Town Team formed to help with regeneration of Wicklow village
This initiative aligns with the national Town Centre First Policy and has been developed in close partnership with Wicklow County Council.
The Rathdrum Town Team unites local stakeholders, business owners, community groups, and public representatives who share a vision of promoting sustainable growth and well-being in Rathdrum. The team will focus on strategic actions to support local businesses, improve public spaces and elevate Rathdrum's profile as a vibrant destination for both residents and visitors.
There was strong local support on the night, with Cathaoirleach of Arklow Municipal District Cllr. Pat Kennedy, attending alongside fellow councillors Pier Leonard and Warren O'Toole. They joined community members in celebrating the establishment of the team.
Cathaoirleach of Arklow Municipal District Cllr. Pat Kennedy, said: "I warmly welcome the formation of the Rathdrum Town Team. This initiative is a wonderful example of how collaboration between local people, businesses, and the Council can create positive momentum for Rathdrum.
"Together, we can build a stronger, more vibrant Rathdrum that supports our community, local economy, and enhances the quality of life for everyone who lives here or visits."
Tim Ryan, chairperson of the Rathdrum Town Team, stated: "We are pleased to bring together people from all parts of the community to make Rathdrum a welcoming and lively town. This team is all about supporting each other and creating a great place for everyone."
Stephen Clarke, town regeneration officer from Wicklow County Council, added: 'It's fantastic to see this community-driven initiative taking shape. Wicklow County Council is here to support the Rathdrum Town Team as they help bring new energy to their town."
Everyone in the community is asked to get involved, share ideas, and help make Rathdrum an even better place for all.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Irish Sun
3 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
Town centre dubbed ‘long-forgotten eyesore' set for £65m transformation into ‘stunning' landmark and plaza
A TOWN centre dubbed a "long forgotten eyesore" is set to undergo a massive £65 million transformation. The vision is to build a "stunning" landmark building in the left-behind area. Advertisement 2 The town centre has been dubbed a "long forgotten eyesore" Credit: Alamy Ashfield District Council has revealed major plans for what it calls the "North Kirkby Gateway". The project will redevelop the Pond Hole site in Kirkby-in-Ashfield, Nottinghamshire, as well as the former factory shop on Ellis Street. The old factory will be turned into a "striking landmark building" that will be home to 24 town centre apartments and business units along Kirkby Plaza. New parking spaces will also be introduced as well as 55 units providing retirement living for Ashfield residents. Advertisement Read more News The council plans to submit a planning application in Autumn 2025 and is currently in the process of appointing a contractor to deliver the project. Work could get underway as soon as early 2026 with the view of completing the redevelopment by Spring 2027. The plans are just one of the Council's projects being funded by the £62.6 million Towns Fund. The Towns Fund has already seen the completion of the Planetarium and Science Discovery Centre at Sherwood Observatory as well as a redesign of Portland Square and upcoming West Kirkby Gateway project. Advertisement Most read in The Sun Councillor Warren Nuttall, who represents Greenwood and Summit on Ashfield District Council, said: "This site has become an eyesore and is in desperate need of transforming to create a stunning gateway into Kirkby. "We are excited to be able to share these plans for North Kirkby Gateway, offering desirable town centre living, community space and business opportunities. "We are committed to developing these sites that appear to be long forgotten into somewhere Ashfield can be proud of. "It is being funded by the council's £62.6 million Towns Fund." Advertisement The council has said the demolition of the old factory shop building later this year will be the first milestone. Work on the derelict Pond Hole site is already underway and is being carried out by Langcroft Developments. Spokesman for the company, Craig Cameron, announced work was now underway in what is "a big step forward in bringing this exciting regeneration project to life". Huge new £1.3billion redevelopment to create new 'cultural hub' in London He said: "This marks a key moment for the Ashfield Town Fund programme and we're proud to be playing our part by delivering much-needed, high-quality and affordable provisions designed with older residents in mind - promoting independent living in a safe, accessible setting. Advertisement "We've appointed CPMG Architects to lead the design and planning process and we're working closely with Ashfield District Council to make sure the scheme ties in with the wider vision for the area - from housing and skills to enterprise and community infrastructure. "We've had great support from the Council, the UK Government and the local community so far and with grant funding in place, we've already started the remediation and enabling works to help move things forward quickly." Separately, Ashfield District Council also lodged a planning application last October for the redevelopment of a new school. The Outwood Academy, formerly known as Kirkby College, has a capacity for about 700 pupils with students potentially moving into the new building by September 2027. Advertisement Kirkby-in-Ashfield isn't the only area to see a major redevelopment either. Sweeping changes to Leicester Market are on track to be completed by the end of next year. Elsewhere, Advertisement From retail and housing to new public spaces and improvements to the train station, the 2 Work could be underway as soon as early 2026 and completed by 2027 Credit: Ashfield District Council
Irish Independent
9 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Developer lodges plans for second Wicklow solar farm with 40-year lifespan
Located in the townland of Ballymoney, just off the M11, the proposed development is the second planned by BNRG Ballymoney Limited, which received consent for a solar farm (covering up to 9.8-hectares) on a neighbouring 19-hectare site in 2019, despite two submissions raising concerns around privacy, biodiversity and visual impact, before being approved by An Bord Pleanála in 2020 after a third party appeal. BNRG Ballymoney Limited's latest application proposes to construct PV panels mounted on metal support structures arranged in rows running east to west, covering a total area of 31.6 sqm, along with a battery energy storage system (BESS), with access provided via the neighbouring, approved solar farm. As revealed in a search of Wicklow County Council (WCC) and An Bord Pleanála planning portals by Neo Environmental, acting on behalf of BNRG Ballymoney Limited, '10 solar farms are consented within a 5km radius of the application site'. The solar farm, battery energy storage system BESS and main infrastructure, including inverter stations, MV stations, new access tracks, underground cabling, a temporary construction compound and a substation, will occupy five fields of agricultural land currently being used for arable farming, with perimeter fencing surrounding it, 16 CCTV cameras and access gates. In Neo Environmental Ltd's planning statement, a consultant noted that, overall, the proposed footprint constitutes a 'relatively small percentage of the total area of the application site', with 16,687.5 sqm allocated for infrastructure (c. 6.14pc of the site area). Commenting on the proposed 40-year lifespan of the development, the consultant noted that WCC would appreciate from their experience with renewable energy projects that developers have 'historically used an operational period of approximately 30 years when seeking planning consent for such schemes'. 'These timescales were initially led by manufacturing guidelines and were originally based upon the expected lifespan of the infrastructure incorporated within the proposals,' they wrote. 'However, by virtue of technological advancements and industry experience, evidence now indicates that the expected operational lifespan of modern solar PV technology significantly exceeds the previously estimated 30 years. 'The proposed layout and design is considered to strike an optimum balance between clean energy production and all environmental and technical considerations.' A decision is due on the application by July 9, with public submissions accepted by Wicklow County Council until June 18.
Irish Independent
14 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Row over funding and property tax vote breaks out at Arklow council meeting
Arklow councillors convened at their May meeting to vote on the development of projects using a €235,650 pot ring-fenced for discretionary funding allocated to them by Wicklow County Council (WCC) via the Local Property Tax (LPT), which elected WCC members voted to maintain in October, at the same level as the past three years – an upward variation of the basic rate by 6pc. Like three of the four other municipal districts in Wicklow, Arklow MD councillors have traditionally put forward notice of motions, with any projects agreed upon funded through the MD's total discretionary allocation. Before a review of this year's discretionary funded projects could take place, leas cathaoirleach, Cllr Peir Leonard, said that she felt very strongly about 'fairness and equality' and making decisions in a timely manner to ensure 'the best value for every penny of that money for our communities' and every councillor has time to 'consider what they represent and what they want to do with a fair share of money'. 'I would like to propose that we look at doing the discretionary in a different way going forward, and that the discretionary funding is split between the six members so that each member can do projects for their share,' the Independent councillor said. 'They can join other members to pool money for bigger projects. I think Wexford County Council do it that way, and other municipal districts, and I just think it's a fairer way, so people can consider, not be under pressure and plan projects knowing there is some funding to do it on behalf of people they represent.' Nodding in agreement, Cllr Warren O'Toole said that, although all the ideas brought forward in the chamber are 'obviously good ideas', the change would allow 'a broader scope on things'. Noting that it's 'entirely up to the members how it is distributed', district manager Leonora Earls explained that, in Arklow, staff review motions put forth by councillors that were passed and involve physical works, then create a list of projects that district engineer Avril Hill had evaluated and costed. 'We also allocate discretionary funding outside of motions, via correspondence etc,' she added. Concerned that a division of the discretionary fund would lead to a narrower geographical spread of works, cathaoirleach, Cllr Pat Kennedy said: 'I actually think we do it in a very fair way – if we split that among six people, we're not going to have anything to show for it. 'We have two towns and 10 villages, and normally what we try to do is spread it across all of them – that is what we have done every year. If we split that up into six slices of the cake, there will be nothing to show for it anywhere. 'A lot of councillors out there would like to have our system, and it would not be very good for the whole MD if we change it.' ADVERTISEMENT Learn more Interjecting, district administrator Alvina Brehony said that every district is different and that comparisons with Wexford should not be drawn as 'they have a different pot and how it's allocated'. 'Again, it's up to yourselves to decide, but I know speaking with some of your colleagues in their areas, they actually think that this way of doing it is the fairest way,' she added. After Cllr Leonard proposed to put it to a vote, Ms Hill noted that the very nature of notice of motions resulted in a spread of projects across the district, and that her understanding was that discretionary funding was primarily for public realm projects, to which Cllr Leonard said she would be happy to allocate all her share towards public realm projects in a geographical spread 'to make our towns more accessible and user friendly'. Visibly perturbed, Cllr Sylvester Bourke raised the issue of the LPT vote, which was a source of discord in the Arklow chamber in 2023, when a motion put forth by Cllr Leonard was not supported because she had not voted to increase the LPT. 'I think we're forgetting something here – there wouldn't be any discretionary funding unless councillors voted for it in the first place, and some of us voted against discretionary funding,' Cllr Bourke said. 'That doesn't give you the right – it's not your money, and that doesn't give you the right to take all that money,' Cllr O'Toole responded. 'Does it not? I don't know,' Cllr Bourke replied. 'It's a discussion that causes problems for councillors who vote for the discretionary fund, who feel they're being progressive in creating that fund.' 'People like myself, who voted against it, and will vote against it again, and again, and again, I'm representing people that have paid into that, including myself, and I'm representing those people who can't afford that,' Cllr O'Toole said. 'There are other ways of saving money. Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael have wasted a lot of money, but we won't go down them roads.' Responding to the Sinn Féin councillor, Fianna Fáil councillor Pat Fitzgerald said: 'You shouldn't, because there are other people wasting money too over the years', before Cllr O'Toole continued: 'I don't think an argument can be had to say someone who votes against it doesn't have a right to spend it. 'People we represent have elected us. We are spending it on them. 'We all respect each other, and we all want good for our communities. I don't think it's going to be one person deviating away.' Asked to formalise her proposal, Cllr Leonard outlined the change to splitting the discretionary budget, to avoid a lot of pressure to 'railroad stuff through', with each member having the option to pool their money towards projects in a notice of motion. After being asked if all the discretionary-funded motions stretching back to March 2025 would be scrapped, Cllr Leonard reiterated her calls for a postponement of the agenda item. 'This is very rushed, and I think we should postpone until our June meeting and have a workshop about it in between to give everybody time, and then we can come back and vote on it and put the proposals in,' she said. After Cllr Kennedy enquired if the delay would affect contractors' prices for the projects, Ms Hill said that they may need to re-tender for some projects, adding: 'Basically, the longer it goes into the year, the less time you have to do it.' Before looking for an agreement on the postponement, Ms Earls and Ms Brehony highlighted the Baltinglass Municipal District, the only district in the county that divides their discretionary budget, with Ms Brehony saying that she had spoken to colleagues out west, and 'you can't get a whole lot more done for your money'. After Cllr Fitzgerald had said that it was a 'bit late to bring this up now' and that he hadn't 'heard anyone talking about it throughout the year', Cllr Bourke said he didn't agree with the postponement or the proposal. 'I won't be changing my approach, because I have gone out on a political limb at voting time for this LPT,' he continued. 'I don't like having to do it, but it does create that fund. We might as well all give up voting for the LPT and set it at zero if that's the case, because I'm not prepared to see one sixth of it (in all due respect) going to you, Warren and Cllr Leonard. 'I know you represent people, too, but we're the ones who have taken the political hit at voting time. 'I took the hit. You didn't, but you want to spend it equally? That doesn't seem fair to me.' After Cllr O'Toole said that he respected what Cllr Bourke was saying, but 'totally disagreed', the discussion shifted to notice of motions and the quantity put forth by each councillor, with Cllr Miriam Murphy questioning whether all the elected members should have an equal amount of motions, adding: 'If you don't have a motion in, you don't get work done'. 'I do understand how some members feel left out, as yourself (Cllr Kennedy) and Cllr Fitzgerald have a history of motions – the highest number – and you get the highest spend,' Cllr Bourke commented. 'They are projects that I've mostly supported, because they benefited my community as well.' Breaking the tension and drawing a cacophony of laughter, Cllr Kennedy noted a point of clarity, directing Cllr Bourke's attention to the list, of which the majority of projects were attached to his motions, with Cllr Bourke jokingly responding: 'This is the first time in all my years!' Concluding the discussion, the councillors agreed to the postponement and a special meeting at the end of the month, before Cllr Kennedy cautioned: 'We're talking about changing something that works, be careful we don't break it'.
