‘Greedy & spiteful' mum who ‘looted' £50,000 inheritance left for her two daughters, 12 & 15, by their granny is jailed
Katherine Hill, 54, and her father Gerald Hill, 94, staged a "blatant and brazen" fraud, taking every penny inherited by the two girls from their beloved gran.
3
3
The sizeable £50,000 inheritance was generously gifted for Gemma and Jessica Thomas by their grandmother Margaret Hill in a trust for their 25th birthdays.
Margaret died in 2013 and placed the money for the two girls in a trust when Jessica was 12 and Gemma was 15.
Katherine Hill and her father Gerald were trustees of the account - but drained it completely within just over a year while the girls were still children.
A court heard that due to inflation the sum stolen by their "greedy and spiteful" mother and grandfather was now worth in the region of £65,000.
But their shameless mother and grandfather tried to lie their way out of it by claiming they posted cash in envelopes through the girls' letterboxes.
However the Hills were found guilty - with Katherine Hill jailed for 30 months and her father handed a 12 month suspended sentence.
The judge told Hill she stole the money because she was 'so annoyed that your daughters received more money than you, that you took their inheritance'.
The court heard Katherine Hill had placed the money into an instant access Barclays Everyday Saver account despite being advised not to.
She and her father both had cards for the account and within 12 months of it opening most of the £50,000 had been withdrawn through cash withdrawals.
The fraud was only realised in 2018 when one of the girls asked for her money early so she could buy a house with her boyfriend.
Sickening moment two school children steal puppy from Glasgow garden
The Hills returned to Swansea Crown Court for a Proceeds of Crime Hearing in a bid to claw back their ill-gotten gains.
Prosecutor James Hartson said Hill initially told investigators she had a 50 per cent equity share in her partner's home after paying the mortgage for nine years.
But she later withdrew the claim and said she had no equitable right to the house - with Mr Hartson saying her change of stance was a "thoroughly dishonest" attempt to avoid payment.
Judge, Recorder Greg Bull KC ruled in favour of the prosecution, and said Hill had "laundered" some of her daughters' money by paying her partner's mortgage.
He said Hill and window cleaner Phillip Lloyd "lived together as man and wife" and she could repay her daughters by raising equity from their home.
Recorder Bull said: "It is significant that investigations could not reveal what had happened either to that £50,000, or to what had happened to other relatively substantial sums left to Katherine Hill after her mother's demise.
"She still maintains that she has never received the £50,000. I disbelieve her on that and I find her answer to be totally untruthful.
"Mr Lloyd is fully aware of what happened to that £50,000 and has probably helped her at least launder it, if not enjoy the fruits of her fraud."
Recorder Bull said: "That £50,000 was used for the benefit of both of them, it would have been used to pay the mortgage, it would have been used to pay their utilities, it would have used to enjoy their lifestyles - a lifestyle that they would not have been able to afford."
"This is a couple who lived as man and wife, they shared their income and they shared the money looted by Miss Hill from her daughters."
Katherine Hill was told she must pay £50,000 in three months or face six month prison in default.
Mr Hill was ordered to pay £6,000 for his part in the fraud or face three months in prison.
The court heard if neither of the Hills pay they will be jailed but their debts would not be cleared.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Homeowners could be hit with new tax as Chancellor aims to fill ‘£41 billion shortfall'
A Treasury minister has not ruled out hitting owners of high-value houses with capital gains tax (CGT) when they sell their family home. Chancellor Rachel Reeves is reported to be considering ending the current exemption from CGT for primary residences as she seeks ways to raise cash in the face of dire warnings about the state of the public finances. Such a move would see higher-rate taxpayers pay 24 per cent of any gain in the value of their home, while basic rate taxpayers would be hit with an 18 per cent levy. The Times reported that under the proposals being considered for the autumn budget, the private residence relief would end for properties above a certain threshold. The threshold is still under consideration but a £1.5 million starting point would hit around 120,000 homeowners who are higher-rate taxpayers with capital gains tax bills of £199,973, the newspaper reported. Treasury minister Torsten Bell declined to rule out hitting people selling their homes with CGT, insisting any potential changes were matters for the Chancellor and would be set out at a budget. Asked to rule out the move, the pensions minister told broadcasters: 'Working people and people's living standards is what this Government is all about. 'We've seen wages rise more in the first 10 months of this Government than the first 10 years of the last Conservative government. 'But of course, as you know, questions for tax are for the budget and they're for chancellors.' Ending primary residence relief could deter people from selling their homes, slowing the housing market and could have a particular impact for older people looking to downsize. The Labour government has ruled out increasing income tax, employees' national insurance contributions and VAT, restricting Ms Reeves' options when it comes to raising money. The scale of the challenge facing her in the autumn budget was illustrated by the NIESR economic think tank warning this month that Ms Reeves is set for a £41 billion shortfall on her self-imposed rule of balancing day-to-day spending with tax receipts in 2029-30. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch hit out at the Chancellor's 'disastrous economic mismanagement' and said the Government was 'stuck in a doom loop of low growth and higher taxes'. She said: 'We should be cutting spending, cutting taxes, and backing the makers who keep our country going.' Any move to hit expensive properties would be likely to impact more heavily on London than other parts of the country. Analysis by Rightmove suggested 10.9 per cent of homes for sale in the capital would exceed a £1.5 million threshold, compared with 1.6 per cent outside London. Rightmove's Colleen Babcock said: 'In essence, this would predominantly be a tax on the most expensive areas of London and the South East. 'The London market is already feeling the effects of taxation more acutely than other parts of England, and this is likely to deter some moves at the upper end.'
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Prince Andrew book edits out claims about Melania Trump's relationship to Epstein
A new book about the Duke of York has been edited to remove claims about Melania Trump's relationship with Jeffery Epstein. The book, called Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York, written by Andrew Lownie, has made headlines in recent weeks after making claims about the disgraced duke's life. An entire chapter is dedicated to Prince Andrew's infamous friendship with Epstein, the late convicted sex offender. The chapter also included a claim that Donald Trump and his wife had been introduced by the disgraced financier - which has now been edited out of future editions. The president and first lady have long said they were introduced by Paolo Zampolli, a modeling agent, at a New York Fashion Week party in 1998. A HarperCollins UK spokesperson said: 'We can confirm that several passages from Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York by Andrew Lownie have been removed in consultation with the author. Entitled is published in the UK by HarperCollins. In the US the book is self-published by Mr Lownie.' It is understood that the changes will appear in all future print editions of the book and that the ebook and audio book have already been updated to reflect these changes. However, it is estimated to have been printed in around 60,000 copies of the book already. The decision comes after Mrs Trump threatened to sue Hunter Biden, the son of former US President Joe Biden, for claiming Epstein introduced her and Mr Trump in the late 1990s. The statements are false, defamatory, and 'extremely salacious,' Melania Trump's lawyer, Alejandro Brito, wrote in the letter to Biden. The letter demanded that Biden walk back the claim and apologise or face legal action for 'over $1bn in damages'. It also accuses the former president's son of having a 'vast history of trading on the names of others' and repeating the claim 'to draw attention to yourself.' Hunter Biden has refused to apologise after the first lady threatened legal action. Democratic strategist James Carville was also forced to take down parts of a podcast episode that alleged a connection between her and Jeffrey Epstein, following involvement from the first lady's lawyer earlier this month. 'First Lady Melania Trump's attorneys are actively ensuring immediate retractions and apologies by those who spread malicious, defamatory falsehoods. The true account of how the First Lady met President Trump is in her best-selling book, Melania,' a spokesperson for the first lady's office previously told The Independent. The book has included a number of accusations about Prince Andrew, including claims of affairs, fights with Prince Harry and of being ' unbelievably cruel ' to royal staff. One passage says Andrew called a staff member in the Royal Household a 'f***ing imbecile' for not referring to the Queen Mother by her full title in 2005. According to the book, Prince Andrew's catchphrase when dealing with royal staff was 'I want this done and I want this done now. Do it!'
The Independent
5 minutes ago
- The Independent
Educational inequalities have ‘grown wider' since the pandemic
A report by the Institute for Government warns that educational inequalities in England have 'grown wider and more pronounced' since the COVID-19 pandemic. Pupils in London are outperforming those in other regions, with the attainment gap between the capital and the rest of the country growing since 2019. The disparity in GCSE attainment between disadvantaged and non-disadvantaged students has increased, with poor white children particularly affected. The Institute for Government criticised the government for lacking a clear vision or plan to address these growing inequalities, despite commitments to close the disadvantage gap. Experts and politicians are calling for urgent action, including addressing funding disparities and tackling high pupil absence rates, to reverse the decline in educational outcomes.
