EU's culture of harassment and fraud laid bare
The internal report, obtained by The Telegraph, highlights almost 100 investigations into European Commission officials for a wide range of misdemeanours, many of which were punished with a mere slap on the wrist.
There were probes into a money-laundering scheme, an official stealing cash from colleagues and dozens of cases of sexual and psychological harassment.
The report, which is usually hidden from the public by Eurocrats, was only released as part of a Freedom of Information request.
Frank Furedi, of the MCC Brussels think tank, which helped unearth the documents, said: 'The numerous cases of disciplinary proceedings serve as testimony to the poor standard of behaviour inside the institutions of the EU.
'Yet we know from anecdotal evidence that far too many examples of inappropriate behaviour do not become targets of disciplinary proceedings.'
He added: 'The real problem is the lack of decisive and ethical leadership from those in charge of EU units.'
The Investigatory and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (Idoc) investigated 88 new cases last year, resulting in only one dismissal.
Allegations of either sexual or psychological harassment featured in 21 of the investigations.
In one case, an official was penalised with a €2,000-a-month deduction from their overall pay package for 18 months after they were found to have 'adopted seriously inappropriate behaviour and sexual harassment'.
The unusually high penalty was justified because 'the misconduct was recurrent and that it seriously disrupted the working environment'.
The official in question had attempted to justify their behaviour as a result of a 'medical condition', but this excuse was thrown out by investigators.
Another anonymous official working at an overseas EU delegation was given a mere warning after being accused of 'inappropriate behaviour towards colleagues, including investigating about colleagues' lives and whereabouts, threatening them to obtain private information about them, questioning their religious choices and commenting on their looks'.
The perpetrator was let off without any serious punishment because they owned up to their actions, apologised and improved behaviour at work, the report said.
In another case highlighted by Idoc's report, a senior member of staff was reprimanded for having 'intimate relationships' with two juniors under his command.
The head of unit – a middle manager role in the Commission – failed to report the relationships as a 'conflict of interest' even after he was alerted to the misdemeanours.
The report reveals how officials stole from both their colleagues and the EU taxpayers who fund the Commission.
One official was demoted a grade – which could result in the docking of thousands of euros in wages – for 'having stolen cash from colleagues'.
A contractor was reprimanded for transporting their family in a EU-owned 'service vehicle', broke public parking rules and 'enabled, through this negligent behaviour, the theft of the said vehicle'.
A retired official had their pension reduced to the minimum amount for a period of 10 years because they were found guilty of being involved in 'a money-laundering scheme involving mainly a company which benefited from EU funds and its owners'.
As well as the more serious offences, there were slaps on the wrists handed out for more petty behaviour.
One official, who had 20 years service, got away with a warning after they 'deliberately deleted … a folder that was necessary to organise the daily work of the unit' from a shared drive.
Five officials were ticked off for leaking 'non-public information', 12 'breaches of loyalty' and two cases of inappropriate use of social media.
In one case, an official was demoted by one grade for being found guilty of a crime by a court in an EU member state. They had also published 'articles' in an online newspaper relating to Brussels without prior 'authorisation'.
As part of Idoc's work last year, it launched an outreach campaign titled 'Say no to temptations, they might have disciplinary consequences!'.
It featured seven training sessions available to EU officials, which featured 'case studies based on anonymised Idoc cases … given to raise awareness on what is appropriate or forbidden to pursue as EU staff members'.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Taoiseach ‘hopeful' of EU-US deal
The Taoiseach remains 'hopeful' that the EU can reach a deal with the US on tariffs. Micheal Martin said both sides continue to negotiate the 'fine detail' of future arrangements. It comes before a looming Wednesday deadline to make a new deal with the Trump administration, which piling pressure on trading partners by threatening dramatically increased tariffs from the existing 10% rate. Speaking to the media after a phone call with the European Commission President, Mr Martin said Ursula von der Leyen outlined to him the 'most up to date situation'. Mr Martin said: 'We remain hopeful that the US and the European Union can agree an outline agreement or framework principle agreement this week. 'There's still a number of issues to negotiated, nothing has been rejected, definitively. 'But what it does illustrate, though, that even if a framework agreement is arrived at, there would be a lot of negotiations subsequently.' 'So therefore, whilst it would create some degree of clarity in terms of where we are in the short term, there would still be a number of issues outstanding in respect of that trade issue between the European Union and the United States and indeed between other countries.' Mr Martin said he supported the Commission's position that an agreement should be reached to provide certainty to consumers, businesses and industry. Asked if he expected a 10% baseline tariff to remain in place, the Taoiseach said: 'There are certain realities that probably will emerge from this that will have impact – and are having impact – on a number of sectors. 'But at least it gives us some sense of the landscape that we have to deal with.'
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
UK locked in talks over one-in-one-out small boats returns deal with France
The UK and France are discussing a radical post-Brexit returns deal ahead of a state visit by French President Emmanuel Macron - but the agreement has sparked alarm in southern Europe The UK is locked in talks over a migrant returns deal with France ahead of Emmanuel Macron's state visit on Tuesday. Keir Starmer and the French President are trying to hammer out a one-in-one-out deal - but hopes of announcing it this week may have been scuppered by outcry from other European nations. Under the plans, people who arrive in small boats would be returned to France in exchange for Britain accepting people with a legitimate case to join their families. But Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Malta and Spain have all voiced concerns, arguing that people returned to France could in turn end up being sent back to other EU nations. Mr Macron will become the first European leader to receive a lavish state visit since Brexit as the Government seeks to reset relations with its nearest neighbours. The two leaders are expected to confirm a new protocol which will see French police intercept small boats in shallow waters. This will see officers permitted to stop vessels within 300 metres of the shore. On Monday a No 10 spokesman said: "Our joint work with the French is stronger than it has ever been and we very much look forward to welcoming President Macron for a historic state visit this week. "That relationship is key to a number of issues, and we expect to make good progress on a wide range of priorities, including migration, growth, defence and security, which will deliver on the interests of both the British and the French public." The spokesman declined to comment on specific deals ahead of the summit, but added: "We expect to make good progress on a wide range of our joint priorities, including on migration. The French are our closest partner on tackling the global threat of organised immigration crime." So far this year 20,600 people have arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel by small boat, a rise of nearly 50% compared to last year. The Government is desperately seeking an agreement that will allow the UK to return them to mainland Europe. The UK had legal powers to do so before Brexit, and Mr Starmer has said reaching a new returns agreement is a top priority. But the five southern European states have voiced their alarm over the proposed new deal between the UK and France. They have written to the European Commission saying it raises "serious concerns". In their letter they demanded clarifications on whether they would be affected - as EU rules mean France could return migrants to countries they previously passed through. Last week French police were filmed using a knife to puncture an inflatable boat in a sign of new tactics being employed. The No10 spokesman appeared to suggest a new approach had not yet been rolled out. Speaking in the Commons, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said she wants to see French authorities change their rules as soon as possible. The No10 spokesman said there was no "silver bullet" to stop small boats arrivals. "We've never shied away from the scale of the problem we face," he said. "These gangs are organised, criminal and international. Their tentacles stretch across borders and continents and for almost a decade they have been allowed to embed their global smuggling networks almost unchecked. "That's what we're intent on changing."
Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
EU countries seek more cuts to deforestation rules, letter shows
BRUSSELS, July 7 (Reuters) - Most European Union countries have demanded further changes to the bloc's anti-deforestation law, saying some of its producers cannot be expected to meet its terms and face a competitive disadvantage, a letter seen by Reuters showed. From December, the deforestation law, a world first, will require operators placing goods including soy, beef and palm oil, onto the EU market to provide proof their products did not cause deforestation. Felling CO2-storing forests is a major cause of climate change. But despite worsening extreme weather, political will to impose strict emissions-cutting policies has ebbed, as governments worry about the financial costs. Brussels has already delayed its launch by a year and cut back reporting rules following criticism from trading partners, including the United States, as well as from EU countries. Of the EU's 27 member countries, agriculture ministers from 18 wrote to the Commission on Monday, demanding the EU rules are not applied to countries deemed to have a low risk of deforestation. They should stick to national measures instead, they said. "Excessive and redundant due diligence requirements should be removed in countries where agricultural expansion is not significantly reducing the forest area," the letter said. It was signed by Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Finland, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and Sweden. The deforestation law also applies to EU exports, prompting the 18 countries to voice concern that European producers would relocate abroad to avoid the additional cost of complying with the rules. "The full traceability within the EU-market required for all commodities by the regulation will be extremely difficult, if not impossible for some of them," the letter added. The countries said Brussels should consider delaying the launch of the policy again, while it drafts proposals to simplify the rules further. A Commission spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The EU policy aims to end the 10% of global deforestation linked to EU consumption of imported goods.
