Strike by 10,000 Air Canada flight attendants declared illegal
The strike at Canada's largest airline entered its third day on Monday and is affecting about 130,000 travelers per day during the peak summer travel season. The two sides remain far apart on pay and other issues. Air Canada suspended plans to restart operations Sunday after the union defied a return-to-work order and said workers would not go back to work.
'The members of the union's bargaining unit are directed to resume the performance of their duties immediately and to refrain from engaging in unlawful strike activities,' the Canada Industrial Relations Board board, or CIRB, said in a written decision.
The board, an independent administrative tribunal that interprets and applies Canada's labor laws, said the union needs to provide written notice to all of its members by noon Monday that they must resume their duties.
It was not immediately clear what recourse the board or the government has if the union continues to refuse.
The panel previously ordered airline staff back to work by 2 p.m. Sunday after the government intervened and Air Canada said it planned to resume flights Sunday evening. But when the workers refused, the airline said it would resume flights Monday evening instead.
Air Canada said in a statement that the union 'illegally directed its flight attendant members to defy a direction from the Canadian Industrial Relations Board.'
Canadian Union of Public Employees national President Mark Hancock on Sunday had ripped up a copy of the initial back-to-work order outside Toronto's Pearson International Airport, and said members wouldn't go back to work this week.
'Our members are not going back to work,' Hancock said. 'We are saying no.'
Picketing flight attendants chanted 'Don't blame me, blame AC' outside Pearson.
Jennifer Kozelj, a spokeswoman for Federal Jobs Minister Patty Hajdu, said Sunday that the minister was closely monitoring the situation.
Hajdu had ordered the 10,000 flight attendants back to work, saying now is not the time to take risks with the economy and noting the unprecedented tariffs the U.S. has imposed on Canada. Hajdu referred the work stoppage to the Canada Industrial Relations Board.
The airline said the CIRB has extended the term of the existing collective agreement until a new one is determined by the arbitrator.
Air Canada operates around 700 flights per day. Flight attendants walked off the job around 1 a.m. EDT on Saturday. Around the same time, Air Canada said it would begin locking flight attendants out of airports.
The bitter contract fight escalated Friday as the union turned down Air Canada's prior request to enter into government-directed arbitration, which allows a third-party mediator to decide the terms of a new contract.
Last year, the government forced the country's two major railroads into arbitration with their labor union during a work stoppage. The union for the rail workers is suing, arguing the government is removing a union's leverage in negotiations.
Passengers whose flights are impacted will be eligible to request a full refund on the airline's website or mobile app, according to Air Canada.
Air Canada and CUPE have been in contract talks for about eight months, but they have yet to reach a tentative deal. Both sides have said they remain far apart on the issue of pay and the unpaid work flight attendants do when planes aren't in the air.
The airline's latest offer included a 38% increase in total compensation, including benefits and pensions, over four years, that it said 'would have made our flight attendants the best compensated in Canada.'
But the union pushed back, saying the proposed 8% raise in the first year didn't go far enough because of inflation.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Former Wells Fargo Advisors Employee Alleges Discrimination in New Lawsuit
You can find original article here Wealthmanagement. Subscribe to our free daily Wealthmanagement newsletter. A former Wells Fargo Advisors employee is suing the firm and questioning whether her ethnicity and gender played a role in her termination. Lisa Krugler originally filed suit against Wells Fargo Advisors in July in Kentucky state court, but the case was transferred to federal jurisdiction last week. According to the complaint, Krugler joined WFA as a client services associate around May 2021, where she was tasked with helping advisors generate documents, run office responsibilities and process estates. According to the suit, she was adopted from South Korea and grew up in the United States. According to LinkedIn, Krugler worked for Cullinan Associates for eight years before moving to Wells Fargo. The suit noted that she was the only non-white Wells Fargo team member in her location and had consistently met performance review expectations. Krugler said she served as 'primary support' for three advisors, backed up other associates working with eight advisors, and helped handle office tasks. Krugler argued she had the highest workload of anyone in the office. Krugler purportedly asked for a raise in January of this year, and while she was assigned more work, she didn't get a pay bump. According to the complaint, Krugler's supervisor, Chris Bohnert, 'was observed to treat the women in the office differently' than the men, frequently ignoring female coworkers altogether. Krugler found it challenging to take time off, as she often had to do the work of multiple associates. However, according to the suit, she traveled to Disney World in June to celebrate her son's birthday. On the trip's third day, Krugler got a call from Bohnert, which surprised her because WFA prohibits work during paid time off. 'Believing it must be important, Mrs. Krugler answered the phone,' the complaint read. 'Mr. Bohnert began the call by stating, 'I'm glad you're at the happiest place on Earth, because I have to let you go.'' According to the suit, Krugler was 'shocked by the callousness and lack of professionalism' on the call, and asked Bohnert to call back with a third-party witness to the conversation; Bohnert allegedly said he would, but Krugler never received that call. According to Krugler, she was never given a 'satisfactory answer' for her firing. 'When she asked if her status as a Korean woman was the reason she was terminated, Mr. Bohnert responded, 'I don't know. It's nothing personal,'' the complaint read. In the complaint, Krugler argued she was treated 'less favorably than similarly situated White men in the office,' with the person taking over her role having less experience on the team and in the industry altogether. According to a Wells Fargo spokesperson, the firm denied the allegations and "intend to defend the company's position through the litigation process." Krugler asked for damages for 'the humiliation, embarrassment, personal indignity, apprehension about past, current and future well-being, emotional distress, and mental anguish' allegedly caused by the firing, as well as additional relief, 'including reinstatement.'


E&E News
15 minutes ago
- E&E News
Sherrod Brown launches Senate comeback bid
Former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown of Ohio announced Monday he is launching a comeback bid, giving Democrats a boost in their long-shot campaign to win back control of the Senate. With no serious primary competition, Brown's announcement effectively kicks off a nearly 15-month general election face-off against Sen. Jon Husted, a Republican appointed earlier this year by Gov. Mike DeWine (R) to fill the seat vacated by JD Vance when he became vice president. 'For the past eight months, all they've done is made things worse for Ohioans, handing over your hard-earned money to corporations and to billionaires,' Brown said in a campaign launch video. 'Their reckless tariffs and economic chaos are increasing prices and threatening the survival of small businesses all across our state.' Advertisement Brown, 72, was heavily courted by Democrats who saw him as their only hope to flip a Senate seat in an increasingly out-of-reach red state.


TechCrunch
15 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Texas attorney general accuses Meta, Character.AI of misleading kids with mental health claims
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has launched an investigation into both Meta AI Studio and for 'potentially engaging in deceptive trade practices and misleadingly marketing themselves as mental health tools,' according to a press release issued Monday. 'In today's digital age, we must continue to fight to protect Texas kids from deceptive and exploitative technology,' Paxton is quoted as saying. 'By posing as sources of emotional support, AI platforms can mislead vulnerable users, especially children, into believing they're receiving legitimate mental health care. In reality, they're often being fed recycled, generic responses engineered to align with harvested personal data and disguised as therapeutic advice.' The probe comes a few days after Senator Josh Hawley announced an investigation into Meta following a report that found its AI chatbots were interacting inappropriately with children, including by flirting. The Texas AG's office has accused Meta and of creating AI personas that present as 'professional therapeutic tools, despite lacking proper medical credentials or oversight.' Among the millions of AI personas available on one user-created bot called Psychologist has seen high demand among the startup's young users. Meanwhile, Meta doesn't offer therapy bots for kids, but there's nothing stopping children from using the Meta AI chatbot or one of the personas created by third parties for therapeutic purposes. 'We clearly label AIs, and to help people better understand their limitations, we include a disclaimer that responses are generated by AI—not people,' Meta spokesperson Ryan Daniels told TechCrunch. 'These AIs aren't licensed professionals and our models are designed to direct users to seek qualified medical or safety professionals when appropriate.' However, TechCrunch noted that many children may not understand — or may simply ignore — such disclaimers. We have asked Meta what additional safeguards it takes to protect minors using its chatbots. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW In his statement, Paxton also observed that though AI chatbots assert confidentiality, their 'terms of service reveal that user interactions are logged, tracked, and exploited for targeted advertising and algorithmic development, raising serious concerns about privacy violations, data abuse, and false advertising.' According to Meta's privacy policy, Meta does collect prompts, feedback, and other interactions with AI chatbots and across Meta services to 'improve AIs and related technology.' The policy doesn't explicitly say anything about advertising, but it does state that information can be shared with third parties, like search engines, for 'more personalized outputs.' Given Meta's ad-based business model, this effectively translates to targeted advertising. privacy policy also highlights how the startup logs identifiers, demographics, location information, and more information about the user, including browsing behavior and app usage platforms. It tracks users across ads on TikTok, YouTube, Reddit, Facebook, Instagram, Discord, which it may link to a user's account. This information is used to train AI, tailor the service to personal preferences, and provide targeted advertising, including sharing data with advertisers and analytics providers. TechCrunch has asked Meta and if such tracking is done on children, too, and will update this story if we hear back. Both Meta and Character say their services aren't designed for children under 13. That said, Meta has come under fire for failing to police accounts created by kids under 13, and Character's kid-friendly characters are clearly designed to attract younger users. The startup's CEO, Karandeep Anand, has even said that his six-year-old daughter uses the platform's chatbots. That type of data collection, targeted advertising, and algorithmic exploitation is exactly what legislation like KOSA (Kids Online Safety Act) is meant to protect against. KOSA was teed up to pass last year with strong bipartisan support, but it stalled after a major push from tech industry lobbyists. Meta in particular deployed a formidable lobbying machine, warning lawmakers that the bill's broad mandates would undercut its business model. KOSA was reintroduced to the Senate in May 2025 by Senators Marsha Blackburn (R-TN) and Richard Blumenthal (D-CT). Paxton has issued civil investigative demands — legal orders that require a company to produce documents, data, or testimony during a government probe — to the companies to determine if they have violated Texas consumer protection laws.