logo
The Fascinating History Of Mopar: What It Means And Which Cars Count

The Fascinating History Of Mopar: What It Means And Which Cars Count

Yahoo25-02-2025

A lot of weird terms are pretty synonymous with American car culture, and if you ever make it to a Cars and Coffee meet, you'll probably hear people shouting about lemons, grease monkeys, and Mopar. Mopar is a term that's almost as synonymous with American car culture as Mustangs and pickup trucks, but have you ever wondered where the phrase actually comes from?
Mopar is a term tied to everything Chrysler, which today is a branch of the automotive giant, Stellantis. That wasn't always the case, though, and back in the 1930s, Chrysler was just a plucky American giant out to get as many people as possible on the roads, and make a ton of money in the process.
As well as selling cars and engines, Chrysler wanted a new product that it could offer owners, something that they would all need to keep in their car's engine and replace from time to time, which would bring them crawling back to Chrysler for more. That product was antifreeze, which was launched under the Chrysler Motor Parts Corporation way back in 1937.
Read more: Judge Takes Away Man's Dodge Charger Hellcat After He Acted Like A Hellcat Owner
The Chrysler Motor Parts Corporation was formed, but the name was shortened for the antifreeze products that it began shipping in 1937. Motor Parts morphed into the portmanteau Mopar for the first products, and by the 1940s the company was shipping all manner of parts and accessories under the name. The company offered components for other Chrysler brands, like Dodge and Plymouth, and even tried its hand at weapons and vehicles for the front line in the Second World War, reports SlashGear.
In the years since, the brand grew from strength to strength, with Mopar sponsoring race teams and even offering up its own packaged models in cars like the Dodge Dart and Plymouth Barracuda Hemi. Now, the name can be linked to all manner of American brands, as MotorTrend explains:
When talking with an enthusiast, a Mopar car is one built by one of the original Chrysler Corp. brands, which in order of ascendancy are Plymouth, Dodge, DeSoto, Ram, Chrysler, and Imperial. Out of those original legacy brands, only Dodge, Ram, and Chrysler remain. These legacy brands aren't the only ones considered Mopars: Chrysler bought the AMC, Eagle, and Jeep brands in 1987, and as a result Mopar cognoscenti welcomed Jeep (the only one of the three to survive) as part of the modern Mopar brand family.
These days, Mopar makes components for every Chrysler brand, but there's one category of cars that will always be synonymous with the parts company: muscle cars.
The obvious differentiator between a regular muscle car and a Mopar muscle car is that it must be made by a brand tied to Chrysler. You're never going to hear anyone describe their Ford Mustang as being filled with Mopar, unless something really weird has happened, but you might hear of someone fitting Mopar components to an old Plymouth.
This is because Mopar cars are only made by brands in the original Chrysler Corporation stable, which includes Chrysler (obviously), Dodge, Ram, Plymouth, Imperial, and DeSoto, adds SlashGear. In 1987, the American Motors Corporation was added to the mix, which meant that AMC, Eagle, and Jeep were all added to the lineup.
When it comes to finding which muscle cars are Mopar, you have to look at Plymouth and Dodge. In the Plymouth lineup, the Mopar muscle cars include the Duster (V-8 only), Road Runner, GTX, Superbird, Belvedere, Fury (B-Body only), Barracuda (A-Body), and 'Cuda (E-Body) models. Dodge, meanwhile, offers up the Demon (V-8 only), Polara, Coronet, Super Bee, Charger, Daytona, Dart (V-8 only), and Challenger as its Mopar contenders.
Today, Mopar services much more than classic muscle cars. Since coming under the Stellantis umbrella in 2021, it has branched out to become the de facto supplier of original equipment and aftermarket accessories for the automaker in North America.
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped
Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped

There's little left for us to say that can further embarrass the Tesla Cybertruck, a vehicle that was supposed to be the culmination of Elon Musk's genius. And maybe this is what Musk's genius looks like. The luckless EV has faced eight recalls so far, and its trademark stainless steel panels, when they aren't flying off, have demonstrated that they're better at serving as a shiny canvas for spray paint than as the armor of an "apocalypse-proof" tank. But somehow, its already dire sales are now even worse than expected. In the entire first quarter of 2025, Tesla has managed to sell just 7,100 Cybertrucks in the US, according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility cited by the Wall Street Journal. It's an astounding and rapid plummet, when in the fourth quarter of 2024, Tesla sold close to double that amount, with roughly 13,000 Cybertrucks. A lot changed between those two quarters — like Musk embarking on a spectacular speedrun to destroy his and Tesla's image, mainly by leading the Trump administration's charge to gut the federal government. These actions, and Musk's personal espousing of far-right politics, sparked worldwide protests against him and his automaker. It has yet to recover, with Tesla's total sales in the US dropping nine percent in the first three months of this year. There are other factors at play, too, like the success of its Chinese competitors and its aging vehicle lineup, but the imploded brand reputation looms largest. And more than any other of its vehicles, the Cybertruck for one reason or another has embodied the public's souring sentiment on Musk, becoming prime targets for vandalism. They're also notoriously unreliable, sold for nothing less than $100,000 before cheaper $70,000 versions were desperately rolled out, and launched with a range over 150 miles shorter than what Musk promised. In all of 2024, the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks. The most recent quarter's tally makes Musk previous boast that the automaker would sell up to half a million Cybertrucks per year even more ridiculous. Is it any wonder that buyers are staying away? So few people want to buy these things that in May Electrek reported that Tesla was sitting on an inventory worth $800 million of 10,000 unsold Cybertrucks — an embarrassment as much as it is a logistical headache. Dealerships have resorted to dumping their glut of the unorthodox pickup trucks in deserted parking lots. The pain isn't likely to stop anytime soon. Trump's tariffs, which factored into Musk's fallout with the president, will drive up the costs of car parts. The administration also plans to axe tax credits for purchasing EVs, demolishing a huge incentive for American consumers to buy from automakers like Tesla. More on Tesla: Terrifying Footage Shows Self-Driving Tesla Get Confused by the Sun, Mow Down Innocent Grandmother Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like
You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

You Are Completely Unprepared for What Tesla's Robotaxi Actually Looks Like

We've finally gotten a glimpse at one of Tesla's Robotaxis in action. But don't expect your socks to be blown off. As seen in a bystander's footage taken in Austin, Texas, that Elon Musk has proudly reshared, it's literally just a black Model Y with the word "Robotaxi" scrawled on the side in a painfully outdated graffiti font. The future is truly upon us. "Beautifully simple design," Musk tweeted, presumably through a pained grimace. To be clear, this isn't the Cybercab, Tesla's currently in-development car that's supposed to function exclusively as an autonomous taxi, with an extremely boneheaded design that features only two seats and no steering wheel. What we're seeing, instead, is a regular Tesla with a software update (and a mid-life crisis design flourish.) "These are unmodified Tesla cars coming straight from the factory," Musk explained in a followup tweet, "meaning that every Tesla coming out of our factories is capable of unsupervised self-driving!" The self-driving cabs are right around the corner. According to a Bloomberg report last month, Tesla plans to launch its Robotaxi service in Austin on June 12, with development reportedly ahead of schedule. Around the time of the reporting, Musk confirmed in a tweet that the automaker had completed its first test of operating a Robotaxi with no human behind the wheel on a public road. In the recent footage, there was no driver physically present, either. The cab service will start with about 10 vehicles operating in the city, according to Musk. At first, only Tesla employees will be allowed to ride in them. But Musk insisted that the service will quickly expand, if all goes to plan. In one of his trademark grand promises, the billionaire estimated that the city would be crawling with over 1,000 Tesla robotaxis "within a few months" of launching, and upped the ante further by adding that more than a million self-driving cars would be roaming American roads by the end of 2026. There are still huge question marks hovering over the entire thing. Tesla's current self-driving offerings, like its misleadingly named Full Self-Driving feature, are considered to have Level 2 autonomy. That means a human driver must be physically present and ready to take control at any moment. But Robotaxis will need to operate at Level 4 autonomy and higher, which entails they're capable of driving with no human present, though only in limited conditions. That's a concerning leap, as Tesla's safety record with its existing FSD is already questionable, and it's yet to demonstrate that it can even accomplish Level 3. The choice of location explains a lot. Texas virtually has no special regulations in place for autonomous vehicles. A prospective Robotaxi basically just has to follow the same safety requirements as any other car, along with having cameras and other data recording systems installed. And due to a 2017 Texas law, cities can't intervene by imposing their own regulations, leaving everything handled by the state. At this stage, it's also unclear how Tesla plans to teleoperate the vehicles, a term that describes the use of humans to remotely supervise or even completely control the Robotaxis as they prowl public roads — something that Tesla's competitors in the space also do, though they try to avoid talking about. Tesla has put up listings for developing a teleoperation system — but, perhaps tellingly, has avoided providing any further details. More on Tesla: Cybertruck Sales Are So Bad That We Gasped

GM to invest $4 billion in U.S. factories as tariffs mount and EVs slow
GM to invest $4 billion in U.S. factories as tariffs mount and EVs slow

Axios

time7 hours ago

  • Axios

GM to invest $4 billion in U.S. factories as tariffs mount and EVs slow

General Motors is investing $4 billion to produce more gasoline vehicles in the U.S. to cope with the twin challenges of high tariffs and low demand for electric vehicles. Why it matters: The plan — which includes shifting some production from Mexico — will no doubt be viewed as a win for President Trump's tariff policies. But there's also a practical reason: if GM can avoid tariffs by building more cars in the U.S., it might as well build ones it knows it can sell. Driving the news: GM is adding production at plants in Michigan, Kansas and Tennessee beginning in 2027 GM's Orion Assembly plant near Detroit will be retooled to produce gas-powered full-size SUVs and pickups, scrapping an earlier plan to build electric pickups there. To meet strong demand for its gas-powered Chevrolet Equinox, GM is also adding production at its Fairfax Assembly plant near Kansas City, a portion of which is moving from Mexico. GM is also moving production of the gas-powered Chevrolet Blazer from Mexico to its Spring Hill, Tennessee, plant. What they're saying: "We believe the future of transportation will be driven by American innovation and manufacturing expertise," GM CEO Mary Barra said in a release. "Today's announcement demonstrates our ongoing commitment to build vehicles in the U.S and to support American jobs. We're focused on giving customers choice and offering a broad range of vehicles they love." Between the lines: Under Barra, GM bet heavily on electric vehicles, but sales have been slower than expected. The manufacturing moves allow the carmaker to expand production of high-profit vehicles most in demand — gas-powered trucks and SUVs — while leveraging excess U.S. factory capacity to avoid tariffs. GM said it will continue to produce battery-electric versions of the Equinox and Blazer in Mexico. It will also build some gasoline-powered Equinox vehicles in Mexico for non-U.S. markets. What to watch: GM said it is on track to begin production of the 2027 Chevrolet Bolt EV in Fairfax by the end of this year.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store