinion: America can't afford to hesitate on nuclear energy
Opinion: America can't afford to hesitate on nuclear energy

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: America can't afford to hesitate on nuclear energy

In 1955, a small city in the American West became the first in the world to be powered entirely by nuclear energy. It marked the dawn of a new technological era — when America built boldly and led decisively. Today, as new demand strains the grid and global energy competition intensifies, the West is once again positioned to do something historic: not just power cities, but ignite a new era of American prosperity and security. In the decades that followed, the United States built more than 100 commercial nuclear reactors, most of them before 1990. It was a time of American acceleration, with some speculating that electricity could soon become 'too cheap to meter.' The rest of the world took notice. France launched a sweeping national effort to replicate that momentum. Today, nuclear provides roughly 70% of France's electricity. But then, we hesitated. A combination of regulatory overreach, shifting public sentiment and political inertia brought new development nearly to a standstill. Well-documented setbacks fueled skepticism, while permitting processes stretched into decades. Our industrial muscle atrophied as we began to treat innovation as risk rather than opportunity. Somewhere along the way, we forgot how to build. But the tide is turning. Between 2019 and 2024, American support for nuclear energy rose by 18 percentage points. A recent poll found that nearly 80% of first-time and Gen Z voters support next-generation nuclear technologies as a complement to renewables. In Utah, where I serve as governor, polling shows similarly broad support for advanced nuclear energy. That support isn't surprising. Existing nuclear plants are among the safest, cleanest and most efficient sources of power ever built. Advanced nuclear builds on this legacy, offering smaller footprints, faster deployment and even broader use cases. Utah isn't just focused on building advanced nuclear reactors, but all energy types that can help us meet our goals. Through my administration's initiative, Operation Gigawatt, we're moving to double our state's energy capacity over the next 10 years and build out our energy ecosystem to meet the needs of the future. This is a strategic imperative. We don't believe in just an 'all-of-the-above' energy strategy — we believe in a more-of-the-above strategy. If it's reliable, clean and scalable, we're building it. That's why at Utah's recent Nuclear Energy Summit, I joined Wyoming Governor Mark Gordon and Idaho Governor Brad Little in signing a tri-state MOU to pursue regional collaboration in energy policy, infrastructure development and regulatory strategy. We're also building an ecosystem to support advanced nuclear. Our new Nuclear Energy Consortium — created in partnership with state lawmakers — will bring together private industry, investors and policymakers to guide development. We're also designating energy development zones and creating policies to attract capital without raising costs for ratepayers. This is a model other states can follow. This work is urgent. AI is already driving explosive growth in computing power, with hyperscale data centers demanding round-the-clock electricity. But that's just one piece of a much larger challenge: how do we keep the lights on, keep rates affordable and build a grid resilient enough to withstand heatwaves, storms and cyber threats? Solving that challenge is essential for Utah families and businesses — today and for generations to come. Because at the core of every strong economy is reliable energy. As we reshore advanced manufacturing and electrify major sectors of our economy — from transportation to housing — the demands on our grid will only grow. The future we're building won't run on gigawatts — it will require terawatts. In May, President Trump signed four executive orders to 'usher in a nuclear renaissance.' These orders provide steps to streamline permitting, support domestic enrichment and prioritize advanced reactor deployment. The economic case is compelling, with nuclear power offering unmatched reliability and energy density. At the announcement, Jake DeWitte, CEO of advanced nuclear firm Oklo, underscored that point with a simple visual: 'A golf ball of uranium metal has enough energy content in it to power your entire life's energy needs.' That's the kind of efficiency we'll need to power the next chapter of American prosperity. But this isn't just about economics. It's also about national security. At the same White House event, General Matter CEO Scott Nolan pointed to a dangerous vulnerability: 'Right now the U.S. is completely dependent on other countries for enrichment.' He's right. Roughly 25% of the enriched uranium used in U.S. reactors today comes from Russia. That dependency is unacceptable. As we bring dozens of new advanced reactors online in the coming years, we must ensure we're not relying on adversaries to fuel them. More than just building reactors, meeting this moment demands a full-scale commitment to the nuclear supply chain, from mining and enrichment to manufacturing and waste handling. It also requires modernizing our permitting systems so that well-designed projects don't languish for years under bureaucratic delay. We've done this before. In less than three decades, America once brought more than 100 nuclear reactors online. We know how to build when we decide it matters. And if we care about energy security, economic growth and global competitiveness, we'll do it again. The American West powered the world's first nuclear city. This time, we have a chance to power something even greater: a nuclear renaissance. Utah is ready to lead. I invite utility executives, policymakers and local leaders everywhere to join us. Now is the time to build.

Trump backs Idaho Gov. Little for reelection — before he's said he'll run
Trump backs Idaho Gov. Little for reelection — before he's said he'll run

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump backs Idaho Gov. Little for reelection — before he's said he'll run

Idaho Gov. Brad Little received President Donald Trump's endorsement Tuesday for another term, nearly a year ahead of the Republican primary — and before the two-term incumbent governor has even announced a bid for reelection. 'Brad Little is the strong and highly popular Governor of Idaho,' Trump posted on Truth Social, the president's social media platform. 'Brad Little has my Complete and Total Endorsement for Re-Election — HE WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!' It is unclear whether Little, 71, an Emmett sheep and cattle rancher, will seek a third term, or which candidates may consider challenging him in the May 2026 primary. Idaho's 33rd governor thanked Trump on the social media platform X, without stating whether he will run for reelection. 'It is an honor to have the support of President @realDonaldTrump,' the post read. 'Idaho will continue leading the fight to Make America Great Again!' Little's campaign did not immediately respond to a request from the Idaho Statesman on Tuesday evening. This year, Little has taken several trips to Washington, D.C., including to visit with Trump. In January, before Trump was sworn in as president, Idaho's governor also traveled to Mar-a-Lago, Trump's private resort in South Florida. Trump, the 45th and 47th U.S. president, remains popular in Idaho, a deep red state. In 2024, he earned nearly 70% of the votes in the presidential election — up from about 64% in 2020 and about 59% in 2016. Nationally, Trump's favorability rating has declined with Americans since he took office, according to recent polling. Little first won election to become Idaho's lead executive in 2018. The sitting lieutenant governor ran in a crowded GOP field and defeated his closest challenger — Raúl Labrador, now Idaho's attorney general — by about 5% points. He sailed to victory over his Democratic rival in the general election that fall. When Little sought a second term in 2022, Trump — out of office after losing the 2020 election to Democratic President Joe Biden — endorsed the governor's main challenger in the Republican primary, Lt. Gov. Janice McGeachin. 'I am giving Janice McGeachin my Complete and Total Endorsement to be the next Governor of Idaho,' Trump said at the time, a near carbon copy of the endorsement he issued Tuesday for Little, right down to the arbitrary capitalization. 'She will make a fantastic Governor, and will never let you down!' Little easily overcame Trump's backing of his rival and beat McGeachin in the primary by nearly 60,000 votes. Six months later in the general election, Little easily earned a second term with nearly 61% of the vote, with his nearest contender winning about 20% of votes. A former four-term state senator, Little was appointed lieutenant governor in 2009 by then-Gov. Butch Otter, a fellow Republican. Little then won two terms as the second-in-command executive role before running to replace his predecessor. In Idaho's 2026 gubernatorial race, only Democrat Terri Pickens, of Boise, has announced her intention to run. She previously ran unsuccessfully for lieutenant governor in 2022. 'We need Idaho Gov. Brad Little to tell the Trump Regime to stay out of Idaho and stay away from the Idaho National Guard,' Pickens said in a statement released earlier Tuesday. 'Gov. Little, we need you to find your courage and stand up for our freedom.'

Western states like Idaho are drowning in legislation
Western states like Idaho are drowning in legislation

Yahoo

time7 days ago

  • Yahoo

Western states like Idaho are drowning in legislation

Members of the Idaho Senate work from the Senate floor on the morning of March 10, 2025, at the Idaho Capitol Building in Boise. (Pat Sutphin for the Idaho Capital Sun) Who knew there were this many things that had to be fixed? The legislative sessions in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and Washington are over. Depending on your political perspective, the benefits — or damages — will be felt for years to come. One thing that isn't in dispute? Lawmakers couldn't help but introduce a record number of bills in Idaho, Montana and Wyoming. Washington may also be added to that list, depending on what happens in the second part of its biennium. More pieces of legislation were prepared for Idaho's 2025 session than in the last 30 years In Idaho, lawmakers introduced nearly 800 pieces of legislation — the highest mark going back at least 16 years. Less than 50% of the legislation actually made it across the finish line. Higher numbers are expected in Idaho, as lawmakers now individually introduce and approve every state department budget, rather than just one large state budget. Still, the numbers are staggering, not only for lawmakers who work at the state capitol, but also for citizens who try to follow the session and be involved in the process. Making it more challenging in Idaho is the sometimes minimal lack of notice regarding hearings for bills that have been introduced. We've recommended that lawmakers commit to a Rule of Three to allow citizens more time to be engaged. In Montana, lawmakers also hit a record of 1,761 bills introduced, with a little more than half being signed into law by Gov. Greg Gianforte. Montana's joint Rule 40-40 'allows members of the Montana Legislature to request an unlimited number of bill or resolution drafts before December 5. After that date, a member may request the Legislative Council to prepare no more than seven bills or resolutions. Unused requests by one member may be granted to another member. The limits do not apply to code commissioner bills or committee bills.' In Wyoming, which divides sessions among general session years and budget years, lawmakers also hit a record of 556 bills introduced. But only 31% became law. Washington state lawmakers were by far the least productive, passing only 19.5% of the more than 2,000 bills they introduced. And they're not done yet, as Washington works on a biennium and lawmakers will return next January to continue increasing the number. Passing legislation certainly isn't a contest. And this column is in no way an encouragement to increase the across-the-finish-line percentages. But it is worth pointing out that introducing legislation takes time and resources — resources that are provided by taxpayers (so perhaps a new state rock shouldn't be high on a lawmaker's list). More bill introductions also make tracking your elected official's work more difficult. Some states, including Arizona, California, New Jersey, Colorado, North Carolina, Florida, North Dakota, Indiana, Louisiana and Montana have sought to restrict how many bills a legislator can introduce each session. Do all states need a rule that limits a lawmaker's appetite for more and more legislation? Maybe. But we'd rather see a self-imposed diet. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store