
Maine bill would protect personal belongings during homeless encampment sweeps
But the woman said she was going to use the money to pay for her storage unit.
"That was where all her personal belongings were — her baby's hat that he wore home from the hospital 50 years ago, all of her photographs, the things that mattered to her that she knew she was going to need when she finally got back into housing," Spencer White said.
"Folks would rather save their mementos than eat that day. That's how important their belongings are to them."
Spencer White, president and CEO of the Mid-Maine Homeless Shelter & Services in Waterville, joined other advocates for homeless people to testify at a legislative hearing Monday in support of a bill to ensure the belongings of homeless people are not confiscated or destroyed without notice.
Supporters said that keeping track of personal belongings is one of the most difficult but often overlooked aspects of being homeless, and that many people have lost valuable possessions during encampment sweeps around the state.
Opponents of the bill, including the Maine Department of Transportation and Maine State Police, said the proposal would be logistically challenging and that storing and tracking personal belongings would be burdensome for municipalities.
Ambureen Rana, D-Bangor, the sponsor of LD 1410, said the bill provides "basic due process" for the homeless.
It would require municipal, county or state agencies or law enforcement to provide at least seven days advance notice before removing a homeless person's belongings from public property, or destroying the property. It also would require them to hold a hearing prior to the planned removal or destruction.
If a homeless person doesn't attend the hearing, the bill would also require the municipality or police department to store their property for at least 90 days and provide them with notice about how to retrieve it.
There would be exceptions for things that are reasonably believed to be abandoned, or that pose health and safety risks.
"To lose your stable housing, have to find shelter elsewhere, lose that shelter and all of your belongings is, as I imagine it, one of the most dehumanizing situations one can experience," Rana said. "This bill is critical to protect the civil rights of unhoused people, and it is a critical step in addressing our state's unhoused crisis."
She said homeless people are at greater risk for losing important medications and personal documents, as well as equipment that helps them survive, like tents and sleeping bags, and often don't have the financial means to replace those items.
The bill is also about providing the same kinds of basic protections for the property of homeless people that those who are housed enjoy, Spencer White said.
"You can do a lot to homeless people because they don't have lawyers, they don't have money for court fees and they are often too overwhelmed with staying alive to worry about protecting their constitutional rights," she said.
Encampment sweeps have been well-documented around Maine, especially in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, which contributed to elevated levels of homelessness.
In Portland in 2023, some homeless residents said their belongings were discarded or lost during a large sweep at the Fore River Parkway Trail, despite a city policy requiring advance notice and storage of any unclaimed items that could have value.
Anna Trevorrow, a former Portland city councilor, said she became aware of the challenges of tracking people's personal belongings during encampment sweeps while she served on the council, and said a statewide law could provide clarity on the issue.
"LD 1410 addresses these concerns by establishing transparent procedures that protect the rights of our most vulnerable citizens," Trevorrow said in written testimony. "It ensures that personal belongings are not discarded without due consideration and that individuals have a clear avenue for recourse if their rights are violated."
The Maine Department of Transportation, Maine State Police and other representatives of law enforcement testified against the bill.
The requirement for a hearing would pose an administrative and legal burden for state and local government, the DOT said in written testimony. Such processes should be reserved only for formal state agency decisions, not routine property management or public safety, the department argued.
The DOT also said the storage requirement poses a practical challenge. In 2024 alone, the agency said it spent about $100,000 cleaning up debris left by homeless people on state property, mostly in the Portland area.
"The sheer volume of debris would necessitate the construction, rental, or leasing of a storage facility, as well as the creation of new staff positions dedicated to managing, inventorying, and distributing these materials if claimed in the future," DOT Director of Government Affairs Meghan Russo wrote in the testimony.
Copy the Story Link
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
Labor union accuses 3 companies contracted by Hennepin, Ramsey counties of stealing $700K in wages
A union representing thousands of workers is accusing three Twin Cities businesses contracted by Hennepin and Ramsey counties of stealing wages. The stolen funds could surpass $700,000, according to SEIU Local 26. More than 70 workers for these contractors have been underpaid between five to twelve dollars an hour, the union said. SEIU Local 26 is pointing the finger at cleaning companies PK Services and Squeaky Services, and security guard service Black Knight Protection Agency. "These workers deserve every cent that they have earned, they've worked so hard for. They need to be made whole," said Jen Guertin, an officer at the St. Paul Regional Labor Federation. The union said they have reviewed pay stubs and spoken with workers, like Jhonnier Gazo. Gazo said he makes $18 per hour working for PK Services. He said he found he should be making what's called a prevailing wage, a required pay of $27.80 per hour in Ramsey County, accounting for pay and benefits. "Although I'm afraid of losing my job, I am not afraid to raise my voice," said Gazo through an interpreter. Paul Beckfeld, the founder of PK Services, said the wage theft allegations are not true. A department of labor audit from a few years ago did find pay errors, but they've since been corrected, he said. Gregory Murphy said he works for Black Knight Security and found he was underpaid by nearly $6 an hour. "I demand that Black Knight pays us what they owe us. This is not fair and we will not stay silent," said Murphy. Neither Black Knight Security nor Squeaky Services would comment on the allegations. The union said there are active investigations, by both the Hennepin and Ramsey County attorneys offices, but neither would comment on if there's an investigation. "We would call on the counties to terminate the contracts with these contractors, as the counties are legally entitled to do," said Greg Nammacher, president of SEIU Local 26.


CBS News
3 days ago
- CBS News
BSO sheriff blames Deerfield Beach city manager for contract impasse
Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony continued his attack on Deerfield Beach's city manager Wednesday, blaming him for the inability to finalize a contract for police and fire services. Tensions between the city and the Broward Sheriff's Office (BSO) have been escalating and reached a boiling point last week after the sheriff made remarks at a roll call meeting. Tony accuses City Manager Rodney Brimlow of withholding information from city leaders—for instance, that Brimlow allegedly never told them the sheriff's office had come up with alternatives to reducing the city's cost that would not have impacted taxpayers. Tony indicated he would "destroy" Brimlow. The city says the sheriff has asked for more than $7 million to cover raises for employees. The sheriff says he had a salary study done and that pay is not on par with other police agencies. At a hastily called news conference Tuesday, Tony declared, "Your city manager has zero credibility and has violated the law." The sheriff accuses Brimlow of filing a false report with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) that Tony threatened him. The sheriff distributed the report from FDLE that clears him. The report said: "They received an allegation from Brimlow that the sheriff threatened physical harm and to pay an individual a million dollars to take him out." But after reviewing the roll call, FDLE said "the sheriff did not make an overt threat" and that his talk was intended "to get members involved in the contract process." Police and fire services are not affected by the contract delay, which technically ends September 30. If the city chooses to form its own departments, there would be a two-year transition period. Subject line: City of Deerfield Beach Stands by Statement and City Manager Brimlow Deerfield Beach, FL – August 13, 2025 – The City of Deerfield Beach stands firmly by its previous statement to the press regarding recent allegations made by Broward County Sheriff Gregory Tony against City Manager Rodney Brimlow. The City stands by the fact that City Manager Brimlow did not file a false criminal complaint against Sheriff Tony, and did not provide any false information of a crime to any law enforcement agency. What still remains is this: The Broward Sheriff's Office requested a 10% increase in its contract for Fiscal Year 2026. When the City refused to agree to the increase they informed the City that services would be terminated effective September 30, 2025. The City of Deerfield Beach remains committed to making informed decisions that are in the best interest of its residents and to providing the highest levels of public safety.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
This Woman Is Going Viral For Hilariously Explaining The Brutal Truth About The US's Student Loan Crisis
I doubt it'll come as a surprise to anyone under 45, but according to nearly "one in six adult Americans" has federal student loan debt, and the New York Times reports that millennials hold the bulk of that debt. Back in May, President Trump resumed collections on previously defaulted student loans, which had been paused since 2020. Combined with the government allowing loan servicers to report late payments to credit bureaus again (which had also been on pause), the New York Times said that millions of people have seen their credit scores drop, and "a record number of borrowers are [now] at risk of defaulting by the end of the year." Student loans have continued to be a point of contention politically as well, with many conservatives arguing against student loan forgiveness, saying it's akin to getting something for free. However, younger people contend that the loans are predatory, unaffordable, and feel impossible to pay off, sometimes even after they've been making regular payments for years. Zoë Tyler, aka thezolyspirit, recently went viral in a video where she jokingly laid out exactly what the student loan crisis looks like in reality. Zoë started out the video satirically, in a perfect mid-Atlantic accent, with a text overlay that says, "What boomers think the student loan crisis is...": "Oh, yes," she said, "Well, I, I know I said I would pay back those student loans, but I... I've decided I don't want to," she said with a smile. "I don't ever want to grow up. I want to stay a child forever." @thezolyspirit / Via Then, she switched immediately back to her normal speaking voice with a text overlay that says "What it actually is..." as she began imitating a one-sided phone call. "Hi, yes, um — so, I have my student loan pulled up here — I've been making the minimum payment on time for 10 years, and I now owe more than I took out. So I just… I was wondering what's that about?" she asked. @thezolyspirit / Via "The interest accrues faster than you can pay it off? Oh, that's…that's you guys are able to do that." "What is the interest, by the way? I can't… It's 13%? Okay. That makes sense, that…that it would be that." Then, Zoë begins a new conversation. "Hi! I just graduated, and I noticed that my student loans are way more than I originally took out. It was accruing interest while I was at school? Uh. Hmm. But it says the principle is more than I took [out]..." @thezolyspirit / Via "When I graduated, you combined the accruing interest into the principle, so now… I took out $55,000, and it's saying that it accrued $20,000 while I was at school. So now, instead of taking the 10% interest off of $55,000, you're taking 10% interest off of $75,000? Wow!" @thezolyspirit / Via The video ended with Zoë signing off the call. "All right, well, uh, thank you. What was your name, sir? One more time? Beelzebub? Okay, thank you." People in the comments were quick to back Zoë up, pointing out that they'd had similar experiences with their own loans. "I borrowed $17k and they want $60k back. They need to be fr lmao," said one person. "My husband, after paying for 13 years, checked his student loan breakdown. Turns out, of the 350$ a month he has been paying on time for 13+ years, only .16 CENTS a month goes toward the principle balance." "atp my student loans are an issue between the government and god." Others pointed out how much costs have changed since the baby boomers were in school. "Tuitions and Fees have gone up 133% since the 80s." U.S. News & World Report confirms this statistic, with the qualifier that it is in regard to in-state tuition and fees at public national universities, and is not adjusted for inflation. "My FIL [father-in-law] paid for his college and his living expenses for the entire year by working an entry level construction job in the summer. No way anyone could do that now-a-days. A summer job wouldn't even cover books and fees." The conversation made its way over to Twitter (X) as well, when the video was shared with the comment, "A TikTok that explains the student-loan crisis better than any politician or journalist can, in 93 seconds." Quoting a response to the original tweet, they also said, "This is not 'basic finance,' these are exploitative non-negotiable terms which makes this a form of predatory lending." "If you get a 7-year car loan and make the minimum payment every month, the loan will be paid off in 7 years... It's literally only student loans that are like this." Unsurprisingly, there were commenters who felt that borrowers were the ones responsible for their debt. "Crying about being responsible for your choices just shows how out of touch that generation is," said one person. "What this tik tok explains really well is that people didn't learn the right things in college." "Do not sign don't understand. Especially don't do that and then try to make it other people's problem." But others pushed back, pointing out that people took these loans out when they were still teenagers, usually with a promise that going to college would help them earn more money later. "Worst part is people will see this and say 'well you as a 17/18 y/o should have realized how predatory it was.'" "Telling 18 year olds that they have to go to college to be successful and not fully explaining to them what loans are like is diabolical." "a lot of us were just shuffled through a line and told to sign a sheet of paper so we could go to school, all with minimal explanation of any of it." And finally, this commenter summed it up best: "But make sure you pay them off whilst also buying a house, paying for a wedding, and having children all whilst earning proportionally less than they ever did because wages are stagnant, ok? You can do it if you just cancel your Netflix." You can see Zoë's full video below: @thezolyspirit / Via And now I have to know: What do you think? Are you still paying off student loans? Do you feel they should be forgiven, or at least reduced after a decade of payments? Let us know in the comments. And if you'd like to remain anonymous, you can use the form below.