US military fuel tanker collides with chemical cargo ship (VIDEO)
A US-flagged fuel tanker collided with a Portuguese-flagged cargo ship in the North Sea near the East Yorkshire coast on Monday, leaving both vessels heavily damaged and on fire.
Ship-tracking data indicates that the MV Stena Immaculate was anchored near the port of Grimsby when the MV Solong struck its port side at approximately 9:48am local time.
The impact caused multiple explosions and ruptured one of the tanker's cargo tanks, leading to a significant fuel spill.
The UK Maritime and Coastguard Agency responded promptly, deploying rescue helicopters, lifeboats from multiple locations, and firefighting vessels to the scene. Of the 37 crew members from both vessels, 36 were rescued and brought ashore, with one individual hospitalized. One crew member from the Solong remains unaccounted for after an extensive search was called off due to challenging conditions.
The MV Stena Immaculate, managed by Crowley Maritime, is a chemical tanker with a deadweight of 49,729 tons. At the time of the collision, it was under charter by the US Navy's Military Sealift Command, transporting approximately 18,000 tons of Jet A-1 fuel for the US military.
The MV Solong, owned by Hamburg-based Ernst Russ, is a 140-meter-long cargo ship. Built in 2005, it was en route from Grangemouth to Rotterdam, carrying at least 15 containers of various chemicals, including highly toxic sodium cyanide.
The collision caused jet fuel to leak into the North Sea and raised concerns about environmental risks, particularly from the sodium cyanide on board the Solong. The Maritime and Coastguard Agency is actively monitoring the situation and assessing the necessary counter-pollution response.
Authorities have launched an investigation into the cause of the crash. Initial reports indicate that dense fog and possible human error may have been contributing factors. The Marine Accident Investigation Branch is leading the inquiry to determine the circumstances surrounding the incident.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
a day ago
- Russia Today
US sanctions International Criminal Court judges
The United States has announced sanctions on four International Criminal Court (ICC) judges over what it described as 'illegitimate and baseless actions' against the US and Israel. DETAILS TO FOLLOW
Russia Today
2 days ago
- Russia Today
NATO more powerful than Romans and Napoleon – bloc chief (VIDEO)
NATO is the 'most powerful alliance' in global history, Secretary General Mark Rutte has claimed, comparing the US-led bloc to the Roman Empire and Napoleon's army. Rutte urged member states to ramp up military spending to make NATO even 'more lethal' and better prepared to counter the alleged threat from Russia, which Moscow has long denied and ridiculed. 'NATO is the most powerful defense alliance in world history. It's even more powerful than the Roman Empire, and more powerful than Napoleon's empire,' Rutte stated at a press conference ahead of the NATO Defense Ministers meeting in Brussels on Wednesday. 'But the defense alliance needs maintenance and needs investment.' He laid out priorities to strengthen NATO's military, insisting they are essential to deter potential future aggression. 'We must make NATO a stronger, fairer and more lethal alliance… We need more resources, forces, and capabilities so that we are prepared to face any threat,' he added. Rutte claimed that Russia could attack NATO within several years and said the bloc would not be prepared to defend itself unless it moves beyond its long-held 2% of GDP defense spending benchmark. NATO Chief Mark Rutte says the NATO 'defensive alliance' is more powerful than both the Roman Empire and Napoleon's Empire.1. NATO is essentially the US, and a collection of vassal states that submit to Washington's hegemony 2. The Chief of NATO compares the organisation he… Rutte said he would present member states with a new 'defense investment plan' at the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague. Russia has repeatedly rejected claims that it poses a threat to NATO, calling them 'nonsense' and accusing the West of stoking fear to justify more military spending. Moscow has also warned that the West's rearmament efforts risk escalating into a broader conflict in Europe. Russian officials have also drawn their own historical comparisons. Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov accused the West of trying to inflict a 'strategic defeat' on Russia 'just like in the times of Napoleon and Hitler' through its proxy war in Ukraine. He said the only way to avoid a wider conflict is for the West to abandon its militaristic path. Rutte's imperial comparisons have sparked criticism on social media. Media analyst Michael William Lebron, known as Lionel, wrote: 'NATO's chief boasting they're 'more powerful than the Roman or Napoleonic Empires' sounds less like diplomacy and more like 1939 Berlin. This isn't defense – it's imperial arrogance... Dangerous rhetoric.' John Laughland, a historian and specialist in international affairs, pointed out on X that 'The Roman and Napoleonic empires were not alliances, they were states. Or is NATO now an empire?' 'NATO 'Chief' sounds like Uncle Adolf back in 1939,' Irish journalist Chay Bowes added. British journalist Afshin Rattansi also weighed in, saying it's no wonder non-NATO states view the bloc as 'a hyper-militarist threat' after it 'destroyed Yugoslavia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and so many others.' Rattansi called Rutte 'a puppet' of Washington and warned that NATO 'is a dangerous, hyper-militarist organization that is far from defensive.'
Russia Today
3 days ago
- Russia Today
Ex-Trump advisor calls for seizure of US senator's passport
US Senator Lindsey Graham should be thrown in jail or have his passport revoked for 'stirring up' the Ukraine conflict, former adviser to President Donald Trump, Steve Bannon, has said. Bannon made the comment after Graham, along with US Senator Richard Blumenthal, visited Kiev last week. There they met with Vladimir Zelensky and discussed, among other things, additional sanctions on Russia and further cooperation between Ukraine and the US. Immediately after the visit Kiev lunched mass drone attacks on multiple Russian airfields, claiming to have damaged over 40 warplanes, including strategic bombers. Moscow has not confirmed the loss of any aircraft and claims to have shot down most of the drones. Bannon and other critics of US involvement in the Ukraine conflict have since speculated that Graham may have encouraged Zelensky to launch the 'audacious' attack, which they claim could have led to a serious escalation, given that it targeted Russia's strategic aviation. Speaking to NewsNation's Chris Cuomo on Monday, Bannon claimed that by meeting with Zelensky, Graham was giving Ukraine 'false hope false hope that we're there to support them in engaging Russia in a kinetic conflict. 'We are not,' Bannon stressed, adding that the US was getting 'sucked' into the Ukraine conflict by people like Graham and could soon find it 'tough' to get out. 'We can't have Lindsey Graham, and particularly Zelensky, leading us into a third world war with a deep strike into Russia,' Bannon insisted, suggesting that US authorities should either 'cancel [Graham's] passport and don't let him back in the country, or put him in jail if he comes back.' Following Monday's attack, which targeted sites from Murmansk in the Arctic to Irkutsk in Siberia, a number of military experts pointed out that Kiev does not have the technical capability to conduct drone strikes that deep into Russian territory. Guillaume Ancel, a writer and former French army lieutenant colonel, told Le Monde that the attack is 'possible and conceivable only with the support of a powerful satellite communications system,' based on intelligence provided by the US. Throughout the Ukraine conflict, Moscow has repeatedly described the hostilities as a Western proxy war against Russia and has condemned foreign military assistance to Kiev as counterproductive to the peace process.
