logo
I've Driven My 2015 Fiat 500e More Than 1,000 Miles, And I'm Not Selling, But It Sure Does Have Its Flaws

I've Driven My 2015 Fiat 500e More Than 1,000 Miles, And I'm Not Selling, But It Sure Does Have Its Flaws

Yahoo10-03-2025

If you aren't aware, I recently bought a 2015 Fiat 500e. I can't afford the cool stuff I really want like a 996 Turbo or a decent Honda S2000, but I also prefer motorcycles for having fun anyway and can get a press car if I really want to go on a road trip, so I decided to go one of the least-expensive electric cars that you can buy. Plus, while I've previously happily owned a first-gen 500e in Los Angeles, the area where I currently live is far more rural than Koreatown, so part of me wanted to see just how bad it could really be. A little more than 1,000 miles later, I don't know if I have a true answer, but I've definitely learned a lot about owning an EV.
Now, you don't buy a decade-old compliance EV that started life as a European city car expecting to take it on any road trips, and I knew that going in. What's really holding me back isn't the range or availability of chargers, though — it's the slow charging speeds. I probably wouldn't mind stopping every hour or so to stretch my legs and pee, at least not that much, if the 500e charged fast enough that I could get another hour's worth of highway driving out of a charge while I was doing that. On a Level 2 charger that would take several hours in the Fiat, and I don't have that kind of patience.
The good news is, almost any used EV you find these days will charge far faster than the 6.6 kW charging rate I'm stuck with. Turns out technology isn't stagnant, and one early example might not mean all EVs did or still do come with the same limitations. You'd think that would be obvious, but I got a couple of comments on my first post acting like this is some kind of gotcha. Yeah, I knew I was buying an early EV with an old battery and outdated charging tech when I bought it. This is supposed to be a torture test of sorts.
Read more: Porsche Taycan Turbos Have Lost Up To $100,000 Value In 4 Years
That said, charging it on a 120V wall outlet at home remains the thing to do. If you drive enough that you really need a Level 2 charger, it's possible you'll get some benefit out of it, but I suspect the vast majority of owners would get plenty of range charging overnight. And while apartment charging can still be an issue, apartments are also much less common in rural areas. If you live in the Bay Area, look away now, but I'm about to go look at a house later this week that rents for less than $1,500 a month. Not an apartment. A house. I didn't specifically want a house, but I have a short-range EV that charges slowly and work remotely. Even though the grocery store has fast chargers, I actually need to charge where I live.
If you own an older apartment building, I can understand not necessarily having new chargers installed. Newer, nicer buildings can get away with charging higher rent, and you can't. What really blew my mind was the brand-spanking new apartment complex I called, which I want to emphasize was completed in 2025, told me they didn't have any electric chargers. Who thought that was a good idea? So in a way the 500e has made my housing search more difficult, but again, that's specifically because of its short range and incredibly slow charging speed. If you can't charge at home or work, you probably shouldn't buy a first-gen 500e, although you could probably get away with it if you had a street charger a short walk away. Sadly, short walks don't exist in rural areas.
What I do get in this rural area, however, is the opportunity to spend 30 minutes on a mostly 65-mph road driving to my girlfriend's house. That isn't horrible by rural standards, but it does mean that if I drive over there and we go somewhere else, I have to charge at her house or hope there's a public charger where we're going because the miles add up quickly. It also doesn't help that this battery appears to be affected by cold weather much more than newer batteries that haven't already been charged 1,000 times. At one point, it got so cold that I was maybe working with a 50-mile effective range, which isn't ideal when the drive I make most frequently is 40 miles roundtrip. And yet, I can also only think of one time the range anxiety actually got to me.
I'd driven to my girlfriend's house and arrived with about a 70-percent charge. When we left to pick up food, I don't know what it was, but the anxiety got to me. The temperature outside was also dropping, and I really didn't know if we'd make it back. A dead EV on the side of the road is a little more complicated to get moving again than a gas car, and I had someone else with me, so I panicked and turned around so we could take her car. The next day, even though I had less charge than I'd started with the night before, I drove past the restaurant, and I would have been fine. I would have needed to charge at her house to get home, but the one time the range anxiety got to me, it was a false alarm. That doesn't mean it isn't real, especially in a car where the cold-weather range can be so unpredictable, but it's also taken a while to get used to the car and how far I can actually push it.
Since I live in Georgia, the weather has already been warming up, and it's currently about 65 degrees outside. And yep, the range is definitely better when it isn't below freezing outside. I still can't drive for 100 miles down the highway or anything like that, and highway driving still saps range faster than roads with lower speed limits, but it's also cut down on how frequently I feel the need to charge and how comfortable I am leaving it at, say, 50 or 70 percent when I get home. If I didn't have to drive so obnoxiously, unnecessarily far to get to every gat-dang doctor's appointment and restaurant, this car would be fantastic. Then again, I also wouldn't be able to rent a house for less than $1,500, so there are tradeoffs, you know?
While it may be annoying — even though I did this to myself intentionally — having to deal with the shortcomings of a decade-old short-range EV that can't fast-charge, a big part of the reason I bought this car was to ensure I had something I could use to get around without having to worry about head gaskets, valve cover gaskets, starters, alternators, engine oil, transmission fluid, or any of the other headaches my 2008 Subaru Forester gave me. Sure, the battery could always die on me, but I'm hedging my bets here on the general lack of maintenance, plus the part where the car still reports getting at least 140 MPGe even during highway driving. It's cheap to insure, cheap to refuel, and should be cheap to operate. Even my tires should be cheap to replace since I'm rocking adorable little 15s. Plus, it costs less than $2 for a full charge at home.
So what am I going to use the money I've saved on gas to buy? Hopefully something that makes it easier to stream music via Bluetooth. I foolishly assumed that pairing my phone with the car would let me do that, but no. Either I'm missing something that's going to make me feel like an idiot when one of you points it out to me, or I need to buy an app. If it's the latter, I'm thinking one of those home speakers I can suction cup to the dash or windshield might be the way to go. That way, if a sweet EV lease deal comes along that's too tempting to pass up, I can just use the speaker for something else.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert
Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert

Yahoo

time13 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk's "Hubris and Arrogance" Are Ruining Our Chances of Actually Getting to Mars, Says Leading Expert

The founder of the Mars Society has accused SpaceX CEO Elon Musk of derailing existing plans to explore and visit the Red Planet. Robert Zubrin, who has coauthored hundreds of papers and laid out several blueprints as to how to settle on Mars, told Agence France-Presse in an interview that Musk is "absolutely instrumental in opening up this opportunity to get humans to Mars, both through the development of Starship and also the inspiration that has caused." But given the "hubris and arrogance" he has since bred — Zubrin went as far as to compare him to failed European dictator Napoleon Bonaparte — our future efforts to travel to the distant planet over 140 million miles away could be in peril. For our effort to send humans to Mars "to succeed, it has to go beyond these — this initiative cannot be seen as a Musk hobbyhorse or a Trump hobbyhorse — it must be seen, at a minimum, as America's program, or preferably the Free World's program," Zubrin told AFP. The publication of the interview comes in the wake of an incredibly messy divorce between Musk and president Donald Trump, though Zubrin made his comments before the relationship disintegrated. The two have been going at each other's throats and even threatening to cut off NASA's access to space. Musk's dreams of making humanity interplanetary by establishing a city on Mars appear to have slipped significantly on his list of priorities. The mercurial CEO was heavily criticized for abandoning his businesses in favor of overseeing a disastrous gutting of the US federal government, and is now racing to make Tesla investors happy as sales continue to plummet worldwide. SpaceX has also encountered major headwind in getting its Mars-bound Starship to not explode. The company's last three test flights ended in so-called "rapid unscheduled disassemblies," highlighting growing technical difficulties and the enormous degree of complexity involved in launching and landing the most powerful rocket in the world. While Musk has previously vowed to land Starships on Mars before the end of next year — he admitted it was a "50-50 chance" late last month — his characteristically ambitious timelines are once again looking unrealistic at best. "Progress is measured by the timeline to establishing a self-sustaining civilization on Mars," Musk said in a promotional video shared by SpaceX on May 29. "Each launch is about learning more and more about what's needed to make life multi-planetary and to improve Starship to the point where it can be taking, ultimately, hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of people to Mars." But all the turbulence Musk has generated, in addition to the Trump administration's brutal budget cut proposal to NASA, likely will only hamper our efforts to visit Mars, Zubrin argued. Complicating matters are fundamental disagreements about NASA's future direction. In a move largely seen as retribution, the Trump administration pulled its nomination for SpaceX space tourist and billionaire Jared Isaacman, who was hand-picked for the job by Musk. "This combination of Trump and Musk is not going to persist forever," Zubrin told AFP, foreshadowing Thursday's drama. "And if this program is identified as their deal, it will be crushed as soon as opposing forces have sufficient power." Most of all, Zubrin disagreed with Musk's stance that humanity will be saved by leaving the Earth behind and settling on Mars instead. "We're not going to Mars out of despair," he told AFP. "We're going to Mars out of hope... to establish new branches of human civilization which will add their creative capacity to that of humanity as a whole." "If we do the kind of program that I advocated... we will once again, as we did in Apollo, astonish the world with what free people can do," he added. "We'll make it clear that freedom, not authoritarianism, is the future of the human race." More on Mars: Trump Just Kicked Elon Musk's Hand-Picked NASA Head to the Curb

Spain's $5B Telecom Breakup? Telefonica and Masorange Plot Bold Move on Vodafone
Spain's $5B Telecom Breakup? Telefonica and Masorange Plot Bold Move on Vodafone

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Spain's $5B Telecom Breakup? Telefonica and Masorange Plot Bold Move on Vodafone

Telefonica (NYSE:TEF) and Masorange have kicked off informal discussions about a potential deal for Vodafone Spain, according to people familiar with the matter. While nothing is on paper yet, insiders say one idea being explored involves splitting up Vodafone Spain's fixed-line and mobile or enterprise operationspossibly to dodge antitrust objections. Masorange could also take over the Lowi brand, Vodafone's low-cost unit. The backdrop? Pressure is mounting in Spain's crowded telecom market, and consolidation is starting to look like the only way out. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 9 Warning Signs with TEF. Masorange, formed in 2024 from the 18.6 billion merger between Masmovil and Orange's local business, is now the country's biggest operator by customer base. Vodafone Spain, meanwhile, was acquired by Zegona for 5 billion last year but has continued to strugglepartly due to an aging fiber-optic network. It's already working with Masorange on a fiber venture, but a broader breakup-and-buyout could redraw Spain's telecom map. Telefonica still dominates business services, but Chairman Marc Murtra has made it clear: Europe's telecom players need to bulk up or risk getting left behind. But even if the strategic logic lines up, execution won't be easy. Telefonica's credit rating is hanging at the edge of investment-grade, leaving little room for risky moves. Murtra has said he won't jeopardize that rating, though some sources say creative funding structures might still be possible. A throwback to the 2020 Brazil playbookwhere Telefonica and two rivals jointly carved up Oi SAcould help navigate regulatory obstacles. For now, there's no formal proposal, but if talks progress, this could become one of the boldest moves in European telecom in years. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Why Robinhood Markets Stock Blasted Nearly 35% Higher in May
Why Robinhood Markets Stock Blasted Nearly 35% Higher in May

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Why Robinhood Markets Stock Blasted Nearly 35% Higher in May

It was a busy month for the next-generation online brokerage. It particularly focused its attention on the world of cryptocurrency. 10 stocks we like better than Robinhood Markets › Robinhood Markets (NASDAQ: HOOD) had a scorching 2025 in the first few months of the year, and it continued to barrel ahead in May. The online brokerage's shares saw their value rise almost 35% across the month, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence, on the back of a well-received earnings report published on the last day of April, plus new and intriguing forays into cryptocurrency and related offerings. While the key figures in that first-quarter earnings release were more or less in the ballpark of analyst expectations, there was no ignoring the hot growth rates posted by Robinhood. Net revenue muscled 50% higher year over year to land at $927 million, thanks to robust year-over-year increases in transaction revenue from facilitating trades in assets such as cryptocurrencies (up by 100% to $252 million), options (56% higher at $240 million), and stocks (44% improvement to $56 million). Speaking of doubling (and then some), Robinhood's net income for the quarter surged 114% higher to $336 million. On top of that, Robinhood announced it was substantially raising the total authorized amount of its current share repurchase program to $1.5 billion from the previous ceiling of $500 million. Management wasn't necessarily thinking hard about stocks in that relatively warm month; no doubt inspired by its clientele's embrace of cryptocurrency, it doubled down on its involvement with digital coins and tokens. In mid-May it announced a deal to buy Canadian company WonderFo Technologies, which owns a pair of regulated cryptocurrency platforms. The total equity value of the deal is roughly 250 million Canadian dollars ($183 million). In its press release touting the deal, Robinhood said that its own "accessible, low-cost, and secure platform will build upon WonderFi's mission and bring millions of Canadians greater access to crypto trading." During the month, Robinhood and crypto technology were connected in a Bloomberg article. The story stated that the brokerage plans to construct a blockchain-based trading system for European investors to transact in U.S. securities. Although details of the apparent plan were scant, it's likely to utilize a digital token-based regime that would allow for those investors abroad to trade U.S. titles quickly and relatively cheaply. Whether or not you're in line with the market's near-35% boost of Robinhood stock on these developments depends heavily on your feelings about cryptocurrency. If you're as bullish as Robinhood management on the future of this asset class, the company's shares are about the best play in the brokerage sphere right now. If not, it might be best for this recent wave of enthusiasm to subside. While I like the company as a business, I'd opt for being more cautious just now. Before you buy stock in Robinhood Markets, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Robinhood Markets wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Eric Volkman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Robinhood Markets Stock Blasted Nearly 35% Higher in May was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store