
Who will be the next pope? Leading candidate could be first Asian pontiff
Predicting who will be chosen as the next leader of the world's 1.2 billion Catholics is notoriously fraught with difficulties. In theory, any baptised Catholic male could be made Pope.
In practice, however, the next pontiff will likely be drawn from the cardinals who will gather in the Sistine Chapel in the Vatican for the secret papal election known as the conclave.
After Pope Benedict XVI stepped down in 2013, very few Vatican observers predicted that Jorge Mario Bergoglio from Argentina would be elected as Pope Francis.
This time around, there are no stand-out candidates, making the guessing game even more challenging.
But there are names of potential 'papabile' (likely candidates for the papacy) swirling around the corridors of the Vatican.
Their diverse origins reflect the vast global reach of the Catholic Church.
The contest is likely to come down to a battle between progressives who applaud the late pope's comparatively liberal stance on divorcees, gays and the plight of refugees, and conservatives who loathed his agenda.
Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, 67
The frontrunner in the betting markets would be the first Asian pope.
Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle, 67, from the Philippines, is a name often mentioned among liberals within the Catholic Church.
Dubbed 'the Asian Francis' for his good humour and progressive views, he has some of Pope Francis' humility – at the seminary in the Philippines where he lived for about 20 years, his room had no air-conditioning or television.
Even when made a bishop, he eschewed a car and went to work in a bus or 'jeepney'.
Edward Pentin, a Vatican expert and the author of The Next Pope: The Leading Cardinal Candidates, said: 'Five or six years ago, he was Pope Francis's favourite to succeed him. He's head of the important new super-dicastery for evangelisation. He's quite a strong contender. And he's still relatively young,'
His age may count against him, however – cardinals are wary of appointing a relatively young man because his papacy could last decades, thwarting their own ambitions and squeezing their chances of one day being elected.
Cardinal Peter Turkson, 76
A key adviser to Pope Francis on issues such as climate change and social justice, Cardinal Peter Turkson would be the first black pope.
Born in Ghana, Pope John Paul II appointed him archbishop of Cape Coast in 1992 and, 11 years later, made him the first cardinal in the history of the West African state.
Promotions continued under John Paul's successor, Benedict, who brought him to the Vatican in 2009 and made him the head of the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace – the body that promotes social justice, human rights and world peace.
In that role, he was one of the Pope's closest advisers on issues such as climate change and drew much attention by attending conferences such as the Davos Economic Forum.
Pope Francis merged Cardinal Turkson's department in 2016 with three other offices, leading to what some saw as a power struggle between him and another cardinal.
Cardinal Turkson resigned from that role in 2021 and was appointed to head two pontifical academies on sciences and social sciences.
In 2023, he told the BBC he prayed 'against' the possibility that he would be elected Pope, but some of his detractors said given his media appearances, it appeared he was campaigning for the job.
Cardinal Peter Erdo, 72
For the conservatives, there is Peter Erdo, a Hungarian cardinal and Archbishop of Esztergom-Budapest.
Mr Pentin said: 'Erdo is a leading contender for the conservative wing of the Church. People like him because he is a strong canonist – he's proficient in Church law.
'Many Catholics feel that the Church needs to be brought back from a sense of ecclesiastical lawlessness that evolved under Francis. Erdo would be a safe pair of hands.'
He ranks as a conservative in theology, and in speeches throughout Europe, he stresses the Christian roots of the continent. However, he is also seen to be pragmatic and never clashed openly with Francis, unlike other tradition-minded clerics.
That said, he raised eyebrows in the Vatican during the 2015 migrant crisis when he went against Pope Francis' call for churches to take in refugees, saying this would amount to human trafficking – seemingly aligning himself with Hungary's nationalist Prime Minister Viktor Orban.
Cardinal Pietro Parolin, 70
Pietro Parolin, the current secretary of state for the Vatican – in effect, its prime minister – is also considered to be a leading candidate.
His profile rose during the Ukraine war as the Vatican presented itself as an honest broker that could eventually mediate with Moscow to bring the conflict to a close.
Thomas Reese, an American Catholic priest and the author of Inside the Vatican, said: 'He's a very competent diplomat.
'He's been the brains behind Pope Francis' international diplomacy. He doesn't put a foot wrong.'
He is tarnished, however, by a property scandal in which the Vatican lost millions of euros through the bungled purchase of a former Harrods showroom in London.
'Questions will be raised about whether he was incompetent or delegated responsibility to subordinates. Either way, something went wrong, and he was the boss. There's an ongoing trial, so it could overshadow his papacy,' said Father Reese, who is also a columnist for Religion News Service.
Other candidates
Another Italian in the mix is Cardinal Matteo Zuppi, 69, the Archbishop of Bologna, a progressive who is regarded as having been close to Francis. The 69-year-old is closely affiliated with the Sant' Egidio Community, a Rome-based Catholic charity that was influential under Francis.
Cardinal Zuppi has extensive experience of conflict resolution. He was part of Sant'Egidio's team that helped negotiate the end of Mozambique's civil war in the 1990s and was named Francis' peace envoy for the war in Ukraine, shuttling between Kyiv, Washington, Moscow and Beijing.
He was appointed a cardinal in 2019 and is regarded as a progressive in the mould of Francis. His relative youth may count against him – cardinals could be wary of appointing someone whose papacy could last for many years, concerned that the direction he takes the Church would become too entrenched.
Aside from Cardinal Parolin and Cardinal Zuppi, there is a third Italian name coming to the fore: Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, a 59-year-old Franciscan who is the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem. He is Italian but has broad experience of the wider world, having spent decades in the Middle East.
He speaks Italian, Hebrew and English. His long years observing the Israel-Palestine conflict mean he is an expert at interfaith dialogue and mediation. He could be seen as a bridge between East and West. Francis appointed him a cardinal in 2023.
There has never been a Pope from North America but some Vatican observers think Cardinal Robert Prevost may be in with a chance. Born in Chicago, the 69-year-old has plenty of experience working in the global south – he was a missionary in Peru and then an archbishop.
He is currently the head of the Vatican's powerful dicastery (department) for bishops, in charge of vetting nominations for bishops around the world. But like Cardinal Zuppi, his relative youth may weigh against him – cardinals could be reluctant to choose a pope who could reign for a couple of decades.
Cardinal Jose Tolentino Calaca de Mendonca is a candidate from the liberal wing of the Church. He comes from the Portuguese island of Madeira and was appointed by Pope Francis as head of a department for culture and education.
Staying within Europe, Cardinal Mario Grech from Malta, the secretary-general of the Synod of bishops, is thought to have a decent chance of landing the top job.
He is seen as having been close to Pope Francis but a conservative at heart, meaning he could fit the bill as a compromise candidate.
Another African who is being mentioned is Cardinal Robert Sarah, from Guinea, who has criticised gender ideology and denounced Islamic radicalism.
Other names of 'papabile' (literally 'pope-able) cardinals include Jean-Marc Aveline from France, Joseph Tobin from the US, Juan Jose Omella Omella, the archbishop of Barcelona, and Fridolin Ambongo Besungu from the Democratic Republic of Congo who, if elected, would become the first black pope.
Forecasting a winner is a risky business
Since Pope Francis was elected in 2013, he has appointed about two-thirds of the cardinals who are eligible to elect the next pope.
'Close to half the cardinals are now from the global south. They have issues that are different to issues in Europe and the US. They're concerned about global warming, poverty, civil wars, corruption in government,' said Father Reese.
'All politics is local. Every cardinal wants to know how the next pope will be viewed in their country. Is he someone who will listen to me, who speaks my language? They could choose a cardinal from the global south.'
Vatican rules state that cardinals must reach a two-thirds majority when they gather to vote in the conclave, which is held inside the Sistine Chapel. For now, there is no leading candidate.
There are so many variables, and the process is so opaque, that forecasting a winner is a risky business.
'Last time around, when Benedict XVI resigned, I predicted that there was no way they would elect a Jesuit pope. They went ahead and elected a Jesuit pope. It proved how poor our understanding was,' said Father Reese.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Rhyl Journal
a day ago
- Rhyl Journal
Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's security trial
Mr Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. Mr Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical of Hong Kong's government. His high-profile case that has stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days, is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub. It is unclear when a verdict will be delivered. Prosecutor Anthony Chau on Monday discussed the security law concerning the collusion charges, arguing the request to impose sanctions must also include officials and not only states. He planned to lay out other principle issues in the afternoon and make his closing statement Tuesday. Earlier, prosecutors alleged Mr Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing 'under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy'. On the first day of his testimony, Mr Lai denied he had asked then-vice president Mike Pence and then-secretary of state Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests. When Mr Lai's lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the US government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Mr Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded. But Mr Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. Closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Mr Lai's health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Mr Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison. The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first. After Friday's hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Mr Lai's medical care. It said a medical examination of Mr Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate. When Mr Lai entered the courtroom, he waved and smiled to those sitting in the public gallery and briefly instructed his legal team in a voice audible to public attendees. He closed his eyes at times when the prosecution laid out its legal arguments. The heart monitor was delivered to Mr Lai and he had no complaints about his health, Mr Chau said. Mr Lai's years-long detention in solidarity confinement has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups. US president Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Mr Lai's release: 'I will get him out.' In a Fox News radio interview in August, Mr Trump denied saying he would save Mr Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up. 'I've already brought it up, and I'm going to do everything I can to save him,' he said. China has accused Mr Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs. Dozens of people waited in the rain on Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Mr Lai. Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Mr Lai's health as he looked visibly thinner and she would continue to pray for him. 'I wanted to let him know we are still here,' she said. When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city's civil liberties for 50 years. But critics say the promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city's stability.

South Wales Guardian
a day ago
- South Wales Guardian
Hong Kong court begins hearing final arguments in Jimmy Lai's security trial
Mr Lai, 77, was arrested in 2020 under a national security law imposed by Beijing following anti-government protests in 2019. He is being tried on charges of colluding with foreign forces to endanger national security and conspiring with others to issue seditious publications. Mr Lai founded Apple Daily, one of the local media outlets that was most critical of Hong Kong's government. His high-profile case that has stretched nearly 150 days, far beyond the original estimate of 80 days, is widely seen as a trial of press freedom and a test for judicial independence in the Asian financial hub. It is unclear when a verdict will be delivered. Prosecutor Anthony Chau on Monday discussed the security law concerning the collusion charges, arguing the request to impose sanctions must also include officials and not only states. He planned to lay out other principle issues in the afternoon and make his closing statement Tuesday. Earlier, prosecutors alleged Mr Lai asked foreign countries, especially the United States, to take actions against Beijing 'under the guise of fighting for freedom and democracy'. On the first day of his testimony, Mr Lai denied he had asked then-vice president Mike Pence and then-secretary of state Mike Pompeo to take action against Hong Kong and China during the 2019 protests. When Mr Lai's lawyer questioned him about an Apple Daily report saying he had asked the US government to sanction Beijing and Hong Kong leaders, he said he must have discussed it with Mr Pompeo, as he had no reason to doubt the accuracy of the report by the now-defunct newspaper he founded. But Mr Lai said he would not have encouraged foreign sanctions after the national security law was enacted on June 30, 2020. Closing arguments have been delayed twice, first due to weather then to concerns over Mr Lai's health. On Friday, his lawyer, Robert Pang, said Mr Lai had experienced heart palpitations while in prison. The judges wanted him to secure a heart monitor and medication first. After Friday's hearing, the Hong Kong government alleged foreign media outlets had attempted to mislead the public about Mr Lai's medical care. It said a medical examination of Mr Lai found no abnormalities and that the medical care he received in custody was adequate. When Mr Lai entered the courtroom, he waved and smiled to those sitting in the public gallery and briefly instructed his legal team in a voice audible to public attendees. He closed his eyes at times when the prosecution laid out its legal arguments. The heart monitor was delivered to Mr Lai and he had no complaints about his health, Mr Chau said. Mr Lai's years-long detention in solidarity confinement has drawn concerns from foreign governments and rights groups. US president Donald Trump, before being elected to his second term in November, said he would talk to Chinese leader Xi Jinping to seek Mr Lai's release: 'I will get him out.' In a Fox News radio interview in August, Mr Trump denied saying he would save Mr Lai, but rather that he would bring the issue up. 'I've already brought it up, and I'm going to do everything I can to save him,' he said. China has accused Mr Lai of stirring a rise in anti-China sentiments in Hong Kong and said it firmly opposes the interference of other countries in its internal affairs. Dozens of people waited in the rain on Monday for a seat in the main courtroom to see Mr Lai. Former Apple Daily reader Susan Li said she worried about Mr Lai's health as he looked visibly thinner and she would continue to pray for him. 'I wanted to let him know we are still here,' she said. When Hong Kong, a former British colony, returned to China in 1997, Beijing promised to retain the city's civil liberties for 50 years. But critics say the promise has become threadbare after the introduction of the security law, which Chinese and Hong Kong authorities insist was necessary for the city's stability.

Daily Mirror
a day ago
- Daily Mirror
'Nigel Farage is right - there IS two-tier justice. White people can get away with it'
Nigel Farage has called for police to release the ethnicity of suspects. Fleet Street Fox says one look at the statistics shows minorities get the rough end of the justice system If ever you needed proof that Nigel Farage is on a one-man mission to raise the nation's blood pressure over the embolism threshold, then his call to release the ethnicity of criminal suspects must surely fit the bill. If you really believe there's a two-tier justice system in which people get let off, or worse encouraged in criminality, then you'll pop a gasket just by his question appearing to confirm it. And if you suspect it's a finely-tuned dog-whistle more likely to jerk the nation's knee than a kick in the scrotum, you'll spit tacks that police have been advised to do as he asks. And if you've actually worked in the justice system, you may know that Michael Weston King's opinion on the matter got less attention than Nigel's, but was a damned sight more accurate. The grandfather of Bebe King, murdered in Southport at a summer dance school in a triple murder which sparked Far Right riots and misinformation, said: "The ethnicity of any perpetrator, or indeed their immigration status, is completely irrelevant. Mental health issues, and the propensity to commit crime, happens in any ethnicity, nationality or race." He pointed out the failures of education and social care which enabled the murders to take place, and he could have said the same about the vast majority of people who were attracted to those riots like moths to a flame. When angry white people were arrested in their hundreds at the direct instruction of the Prime Minister, they claimed to be victims of 'two-tier Keir'. In fact, the evidence shows they are the beneficiaries of a justice system stacked in their favour. If the justice system were entirely fair, 84% of suspects, arrests and convictions would be white. Instead at every stage the proportion of white suspects is lower, and the number of ethnic minorities is greater. To Nigel, and any passing eugenicist, this is because people of colour are pre-destined to criminality. And perhaps they are, in a way. For a third of teenage murder victims are black, compared to the 13% who are white. Between 2018 and 2022, white defendants served an average sentence of 21 months in jail, compared to 30 months for Asian offenders, and 28 months for black prisoners. If you're black, you will probably serve 68% of your sentence in custody, compared to 64% if you're white. And yes, that includes serious offences like rape and murder. Minorities are disproportionately more likely to be searched, to be prosecuted, to be a child who is prosecuted, and to reoffend. And get this: prison surveys show white prisoners feel more respected, less victimised by staff, and even get better access to showers. And we know this means the justice system is racist because of one more, literally-kills-people fact: the white people who are cautioned or sentenced have the lowest educational attainment of all ethnic groups. Doing badly at school increases everyone's risk of jail, but white people have to do REALLY badly at school. Even then, they are less likely to be jailed, are imprisoned for shorter periods, and enjoy it more. Nigel is not trying to fix a great criminal injustice, because we already know what the data shows. What he's calling for is more evidence that people of colour are more likely to have a lifetime of crap thrown at them, often by privately-educated ex-City traders in yellow trousers whose voices travel a lot further than their brains. But then, fixing it is not actually the point: all Nigel wants to do is normalise a trope, and blame behaviour on skin colour. The real two-tier system in this country is about class, education, and opportunity. About being able to see the shiny palaces of power, but not the route by which you could get there. There are no stepping stones between the social housing estates and the skyscrapers that tower over them, and it's the inability to migrate that is the real root of half this nation's problems. The other half are all down to the refusal to notice. According to the Ministry of Justice, offenders from all ethnic groups are more likely to have been on free school meals than the general population. The people who fill our prisons are not a rainbow coalition of minorities. It's the kids who were excluded, who fell through the cracks of a safety net which after years of Treasury cutbacks is now the kind of rope bridge even Indiana Jones would hesitate to trust. Yet Nigel is getting his way, with a handful of MPs and the combined professionalism of Del Boy Trotter and his pals on a coach trip to Margate. Police have been issued guidelines, welcomed by the Home Secretary, that they should 'consider' releasing the ethnicity of suspects. Presumably they think it will both show up and shut up Nigel, but neither seems likely. To admit that crime is driven by poverty, trauma and poor education means spending money, changing policies, and admitting failures, which is why all previous governments have shrunk from it. They left a void which racists can populate with a bogeyman, and if he happens to be black, well, black people are more likely to go to prison, innit? It would make more sense for police to publish a suspect's school report: the colour of a person's childhood matters more than that of their skin. And if you want proof, look no further than the talentless, persistently-absent, achievement-free, gobby pub-bore grifter Nigel Farage, who wouldn't be invited on Question Time quite so often if he was black, and from Hulme, and actually knew what he was talking about.



